Skip to main content
Log in

Morphology of the petal inAconitum

  • Published:
The botanical magazine = Shokubutsu-gaku-zasshi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The petals ofAconitum were classified into six types. Type I: the labium tubular at the base and no appendage inside. Type II: a lambda (A)-shaped enation present inside the limb. The upper part of the enation is situated at the lower edge of the spur mouth and both wings of the enation extend to margins of the labium. Type III resembles type II but both wings do not extend to the margins. Type IV: a small flap attached at the lower edge of the spur mouth. Type V: two auriculate appendages present on both lateral walls of the labium. Type VI: without inside appendage. Most species of sect.Lycoctonum have type I petal and those of sect.Aconitum have type V petal. Type I is distinctly cup-shaped or peltate with a well developed cross zone or adaxial wall and type II is a modification of type I. Type VI is distinctly flat or epeltate without the cross zone. Others are intermediate between cup-shaped and flat or peltate and epeltate types. Based on the observation of petal ontogeny onA. pterocaule var.glabrescens, A. vulparia andA. japonicum var.eizanense, the relation among these types was explained by the partial or total reduction of the adaxial meristematic regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Hiepko, P. 1965. Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.84: 359–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinfellner, W. 1958 Beiträge zur Kronblattmorphologie VIII. Der peltate Bau der Nectarblätter vonRanunculus, darleget an Hand jener vonRanunculus pallasii Schlecht. Oesterr. Bot. Z.105: 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payer, J.B. 1857. Traité d'Organogénie Comparée de la Fleur. Librairie de Victor Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, K. 1887. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik der Ranunculaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.9: 225–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, R. 1909. Der Blütenbau der zygomorphen Ranunculaceen und seine Bedeuting für die Stammesgeschichte der Helleboreen. Abh. K. K. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien.4–5: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, M. 1965. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae IV. Sci. Rep. Osaka Univ.14: 53–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. Morphology, ecology and phylogeny of the Ranunculaceae VI. Sci. Rep. Osaka Univ.15: 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W.T. andP.K. Hsiao. 1965 Notulae de Ranunculaceis Sinensibus II. Acta Phytotax. Sin. Addit.1: 49–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kosuge, K., Tamura, M. Morphology of the petal inAconitum . Bot Mag Tokyo 101, 223–237 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488601

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488601

Key words