Abstract
In reading the considerations of the leading contemporary sociologists, attentive observers of the metamorphosis of identity in the post-modern age, a game came to my mind: “what if I mixed up quotes from these scholars’ papers with extracts from patients’ clinical reports, especially people suffering from so-called “eating disorders”? The objective of this game is to show how difficult it is to pick out the clinical fragments from the sociologists’ descriptions of the “never ending task of assembling our Self”. The game is to try to separate psychopathology from the Late Modern physiology of identity. The great psychopathologists from the last century offered us two major meaning organizers of identity and its disorders: the Freudian and the Jaspersian. Freud’s notion of the “discontents with civilization” served to explain that widespread sense of malaise that characterizes the modern condition. As civilization has been built on our restraining our drives, civilized man ended up “trading in a part of his chances for happiness for a bit of security”. Security is guaranteed by our submitting to norms of civilized living together. Neurosis, that feeling that permeates modern human beings who neither belong to themselves nor to others, is the agonizing result. The Jaspersian concept of the Ego consciousness is mainly based on the Kantian Self, the identity pole of subjectivity, standing above the stream of changing experience. It is a necessary condition for coherent experience. Also the Jaspersian Self presupposes coherence, since its main features include identity through time, a sense of unity and one of demarcation from the external world, and a feeling of being actively involved in one’s own experiences and performances. In late modernity, identity is a task. Post-modern people have the task and necessity to be perpetually constructing themselves. Being, Self, are organized in a reflexive way. Individuals are forced to choose their own life style among a multitude of alternatives. Are the Freudian and the Kantian/Jaspersian models of the Self now still proving to be suitable for an adequate psychopathological analysis?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Bauman Z.: Intervista sull’identità. Roma/Bari, Laterza, 2003.
Giddens A.: Modernity and self-identity. London, Blackwell, 1991.
Sennet R.: The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York/London, Norton and Co., 1999.
Bauman Z.: La società dell’incertezza, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1999.
Milos G., Spindler A., Schnyder U., Mertz J., Hoek H.W., Willi J.: Incidence of severe anorexia nervosa in Switzerland: 40 years of development. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 35, 250–258, 2004.
Hoek E.W., van Hoeken D.: Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 34, 383–396, 2003.
Yannakoulia M., Matalas A.-L., Yiannakouris N., Papoutsakis C., Passos M., Klimis-Zacas D.: Disordered eating attitudes: an emerging health problem among Mediterranean adolescents. Eat. Weight Disord., 9, 126–133, 2004.
Freud S.: 1929. Civilization and its discontents, Standard Edition, vol. XXI, London Hogarth Press, 1961.
Jaspers K.: Allgemeine Psychopathologie, Heidelberg, Springer, 1913.
Bleuler E.: Dementia praecox oder Gruppe der Schizophrenie. Leipzig, Deuticke, 1911.
Minkowski E.: La schizophrénie. Psychopathologie des schizoides et des schizophrènes, Paris, Payot, 1927.
Henry M.: Incarnation. Pour une philosophie de la chaire, Paris, Seuil, 2000.
Merleau-Ponty M.: The primacy of perception, Northwestern, Evanston, 1964.
Sheets-Johnstone M.: The primacy of movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, Benjamins, 1999.
Stanghellini G.: Disembodied spirits and deanimated bodies. The psychopathology of common sense. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press, 2004.
Tiger L.: The manufacture of evil: Ethics, evolution and the industrial system. New York, Harper & Row, 1987.
Paquette M.C., Rine K.: Sociocultural context of women’s body image. Soc. Sci. Med., 59, 1047–1058, 2004.
Kjaerbye-Thygesen A., Munk C., Ottesen B., Kruger Kjaer S.: Why do slim women consider themselves too heavy? A characterization of adult women considering their body weight as too heavy. Int. J. Eat. Disord., 35, 275–285, 2004.
Cena H., Toselli A., Tedeschi S.: Body uneasiness in overweight and obese Italian women seeking weightloss treatment. Eat. Weight Disord., 8, 321–325, 2003.
Foucault M.: L’hermeneutique du sujet. Cours au College de France, 1981-1982. Paris, Seuil/Gallimard, 2001.
Ricouer P.: Soi-méme comme un autre. Paris, Seuil, 1990.
Arciero G.: Saggi e dialoghi sull’identità personale. Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, 2002.
Gergen M., Gergen K.J.: Social construction. A reader. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, SAGE, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stanghellini, G. For an anthropology of eating disorders. A pornographic vision of the self. Eat Weight Disord 10, e21–e27 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327536
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03327536