Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Bad to the bone?: Historical archaeologists in the practice of forensic science

  • Article
  • Published:
Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heightened recognition by law enforcement personnel of forensic archaeology provides an expanding array of opportunities for historical archaeologists to apply their skills in situations of medicolegal significance. Yet too few archaeologists are familiar with the protocols of criminalistics, including crime scene processing, chains of custody, and effective court testimony. Also, most archaeologists do not fully realize the health risks associated with handling decomposed human remains and the professional liability exposure inherent to a juridical investigation. As a group, historical archaeologists undoubtedly possess the skills and ethical disposition required of forensic scientists, but those who wish to offer their services as forensic experts must also be prepared to assume the serious responsibilities of doing so. This paper discusses the development of forensic archaeology, the specialized training that qualifies one to participate in a crime scene investigation, methods to reduce health risks and professional liability exposure, and the most effective approaches an historical archaeologist can follow to become certified as a forensic expert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Academy of Forensic Sciences [AAFS] 1998 1998 Membership Directory. American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Colorado Springs, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James E. 1962 The Human Skeleton: A Manual for Archaeologists. National Museum of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babits, Lawrence E. 1995 The Frustration of Jane Bones. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Washington, DC.

  • Bass, William M. 1962 The Excavation of Human Skeletal Remains. In Field Handbook on the Human Skeleton Robert F. G. Spier, editor, pp. 39–51. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 Human Osteology: A Laboratory and Field Manual of the Human Skeleton. Special Publication, No. 2. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 Developments in the Identification of Human Skeletal Material (1968–1978). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51:555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1983 The Occurrence of Japanese Trophy Skulls in the United States. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 28:800–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, William M., and Walter H. Birkby 1978 Exhumation: The Method Could Make the Difference. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 47:6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellantoni, Nicholas F., and David G. Cooke 1996 Criminal Investigations: A Forensic Archaeology Case Study from Connecticut. CRM, 19(10):13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berryman, Hugh E., William M. Bass, Steven A. Symes, and O. C. Smith 1991 Recognition of Cemetery Remains in the Forensic Setting. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36:230–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Sheilagh T., and Richard H. Brooks 1984 Problems of Burial Exhumation, Historical and Forensic Aspects. In Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra, editors, pp. 64–86. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brothwell, Donald R. 1965 Digging Up Bones. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brues, Alice M. 1958 Identification of Skeletal Remains. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48(5):551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, Jane E. 1977 Biocultural Dimensions of Archaeological Study: A Regional Perspective. In Biocultural Adaptations in Prehistoric America, Robert L. Blakely, editor, pp. 67–84. Southern Anthropological Society Proceedings, No. 11. University of Georgia Press, Athens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buikstra, Jane E., and Della C. Cook 1980 Paleopathology: An American Account. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9:433–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, E. Paul, and Neal H. Haskell 1990 Entomology and Death: A Procedural Guide. Joyce’s Print Shop, Clemson, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, Melissa 1995 Forensic Investigations at Pakracka Poljana, Croatia. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Washington, DC.

  • Cornwall, I.W. 1956 Bones for the Archaeologist. Macmillan, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, Thomas A. J., Arthur Washburn, Frank V. DeAndrea, Brian S. Tobin, and Joseph M. Shaver 1996 Steep Slope Dispersal Dynamics of Skeletonized Human Remains-Ridge Recovery Techniques and the Critical Importance of Provenience Mapping. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, 2:175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirkmaat, Dennis C., and James M. Adovasio 1997 The Role of Archaeology in the Recovery and Interpretation of Human Remains from an Outdoor Forensic Setting. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, editors, pp. 39–64. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Sheila A. (editor) 1994 Lessons in Professional Liability. Design Professionals Insurance Company, Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, George A. 1899 The Skeleton in Medicolegal Anatomy. Medical Recorder, 16:172–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutra, Frank R. 1944 Identification of Person and Determination of Cause of Death from Skeletal Remains. Archives of Pathology, 38:339–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwight, Thomas 1878 The Identification of the Human Skeleton: A Medico-Legal Study. Paper presented to the Massachusetts Medical Society, Boston, MA.

  • Field, Kenneth S. 1998 History of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Colorado Springs, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, T. Michael 1996 Rodents, Human Remains, and North American Hantaviruses: Risk Factors and Prevention Measures for Forensic Science Personnel-A Review. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41:1052–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, Michael J. 1980 Forensic Anthropology: What to Expect from a Forensic Anthropology Report. Identification News, 39:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Joseph 1995 What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You. Federal Archaeology, 8(2):10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Richard H., and Carl L. Cunningham 1985 Crime Scene Search and Physical Evidence Handbook. Department of Justice, Washington. DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, Alison, Walter H. Birkby, Tzipi Kahana, and Laura Fulginiti 1990 Physical Anthropology and the Law: Legal Responsibilities of Forensic Anthropologists. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 33:39–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, Alison, and J. Josh Snodgrass 1998 Biological and Chemical Hazards of Forensic Skeletal Analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43:940–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geberth, Vernon J. 1996 Practical Homicide Investigation: Tactics, Procedures, and Forensic Techniques, 3rd edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haglund, William D. 1991 Applications of Taphonomic Models to Forensic Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 Contribution of Rodents to Postmortem Artifacts of Bone and Soft Tissue. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 37:1459–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Gary 1997 Forward to Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains. William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, editors, pp. xvii–xix. CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkes, Madeline J. 1989 The Role of the Forensic Anthropologist in Mass Disaster Resolution. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60:A60–A63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Thomas D., Bruce E. Anderson, and Robert W. Mann 1997 Human Variables in the Postmortem Alteration of Human Bone: Examples from U.S. War Casualties. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, editors, pp. 263–274. CRC Press, Boca Raton. FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooton, Earnest A. 1943 Medico-Legal Aspects of Physical Anthropology. Clinics, 1(6):1612–1624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, Frank, and Robert Meesig 1996 The Criminal Investigation Process and the Role of Forensic Evidence: A Review of Empirical Findings. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41:963–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshower, Lisa M. 1998 Forensic Archaeology and the Need for Flexible Excavation Strategies: A Case Study. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43(1):53–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Peter W. 1988 Liability: The Legal Revolution and Its Consequences. Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, John 1996 A Background to Forensic Archaeology. In Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology, John Hunter, Charlotte Roberts, and Anthony Martin, editors, pp. 7–23. B. T. Batsford, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, John, and S. Dockrill 1996 Recovering Buried Remains. In Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology, John Hunter, Charlotte Roberts, and Anthony Martin, editors, pp. 40–57. B. T. Batsford, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, John, Charlotte Roberts, and Anthony Martin, (editors) 1996 Studies in Crime: An Introduction to Forensic Archaeology. B. T. Batsford, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • İşcan, Mehmet Yşar 1988 Rise of Forensic Anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 31:203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Christopher, and Eric Stover 1991 Witnesses from the Grave: The Stories Bones Tell. Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerley, Ellis R. 1978 Recent Developments in Forensic Anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 21:160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogman, William M. 1939 A Guide to the Identification of Human Skeletal Material. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 8(8):1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1943 Role of the Physical Anthropologist in the Identification of Human Skeletal Remains. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 12(1):7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1949 The Human Skeleton in Legal Medicine: Medical Aspects. In Symposium on Medicolegal Problems, S. A. Levinson, editor, pp. 1–92. J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1962 The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Lowell J., Homer R. Campbell, Jr., and J. Stanley Rhine 1984 Perpendicular Forensic Archaeology. In Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology, Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra, editors, pp. 87–95. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Ling, Xiang Zhang, Niel T. Constantine, and John E. Smialek 1993 Seroprevalence of Parenterally Transmitted Viruses (HIV-1, HBV, HCV, and HTLV-I/II) in Forensic Autopsy Cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38:1075–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maples, William R., and Michael Browning 1994 Dead Men Do Tell Tales: The Strange and Fascinating Cases of a Forensic Anthropologist. Doubleday, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melbye, Jerry, and Susan B. Jimenez 1997 Chain of Custody from the Field to the Courtroom. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, editors, pp.65–75. CRC Press, Boca Raton, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Dan, Donald Crusoe, and H. G. Smith 1976 Forensic Archaeology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 21(2):323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Dan, R. C. Dailey, James Stoutamire, and Jack Duncan 1984 Forensic Archaeology. In Human Identification: Case Studies In Forensic Anthropology, Ted A. Rathbun and Jane E. Buikstra, editors, pp. 53–64. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Dan. Jack Duncan, and James Stoutamire (editors) 1983 Handbook of Forensic Archaeology and Anthropology. Florida State University Foundation, Tallahassee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Dan, James Stoutamire, and Jack Duncan 1976 A Unique Course in Anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 45:743–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Robert B., and David C. Bachman 1997 The Use of Forensic Anthropology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, David A., and Nicholas F. Bellantoni (editors) 1996 Forensic Archaeology: A Humanistic Science. CRM, 19(10):1.

  • Posner, Gerald L., and John Ware 1986 Mengele: The Complete Story. Macdonald Queen Anne Press, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, Ted A. 1981 Human Remains as an Archaeological Resource. South Carolina Antiquities, 13:17–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhine, J. Stanley 1979 Bones in the Backyard: Physical Anthropology and Medicolegal Investigation. Pathologist, 33(6):300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Douglas D. 1995 Firearms Identification of Two Mass Execution Sites, Iraq and El Salvador. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Washington, DC.

  • Scott, Douglas D., and Melissa Connor 1997 Context Delecti: Archaeological Context in Forensic Work. In Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains, William D. Haglund and Marcella H. Sorg, editors, pp. 27–38. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Mark 1987 Planning the Archaeological Recovery of Evidence from Recent Mass Graves. Forensic Science International, 34:267–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Mark, and R. A. Lazenby 1983 Found! Hunan Remains: A Field Manual for the Recovery of the Recent Human Skeleton. Archaeology Press, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sledzik, Paul S. 1996 Federal Resources in Mass Disaster Response. CRM, 19(10):19–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1998 Forensic Anthropology and Mass Fatality Response. Paper presented at the National Transportation Safety Board International Symposium on Family and Victim Assistance for Transportation Disasters, Washington, DC.

  • Sledzik, Paul S., and Stephen D. Ousley 1991 Analysis of Six Vietnamese Trophy Skulls. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36:520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles E. 1948 The Identification of the Unknown War Dead. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 15:125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Clyde C. 1982 Forensic Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 11:97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society for Historical Archaeology [SHA] 1998 Membership Directory, 1998. Society for Historical Archaeology Newsletter, 31(2):35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderman, Harry, and John J. O’Connell 1952 Modern Criminal Investigation, 4th edition. Funk and Wagnalls, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, Roderick 1995 Is It Time for a Board of Forensic Archaeology’? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of The Society for Historical Archaeology Conference on Historical and Underwater Archaeology, Washington, DC.

  • Stewart, T. Dale 1948 Medico-legal Aspects of the Skeleton: I. Age, Sex, Race, and Stature. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 6:315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1954 Evaluation of Evidence from the Skeleton. In Legal Medicine, R. B. Gradwohl, editor, pp. 407–450. Mosby, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 George A. Dorsey’s Role in the Luetgert Case: A Significant Episode in the History of Forensic Anthropology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 23:786–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 1979 Essentials of Forensic Anthropology, Especially as Developed in the United States. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 Background of American Forensic Anthropology. Criminal Justice Review, 7(1):4–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. Dale (editor) 1970 Personal Identification in Mass Disasters. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, Charles R., Jr., Neil C. Chamelin, and Leonard Territo 1988 Criminal Investigation, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubelaker, Douglas H. 1978 Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Taraxacum Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 Positive Identification of American Indian Skeletal Remains from Radiograph Comparison. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 35:466–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1996 Forensic Anthropology and the FBI. CRM, 19(10):25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) 1996 Crime in the United States for 1995 and 1996. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Charles P. 1978 Personal Identification of Human Remains: An Overview. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 23:388–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, Harris H., and Bert Wentworth 1918 Personal Identification: Methods for the Identification of Individuals, Living or Dead. Badger, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kise, Straw, And Kolodner, Inc., 123 Broad St., Suite 1270, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 19109

    Thomas A. J. Crist

Authors
  1. Thomas A. J. Crist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Crist, T.A.J. Bad to the bone?: Historical archaeologists in the practice of forensic science. Hist Arch 35, 39–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374526

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03374526