Skip to main content
Log in

Independent predictors of discordance between the resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heart and Vessels Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), a novel resting index, is well correlated with and shows good diagnostic accuracy to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, discordance results between the RFR and FFR have been observed to occur in about 20% of cases. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence and factors of discordant results between the RFR and FFR through a direct comparison of these values in daily clinical practice. A total of 220 intermediate coronary lesions of 156 consecutive patients with RFR and FFR measurements were allocated to four groups according to RFR and FFR cutoff values. We compared the angiographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables among the groups. Discordant results between the RFR and FFR were observed in 19.6% of vessels, and the proportion of discordant results was significantly higher in the left main trunk and left anterior descending artery (LM + LAD) than in non-LAD vessels (25.2% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.006). In the multivariable regression analysis, LM + LAD location, hemodialysis, and peripheral artery disease were associated with a low RFR among patients with a high FFR. Conversely, the absence of diabetes mellitus and the presence of higher hemoglobin levels were associated with a higher RFR among patients with a low FFR. Specific angiographic and clinical characteristics such as LM + LAD location, hemodialysis, peripheral artery disease, and absence of diabetes mellitus and anemia can be independent predictors of physiologic discordance between the RFR and FFR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

RFR:

Resting full-cycle ratio

FFR:

Fractional flow reserve

CCS:

The Canadian cardiovascular society functional classification

References

  1. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, van’t BechVeer JWM, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van’t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B, FAME Study Investigators (2010) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuramitsu S, Matsuo H, Shinozaki T, Horie K, Takashima H, Terai H, Kikuta Y, Ishihara T, Saigusa T, Sakamoto T, Suematsu N, Shiono Y, Mizuno A, Tsujita K, Masamura K, Yokoi H, Tanaka N, Registry Investigators J-CONFIRM (2020) Two-year outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve: the J-confirm registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 13:e008355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J (2017) Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med 376:1824–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O, iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators (2017) Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med 376:1813–1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ, ESC Scientific Document Group (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Svanerud J, Ahn JM, Jeremias A, van’t Veer M, Gore A, Maehara A, Crowley A, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Johnson NP, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Berry C, Oldroyd KG, Park SJ, Ali ZA (2018) Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the resting full-cycle ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. EuroIntervention 14:806–814

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar G, Desai R, Gore A, Rahim H, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Kirtane A, Jeremias A, Ali Z (2020) Real world validation of the nonhyperemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity-resting full-cycle ratio-RE-VALIDATE. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(1):E53–E58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JM, Rhee TM, Choi KH, Park J, Hwang D, Kim J, Park J, Kim HY, Jung HW, Cho YK, Yoon HJ, Song YB, Hahn JY, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Hur SH, Koo BK (2019) Clinical outcome of lesions with discordant results among different invasive physiologic indices- resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio, resting full-cycle ratio, diastolic pressure ratio, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve. Circ J 83:2210–2221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohashi H, Takashima H, Ando H, Suzuki A, Sakurai S, Nakano Y, Sawada H, Fujimoto M, Suzuki W, Shimoda M, Tajima A, Waseda K, Ohashi W, Amano T (2020) Clinical feasibility of resting full-cycle ratio as a unique non-hyperemic index of invasive functional lesion assessment. Heart Vessels 35(11):1518–1526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Lamee R, Howard JP, Shun-Shin MJ, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Davies J, Keeble T, Tang K, Malik IS, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Sharp ASP, Gerber R, Baker C, Kaprielian R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Cole G, Keenan NG, Kanaganayagam G, Sehmi J, Wensel R, Harrell FE, Mayet J, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP (2018) Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as predictors of the placebo-controlled response to percutaneous coronary intervention in stable single-vessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 138:1780–1792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Mielewczik M, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Baker C, Sharp A, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Collier D, Shun-Shin M, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Shun-Shin M, Sethi A, Baker C, Sharp A, Ramrakha P, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Foale R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, Khamis R, Hadjiloizou N, Khan M, Kooner J, Bellamy M, Mikhail G, Clifford P, O’Kane P, Levy T, Swallow R (2018) Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391:31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki N, Asano T, Nakazawa G, Aoki J, Tanabe K, Hibi K, Ikari Y, Kozuma K (2020) Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 35:105–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kawase Y, Matsuo H, Akasaka T, Shiono Y, Tanaka N, Amano T, Kozuma K, Nakamura M, Yokoi H, Kobayashi Y, Ikari Y (2019) Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 34:85–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Muroya T, Kawano H, Hata S, Shinboku H, Sonoda K, Kusumoto S, Eto R, Otsuka K, Maemura K (2020) Relationship between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessments of coronary stenosis severity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(4):E432–E438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kobayashi Y, Johnson NP, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Gould KL, Jeremias A, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, CONTRAST Study Investigators (2016) The influence of lesion location on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-free coronary pressure wire measurements. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:2390–2399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pijls NHDBB, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Koolen JJBJ, Koolen JJ (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE (2012) Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1392–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JM, Shin ES, Nam CW, Doh JH, Hwang D, Park J, Kim KJ, Zhang J, Koo BK (2017) Discrepancy between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: clinical and angiographic characteristics. Int J Cardiol 245:63–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Derimay F, Johnson NP, Zimmermann FM, Adjedj J, Witt N, Hennigan B, Koo BK, Barbato E, Esposito G, Trimarco B, Rioufol G, Park SJ, Baptista SB, Chrysant GS, Leone AM, Jeremias A, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF (2019) Predictive factors of discordance between the instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94:356–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FV, Miller LW, Donohue TJ (1996) Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1154–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Niizuma S, Takiuchi S, Okada S, Horio T, Kamide K, Nakata H, Yoshihara F, Nakamura S, Kawano Y, Nakahama H, Iwanaga Y, Nakatani S (2008) Decreased coronary flow reserve in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:2324–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morioka Y, Arashi H, Otsuki H, Yamaguchi J, Hagiwara N (2018) Relationship between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in patients receiving hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 33:256–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pellegrino T, Storto G, Filardi PP, Sorrentino AR, Silvestro A, Petretta M, Brevetti G, Chiariello M, Salvatore M, Cuocolo A (2005) Relationship between brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and coronary flow reserve in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Nucl Med 46:1997–2002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nijjer SS, de Waard GA, Sen S, van de Hoef TP, Petraco R, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Meuwissen M, Danad I, Knaapen P, Escaned J, Piek JJ, Davies JE, van Royen N (2016) Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators. Eur Heart J 37:2069–2080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahn SG, Suh J, Hung OY, Lee HS, Bouchi YH, Zeng W, Gandhi R, Eshtehardi P, Gogas BD, Samady H (2017) Discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: insights from intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:999–1007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Camici PG, Crea F (2007) Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356:830–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nahser PJ Jr, Brown RE, Oskarsson H, Winniford MD, Rossen JD (1995) Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation 91:635–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geha AS (1976) Coronary and cardiovascular dynamics and oxygen availability during acute normovolemic anemia. Surgery 80:47–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all staff and patients who are contributed to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroaki Takashima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aichi Medical University Hospital (Reference Number 2019–057).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

380_2020_1763_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary Figure Clinical symptoms for each group(A) Group1; concordant negative, (B) Group2; low RFR and high FFR, (C)Group3; highRFR and low FFR, and (D)Group4; concordant positive. Symptomatic is defined asthe Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional classification (CCS) ≥1.Asymptomatic is defined as the Canadian Cardiovascular Society functionalclassification (CCS) =0. (JPG 84 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goto, R., Takashima, H., Ohashi, H. et al. Independent predictors of discordance between the resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve. Heart Vessels 36, 790–798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01763-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01763-1

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Yusuke Nakano