Abstract
The resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), a novel resting index, is well correlated with and shows good diagnostic accuracy to the fractional flow reserve (FFR). However, discordance results between the RFR and FFR have been observed to occur in about 20% of cases. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence and factors of discordant results between the RFR and FFR through a direct comparison of these values in daily clinical practice. A total of 220 intermediate coronary lesions of 156 consecutive patients with RFR and FFR measurements were allocated to four groups according to RFR and FFR cutoff values. We compared the angiographic, clinical, and hemodynamic variables among the groups. Discordant results between the RFR and FFR were observed in 19.6% of vessels, and the proportion of discordant results was significantly higher in the left main trunk and left anterior descending artery (LM + LAD) than in non-LAD vessels (25.2% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.006). In the multivariable regression analysis, LM + LAD location, hemodialysis, and peripheral artery disease were associated with a low RFR among patients with a high FFR. Conversely, the absence of diabetes mellitus and the presence of higher hemoglobin levels were associated with a higher RFR among patients with a low FFR. Specific angiographic and clinical characteristics such as LM + LAD location, hemodialysis, peripheral artery disease, and absence of diabetes mellitus and anemia can be independent predictors of physiologic discordance between the RFR and FFR.




Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Abbreviations
- RFR:
-
Resting full-cycle ratio
- FFR:
-
Fractional flow reserve
- CCS:
-
The Canadian cardiovascular society functional classification
References
Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, van’t BechVeer JWM, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B (2007) Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2105–2111
Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van’t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B, FAME Study Investigators (2010) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:177–184
Kuramitsu S, Matsuo H, Shinozaki T, Horie K, Takashima H, Terai H, Kikuta Y, Ishihara T, Saigusa T, Sakamoto T, Suematsu N, Shiono Y, Mizuno A, Tsujita K, Masamura K, Yokoi H, Tanaka N, Registry Investigators J-CONFIRM (2020) Two-year outcomes after deferral of revascularization based on fractional flow reserve: the J-confirm registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 13:e008355
Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J (2017) Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med 376:1824–1834
Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O, iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators (2017) Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI. N Engl J Med 376:1813–1823
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, Prescott E, Storey RF, Deaton C, Cuisset T, Agewall S, Dickstein K, Edvardsen T, Escaned J, Gersh BJ, Svitil P, Gilard M, Hasdai D, Hatala R, Mahfoud F, Masip J, Muneretto C, Valgimigli M, Achenbach S, Bax JJ, ESC Scientific Document Group (2020) 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477
Svanerud J, Ahn JM, Jeremias A, van’t Veer M, Gore A, Maehara A, Crowley A, Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Johnson NP, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Berry C, Oldroyd KG, Park SJ, Ali ZA (2018) Validation of a novel non-hyperaemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity: the resting full-cycle ratio (VALIDATE RFR) study. EuroIntervention 14:806–814
Kumar G, Desai R, Gore A, Rahim H, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Kirtane A, Jeremias A, Ali Z (2020) Real world validation of the nonhyperemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity-resting full-cycle ratio-RE-VALIDATE. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(1):E53–E58
Lee JM, Rhee TM, Choi KH, Park J, Hwang D, Kim J, Park J, Kim HY, Jung HW, Cho YK, Yoon HJ, Song YB, Hahn JY, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Hur SH, Koo BK (2019) Clinical outcome of lesions with discordant results among different invasive physiologic indices- resting distal coronary to aortic pressure ratio, resting full-cycle ratio, diastolic pressure ratio, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve. Circ J 83:2210–2221
Ohashi H, Takashima H, Ando H, Suzuki A, Sakurai S, Nakano Y, Sawada H, Fujimoto M, Suzuki W, Shimoda M, Tajima A, Waseda K, Ohashi W, Amano T (2020) Clinical feasibility of resting full-cycle ratio as a unique non-hyperemic index of invasive functional lesion assessment. Heart Vessels 35(11):1518–1526
Al-Lamee R, Howard JP, Shun-Shin MJ, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Davies J, Keeble T, Tang K, Malik IS, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Sharp ASP, Gerber R, Baker C, Kaprielian R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Cole G, Keenan NG, Kanaganayagam G, Sehmi J, Wensel R, Harrell FE, Mayet J, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP (2018) Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as predictors of the placebo-controlled response to percutaneous coronary intervention in stable single-vessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 138:1780–1792
Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi H-M, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Mielewczik M, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Baker C, Sharp A, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Collier D, Shun-Shin M, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, Keeble T, Kaprielian R, Malik IS, Nijjer SS, Petraco R, Cook C, Ahmad Y, Howard J, Shun-Shin M, Sethi A, Baker C, Sharp A, Ramrakha P, Gerber R, Talwar S, Assomull R, Foale R, Mayet J, Wensel R, Thom SA, Davies JE, Francis DP, Khamis R, Hadjiloizou N, Khan M, Kooner J, Bellamy M, Mikhail G, Clifford P, O’Kane P, Levy T, Swallow R (2018) Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391:31–40
Suzuki N, Asano T, Nakazawa G, Aoki J, Tanabe K, Hibi K, Ikari Y, Kozuma K (2020) Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 35:105–116
Kawase Y, Matsuo H, Akasaka T, Shiono Y, Tanaka N, Amano T, Kozuma K, Nakamura M, Yokoi H, Kobayashi Y, Ikari Y (2019) Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 34:85–96
Muroya T, Kawano H, Hata S, Shinboku H, Sonoda K, Kusumoto S, Eto R, Otsuka K, Maemura K (2020) Relationship between resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve in assessments of coronary stenosis severity. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 96(4):E432–E438
Kobayashi Y, Johnson NP, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Gould KL, Jeremias A, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, CONTRAST Study Investigators (2016) The influence of lesion location on the diagnostic accuracy of adenosine-free coronary pressure wire measurements. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:2390–2399
Pijls NHDBB, Peels K, Van Der Voort PH, Bonnier HJ, Koolen JJBJ, Koolen JJ (1996) Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334:1703–1708
Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE (2012) Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1392–1402
Lee JM, Shin ES, Nam CW, Doh JH, Hwang D, Park J, Kim KJ, Zhang J, Koo BK (2017) Discrepancy between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio: clinical and angiographic characteristics. Int J Cardiol 245:63–68
Derimay F, Johnson NP, Zimmermann FM, Adjedj J, Witt N, Hennigan B, Koo BK, Barbato E, Esposito G, Trimarco B, Rioufol G, Park SJ, Baptista SB, Chrysant GS, Leone AM, Jeremias A, Berry C, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF (2019) Predictive factors of discordance between the instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94:356–363
Kern MJ, Bach RG, Mechem CJ, Caracciolo EA, Aguirre FV, Miller LW, Donohue TJ (1996) Variations in normal coronary vasodilatory reserve stratified by artery, gender, heart transplantation and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:1154–1160
Niizuma S, Takiuchi S, Okada S, Horio T, Kamide K, Nakata H, Yoshihara F, Nakamura S, Kawano Y, Nakahama H, Iwanaga Y, Nakatani S (2008) Decreased coronary flow reserve in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:2324–2328
Morioka Y, Arashi H, Otsuki H, Yamaguchi J, Hagiwara N (2018) Relationship between instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in patients receiving hemodialysis. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 33:256–263
Pellegrino T, Storto G, Filardi PP, Sorrentino AR, Silvestro A, Petretta M, Brevetti G, Chiariello M, Salvatore M, Cuocolo A (2005) Relationship between brachial artery flow-mediated dilation and coronary flow reserve in patients with peripheral artery disease. J Nucl Med 46:1997–2002
Nijjer SS, de Waard GA, Sen S, van de Hoef TP, Petraco R, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Meuwissen M, Danad I, Knaapen P, Escaned J, Piek JJ, Davies JE, van Royen N (2016) Coronary pressure and flow relationships in humans: phasic analysis of normal and pathological vessels and the implications for stenosis assessment: a report from the Iberian-Dutch-English (IDEAL) collaborators. Eur Heart J 37:2069–2080
Ahn SG, Suh J, Hung OY, Lee HS, Bouchi YH, Zeng W, Gandhi R, Eshtehardi P, Gogas BD, Samady H (2017) Discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow reserve: insights from intracoronary imaging and physiological assessment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:999–1007
Camici PG, Crea F (2007) Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 356:830–840
Nahser PJ Jr, Brown RE, Oskarsson H, Winniford MD, Rossen JD (1995) Maximal coronary flow reserve and metabolic coronary vasodilation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation 91:635–640
Geha AS (1976) Coronary and cardiovascular dynamics and oxygen availability during acute normovolemic anemia. Surgery 80:47–53
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all staff and patients who are contributed to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aichi Medical University Hospital (Reference Number 2019–057).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
380_2020_1763_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
Supplementary Figure Clinical symptoms for each group(A) Group1; concordant negative, (B) Group2; low RFR and high FFR, (C)Group3; highRFR and low FFR, and (D)Group4; concordant positive. Symptomatic is defined asthe Canadian Cardiovascular Society functional classification (CCS) ≥1.Asymptomatic is defined as the Canadian Cardiovascular Society functionalclassification (CCS) =0. (JPG 84 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goto, R., Takashima, H., Ohashi, H. et al. Independent predictors of discordance between the resting full-cycle ratio and fractional flow reserve. Heart Vessels 36, 790–798 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01763-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-020-01763-1
Keywords
Profiles
- Yusuke Nakano View author profile