Abstract
There are a large variety of dopamine agonists available. Especially de novo patients are treated with dopamine agonists to avoid dyskinesia. Dopamine agonists can be subdivided into ergoline and non-ergoline derivatives. This distinction raises the question whether there are differences in the effects to treat symptoms, not only in the side effects between the individual dopamine agonists but also between these two groups. Pergolide is now considered a second line drug because of its particularly high tendency towards valvular heart disease. Some authors claim that all ergoline-derivatives may cause this problem, while own results do not necessarily support this view. We recommend performing echocardiography on those patients being treated with an ergotderivative. New data support the view that all dopaminergic drugs may cause somnolence and that there is no preference for non-ergots. It may be that the number of gamblers is slightly higher among patients treated with pramipexole than in others. Dopamine agonists with a high affinity to D3 receptors have a good anti-anhedonic potency. In cell culture all dopamine agonists studied so far show neuroprotective properties in cell culture. The introduction of a slow-release formulation for ropinirole and the rotigotine and lisuride patches have opened new ways of continuous dopamine receptor stimulation. Taken together, dopamine agonists show individual properties and there are differences between ergot and non-ergot derivatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baseman DG, O’Suilleabhain PE, Reimold SC, Laskar SR, Baseman JG, Dewey Jr. RB (2004) Pergolide use in Parkinson disease is associated with cardiac valve regurgitation. Neurology 63:301–304
Dhawan V,Medcalf P, Stegie F, Jackson G, Basu S, Luce P,Odin P, Chaudhuri KR (2005) Retrospective evaluation of cardio-pulmonary fibrotic side effects in symptomatic patients from a group of 234 Parkinson’s disease patients treated with cabergoline. J Neural Transm 112:661–668
Eggert K, Odin P, Gasser T,Meinertz T, Strasser R, Osterspey A, Deuschl G, Oertel WH (2005) Fachgerechter Einsatz von Dopamin-Agonisten. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 102:B22–B23
Fitzgerald LW, Burn TC, Brown BS, Patterson JP, Corjay MH, Valentine PA, Sun JH, Link JH, Abbaszade I, Hollis JM, Largent BI, Hartig PR, Hollis GF, Meunier PC, Robichaud AJ, Robertson DW (2000) Possible role of valvular serotonin 5-HT(2B) receptors in the cardiopathy associated with fenfluramine. Mol Pharmacol 57:75–81
Flowers CM, Racoosin JA, Lu SL, Beitz JG (2003) The US Food and Drug Administration’s registry of patients with pergolide-associated valvular heart disease. Mayo Clin Proc 78:730–731
Frucht S, Rogers JD, Greene PE (1999) Falling asleep at the wheel: motor vehicle mishaps in persons taking pramipexole and ropinirole. Neurology 52:1908–1910
Hanna PA, Ratkos L, Ondo WG, Jankovic J (2001) Switching from pergolide to pramipexole in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 108:63–70
Horowski R, Jahnichen S, Pertz HH (2004) Fibrotic valvular heart disease is not related to chemical class but to biological function: 5-HT2B receptor activation plays crucial role. Mov Disord 19(12):1523–1524
Horvath J, Fross RD, Kleiner-Fisman G, Lerech R, Stadler H, Liaudat S, Raskoff WJ, Flachsbart KD, Rakowski H, Pache JC, Burkhard PR, Lang AE (2004) Severe multivalvular heart disease: a new complication of the ergot derivative dopamine agonists. Mov Disord 19:656–662
Jahnichen S, Horowski R, Pertz HH (2005) Agonism at 5-HT2B receptors is not a class effect of the ergolines. Eur J Pharmacol 513:225–228
Junghanns S, Fuhrmann JT, Simonis G, Oehlwein Ch, Koch R, Strasser RH, Reichmann H, Storch A (2006) Valvular heart disease in Parkinson’s disease treated with dopamine agonists: A reader-blinded monocenter echocardiography study. Mov Disord (in press)
Parkinson Study Group (2002) Dopamine transporter brain imaging to assess the effects of pramipexole vs. levodopa on Parkinson disease progression. JAMA 287:1653–1661
Parkinson Study Group (2004) Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson’s disease. New Engl J Med 351:2498–2508
Peralta C, Wolf E, Alber H, et al. (2006) Valvular heart disease in Parkinson’s disease vs. controls: An echocardiographic study. Mov Disord; published online
Pritchett AM, Morrison JF, Edwards WD, Schaff HV, Connolly HM, Espinosa RE (2002) Valvular heart disease in patients taking pergolide. Mayo Clin Proc 77:1280–1286
Reichmann H, Brecht MH, Koster J, Kraus PH, Lemke MR (2003) Pramipexole in routine clinical practice: a prospective observational trial in Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 17:965–973
Serratrice J, Disdier P, Habib G, Viallet F, Weiller PJ (2002) Fibrotic valvular heart disease subsequent to bromocriptine treatment. Cardiol Rev 10:334–336
Van Camp G, Flamez A, Cosyns B, Weytjens C, Muyldermans L, Van Zandijcke M, De Sutter J, Santens P, Decoodt P, Moerman C, Schoors D (2004) Treatment of Parkinson’s disease with pergolide and relation to restrictive valvular heart disease. Lancet 363:1179–1183
Waller EA, Kaplan J, Heckman MG (2005) Valvular heart disease in patients taking pergolide. Mayo Clin Proc 80:1016–1020
Whone AJ, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ, Brooks DJ (2003) Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levo-dopa. Ann Neurol 54:93–101
Yamamoto M, Uesugi T (2005) Cardiac valvulopathy in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 20(Suppl 10):P317
Zadikoff C, Rochon P, Lang A (2006) Cardiac valvulopathy associated with pergolide use. Can J Neurol Sci 33:27–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-008-0082-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reichmann, H., Bilsing, A., Ehret, R. et al. Ergoline and non-ergoline derivatives in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 253 (Suppl 4), iv36–iv38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-4009-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-4009-z