Abstract
We can observe an increasing innovation pace in economy and society which can be considered as the main trend most likely to continue also in the future. However, there are also some indications that in some areas it becomes more difficult to innovate and that we are entering a technological plateau. In addition, in some markets we can observe that customers and society are more aware of possible harmful effects of too much innovation and are calling, for instance, for a more mindful development of technologies resulting in longer lasting products. While hyper innovation describes best the current innovation paradigm, we explore in this paper a counter trend which can be labelled as slow innovation movement.
Zusammenfassung
Der technologische Fortschritt treibt permanent die Wirtschaft voran, schafft Wachstum und bringt neue Produkte hervor. Wenngleich dieser Trend zukünftig im Allgemeinen anhalten wird, gibt es jüngst Anzeichen, dass es in einigen Bereichen schwieriger wird, Innovationen hervorzubringen und wir uns möglicherweise einem technologischen Plateau annähern. Gleichzeitig gibt es bestimmte Kundengruppen, die zunehmend gegen die steigende Geschwindigkeit mobil machen und sich durch neue Formen der Innovationen mehr Lebensqualität erhoffen. Während der Trend zu immer mehr Innovation als dominantes Paradigma angesehen werden kann, wird in diesem Beitrag ein Gegentrend untersucht, der als Slow Innovation Bewegung bezeichnet werden kann.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Leitner, K‑H.: Innovation Futures: New forms of Innovation and their implications for innovation policy, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 9 (2013), pp 296–286
OECD (2017): Compendium of Productivity Statistics 2016, Paris
Azoulay, P.; Jones, B.: Generating Ideas: Applied and Academic Research (with Ben Jones), Slides from a discussion prepared for the “Innovation and Early Stage Ideas” Conference, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam, December, 2006
Leitner, K‑H.; Butler, J.; Cerulli, G.; Dunnewijk, T.; et al.: Analysis of the evolution of the costs of research – trends, drivers and impacts, Final Report, Study commissioned by DG Research & Innovation, Contract: RTD/B2/2009/COST-2009-01, September, 2011
Community Innovation Survey: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/web/microdata/community-innovation-survey (25 June 2017)
Porter, M.: Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press, 1985
Zahradnik, G.; Rhomberg, W.; Leitner, K‑H: EMS 2015. Innovationen in der Produktion: Basisauswertung und Sonderauswertung zum Thema Industrie 4.0, AIT-IS-Report, Austrian Institute of Technology, Vienna, Vol. 125, April, 2016
Buchalter, A.; Sakhnini, H.: Fighting cannibalization. McKinsey Quarterly, no. 1, pp 12–13
Shenkar, O.: Copycats: how smart companies use imitation to gain a strategic edge. Strategic Direction, 26 (2010), no. 10, pp 3–5
Arznei Telegramm: Restricted list for pseudo-innovative drugs improves therapeutic quality and reduces expenditures, arznei-telegramm, 2001, no. 32, pp 77–79
Hallnäs, L.; Redström, J.: Slow Technology: Designing for Reflection, Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 5 (2001), no. 3, pp 201–212
Ascharya, K.: Wish You Could Slow Down? You’re Not the Only One, http://2machines.com/156804/ (25 June 2017)
Schneider, F.: Degrowth of Production and Consumption Capacities for social justice, well-being and ecological sustainability, 2nd Conference on Economic Degrowth, Barcelona, Spain, March 26–29 2010, Conference proceedings, 2010
Roux, M.: Transhumanism and Degrowth – a false opposition? Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies, June 17, 2015 http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/roux20150617 (25 June 2017)
Gordon, B.: Is US Economic Growth Over? NBER Working Paper, The National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leitner, KH. The Future of Innovation: Hyper Innovation, Slow Innovation, and No Innovation. Berg Huettenmaenn Monatsh 162, 386–388 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-017-0635-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00501-017-0635-2