Abstract
Post-agricultural land differs from typical forest land in physical, chemical and biological features. In addition, the environment of this land type is determined, among other things, by the introduced tree species. These differences may be revealed by the biodiversity and abundance of the soil fauna. We analysed the abundance, species richness and diversity of different instars of mesostigmatid mites inhabiting three different habitat types on post-agricultural land (shaped by pure Pinus sylvestris L., Tilia cordata Mill. and Betula pendula Roth stands). We collected 288 soil samples from eight plots in three stands. The collection was conducted in July and October in two consecutive vegetation seasons (2021 and 2022) for Mesostigmata mites community. Soil characteristics (determination of soil group and analysis of physical and chemical properties of soil and litter) were done in July 2021. In total, 399 individuals (266 females, 50 males and 83 juveniles) were classified into 38 taxa (33 species, five genera). Most individuals belonged to the Parasitidae, Laelapidae and Veigaiidae families. The most abundant species were Hypoaspis aculeifer (Canestini) (21.6% of all recorded mites), Veigaia nemorensis (C.L.Koch) (7.8%) and Trachytes aegrota (C.L.Koch) (7.0%). Abundance, species richness and diversity were shaped by collection month and Fe content in soil. The abundance was influenced by N litter content and was significantly lower in P. sylvestris stand in July (0.57 ± 0.23; mean ± SE) than in P. sylvestris (2.17 ± 0.54) and T. cordata (2.15 ± 0.48) stands in October. Moreover, abundance in P. sylvestris stand in October was higher than in B. pendula stand in July (0.78 ± 0.26). Similarly, species richness was significantly lower in P. sylvestris stand in July than in P. sylvestris and T. cordata stands in October (2.17 ± 0.54 and 2.15 ± 0.48, respectively). Higher Shannon’s diversity of mite communities was reported in P. sylvestris stand in October (0.40 ± 0.10) than in P. sylvestris and B. pendula stands in July (0.12 ± 0.06 and 0.14 ± 0.08, respectively). Large fluctuations of abundance, species richness and diversity of soil mite communities in P. sylvestris and B. pendula stands between collection months give the insights for creating mixed stands on post-agricultural land. It is worth noticing that the wet season creates the most favourable living environment for mesostigmatid mites in P. sylvestris litter.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The area of forests in Poland increased between 1945 and 2012 from 21 to 30% (i.e. from 6,470,000 ha to 9,164,000 ha). Such growth occurred primarily through the afforestation of post-agricultural lands (Kaliszewski 2016), accounting for 55% of afforestation—1,477,000 ha (Krawczyk 2015). Afforested post-agricultural land differs in physical and chemical characteristics from typical forest land. The most important differences include a higher pH and a lower C:N ratio. This results from long-term agricultural use—repeated ploughing and fertilization. Ploughing is responsible for the transformation of the soil profile and fertilization for the chemical changes (Gorzelak 1996). Additional differences are generated by the fact that these lands have been deprived for many years of the influence of tree root systems, which stabilize the soil structure and enrich it biologically (Thoms et al. 2010). The greater biodiversity of bacteria and lower diversity of fungi in soils of post-agricultural lands may be triggered by higher availability of nutrients (Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2017). Planting of trees on post-agricultural land shapes the succession process of herbaceous plants and shrubs. This process is long-lasting and depends on the fragmentation of habitats and the vicinity of inhabited stands (Ciurzycki et al. 2021). The diversity of different plant functional groups may be positively correlated with soil functions such as microbial biomass carbon, basal respiration, and carbon sequestration. Thus, with the ongoing succession of these groups on post-agricultural land, the parameters may improve (Heydari et al. 2020). Both land use history and soil type are, therefore, a set of abiotic factors that shape the living conditions of trees and soil organisms. The importance of soil biota in soil remediation processes is based on their contribution to the decomposition of dead organic matter. Fungi, bacteria, nematodes (Nematoda), springtails (Collembola) and soil mites (Acari) should be considered as the main groups of such organisms. Good bioindicators of changes in the soil environment are free-living mesostigmatid mites (Mesostigmata). They occur in large numbers in the soil and forest litter, lead a relatively sedentary lifestyle (Kamczyc et al. 2019) and are sensitive to pollution and degradation of forest areas (Manu et al. 2019). They hunt primarily on springtails, nematodes, potworms (Enchytraeidae) or insect larvae (Insecta) (Koehler 1999; Wissuwa et al. 2012). The structure of mesostigmatid mite communities depends on the particular conditions of habitat type, such as vegetation, age of the trees or human impact and abiotic factors. Mesostigmatid mites highlight the degree of anthropogenization in ecosystems, but this effect is especially pronounced in forests (Călugăr, 2021). Mesostigmatid mite communities are also subject to seasonal changes in species composition and abundance concerning temperature and precipitation (Salmane 2000; Kamczyc et al. 2022). Environmental conditions and seasonal dynamics are also expressed through changes in the relationships of different mesostigmatid developmental instars, which include adult (males, females) and three juvenile instars (deutonymphs, protonymphs and larvae) (Urbanowski et al. 2021).
The aim of the study was to recognize differences in seasonal changes in the abundance, species richness and diversity of Mesostigmata mite assemblages inhabiting pure forests (Betula pendula Roth, Tilia cordata Mill., Pinus sylvestris L.) growing on post-agricultural lands. Considering previous studies on post-agricultural lands (Scheu and Schulz 1996; Gormsen et al. 2006; Gawęda et al. 2021), we hypothesized that abundance, species richness, diversity, and relative proportion of different instars (including sex ratio) in mite communities would respond in different ways to (1) season (summer and autumn), (2) tree species, and (3) soil properties. We expected that various forest litter types would affect soil mite assemblages differently, and that effect would change with season.
Materials and methods
Site description and experimental design
The study site was located in the Opole Forest District (S–W Poland), where coniferous forests cover 60% of the forest area. The forests are dominated by mesic (57% of area), moist (40%), and marsh sites (~ 3%). Considering the soil environment, the main groups of soils are Arenosols (rusty soils)—45.3%, Podzols (podzolic soils)—23.0%, and Gleysols (gleyic soils)—16.4% (Forest Management Plan for Opole Forest Division, 2014). The vegetation season lasts 227 days. Mean annual precipitation reaches 603 mm, while mean annual temperature is 8 °C. The duration of winter is 60–70 days, and the number of days with snow cover is 58–65 days. In turn, the duration of summer is 90–100 days (Malica et al. 2024).
At the beginning of our study, three pure stands of different tree species (Pinus sylvestris L., Tilia cordata Mill. and Betula pendula Roth) were selected (Fig. 1). Every stand was located on post-agricultural land characterized by sandy, acidic or slightly acidic soils, with no calcium carbonates and low soil organic matter content in upper soil horizons (rusty soil—Arenosol). The distance between stands was at least 50 m. Finally, eight circular study plots (0.02 ha) were established in total. The study site characteristics were done in summer 2021 to note all plant species growing on each site. On each study plot, we measured: (1) the total number of trees (N); (2) the height of the trees (m); (3) the dimension at breast height—DBH (cm). Moreover, all vascular plants were recorded and the cover of each species in each layer was estimated using the seven-level Braun-Blanquet abundance scale (Table 4 in Appendix 1).
Soil analyses
The soil environment was characterized by the description of soil pit (at least to a depth of 1 m) located in the middle of the chosen stands. Subsequently, we described the reference soil groups based on the IUSS WRB (2015) and took soil and litter (mineral and organic layer separately) samples (ca. 500 g in total) from every soil horizon for further laboratory studies (16 samples in total). Soil samples were collected to determine: (1) soil texture (Casagrande’s aerometric method modified by Prószyński); (2) pH of soil and litter—measured in distilled water (potentiometric method); (3) content of organic carbon (Corg%—Tiurin’s method); (4) soil organic matter (SOM%—loss on ignition method); (5) the total nitrogen content (N%—Kjeldahl’s method); (6) C to N ratio; (7) elements such as Mg, Na, Ca, P, K (%) as well as Fe, Cd, Pb, Mn, Zn, and Cu (mg/kg) using atomic absorption spectrometry analysis using the AAS Varian 55B spectrometer (Peña et al. 2016). Moreover, we collected samples of intact soil for analysis of bulk density (BD; g/cm3)—core method, and actual soil moisture (SM; %)—gravimetric method (Lityński et al. 1976). The analyses were conducted in the laboratory at the Poznań University of Life Sciences (Table 5 in Appendix 2).
Mesostigmata mites investigation
Sampling was carried out four times: in July and October 2021 and in July and October 2022. Collecting of the soil samples (288 samples in total = eight plots × nine samples per plot × four samplings) was conducted on each study plot using metal soil corer (ø 5 cm) to the depth of 15 cm. In the laboratory, samples were placed on the Berlese-Tullgren apparatus, consisting of a funnel, a light bulb (40W), a strainer (mesh size 2 mm), and containers with 75% ethanol solution. Edaphon was extracted from the soil samples for at least seven days (until the collected samples were dry). Mesostigmatid mite individuals were selected from the alcohol solution under a stereomicroscope and placed in the Hoyer’s medium on slides. The detailed diagnosis took place under a compound microscope Zeiss Axio Scope.A1. All individuals were classified into the appropriate instar, as well as species level or higher taxonomic unit using identification keys (Micherdziński 1969; Karg 1971, 1993; Gwiazdowicz 2007; Mašán & Halliday 2014).
Data analysis
Sampled material allowed to determine mite abundance (ind.), species richness and Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′ = − Σpiln(pi), where pi is the proportion of particular species in the mite community) for each of the plots. During analysis raw, data for abundance, species richness and diversity of mesostigmatid mite communities were presented as mean (± SE) values per sample within collection month and habitat type. In addition, for each species, indicators of dominance and constancy (the ratio of samples in which a given species occurs to all samples collected in a given variant) were determined for each habitat variant. Statistical analyses were done using R software (R version 4.1.2; R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; available online: https://www.r-project.org/). We used generalized linear models (GLM) assuming a Tweedie distribution for mesostigmatid abundance, species richness, and diversity calculated per sample and per plot. We applied predictors in models with low variance inflation factors (VIF < 5). Furthermore, we conducted Tukey post-hoc tests for each model to determine the differences in studied factors between month/habitat combinations. The statistical significance of variables used in GLM’s was calculated using t-values. Results were treated as significant when p < 0.05. In order to describe the relationship between mesostigmatid mite assemblages and habitat characteristics, including soil properties, we conducted canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) implemented in the vegan package in R. The variables included in the CCA final model were based on Akaike information criterion (AIC). Furthermore, environmental variables were selected on VIF < 2. To test the factor's significance, we conducted a permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). We plotted a cumulative species number using the vegan::specaccum() function (Oksanen et al. 2018). Furthermore, we used the bipartite package to reveal the relationship between mesostigmatid mite taxa and habitats (Dormann et al. 2008). In the conducted bipartite interaction network we assumed habitats as lower-level and mite taxa as higher-level groups. The taxa level response to specific habitat was described by specialisation index d′, derived from the Kulback-Leibler distance, expressing whether a given taxon is a non-specialist or a perfect specialist (range from 0 to 1). Additionally, d′ index describes how strongly the taxa differ from a random sampling of available interacting partners (Dormann 2011).
Results
Overall results
In total, 399 individuals (266 females, 50 males and 83 juveniles) were classified as 38 taxa (33 species, five genera) (Table 1). The GLM models assuming Tweedie distribution revealed that collection month and Fe content in soil affected abundance, species richness and diversity. Moreover, mesostigmatid mite abundance was influenced by litter N content (Table 2). The canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) revealed significant differences in mite taxa distribution. Axis 1 and axis 2 explained 26.1% and 25.0% of variance in community composition, respectively (Fig. 2). Axis 1 reflects collection time, while Axis 2 reflects the tree species studied. The analysis of variance conducted for the model showed that collection month (p = 0.002), year (p = 0.002), soil Mn content (p = 0.001), soil Na content (p = 0.028) and litter thickness (p = 0.036) significantly influenced the mite communities structure (Table 3). Species of the genus Paragamasus were influenced by soil Mn content and litter thickness. In contrast, species belonging to the genus Veigaia were affected by soil Na content and were also the least sensitive to soil Mn among all other genera.
Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) for Mesostigmata communities across four sampling periods (July, October; 2020, 2021) in pure stands on post-agricultural lands (Opole Forest District). Mite taxa labelled with the first two letters of the genus name and the first two letters of the species name for each mite taxon (for abbreviations of mite taxa see Table 6 in Appendix 3). BP—B. pendula, PS—P. sylvestris, TC—T. cordata, Jul—July, Oct—October, FLt—forest litter thickness, Sna—soil Na content, Smn—soil Mn content
Seasonal changes in mesostigmatid mite communities
The highest abundance calculated per sample was recorded in P. sylvestris stand in October 2022 (3.19 ± 0.62 ind.), while the lowest was recorded in P. sylvestris stand in July 2022 (0.37 ± 0.17). The highest abundance in July was reported in T. cordata stand in 2021 (1.59 ± 0.50 ind.) (Fig. 3A). The Tukey post-hoc tests revealed that mesostigmatid mite abundance was significantly lower in P. sylvestris stand in July (0.57 ± 0.17 ind.) than in P. sylvestris and T. cordata stands in October (2.17 ± 0.41 and 2.15 ± 0.34, respectively). Moreover, abundance in P. sylvestris stand in October was significantly higher than in B. pendula stand in July (0.78 ± 0.18 ind.).
Mean abundance (A), species richness (B) and Shannon’s diversity (C) of mesostigmatid mites in the total communities across four sampling periods (July, October; 2020, 2021) in pure stands on post-agricultural lands (Opole Forest District). Abbreviations of variants: Oct—October, Jul—July, BP—B. pendula, PS—P. sylvestris, TC—T. cordata, Oct_PS—October/P. sylvestris, Jul_PS—July/P. sylvestris, Oct_TC—October/T. cordata, Jul_BP—July/B. pendula, Jul_TC—July/T. cordata, Oct_BP—October/B. pendula
The highest species richness per sample was recorded in P. sylvestris stand in October 2022 (1.85 ± 0.35 species) and the lowest in P. sylvestris stand in July 2022 (0.30 ± 0.12) (Fig. 2B). Species richness of mesostigmatid mite communities was significantly lower in P. sylvestris stand in July (0.52 ± 0.15 species) than in P. sylvestris and T. cordata stands in October (1.37 ± 0.25 and 1.37 ± 0.19, respectively) (Fig. 3B).
The highest mesostigmatid mite Shannon’s diversity was found in P. sylvestris stand in October 2022 (0.52 ± 0.11), while the lowest was in T. cordata stand in July 2022 (0.05 ± 0.03). A significantly higher diversity was found in P. sylvestris stand in October (0.40 ± 0.07) compared to P. sylvestris and B. pendula stands in July (0.12 ± 0.05 and 0.14 ± 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 3C).
Mite communities structure
Most mite individuals belonged to the Parasitidae (111 ind.), Laelapidae (95) and Veigaiidae (70) families (Table 1). The most abundant species were Hypoaspis (Gaeolaelaps) aculeifer (21.6% of all recorded mites), Veigaia nemorensis (7.8%) and Trachytes aegrota (7.0%). Each of these species was most abundant in the T. cordata stand in October. Only two species occurred in each studied variant – Veigaia nemorensis and Hypoaspis aculeifer, while 15 mite species were unique for one variant (Fig. 4, Table 6 in Appendix 3). The cumulative species richness for T. cordata stand in October and July exceeded those for other examined month/habitat combinations (Fig. 5). The lowest juvenile abundance was recorded in T. cordata stand in July 2022 (0.07 ± 0.05 ind.; 2.4% of all juveniles). However, the number of juveniles was not statistically different among studied habitats and collection months (Fig. 3C). Interestingly, most females (2.19 ± 0.49 ind.; 22.2% of all females) were reported in P. sylvestris stand in October 2022, while the lowest female abundance was found in P. sylvestris stand in July of the same year (0.15 ± 0.09) (Fig. 6A). Males were the most numerous in the T. cordata stand in October 2022 (0.52 ± 0.20 ind.; 28.0% of all males). Moreover, no males were recorded in July 2022 in T. cordata and B. pendula stand (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the most juveniles were found in P. sylvestris (0.56 ± 0.19 ind.; 18.1% of all juveniles) and T. cordata stand (0.56 ± 0.15; 18.1%) in October 2022, as well as in B. pendula stand in October 2021 (0.56 ± 0.30; 12.1%) (Fig. 6C).
Co-occurrence network for bipartite relationships between mesostigmatid mite taxa (upper boxes) and collection Month/Habitat (lower boxes). Boxes are proportional to total mite abundance, whereas ribbon width is proportional to the co-occurrence. Oct_PS—October/P. sylvestris, Jul_PS—July/P. sylvestris, Oct_TC—October/T. cordata, Jul_BP—July/B. pendula, Jul_TC—July/T. cordata, Oct_BP—October/B. pendula. For abbreviations of mite taxa see Table 6 in Appendix 3
The largest number of H. aculeifer females was found in samples taken in October from the P. sylvestris and T. cordata stands (in both cases there were 22 individuals from two years, which accounted for 81.48% of all individuals of this species in the variant). In contrast, the largest number of H. aculeifer juveniles was found in samples taken in July from the T. cordata stand (6 ind.; 42.86%). Similarly, in the case of V.nemoresnis, the most females were found in samples collected in October from the T.cordata stand (10 ind.; 83.33%), while the most juvenile stages were reported in July in the T. cordata stand (4 ind.; 66,67%). No T. aegrota individuals were found in B. pendula stands, while the highest number of individuals of this species was reported in the T. cordata stands in October (35.71% of all T. aegrota individuals in total).
Discussion
Seasonal changes in mite communities
Generally, we found a significantly higher abundance of Mesostigmata mites in October than in July, as we expected from the results of other studies (Fujii and Takeda 2017). It alludes to the study by Kaczmarek et al. (2011), highlighting that soil moisture is the main factor that allows soil mite assemblage to develop. Indeed, in the climatic conditions of Poland, lower abundance in July may be explained by higher temperature and rapidly decreasing soil moisture in summer, which causes a decrease in mite density. With the end of summer, the temperature remains high, but soil moisture increases. Consequently, this causes an increase in soil mite density (Salmane 2000). The same relationship also applied to species richness and diversity of soil acarofauna. Similar importance of precipitation and temperature for the soil mite community structure was also revealed by Kamczyc et al. (2022), who reported that the abundance of mesostigmatid mites in decomposing litter of broadleaved and coniferous temperate tree species was positively correlated with the temperature of the sampling month and negatively correlated with the temperature of the month before sampling. The difference with our study was that the abundance shown in summer (July) was higher than in autumn (October). Species richness and diversity showed only slight changes between consecutive months of the growing season (April–October).
An interesting result of our study is the increase in the proportion of juvenile instars in summer. They are considered to be more sensitive than adult mite instars to temperature increases and humidity decreases, which is associated inter alia with a lower degree of body sclerotization (Huhta and Hänninen 2001). Adult mites should be more resistant than juveniles to water loss and less susceptible to changes in temperature and humidity (Urbanowski et al. 2021). An explanation for our result may be the overlap of the period of high mortality with the hatching of mesostigmatid juveniles. As demonstrated by Kaczmarek et al. (2011), under similar climatic conditions, there are two density peaks for mesostigmatid mites—in January and at the turn of spring and summer.
Most identified individuals belonged to the Parasitidae, Laelapidae and Veigaiidae families. Mites of the Parasitidae family are found in all types of forests, meadows, bogs, and farmland. They mainly inhabit the litter but also the humus layer. Their main prey are springtails and other mites, such as Oribatida and Astigmata (Błoszyk 2008). The Laelapidae family includes, among others, large predatory species of the Hypoaspis genus. Hypoaspis (Geolaelaps) aculeifer is a common pioneer species (Wissuwa et al. 2012), also found in large numbers on former farmland. Hypoaspis aculeifer is a species that inter alia preys on springtails (Cortet et al. 2003). Veigaiidae family contains species specialised in feeding on springtails, but may also feed on other soil fauna (Koehler 1999). They primarily inhabit forest litter in the Palearctic but are also found in meadows and agricultural land (Błoszyk 2008). Together with the mites of the Parasitidae family, they form the dominant group of predators in the Mesostigmata order (Koehler 1997; Błoszyk 2008; Skorupski 2008; Kazemi et al. 2013). Veigaia nemorensis is a common species in the litter and upper soil layers on former farmland and even on degraded or post-industrial sites (Skorupski et al. 2013; Manu et al. 2017). Veigaia nemorensis, in contrast to the general characteristics of the Veiigaidae family, mainly preys on bacterial and root-feeding nematode species (Manu et al. 2017).
Tree species impact
The differences in litter impact of tree species such as P. sylvestris, B. pendula and T. cordata on mesostigmatid mite assemblages were compared by Kamczyc et al. (2019) and Urbanowski et al. (2021). Kamczyc et al. (2019) showed that tree litter only affected abundance, while there was no influence on species richness and diversity of mesostigmatid mite assemblages. In addition, they indicated a positive effect of P. sylvestris litter comparing to T. cordata litter on soil mite density. In contrast, Urbanowski et al. (2021) showed no significant differences in the effect of P. sylvestris and B. pendula litter on the abundance, species richness and diversity of mesostigmatid mite communities. Our study did not show differences in the influence of individual tree species on the soil Mesostigmata. However, when comparing mite assemblages in summer and autumn, we observed high differences in mite abundance, species richness and diversity between the studied stands. Our results indicate that the most extreme abundance values were found in P. sylvestris stand, which provided the most favourable conditions for the soil fauna in autumn and the least favourable in summer. This effect may be explained by the highest water absorption capacity of P. sylvestris litter, a coniferous species, with the greatest decreases in moisture during dry months (Zhou et al. 2018). Interestingly, Ilek et al. (2024) revealed that forest litter with a low C:N ratio and a predominant share of oak leaves achieved the greatest water storage capacity, while litter with a high C:N ratio and a predominant share of P. sylvestris needles had the lowest water storage capacity. This is consistent with our results because the C:N ratio was the lowest in the P. sylvestris stand and the highest in the T. cordata stand. Also in the B. pendula stand, mite abundance and diversity were significantly lower in summer than in P. sylvestris stand in autumn. We assume that this results from the fact that B. pendula stands are less able to protect the soil in summer from heating and drying out (Jonczak et al. 2020).
Interaction between soil parameters and mite communities
Our study revealed that Fe content in soil affected abundance, species richness and diversity of mite communities—the biodiversity decreased as soil Fe concentration increased. The negative effects of this nutrient on soil fauna were also noted by Huot et al. (2018) and Rusek and Marshall (2000). An increase in soil Fe concentration may limit the development of springtails, reduce manganese uptake, and stress soil organisms through the energy-demanding detoxification process (Rusek and Marshall 2000). Christophe et al. (2014) proved that the concentration of elements such as Fe in the rhizosphere solution and the soil environment changes with the seasons and is highest in autumn. Widowati and Sukristyonubowo (2019) showed that Fe becomes less toxic to plants when the soil pH is lower. In turn, Thoms and Gleixner (2013) observed that soil pH is lower in autumn than in summer.
Also, the collection month significantly affected the abundance, species richness and diversity of mesostigmatid mite communities. Changes in weather conditions with the ongoing seasons appear to be crucial to the density and diversity of soil fauna communities. This is not surprising because mites are ectothermic organisms, depending on climatic conditions such as temperature and precipitation (Thakur et al. 2018). This result was also confirmed by other studies conducted in central Europe (Urbanowski et al. 2021; Kamczyc et al. 2022). Additionally, species richness and diversity of mesostigmatid mites increased with litter nitrogen content, which may be associated with a higher biomass and species richness of microorganisms and nematodes (Kaneko and Salamanca 1999; Sánchez-Moreno et al. 2009; Renčo et al. 2020). Interestingly, in our study, the abundance of mites was not influenced by litter nitrogen content, which is correlated with the type of litter (Cornwell et al. 2008; Horodecki and Jagodziński 2019). It corresponds to the conclusions of studies conducted by Seniczak et al. (2018) on moss mite (Oribatida) and mesostigmatid mite communities. They reported that nutrient-rich habitats generate high species diversity but low densities of soil mites. This may mean that poorly fertile habitats have the opposite trend in mite community structure.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we revealed that different tree species growing on post-agricultural lands shape various soil conditions, which change between the summer and autumn seasons. Large fluctuations in soil mite abundance, species richness and diversity between P. sylvestris and B. pendula stands in summer and autumn may depend on tree species and season, which may constitute proof for using mixed stands during afforestation of post-agricultural lands. Seasonal change in the proportion between instars was unclear, but contrary to expected results, the proportion of young individuals increased in summer.
Data availability
We declare all data is being provided within this manuscript.
References
Błoszyk J (2008) Wykaz gatunków Acari: Uropodina, in: Fauna Polski – Charakterystyka i Wykaz Gatunków. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, pp 76–78
Bureau for Forest Management and Geodesy State Enterprise (2014) Forest Management Plan for Opole Forest Division. Kraków
Călugăr A (2021) Mesostigmatid mites as a piece of the bioindicators puzzle. Agronomie 64
Christophe C, Collignon C, Kies A, Turpault M-P (2014) Seasonal evolution of the rhizosphere effect on major and trace elements in soil solutions of Norway Spruce (Picea abies Karst) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) in an acidic forest soil. Open J Soil Sci 4:323–336. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2014.49034
Ciurzycki W, Marciszewska K, Zaniewski PT (2021) Formation of undergrowth species composition in birch forests on former farmland in the early stage of spontaneous secondary succession. Sylwan. https://doi.org/10.26202/sylwan.2021055
Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K et al (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x
Cortet J, Joffre R, Elmholt S, Krogh PH (2003) Increasing species and trophic diversity of mesofauna affects fungal biomass, mesofauna community structure and organic matter decomposition processes. Biol Fertil Soils 37:302–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0597-2
de la Peña E, Baeten L, Steel H, Viaene N, Sutter ND, Schrijver AD, Verheyen K (2016) Beyond plant–soil feedbacks: mechanisms driving plant community shifts due to land-use legacies in post-agricultural forests. Funct Ecol 30:1073–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12672
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Reich PB, Khachane AN, Campbell CD, Thomas N, Freitag TE, Abu Al-Soud W, Sørensen S, Bardgett RD, Singh BK (2017) It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity. Environ Microbiol 19:1176–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13642
Dormann CF (2011) How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks. Netw Biol 1:1–20
Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fründ J (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8:8–11
Fujii S, Takeda H (2017) Succession of soil microarthropod communities during the aboveground and belowground litter decomposition processes. Soil Biol Biochem 110:95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.003
Gawęda T, Małek S, Błońska E, Jagodziński AM, Bijak S, Zasada M (2021) Macro- and micronutrient contents in soils of a chronosequence of naturally regenerated birch stands on abandoned agricultural lands in Central Poland. Forests 12:956. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070956
Gormsen D, Hedlund K, Huifu W (2006) Diversity of soil mite communities when managing plant communities on set-aside arable land. Appl Soil Ecol 31:147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.03.001
Gorzelak A (1996) Ekologiczne uwarunkowania kształtowania lasów na gruntach porolnych. Sylwan 140:29–34
Gwiazdowicz DJ (2007) Ascid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) from selected forest ecosystems and microhabitats in Poland. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Poznań, Augusta Cieszkowskiego
Heydari M, Zeynali N, Omidipour R, Bazgir M, Kohzadian M, Prevosto B (2020) Linkage between plant species diversity and soil-based functions along a post-agricultural succession is influenced by the vegetative forms. Environ Monit Assess 192:429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08378-z
Horodecki P, Jagodziński AM (2019) Site type effect on litter decomposition rates: a three-year comparison of decomposition process between spoil heap and forest sites. Forests 10:353. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040353
Huhta V, Hänninen S-M (2001) Effects of temperature and moisture fluctuations on an experimental soil microarthropod community. Pedobiologia 45:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00085
Huot H, Cortet J, Watteau F, Milano V, Nahmani J, Sirguey C, Schwartz C, Morel JL (2018) Diversity and activity of soil fauna in an industrial settling pond managed by natural attenuation. Appl Soil Ecol 132:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.08.020
Ilek A, Błońska E, Miszewski K, Kasztelan A, Zborowska M (2024) Investigating water storage dynamics in the litter layer: the impact of mixing and decay of pine needles and oak leaves. Forests 15:350. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020350
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015 International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps. World Soil Resources Reports, 106, FAO, Rome
Jonczak J, Jankiewicz U, Kondras M, Kruczkowska B, Oktaba L, Oktaba J, Olejniczak I, Pawłowicz E, Polláková N, Raab T, Regulska E, Słowińska S, Sut-Lohmann M (2020) The influence of birch trees (Betula spp.) on soil environment—a review. For Ecol Manag 477:118486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118486
Kaczmarek S, Faleńczyk-Koziróg K, Marquardt T (2011) Abundance dynamics of mites (Acari) in the peatland of ‘Linie’ Nature Reserve, with particular reference to the Gamasida. BIOLET 48:159–166. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10120-011-0014-8
Kaliszewski A (2016) Krajowy program zwiększania lesistości—stan i trudności realizacji z perspektywy lokalnej. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie 7–19
Kamczyc J, Dyderski MK, Horodecki P, Jagodziński AM (2019) Mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata) in the initially decomposed ‘litter islands’ of 11 tree species in scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Forest. Forests 10:403. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10050403
Kamczyc J, Pers-Kamczyc E, Urbanowski CK, Malica J, Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2020) An alternative, portable method for extracting microarthropods from forest soil. Acta Oecologica 109:103655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103655
Kamczyc J, Dyderski MK, Horodecki P, Jagodziński AM (2022) Impact of microclimatic conditions on soil mite (Mesostigmata) abundance, species richness and diversity and litter decomposition. Figshare Repos. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18972998
Kaneko N, Salamanca E (1999) Mixed leaf litter effects on decomposition rates and soil microarthropod communities in an oak–pine stand in Japan. Ecol Res 14:131–138. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.1999.00292.x
Karg W (1971) Acari (Acarina) Milben, Unterordnung Anactinochaeta (Parasitiformes). Die freilebenden Gamasina (Gamasides). Raubmilben, Die Tierwelt Deutschlands 59. Gustav Fischer Verlag: Jena
Karg W (1993) Acari (Acarina) Milben Parasitiformes (Anactinochaeta), Cohors Gamasina Leach Raubmmilben. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands. VEB Gustav Fischer Ver Lag: Jena
Kazemi S, Arjomandi E, Ahangaran Y (2013) A review of the Iranian Parasitidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Persian J Acarol 2:159–180. https://doi.org/10.22073/pja.v2i1.9951
Koehler HH (1999) Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata). Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:395–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00045-6
Krawczyk R (2015) Afforestation and secondary succession. For Res Pap 75:423–427. https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2014-0039
Lityński T, Jurkowska H, Gorlach E (1976) Chemical and agricultural analysis. Methodological guide for soil and fertilizer analysis. PWN, Warszawa
Malica J, Rączka G, Turczański K, Andrzejewska A, Skorupski M, Urbanowski CK, Kamczyc J (2024) Impact of land use history and soil properties on soil mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata) inhabiting stands growing on post-agricultural land. Land Degrad Dev 35:1776–1791. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5020
Manu M, Calugar A, Badiu D (2017) Distribution of the genus Veigaia (Mesostigmata: Veigaiidae) in Romania with notes on the species ecology. Biologia (Bratisl) 72:628–641. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0072
Manu M, Honciuc V, Neagoe A, Băncilă RI, Iordache V, Onete M (2019) Soil mite communities (Acari: Mesostigmata, Oribatida) as bioindicators for environmental conditions from polluted soils. Sci Rep 9:20250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56700-8
Mašán P, Halliday B (2014) Review of the mite family Pachylaelapidae (Acari: Mesostigmata). Zootaxa 3776:1–66. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3776.1.1
Micherdziński W (1901) Die Familie Parasitidae Oudemans. 1901 (Acarina, Mesostigmata). PWN, Kraków
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara R, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens M, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2018) Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version. 2.5–2. CRAN
Renčo M, Gömöryová E, Čerevková A (2020) The effect of soil type and ecosystems on the soil nematode and microbial communities. Helminthologia 57:129–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0014
Rusek J, Marshall VG (2000) Impacts of airborne pollutants on soil fauna. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 31:395–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.395
Salmane I (2000) Investigation of the seasonal dynamics of soil Gamasina mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) in PInaceum Myrtilosum, Latvia. In: Gajdos P, Pekár S (eds) Proceedings of the 18th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Stará Lesná, 1999. Ekológia Bratisl. 19:245–252
Sánchez-Moreno S, Nicola NL, Ferris H, Zalom FG (2009) Effects of agricultural management on nematode–mite assemblages: soil food web indices as predictors of mite community composition. Appl Soil Ecol 41:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.09.004
Scheu S, Schulz E (1996) Secondary succession, soil formation and development of a diverse community of oribatids and saprophagous soil macro-invertebrates. Biodivers Conserv 5:235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055833
Seniczak S, Graczyk R, Seniczak A, Faleńczyk-Koziróg K, Kaczmarek S, Marquardt T (2018) Microhabitat preferences of Oribatida and Mesostigmata (Acari) inhabiting lowland beech forest in Poland and the trophic interactions between these mites. Eur J Soil Biol 87:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2018.04.004
Skorupski M, Horodecki P, Jagodziński AM (2013) Mite species of Mesostigmata order (Arachnida, Acari) in industrial and postindustrial areas of Poland. Nauka Przyr Technol 7:1–23
Skorupski M (2008) Wykaz gatunków Acari: Mesostigmata, in: Fauna Polski – Charakterystyka i Wykaz Gatunków. Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, pp 64–76
Thakur MP, Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Stefanski A, Rich R, Rice KE, Eddy WC, Eisenhauer N (2018) Reduced feeding activity of soil detritivores under warmer and drier conditions. Nat Clim Change 8:75–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0032-6
Thoms C, Gleixner G (2013) Seasonal differences in tree species’ influence on soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 66:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.05.018
Thoms C, Gattinger A, Jacob M, Thomas FM, Gleixner G (2010) Direct and indirect effects of tree diversity drive soil microbial diversity in temperate deciduous forest. Soil Biol Biochem 42:1558–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.030
Tyler G, Olsson T (2001) Plant uptake of major and minor mineral elements as influenced by soil acidity and liming. Plant Soil 230:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010314400976
Urbanowski CK, Horodecki P, Kamczyc J, Skorupski M, Jagodziński AM (2021) Does litter decomposition affect mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata)? A five-year litterbag experiment with 14 tree species in mixed forest stands growing on a post-industrial area. Geoderma 391:114963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.114963
WidowatiSukristyonubowo LR (2019) Dynamics of pH, ferrum and mangan, and phosphorus on newly opened paddy soil having high soil organic matter on rice growth. J Trop Soils 17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.5400/jts.2012.v17i1.1-8
Wissuwa J, Salamon J-A, Frank T (2012) Effects of habitat age and plant species on predatory mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in grassy arable fallows in Eastern Austria. Soil Biol Biochem 50:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.025
Zhou Q, Keith DM, Zhou X, Cai M, Cui X, Wei X, Luo Y (2018) Comparing the water-holding characteristics of broadleaved, coniferous, and mixed forest litter layers in a Karst Region. Mt Res Dev 38:220–229. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-17-00002.1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: J.M., M.S. and J.K., Methodology: J.M., J.K., M.S., C.K.U., K.T. and G.R., Formal analysis: J.M., J.K. and C.K.U., Investigation: J.M., C.K.U., G.R., J.K., and K.T., Writing - Original Draft Preparation: J.M., C.K.U. and K.T., Visualization: J.M. and C.K.U., Supervison: J.K. and M.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Malica, J., Urbanowski, C.K., Turczański, K. et al. Soil mite communities (Acari, Mesostigmata) in pure stands on post-agricultural lands: does season matter?. Exp Appl Acarol 94, 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00968-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-024-00968-7