Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We have investigated the effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the release of mercury from dental amalgam into artificial saliva.

Methods

A commercial brand of amalgam capsules was used, and the capsules were molded into discs (diameter 3 mm, thickness 1 mm) in plexiglas molds before treatment. The samples were divided into three groups. The first group was exposed to X-rays, the second group was exposed to MRI in a soft tissue-equivalent material, and the third group contained an equal number of samples as a control group. All samples were stored in artificial saliva for 1, 2, or 24 h. Mercury analyses were performed with a cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometer. The results were analyzed by two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with the Bonferroni correction as a post hoc test at the 95 % confidence level.

Results

A significant increase in mercury was detected in the X-ray-exposed group versus the control group (mean values 5.79 vs. 3.84 ppb, respectively; p ≤ 0.05). However, no significant difference in mercury dissolution was found between the MRI-exposed group and the control group (mean values: 4.51 vs. 4.30 ppb).

Conclusions

Mercury release increased after exposure to X-rays, but no change was detected after exposure to MRI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials, 9th edn. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campus G, Garcia-Godoy F, Gaspa L, Panzanelli A, Piu PC, Micera G, et al. Dependence of kinetic variables in the short-term release of Hg2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ ions into synthetic saliva from an high-copper dental amalgam. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18:1521–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts HW, Charlton DG. The release of mercury from amalgam restorations and its health effects: a review. Oper Dent. 2009;34:605–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinto OF, Huggins HA. Mercury poisoning in America. J Int Acad Prev Med. 1976;3:42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McHugh WD. Statements: effects and side-effects of dental restorative materials. Adv Dent Res. 1992;6:139–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eley BM. The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 3: mercury exposure from amalgam restorations in dental patients. Br Dent J. 1997;182:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uçar Y, Brantley WA. Biocompatibility of dental amalgams. Int J Dent. 2011;2011:981595. doi:10.1155/2011/981595.

  8. Spencer AJ. Dental amalgam and mercury in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2000;45:224–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fusayama T, Katayori T, Nomoto S. Corrosion of gold and amalgam placed in contact with each other. J Dent Res. 1963;42:1183–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. [No authors listed]. Dental amalgam: update on safety concerns. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. J Am Dent Assoc. 1998;129:494–503.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stadtler P. Dental amalgam I: toxicity. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1991;29:161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Svensson BG, Schulz A, Nisson A, Akesson I, Akesson B, Skerfving S. Fish as a source of exposure to mercury and selenium. Sci Total Environ. 1992;126:61–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Environmental health criteria 101: Methylmercury International Program on Chemical Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.

  14. Barregård L, Sällsten G, Järvholm B. People with high mercury uptake from their own dental amalgam filling. Occup Environ Med. 1995;52:124–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. Guidance for identifying populations at risk from mercury exposure. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.

  16. Marek M. The release of mercury from dental amalgam: the mechanism and in vitro testing. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1167–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marek M. The effect of tin on the corrosion behavior of the Ag-Hg phase of dental amalgam and dissolution of mercury. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1786–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okabe T, Ferracane J, Cooper C, Matsumoto H, Wagner M. Dissolution of mercury from amalgam into saline solution. J Dent Res. 1987;66:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferracane JL, Mafiana P, Cooper C, Okabe T. Time-dependent dissolution of amalgams into saline solution. J Dent Res. 1987;66:1331–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Müller-Miny H, Erber D, Möller H, Müller-Miny B, Bongartz G. Is there a hazard to health by mercury exposure from amalgam due to MRI? J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:258–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mortazavi SMJ, Daiee E, Yazdi A, Khiabani K, Kavousi A, Vazirinejad R, et al. Mercury release from dental amalgam restorations after magnetic resonance imaging and following mobile phone use. Pak J Biol Sci. 2008;11:1142–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Örtendahl TW, Högstedt P, Odelius H, Noren JG. Effects of magnetic fields from underwater electrical cutting on in vitro corrosion of dental amalgam. Undersea Biomed Res. 1988;15:443–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by the Scientific Research Unit (BAP No. 09B4240011) of Ankara University. The authors are grateful to the SDI Company for the amalgam capsules used in the study.

Conflict of interest

Mustafa Taştekin received financial support from the Scientific Research Unit (BAP No. 09B4240011) of Ankara University to buy the atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Sebnem Kursun, Bengi Öztas, and Havva Atas declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ankara, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey

    Sebnem Kursun & Bengi Öztas

  2. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ankara, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey

    Havva Atas & Mustafa Tastekin

Authors
  1. Sebnem Kursun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bengi Öztas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Havva Atas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mustafa Tastekin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebnem Kursun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kursun, S., Öztas, B., Atas, H. et al. Effects of X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging on mercury release from dental amalgam into artificial saliva. Oral Radiol 30, 142–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-013-0154-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-013-0154-0

Keywords