
References
Hu X, Pierce JT, Taylor T, Morrissey K. The carbon footprint of general anaesthetics: a case study in the UK. Resour Conserv Recy 2021; 167: 105411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105411
Slingo JM, Slingo ME. The science of climate change and the effect of anaesthetic gas emissions. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 252–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16189
Hendrickx JF, Nielsen OJ, De Hert S, De Wolf AM. The science behind banning desflurane: a narrative review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39: 818–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000001739
Moonesinghe SR. Desflurane decommissioning: more than meets the eye. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 237–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16219
Wyssusek K, Chan KL, Eames G, Whately Y. Greenhouse gas reduction in anaesthesia practice: a departmental environmental strategy. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11: e001867. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001867
Bernat M, Boyer A, Roche M, et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of general anaesthesia: a comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia vs. a mixed anaesthetic strategy in 47,157 adult patients. Anaesthesia 2024; 79: 309–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Funding statement
None.
Editorial responsibility
This submission was handled by Dr. Philip M. Jones, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bracco, D., Bozzer, C. The effects of desflurane withdrawal from the hospital: a call for a national ban of desflurane. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth 71, 1778–1779 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02782-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02782-6