Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation of combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with diesel–biodiesel–alcohol blends

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of diesel–biodiesel–alcohol blends on the combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of a single-cylinder diesel engine. Tests were conducted at different engine speeds of 1750, 2250, 2750 and 3250 rpm and under full load. In this study, different fuels [called as reference diesel (D100), 20 vol% cottonseed methyl ester (D80C20), 10 vol% ethanol (D90E10) and finally the ternary type of their derivations (D70C20E10)], were used. The experimental results showed that the highest reduction values were observed on CO emission by 42%, 30% and 8% for the D90E10, D70C20E10 and D80C20 fuels, respectively. These reductions for HC emission were achieved as 40%, 31% and 23% for the D90E10, D70C20E10 and D80C20, respectively. On the other hand, the reductions of NOx and CO2 emissions were not sharp and varied between 2–7%. Besides the reductions on the exhaust emissions, biodiesel–ethanol blend presented better results in terms of HRRmax and CPmax than using biodiesel alone. Additionally, ignition delay of the biodiesel blends was longer than that of D100 fuel owing to their low cetane numbers. Combustion duration was shortened with the increment in engine speed because the turbulence increased in the combustion chamber at high engine speed. This case also improved the homogeneity of test fuels and increased the quality of the combustion process. As a consequence, this paper clearly reported that it is possible to achieve fewer emissions, the highest CPmax values with the presence of ethanol in biodiesel fuels rather than using biodiesel alone for diesel engines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Abbreviations

ACPmax :

Angle of maximum cylinder pressure (°CA)

AIPmax :

Angle of maximum pressure increase (°CA)

BSFC:

Brake-specific fuel consumption (g/kWh)

BTE:

Brake thermal efficiency

C20:

20% cottonseed biodiesel + 80% diesel (v/v)

C100:

100% cottonseed methyl ester

CD:

Combustion duration

CO:

Carbon monoxide

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

CPmax :

Maximum cylinder pressure

D80C20:

20% cottonseed biodiesel + 80% diesel (v/v)

D70C20E10:

20% cottonseed biodisel + 10% ethanol + 70% diesel (v/v)

D90E10:

10% ethanol + 90% diesel (v/v)

D100:

Reference fuel—conventional diesel

DF:

Diesel fuel

EPi :

Pollutant mass, i, referenced to Peff (g/kWh)

EVi,d :

Exhaust emission value of components on dry basis, i, as volume share (ppm)

EVi,w :

Exhaust emission value of components on wet basis, i, as volume share (ppm)

HC:

Hydrocarbon

HRRmax :

Maximum heat release rate (J/°CA)

ICEs:

Internal combustion engines

k :

Polytrophic constant

M i :

Molecular mass of the components, i (g/mol)

M Exh,d :

Molecular mass of the exhaust gases on dry basis (g/mol)

M Exh,w :

Molecular mass of the exhaust gases on wet basis (g/mol)

NaOH:

Sodium hydroxide

NOx :

Nitrogen oxide

P e :

Brake power (kW)

PM:

Particulate matter

RMS:

Root-mean-square

SOC:

Start of combustion (°CA)

SOI:

Start of injection (°CA)

TDC:

Top dead centre

T ex :

Exhaust temperature (°C)

UHC:

Unburnt hydrocarbon

wt%:

Weight per cent

v/v:

Volumetric ratio

vol%:

Volumetric per cent

Ø or °CA:

Crank angle

\(\partial P\) :

Change in-cylinder pressure

m Exh,d :

Exhaust mass flow (kg/h)

p eff :

Power output (kW)

\(\partial V\) :

Change in-cylinder volume

λ :

Air–fuel equivalence ratio

References

  1. Gürel AE, Ağbulut Ü, Ergün A, Ceylan İ (2019) Environmental and economic assessment of a low energy consumption household refrigerator. Eng Sci Technol Int J (in press)

  2. Ağbulut Ü (2019) Turkey’s electricity generation problem and nuclear energy policy. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Effects 41(18):2281–2298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1587107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karaağaç İ, Önel T, Uluer O (2019) The effects of local heating on springback behaviour in v bending of galvanized DP600 sheet. Ironmak Steelmak 1–7 (in press)

  4. Şen N (2018) DP600 Malzemenin Şekillendirilmesinde Değişken Baskı Plakası Kuvvetinin Etkisinin Araştırılması. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi 6(4):1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.422143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Şen N, Karaağaç İ, Kurgan N (2016) Experimental research on warm deep drawing of HC420LA grade sheet material. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9–12):3359–3371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ağbulut Ü, Sarıdemir S, Durucan G (2018) The impacts of ethanol-gasoline blended fuels on the pollutant emissions and performance of a spark-ignition engine: an empirical study. Int J Anal Exp Finite Elem Anal (IJAEFEA) 5(4):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Özçelik Z, Gültekin N (2019) Effect of iridium spark plug gap on emission, noise, vibration of an internal combustion engine. Int J Energy Appl Technol 6(2):44–48

    Google Scholar 

  8. He BQ, Shuai SJ, Wang JX, He H (2003) The effect of ethanol blended diesel fuels on emissions from a diesel engine. Atmos Environ 37(35):4965–4971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajasekar E, Selvi S (2014) Review of combustion characteristics of CI engines fueled with biodiesel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 35:390–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarıdemir S, Albayrak S (2015) Kanola Yağı Metil Esteri ve Karışımlarının Motor Performans ve Egzoz Emisyonlarına Olan Etkileri. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi 4(1):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal AK, Gupta JG, Dhar A (2017) Potential and challenges for large-scale application of biodiesel in automotive sector. Prog Energy Combust Sci 61:113–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shahir VK, Jawahar CP, Suresh PR (2015) Comparative study of diesel and biodiesel on CI engine with emphasis to emissions—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45:686–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu H, Lee CF, Huo M, Yao M (2011) Comparison of ethanol and butanol as additives in soybean biodiesel using a constant volume combustion chamber. Energy Fuels 25(4):1837–1846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SH, Suh HK, Lee CS (2009) Effect of bioethanol–biodiesel blending ratio on fuel spray behavior and atomization characteristics. Energy Fuels 23(8):4092–4098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhale PV, Deshpande NV, Thombre SB (2009) Improving the low temperature properties of biodiesel fuel. Renew Energy 34(3):794–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Emiroğlu AO, Şen M (2018) Combustion, performance and emission characteristics of various alcohol blends in a single cylinder diesel engine. Fuel 212:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lapuerta M, Rodríguez-Fernández J, Fernández-Rodríguez D, Patiño-Camino R (2017) Modeling viscosity of butanol and ethanol blends with diesel and biodiesel fuels. Fuel 199:332–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gerdes KR, Suppes GJ (2001) Miscibility of ethanol in diesel fuels. Ind Eng Chem Res 40(3):949–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. McCormick RL, Parish R (2001) Technical barriers to the use of ethanol in diesel fuel. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hansen AC, Zhang Q, Lyne PW (2005) Ethanol–diesel fuel blends: a review. Bioresour Technol 96(3):277–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Can Ö, Celikten I, Usta N (2004) Effects of ethanol addition on performance and emissions of a turbocharged indirect injection diesel engine running at different injection pressures. Energy Convers Manag 45(15–16):2429–2440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar C, Athawe M, Aghav YV, Babu MG, Das LM (2007) Effects of ethanol addition on performance, emission and combustion of DI diesel engine running at different injection pressures (No. 2007-01-0626). SAE technical paper

  23. Lapuerta M, Armas O, Herreros JM (2008) Emissions from a diesel–bioethanol blend in an automotive diesel engine. Fuel 87(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghobadian B, Yusaf T, Najafi G, Khatamifar M (2009) Diesterol: an environment-friendly IC engine fuel. Renew Energy 34(1):335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kwanchareon P, Luengnaruemitchai A, Jai-In S (2007) Solubility of a diesel–biodiesel–ethanol blend, its fuel properties, and its emission characteristics from diesel engine. Fuel 86(7–8):1053–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi X, Pang X, Mu Y, He H, Shuai S, Wang J, Chen H, Li R (2006) Emission reduction potential of using ethanol–biodiesel–diesel fuel blend on a heavy-duty diesel engine. Atmos Environ 40(14):2567–2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernando S, Hanna M (2004) Development of a novel biofuel blend using ethanol–biodiesel–diesel microemulsions: EB-diesel. Energy Fuels 18(6):1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Çelik M, Solmaz H, Yücesu HS (2015) Pamuk Metil Esterine N-Heptan Katkısının Motor Performansı ve Yanma Karakteristiklerine Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 30(3):361–369

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nabi N, Rahman M, Akhter S (2009) Biodiesel from cotton seed oil and its effect on engine performance and exhaust emissions. Appl Therm Eng 29:2265–2270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gopal BV, Sridevi V, Sarma AJN, Rao PV (2015) Processing and characterization of cotton seed methyl ester. Austin Chem Eng 2(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rashid U, Anwar F, Knothe G (2009) Evaluation of biodiesel obtained from cottonseed oil. Fuel Process Technol 90(9):1157–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heseding M, Daskalopoulos P (2006) Exhaust emission legislation-diesel-and gas engines. VDMA, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pilusa TJ, Mollagee MM, Muzenda E (2012) Reduction of vehicle exhaust emissions from diesel engines using the whale concept filter. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12(5):994–1006. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.04.0100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ümit Ağbulut.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Mário Eduardo Santos Martins.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ağbulut, Ü., Sarıdemir, S. & Albayrak, S. Experimental investigation of combustion, performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fuelled with diesel–biodiesel–alcohol blends. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1891-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1891-8

Keywords