Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-5mwv9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-16T22:02:36.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using the literature to quantify the learning curve: A case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2007

Jonathan A. Cook ,
Craig R. Ramsay  and
Peter Fayers
Jonathan A. Cook
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Craig R. Ramsay
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Peter Fayers
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen and Norwegian University of Technology and Science
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether a literature review of a technology can allow a learning curve to be quantified.

Methods: The literature for fiberoptic intubation was searched for studies reporting information relevant to the learning curve. The Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Science Citation index were searched. Studies that reported a procedure time were included. Data were abstracted on the three features of learning: initial level, rate of learning, and asymptote level. Random effects meta-analysis was performed.

Results: Only twenty-one studies gave explicit information concerning the previous experience of the operator(s). There were thirty-two different definitions of procedure time. From four studies of fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation, the mean starting level and time for the 10th procedure was estimated to be 133 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 113–153) and 71 seconds (95 percent confidence interval, 62–79), respectively.

Conclusions: The review approach allowed learning to be quantified for our example technology. Poor and insufficient reporting constrained formal statistical estimation. Standardized reporting of nondrug techniques with adequate learning curve details is needed to inform trial design and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Keywords

Randomized controlled trialsLearningClinical competenceLiterature review
Type
GENERAL ESSAYS
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 255 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1.Cook, JA, Ramsay, CR, Fayers, P. Statistical evaluation of learning effects in surgical trials. Clin Trials. 2004; 1: 421–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Dashfield, AK, Smith, JE. Correlating fibreoptic nasotracheal endoscopy performance and psychomotor aptitude. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 81: 687–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.DerSimonian, R, Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Devereaux, PJ, Bhandari, M, Clarke, M et al. , Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005; 330: 88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Douek, M, Smith, G, Oshowo, A, Stoker, DL, Wellwood, JM. Prospective randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia mesh repair: Five year follow up. BMJ. 2003; 326: 1012–1013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Fridrich, P, Frass, M, Krenn, CG et al. , The UpsherScope in routine and difficult airway management: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85: 1377–1381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Gravenstein, D, Melker, RJ, Lampotang, S. Clinical assessment of a plastic optical fiber stylet for human tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1999; 91: 648–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Hartley, M, Morris, S, Vaughan, RS. Teaching fibreoptic intubation. Effect of alfentanil on the haemodynamic response. Anaesthesia. 1994; 49: 335–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Johnson, C, Roberts, JT. Clinical competence in the performance of fiberoptic laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation: A study of resident instruction. J Clin Anesth. 1989; 1: 344–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Marsland, CP, Robinson, BJ, Chitty, CH, Guy, BJ. Acquisition and maintenance of endoscopic skills: Dexterity training system for anesthesiologists. J Clin Anesth. 2002; 14: 615–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.McCulloch, P, Taylor, I, Sasako, M, Lovett, B, Griffin, D. Randomised trials in surgery: Problems and possible solutions. BMJ. 2002; 324: 1448–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Moher, D, Schulz, KF, Altman, D, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1987–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Morris, IR. Fibreoptic intubation. Can J Anaesth. 1994; 41: 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Osborn, NA, Jackson, AP, Smith, JE. The laryngeal mask airway as an aid to training in fibreoptic nasotracheal endoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53: 1080–1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Ramsay, CR, Grant, AM, Wallace, SA et al. , Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies. Health Technol Assess. 2001; 5 (12).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Schaefer, HG, Marsch, SC, Keller, HL et al. , Teaching fibreoptic intubation in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 1994; 49: 331–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Smith, JE, Jackson, AP, Hurdley, J, Clifton, PJ. Learning curves for fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation when using the endoscopic video camera. Anaesthesia. 1997; 52: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Smith, JE, Jackson, APF. Learning fibreoptic endoscopy. Nasotracheal or orotracheal intubations first? Anaesthesia. 2000; 55: 1072–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Smith, JE, Mackenzie, AA, Scott-Knight, VC. Comparison of two methods of fibrescope-guided tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 66: 546–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Vaughan, RS. Training in fibreoptic laryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 66: 538–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Cook_DEFINITIONS

Cook_DEFINITIONS

Download Cook_DEFINITIONS(PDF)
PDF 32.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Cook_INCLUDED_STUDIES

Cook_INCLUDED_STUDIES

Download Cook_INCLUDED_STUDIES(PDF)
PDF 34.6 KB