Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The testosterone patch for women

Abstract

Editor's Note: Has the FDA discriminated against female sexual dysfunction by not endorsing Procter & Gamble's (P&G) Intrinsa? Has the pendulum swung so far to the right that drugs for sexual medicine receive undue scrutiny? Why is testosterone replacement therapy available for men, but not for women? How should the pharmaceutical industry proceed with future studies? How should clinicians guide their patients? In this third and final perspective regarding Intrinsa, Sheryl Kingsberg, PhD, an expert on female sexual dysfunction and one of the lead investigators of the Intrinsa clinical trials, addresses these questions. This is a highly charged issue that appears to be on the agenda for the foreseeable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S A Kingsberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kingsberg, S. The testosterone patch for women. Int J Impot Res 17, 465–466 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901375

Search

Quick links