Models of Inpatient Neurologic Care

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The rapid ascension of the neurohospitalist model has been a response to national pressures implemented around local practicalities. As such, there is no uniform or ideal neurohospitalist model; there remains tremendous variation nationally. Over time, several dominant models have emerged, each of which raises distinct issues, both clinical and financial. As the field continues to grow, neurohospitalists in both hospital-owned and private practices are developing models that are reshaping the practice of inpatient neurology. A thoughtful approach to developing and maintaining programs is critical to success.

• References

• 1 Wachter RM, Goldman L. The emerging role of “hospitalists” in the American health care system. N Engl J Med 1996; 335 (7) 514-517
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Fuchs VR. Major trends in the U.S. health economy since 1950. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (11) 973-977
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 3 Josephson SA, Engstrom JW, Wachter RM. Neurohospitalists: an emerging model for inpatient neurological care. Ann Neurol 2008; 63 (2) 135-140
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 4 Likosky DJ. Is it time for neurohospitalists?. Neurology 2009; 72 (9) 859 , author reply 859–860
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 5 Likosky DJ, Josephson SA, Coleman M , et al. Survey of current neurohospitalist practice. Neurol Clin Pract 2012; 2 (4) 319-327
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 6 Merritt Hawkins. The 2014 Review of Physician and Advanced Practitioner Recruiting Incentives. Available at: http://www.merritthawkins.com/uploadedFiles/MerrittHawkings/Surveys/mha2014incensurvey.pdf . Accessed March 10, 2015
  PubMed
• 7 Douglas VC, Josephson SA. A proposed roadmap for inpatient neurology quality indicators. Neurohospitalist 2011; 1 (1) 8-15
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 8 Bernard CD. Physician liability for the actions of midlevel providers. Med Econ 2015; 25: 43
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 9 Schwamm LH, Holloway RG, Amarenco P , et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009; 40 (7) 2616-2634
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 10 Freeman WD, Barrett KM, Vatz KA, Demaerschalk BM. Future neurohospitalist: teleneurohospitalist. Neurohospitalist 2012; 2 (4) 132-143
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Rubin MN, Wellik KE, Channer DD, Demaerschalk BM. Systematic review of teleneurology: neurohospitalist neurology. Neurohospitalist 2013; 3 (3) 120-124
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). HHS Fed. Reg. 40318, 40358. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/PQRS/Downloads/2015_Medicare_Physician_Fee_Schedule_Proposed_Rule_CMS-1612-P.pdf . Accessed March 1, 2015
  PubMed
• 13 Josephson SA, Douglas VC, Lawton MT , et al. Improvement in intensive care unit outcomes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage after initiation of neurointensivist co-management. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (3) 626-630
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 14 Nelson JR, Whitcomb WF. Organizing a hospitalist program: an overview of fundamental concepts. Med Clin North Am 2002; 86 (4) 887-909
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 15 Ma E. The scourge of seven on/seven off. How the popular staffing model has adversely impacted hospital medicine. ACP Hospitalist Blog; 2011. . Available at: http://www.acphospitalist.org/archives/2011/05/perspectives.htm
  Search in Google Scholar