Utilization of Ultrashort Bicon Implants in Clinical Situations: A Retrospective Case Series

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

When vertical bone loss results in insufficient crestal height to place standard-length implants without the use of osseous grafting, this poses clinical issues to implant usage. Based on an analysis of the literature and clinical experience, it has been found that it is possible to optimally use the available bone volume of the maxillary and mandibular ridges for implant placement without extensive osseous grafting to increase vertical height. This case report will examine several uses of ultrashort implants utilizing the Bicon system in common clinical situations in the maxillary and mandibular arches without the need for osseous reconstruction to improve the available vertical height of the crest to permit implant placement.

Publication History

Article published online:
21 November 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

• References

• 1 Helmi MF, Huang H, Goodson JM, Hasturk H, Tavares M, Natto ZS. Prevalence of periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in a patient population at Harvard School of Dental Medicine. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19 (01) 254
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Cavalcanti MC, Guirado TE, Sapata VM. et al. Maxillary sinus floor pneumatization and alveolar ridge resorption after tooth loss: a cross-sectional study. Braz Oral Res 2018; 32: e64
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 3 Felice P, Checchi V, Pistilli R, Scarano A, Pellegrino G, Esposito M. Bone augmentation versus 5-mm dental implants in posterior atrophic jaws. Four-month post-loading results from a randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2009; 2 (04) 267-281
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 4 Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. BMC Oral Health 2015; 15: 65
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 5 Ajayi YO, Nwachukwu N, Akinboboye BO. TREATMENT OUTCOME OF SHORT DENTAL IMPLANTS. J West Afr Coll Surg 2017; 7 (04) 52-71
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 6 Zhang J, Jiang HH, Shang J, Xu S, Liu ZH. [Clinical evaluation of short implants in atrophic posterior region]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2018; 27 (04) 401-406
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 7 Dibart S, Warbington M, Su MF, Skobe Z. In vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20 (05) 732-737
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 8 Mao Z, Beuer F, Wu D. et al. Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Int J Implant Dent 2023; 9 (01) 34
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 9 Bittencourt ABBC, Neto CLMM, Penitente PA, Pellizzer EP, Dos Santos DM, Goiato MC. Comparison of the Morse cone connection with the internal hexagon and external hexagon connections based on microleakage - review. Prague Med Rep 2021; 122 (03) 181-190
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 10 Markose J, Eshwar S, Srinivas S, Jain V. Clinical outcomes of ultrashort sloping shoulder implant design: a survival analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018; 20 (04) 646-652
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Gil LF, Suzuki M, Janal MN. et al. Progressive plateau root form dental implant osseointegration: a human retrieval study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015; 103 (06) 1328-1332
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 Leonard G, Coelho P, Polyzois I, Stassen L, Claffey N. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20 (03) 232-239
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 13 Marincola M, Perpetuini AP, Carelli S, Lombardo G, Morgan W. Time proven clinical success of the SHORT™ implant. Implants 2013; 1: 38-40
  Search in Google Scholar
• 14 https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FishersExactTest.html
• 15 https://sphweb.bumc.bu.edu/otlt/mph-modules/bs/bs704_nonparametric/bs704_nonparametric4.html
• 16 Davydova OB, Kostin IO. [Experience of using short Bicon implants for treatment of partial and complete teeth loss]. Stomatologia (Mosk) 2012; 91 (06) 59-62
  Search in Google Scholar
• 17 Huang JQ, Hu CQ, Xia X, Guo SG, Gong JM, Wei HW. [Retrospective study on transcrestal sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implantation of short implants]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020; 38 (06) 667-671
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 18 Urdaneta RA, Daher S, Leary J, Emanuel KM, Chuang SK. The survival of ultrashort locking-taper implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27 (03) 644-654
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 19 Maciejewska K. Analiza kliniczna zalet implantów BICON® w wybranych przypadkach. Implants 2012; 4: 32-36
  Search in Google Scholar
• 20 Maciejewska K. Krótki implant Bicon w atroficznym odcinku wyrostka zębodołowego szczęki – opis przypadku. Implants 2013; 2: 28-30
  Search in Google Scholar
• 21 Lombardo G, Pighi J, Marincola M, Corrocher G, Simancas-Pallares M, Nocini PF. Cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort implants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year retrospective study. Int J Dent 2017; 2017: 8434281
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 22 Marincola M. Ubytki w kościach szczęk i ich konsekwencje w implantologii stomatologicznej. Implants 2016; 1: 12-16
  Search in Google Scholar
• 23 Lombardo G, Marincola M, Signoriello A, Corrocher G, Nocini PF. Single-crown, short and ultra-short implants, in association with simultaneous internal sinus lift in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a three-year retrospective study. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13 (09) 2208
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 24 Al-Hashedi AA, Taiyeb-Ali TB, Yunus N. Outcomes of placing short implants in the posteriori mandible: a preeliminary randomized controlled trial. Aust Dent J 2016; 61 (02) 208-218
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 25 Lombardo G, Signoriello A, Marincola M, Liboni P, Bonfante EA, Nocini PF. Survival rates of ultra-short (<6 mm) compared with short locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas: a 5-year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021; 23 (06) 904-919
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 26 Ewers R. The incisal foramen as a means of insertion for one of three ultra-short implants to support a prosthesis for a severely atrophic maxilla - a short-term report. Heliyon 2018; 4 (12) e01034
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 27 May MC, Andrews PN, Daher S, Reebye UN. Prospective cohort study of dental implant success rate in patients with AIDS. Int J Implant Dent 2016; 2 (01) 20
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar