Skip to main content

Cost–Benefit Analysis

The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics
  • 49 Accesses

Abstract

Cost–benefit analysis is a widely used technique of applied welfare economics, which is used to throw light on the social desirability of undertaking an economic project. A project can be defined as an act of investment, introduction of a new commodity or a change in policy. Its analytical foundations go back to Dupuit (1844) who in his classic paper on ‘consumers’ surplus’ can be said to have laid the foundations which in modified forms still inform a great deal of contemporary work. In an operational sense, there may be some justification for dating it back to the US Flood Control Act of 1936, as mentioned by Eckstein (1959). In postwar years, considerable impetus was imparted by the growth of a considerable literature on development programming where choice of investment projects figured very prominently. Tinbergen (1958, 1967) was amongst the first set of influential economists who strongly recommended the use of ‘accounting prices’, subsequently often referred to as ‘shadow prices’ for the appraisal of social worthwhileness of investment projects. Influential contributions were made in the 1960s by Little and Mirrlees (1968, 1974) which can be directly related to the work done by Tinbergen (1967). Marglin (1963) and Sen (1968) have provided major inputs into the discussion at different stages and were responsible along with P. Dasgupta in propounding a system of guidelines for project appraisal. The Little–Mirrlees work which was sponsored by the OECD has often been compared with the work done by Dasgupta, Marglin and Sen under the auspices of the United Nations through its specialized office at Vienna (UNIDO).

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, 1st edition, 1987. Edited by John Eatwell, Murray Milgate and Peter Newman

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K.J. 1951. An extension of the basic theorems of classical welfare economics. In Proceedings of the second Berkeley symposium. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., and L. Hurwicz. 1960. Decentralization and computation in resource allocation. In Essays in honor of Harold hotelling, ed. R.W. Pfouts. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, E. 1908. The ministry of production in the collectivist state. Trans. In Collectivist economic planning, ed. F.A. Hayek. London: G. Routledge & Sons, 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J., and R.E. Gomory. 1960. Integer programming and pricing. Econometrica 28(July): 521–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. 1972. A comparative analysis of the UNIDO guidelines and the OECD Manual. Bulletin of the Oxford University Institute of Economics and Statistics 34(1): 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuit, J. 1844. On the measurement of the utility of public works. Trans. In International economic papers, vol. 2. London: Macmillan, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. 1958. Water resource development: The economics of project evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. 1959. A survey of the theory of public expenditure criteria. In Conference on public finances: Needs, sources and utilization. New York: NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, O. 1964. Public finance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. 1976. In Economic planning studies, ed. F.V. Long. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. 1971. Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretative essay. Journal of Economic Literature 9(3): 785–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A.C. 1972. Project evaluation. In Collected papers, ed. A.C. Harberger. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1941. The rehabilitation of consumers’ surplus. Review of Economic Studies 8(February): 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. 1938. The general welfare in relation to problems of taxation and of railway and utility rates. Econometrica 6(July): 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornai, J. 1979. Appraisal of project appraisal. In Economics and human welfare, ed. Michael J. Boskin. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (ed.). 1976. Cost-benefit analysis, selected readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I.M.D., and J.A. Mirrlees. 1968. Manual of industrial project analysis in developing countries. Vol.II, social cost benefit analysis. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I.M.D., and J.A. Mirrlees. 1974. Project appraisal and planning for developing countries. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S.A. 1963a. The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 77(February): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S.A. 1963b. The opportunity cost of public investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 77(May): 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S.A. 1967. Public investment criteria. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S.A. 1976. Value and price in a labour surplus economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R.A. 1969. Cost-benefit analysis and the theory of public finance. Journal of Economic Literature 7(3): 797–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. 1932. The economics of welfare, 4th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prest, A.R., and R. Turvey. 1965. Cost-benefit analysis: A survey. Economic Journal 75(December): 683–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. 1928. A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal 38(December): 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. 1947. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1961. On optimising the rate of saving. Economic Journal 71(September): 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1968. Choice of techniques, 3rd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 1972. Control areas and accounting prices: An approach to economic evaluation. Economic Journal 82(Supplement): 486–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1958. The design of development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, J. 1967. Development planning. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organisation), P. Dasgupta, S.A. Marglin, and A.K. Sen. 1972. Guidelines for project evaluation. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, R.D. 1976. Consumers’ surplus without apology. American Economic Review 66(4): 589–597.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1987 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Chakravarty, S. (1987). Cost–Benefit Analysis. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_381-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_381-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Living Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Cost–Benefit Analysis
    Published:
    22 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_381-2

  2. Original

    Cost–Benefit Analysis
    Published:
    09 November 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_381-1