Skip to main content

Language for Institutional Change

Notes from US Higher Education

  • Chapter
Framing Sexual and Domestic Violence through Language
  • 431 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines language and action for structural changes aimed at ending sexual assault and intimate partner violence on college campuses. The primary focus is on language used by campus authorities in reference to institutional operating procedures involved in staff development. This discussion draws on relevant policy and research but also on practical experience of working with, and learning from, staff members at universities across the United States who were active in violence prevention on campus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, Elizabeth J. (2003). “Constructing Women’s Status: Policy Discourses of University Women’s Commissions.” Harvard Educational Review 73 (1): 44–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. A., and S. C. Whiston. (2005). “Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 29: 374–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., L. Hamilton, and B. Sweeney. (2006). “Sexual Assault on Campus: A Multilevel, Integrative Approach to Party Rape.” Social Problems 53 (4): 483–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banyard, V. L. (2008). “Sexual Violence: Current Perspectives on Prevention and Intervention.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community 36 (1–2): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., L. E. Daigle, F. T. Cullen, and M. G. Turner. (2003). “Reporting Sexual Victimization to the Police and Others: Results from a National-Level Study of College Women.” Criminal Justice and Behavior 30: 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, J., and W. Parkin. (2001). Gender, Sexuality and Violence in Organizations: The Unspoken Forces of Organization Violations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, S. V. (2008). “Now Is the Time for Change: Reframing Diversity Planning at Land-Grant Universities.” Journal of Extension [Online] 46 (1): Article IFEA3, http://www.joe.org/joe/2008/february/a3.shtml.

  • Karjane, H. M., B. S. Fisher, and F. T. Cullen. (2005). Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges and Universities Are Doing about It. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. (2012). Responding to Sexual and Domestic Violence against Women: The Role of Informal Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., C. A. Gidycz, and N. Wisniewski. (1987). “The Scope of Rape: Incidence and Prevalence of Sexual Aggression and Victimization in a National Sample of Higher Education Students.” Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology 55 (2): 162–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, M. D. (2010). “The interACT Model: Considering Rape Prevention from a Performance Activism and Social Justice Perspective.” Feminism & Psychology 20 (4): 511–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper Starch Worldwide for Liz Claiborne. (1994). Addressing Domestic Violence: A Corporate Response. New York: Roper Starch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn, C. Y. (2011). “An Imperfect Feminist Journey: Reflections on the Process to Develop an Effective Sexual Assault Resistance Programme for University Women.” Feminism &Psychology 21 (1): 121–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. J., B. S. Fisher, and F. T. Cullen. (1997). “Assessing the Student-Right-to-Know and Campus Security Act of 1990: An Analysis of the Victim Reporting Practices of College and University Students.” Crime & Delinquency 43: 48–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy E. (2006). Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J. A., H. L. Scherer, and B. S. Fisher. (2012). “Social Organization and Social Ties: Their Effects on Sexual Harassment Victimization in the Workplace.” Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation 42 (1): 137–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, J. E., T. K. Logan, and C. Macke. (2006). “The Consequences of Partner Violence on Employment and the Workplace.” In E. K. Kelloway, J. Barling, and J. J. Hurrell (eds.), Handbook of Workplace Violence, 351–79. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. E. (2010). Talking about Sexual Assault: Society’s Response to Survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, Chris. (1997). Feminist Practice and Postructuralist Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zirin, Dave. (2012). “Why the NCAA’s Sanctions on Penn State Are Just Dead Wrong.” Edge of Sports. Accessed August 14, 2012, http://www.edgeofsports.com/2012–07-23–761/index.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Renate Klein

Copyright information

© 2013 Renate Klein

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klein, R. (2013). Language for Institutional Change. In: Klein, R. (eds) Framing Sexual and Domestic Violence through Language. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340092_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics