Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Do Clades Cladogenerate?

  • Letter
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cantino PD, de Queiroz K (2007) International Code of Phylogenetic Nomenclature, Version 4b. http://www.ohiou.edu/phylocode/

  • Davis JI, Nixon KC (1992) Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology 41: 421–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz K (1999) The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Species. New Interdisciplinary Essays (Wilson RA, ed), 49–89. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris SJ (1974) Formal definitions of paraphyly and polyphyly. Systematic Zoology 23: 548–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich PD (1979) Stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate paleontology. In: Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology (Cracraft J, Eldredge N, eds), 41–77. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R (2000) Phylogenetic species, nested hierarchies, and character fixation. Cladistics 16: 364–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Raup DM, Sepkoski JJ, Schopf TJM, Simberloff DS (1977) The shape of evolution: A comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology 3: 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg JR (1954) The Language of Taxonomy. An Application of Symbolic Logic to the Study of Classificatory Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesemer J (2000) Development, culture, and the units of inheritance. Philosophy of Science 67: S348–S368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber MH, Hamilton A (2005) Coherence, consistency, and cohesion: Clade selection in Okasha and beyond. Philosophy of Science 72: 1026–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton A, Haber MH (2006) Are clades reproducers? Biological Theory 1: 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik. Berlin: Deutscher Zentralverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1953) Kritische Bemerkungen zum Phylogenetischen System der Insekten. Beitrage zur Entomologie 3 (Beilageband): 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1957) Systematik und phylogenese. In: Bericht über die Hundertjahrfeier der Deutschen Entomologischen Gesellschaft Belin (Hannemann H-J, ed), 50–71. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1965) Phylogenetic systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig W (1966) Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckow M (1995) Species concepts: Assumptions, methods, and application. Systematic Botany 20: 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahner M, Bunge M (1997) Foundations of Biophilosophy. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1974) Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 12: 94–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler BD, Theriot EC (2000) The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot): Monophyly, apopmorphy, and the phylogenetic species concepts. In: Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate (Wheeler QD, Meier R, eds), 44–54. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2003) Does the concept of “clade selection” make sense? Philosophy of Science 70: 739–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson C (1981) The significance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 195–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rensch B (1947) Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre: Die Transspezifische Evolution. Stuttgart, Germany: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieppel O (2007) The metaphysics of Hennig’s phylogenetic systematics: Substance, events, and laws of nature. Systematics and Biodiversity 5: 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlee D (1971) Die Rekonstruktion der Phylogenese mit Hennig’s Prinzip. Aufsätze und Reden der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Waldemar Kramer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M (2001) Willi Hennig (1913–1976). In: Darwin & Co.: Eine Geschichte der Biologie in Porträts, Vol. 2 (Jahn I, Schmitt M, eds), 316–343. München, Germany: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober E (1992) Monophyly. In: Keywords in Evolutionary Biology (Keller EF, Lloyd EA, eds), 202–207. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny, K. 1996. Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 11: 193–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrey TW (1939) Organisms in time. Quarterly Review of Biology 14: 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley EO (1981) Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams DM, Scotland RW, Humphries CJ, Siebert DJ (1996) Confusion in philosophy: A comment on Williams (1992). Synthese 108: 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmann R (1983) Biospezies und Phylogenetische Systematik. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung 21: 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmann R (1985) Die Art in Raum und Zeit. Das Artkonzept in der Biologie und Paläontologie. Hamburg, Germany: Paul Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger JH (1952) From biology to mathematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology, The Field Museum, Chicago, IL, USA

    Olivier Rieppel

Authors
  1. Olivier Rieppel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Rieppel.

Additional information

This title is borrowed from Hamilton and Haber (2006: 382).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rieppel, O. Do Clades Cladogenerate?. Biol Theory 3, 375–379 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.4.375

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2008.3.4.375

Keywords