Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Evaluation of anion exchange resin for sorption of selenium (IV) from aqueous solutions

Abstract

In this work, selenium (IV) ions were adsorbed from aqueous solutions by the strongly basic anion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400. The morphology of the resin before and after Se(IV) sorption was investigated using different techniques such as energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). To determine the ideal sorption conditions, a batch approach was used to examine the variables affecting Se(IV) sorption performance, including pH, shaking time, adsorbent dosage, initial metal ion concentration, and temperature. The results showed the optimal parameters for the highest percentage of selenium (80.25%) at an initial concentration of 100.0 mg L−1, pH 3.0, the adsorbent dosage of 10.0 mg, and the shaking time of 60.0 min. According to the experimental findings, the sorption process was satisfactorily explained by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The maximum adsorption capacity at pH 3.0 was 18.52 mg g−1, and the adsorption rather well followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. Moreover, exothermic and spontaneous sorption reaction was the result of thermodynamic properties (negativity of both ΔG° and ΔH°). The adsorption phase's random distribution of the resin-solution interface is indicated by the positive value of ΔSo. Finally, the desorption study was performed using different concentrations of desorbing agents; HNO3, HCl, and sodium acetate. The results illustrated that the effective desorbing agent was 1.0 mol L-1 HNO3, with desorption efficiency reaching about 96.4%. Finally, the Amberlite IRA-400 demonstrated excellent adsorption–desorption behavior over five times, suggesting that the Amberlite IRA-400 could be an effective candidate for the sorption of Se(IV) from several metal ions that occur in fission products.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The management of radioactive waste is a significant concern for nuclear energy and different industries that employ radioactive materials. The removal of long-lived radionuclides is a major challenge to the safe and efficient disposal of radioactive waste [1,2,3,4,5]. One such radionuclide is selenium, which is found in fission products and radioactive waste due to its presence in nuclear fuel cycle processes and the decay of other radioactive isotopes. Selenium is a naturally occurring element with several isotopes, but the most common radioactive isotope is selenium-79. This isotope has a half-life of approximately 3.27 × 105 years, making it a persistent and potentially hazardous component of radioactive waste [6, 7]. If not properly managed, selenium-79 can pose long-term risks to human health and the environment. Selenium is significantly applied in numerous products, including semiconductors, pesticides, and photosensitive materials, and thus can be emitted into the environment through sources such as agricultural runoff and industrial effluent [8, 9]. Additionally, it is also utilized in the production of ceramics, catalysts, and the medical field due to it being an important element for living organisms [10]. Selenium (IV) has been removed from aqueous solutions using a variety of techniques, such as solvent extraction [11], co-precipitation [12], membrane separation [13], adsorption [14, 15], and multiple evaporation processes [16]. One of the most promising approaches for removing selenium is the adsorption process, which is considered to be inexpensive, easy to operate, and efficient for the removal of Se(IV) from aqueous solutions. Numerous types of adsorbents, such as hematite-modified magnetic nanoparticles [17], phlogopite and calcite surfaces [18], zirconium and iron oxides [19], aluminum oxide-coated sand [20], chitosan-clay composite [21], iron-coated GAC [22], nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite [23], iron oxide impregnated CNTs [24], Mg-FeCO3 loaded cellulose fiber [25], Al/Si and Fe/Si Coprecipitates [26], poly(1,8-diaminonaphthalene) [27], and iron oxide/hydroxide-based nanoparticles sol (NanoFe) [28] have been applied for the removal of Se(IV) from aquatic solutions. Amberlite IRA-400 is known for its strong ion exchange capacity, making it ideal for many applications such as the removal of selenium and other metal ions. The Amberlite IRA-400 resin already contains highly effective functional groups, like quaternary ammonium groups, which provide excellent ion exchange capacity for removing elements like selenium from aqueous solutions. These functional groups allow the resin to perform efficiently without the need for any modifications. Therefore, there is no necessity to modify the resin, as it is already designed to effectively achieve the treatment process. The objective of this research was to assess the efficiency of an anion exchange resin (Amberlite IRA-400) in the sorption of Se(IV) from aqueous solutions. Amberlite IRA-400 resin was analyzed using FT-IR, SEM, and EDX. Through the study of the isothermal, kinetic, thermodynamic, and regeneration characteristics of sorption, the mechanism of sorption was further clarified.

Materials and methods

Materials

Analytical-grade chemicals and double-distilled water were utilized to prepare all chemical solutions. BDH Chemical Company supplied Amberlite IRA-400 anion exchange resin. The key features of Amberlite IRA-400 are displayed in Table 1. Sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, and selenium dioxide (SeO2) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Table 1 Specifications of the ion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400

Characterization of the Amberlite IRA-400 resin

Before and after sorption, the characteristics of anion exchange resin (Amberlite IRA-400) were examined using FT-IR, SEM, and EDX. Japan's JSM-6510 LA SEM model was used to identify the morphological properties of anion exchange resin. The resin spectra were examined with a Nicolet IS10 Fourier transformer infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer from Meslo, USA. A quantitative elemental analysis was performed on the Amberlite IRA-400 both before and after Se(IV) adsorption using an Oxford energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer (Oxford Link ISIS, Japan). The concentrations of selenium ions were determined using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer of the Model S4 Series manufactured by Thermo-electron Corporation.

Batch experimental procedures

Using the batch equilibrium technique, the use of Amberlite IRA-400 for the sorption of Se(IV) from aquatic solutions was investigated. The following variables were optimized: pH, temperature, adsorbent dose, starting concentration, and shaking duration. For the adsorption evaluations, 0.10 g of resin and 5.0 ml (100 mg L−1) of Se(IV) were shaken in a shaker bath (G.F.L. 1083, Germany) at 25 °C, and the rpm was set to 250 for ion exchange or sorption studies in all batch experiments. Using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer, the initial selenium concentrations before (Co) and after (Ce) sorption were calculated. The sorption percent (S%) of Se(IV) and the sorption capacity (qo) of Amberlite IRA-400 were calculated using the relations

$$S\% = \left( {\frac{{{\text{C}}_{{\text{o}}} - {\text{C}}_{{\text{e}}} }}{{{\text{C}}_{{\text{o}}} }}} \right) \times 100$$
(1)
$${\text{q}}_{{\text{o}}} = ({\text{C}}_{{\text{o}}} - {\text{C}}_{{\text{e}}} )\left( {\frac{{\text{V}}}{{\text{m}}}} \right) \left[ {{\text{mg}} {\text{g}}^{ - 1} } \right]$$
(2)

The initial and equilibrium concentrations (mg L−1) of Se(IV) in the solution are represented by Co and Ce, respectively. V is the solution volume (L), and m is the Amberlite IRA-400 resin weight (g).

Mathematical models

Table 2 summarizes the kinetic and isotherm models that were applied. To investigate the sorption kinetics, both pseudo-first and pseudo-second-order equations were illustrated. To set the experimental data, Freundlich, Langmuir, Dubinin-Radushkevich, and thermodynamic models were utilized.

Table 2 Models and equilibrium isotherms for the sorption of selenium ions onto Amberlite IRA-400 resin [29,30,31]

Results and discussion

Characterization of the resin

An energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy were used to evaluate the resin chemical and physical characteristics.

Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy

FT-IR analysis was performed to display the structure of Amberlite (IRA-400) resin both before and after the sorption of Se(IV). The resulting spectrums have been recorded and presented in Fig. 1a, b. Styrene–divinylbenzene polymeric matrixs spectra exhibit a prominent peak at 3426 cm−1, which may be ascribed to –OH, as illustrated in Fig. 1a. The asymmetric C−H stretching vibrations of CH2 and CH3 in CH3−N are responsible for the band at 2923 cm−1 [32]. Furthermore, many peaks are seen at 1637, 1513, 1380, 1262, 1030, and 520 cm−1. These could be related to the –C–C– functional groups, as well as the C=O, and C−N stretching vibrations of benzene rings [33]. The peaks at 1030 and 890 cm−1, respectively, are caused by the C–O and C–H bonds. Upon comparing the spectra, the FT-IR spectrum of Amberlite (IRA-400) following Se(IV) sorption is displayed in Fig. 1b, exhibiting several discernible alterations. These modifications (at 1625, 1262, and 1024 cm−1) could therefore be the result of Se(IV) binding to adsorbent.

Fig. 1
figure 1

FTIR of a Amberlite IRA-400 resin and b Amberlite IRA-400 resin after sorption of Se(IV) ions

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

The surface morphology of Amberlite (IRA-400) before and after sorption of Se(IV) is investigated by SEM at 50X magnification, as illustrated in Fig. 2a, b. It can be seen that Amberlite (IRA-400) has smooth, spherically shaped particles. While the surface structure after the adsorption of Se(IV) showed some minor cracks in the particle surface and not changes in the shape of the particles, that illustrate approximately the stability of the resin.

Fig. 2
figure 2

SEM images of a Amberlite IRA-400 resin and b Amberlite IRA-400 resin after sorption of Se(IV) ions

Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope (EDX)

Figure 3a, b displays the Amberlite (IRA-400) EDX spectrum both before and after the sorption of Se(IV). Based on the EDX examination, the main components of Amberlite (IRA-400) (Fig. 3a) include C (78.35%), N (7.39%), O (3.19%), and Cl (11.07%). Additionally, components C (74.29%), N (5.37%), O (3.79%), Cl (15.26%), and Se (1.29%) were detected in the Amberlite (IRA-400) EDX spectrum following Se(IV) adsorption (Fig. 3b).The presence of Se elements in the loaded resin was verified by the EDX characterization.

Fig. 3
figure 3

EDX of a Amberlite IRA-400 resin and b Amberlite IRA-400 resin after sorption of Se(IV) ions

Batch sorption studies

Effect of pH

The pH of the adsorption medium plays a significant role in affecting the ionization characteristics of the active sites on the adsorbent [31]. The effect of solution pH on the sorption percentage of Se(IV) from aqueous solution in the range of 1.0 to 8.0 was investigated, and the obtained results were presented in Fig. 4a. It was noticed that the sorption effectiveness increased from 14.92 to 80.25% as the pH increased from 1.0 to 3.0. After that, as the pH increased, the sorption percentage decreased. Using the Hydra/Medusa chemical equilibrium software, the speciation diagrams for Se(IV) are shown in Fig. 4b. From this figure, it is clear that at low pH, the predominate species of Se(IV) is selenious acid (H2SeO3). This explained the low values for the sorption percent at pH ≤ 2. Moreover, as the pH increased up to 3.5, the predominant species biselenite (HSeO3) appeared. Based on the obtained results, at low pH values, the anionic resin used in the experiment contains positive charges (a higher number of H+ ions), so an electrostatic reaction occurs between the HSeO3- species and the positive charge of the resin surface. Thus, pH 3.0 was chosen for the sorption process of selenium ions in the following investigations. Furthermore, the sorption is related to the chemical composition of the resin that contains amino functionalities in its—R3N+Cl structure, which leads to an increase the sorption process at pH 3.0. This process can occur via an ion exchange reaction, as indicated in Fig. 4c [34, 35]. It was confirmed by a zero-point charge. The zero-point charge (pHzpc) of the resin was measured at pH 3 (Fig. 4d). The sorbent surface holds positive charges at pH less than pHzpc, which increases the electrostatic attraction force with biselenite (HSeO3). The proposed mechanism is clarified in Fig. 4c.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a pH impact on the sorption efficiency of Se(IV) from aqueous solutions, (t = 60.0 min, [Se (IV)] = 100.0 mg L−1, dose = 0.1 g, V = 5.0 mL, T = 25 ºC). b Speciation digram of Se(IV) at different pH. c Suggested mechanism of the electrostatic and ion-exchange reactions that occur on the surface of the Amberlite IRA-400 resin and d Zero point charge (pHZPC) of the resin

Effect of shaking time

One of the most crucial factors to consider when developing a batch sorption experiment is the rate of sorption. It affects removal efficiency, contributes to contact time optimization, supports kinetics modeling, and contributes to establishing suitable experimental conditions. The impact of shaking time on selenium sorption was examined in each experiment under the following conditions: pH 3.0, initial concentration of 100.0 mg L−1, and adsorbent mass of 0.10 g. Figure 5a depicts the evaluation of Se(VI) sorption on the Amberlite IRA-400 resin as a shaking time in the range of 1.0–60.0 min. We observe that the sorption percentage of Se(IV) increases from 69.62 to 82.10% when the shaking time increases from 1.0 to 10.0 min. After that, the sorption percentage remained constant for 60.0 min. Two main linear kinetic models, the pseudo-first-order model and the pseudo-second-order model, have been used to explain the selenium adsorption process onto Amberlite IRA-400 resin (see Fig. 5b,c). Table 3 summarizes the correlation coefficient (R2) and several parameters of these kinetic models. It is noted that the pseudo-second-order is close to the unit (R2 = 0.999). Furthermore, the experimental result, qe EXP = 4.11 mg g−1, and the calculated qeCAL = 4.12 mg g−1 values match quite well. These results demonstrated that the Se(VI) adsorption on Amberlite IRA-400 is adequately explained by the pseudo-second-order model.

Fig. 5.
figure 5

a shaking time impact on the sorption percentage: b pseudo-first-order and c pseudo-second-order kinetic model for Se(IV) with concentration of 100 mg L−1, dosage of 0.10 g, volume of 5 mL, pH 3.0, and 25 °C from aqueous solutions.

Table 3 Kinetic model parameters for the sorption of Se(IV) ([Se(IV)] = 100 mg L−1, pH = 3.0, V = 5.0 mL, adsorbent dosage = 0.10 g, T = 25 °C) from aqueous solutions

Effect of initial selenium ion concentration

Figure 6a illustrates the impact of initial metal ion concentrations on the sorption percentage of selenium. We observed that the sorption efficiency of Se(IV) decreased from 81.27 to 67.0% as the initial concentration of Se(IV) was increased from 100.0 to 200.0 mg L-1. These results can be attributed to the fact that, at low initial concentrations of Se(IV), the quantity of Se(IV) species in the solution is relatively small compared to the total number of available binding sites on the surface of the adsorbent. In this case, there are sufficient binding sites available to accommodate the Se(IV) species, which leads to high sorption efficiency. As more Se(IV) is added into the system at higher initial concentrations, the number of Se(IV) species in the solution increases, while the number of binding sites remains constant. As a result, the sorption efficiency will directly decrease [36, 37].

Fig. 6
figure 6

a Effect of initial Se(IV)ion concentration b Plots of linear Langmuir isotherms; c Plots of linear Freundlich isotherm d Linear Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm on the sorption percent of Se(IV) from aqueous media. (t = 10.0 min, pH = 3.0, Dose = 0.10 g, V = 5 ml, T = 25 ºC)

Sorption isotherm and modeling

To estimate the adsorption mechanism for the interaction of Se(IV) ions on the Amberlite IRA-400 surface, adsorption isotherms at equilibrium are crucial. Various linear isotherm models were utilized to evaluate the results of the experiment. Table 4 represents the values calculated from the slopes and intercepts for Se(IV) sorption obtained from Fig. 6b–d. It was shown that the Langmuir model has the highest correlation coefficient (0.999). This showed that the selenium species prefer to adsorb as monolayer adsorption onto Amberlite IRA-400 active sites.

Table 4 Linearized sorption isotherm parameters for Se(IV) sorption onto the Amberlite IRA-400 resin

Effect of adsorbent dose

Figure 7 illustrates the impact of Amberlite IRA-400 resin on selenium sorption efficiency in the range of 0.10–0.20 g. According to the results of the experiment, the sorption performance of Se(IV) increased from 81.44 to 86.62% when the adsorbent dosage was increased from 0.10 to 0.20 g. The observed increase in sorption can be attributed to the higher adsorbent dosage, which leads to an increased availability of active sites for the sorption of selenium species. For additional sorption investigations, 0.1 g of Amberlite IRA-400 was determined to be the optimum dosage.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of adsorbent dos on the sorption percentage of Se(IV) from aqueous solutions ([Se(IV)] = 100 mg L−1, V = 5 ml, pH = 3.0, t = 10.0 min, T = 25 °C)

Effect of solution temperature

Figure 8a illustrates the impact of temperatures ranging from 25 to 65 °C on the sorption percentage of selenium from aqueous solutions. It is demonstrated that as the temperature increases, the adsorption percentage decreases gradually. Using the slope and intercept of the linear plot of Ln Kd against T−1 shown in Fig. 8b, the thermodynamic parameter (ΔGo) and the values of ΔHo and ΔSo were calculated. Table 5 includes the values of these parameters. From this table, it is noted that the sorption of selenium on Amberlite IRA-400 resin is spontaneous and available, as demonstrated by the negative values of ΔGo. The sorption process is exothermic nature, as indicated by the negative value of ∆H°. Moreover, the positive values of ΔS° suggested that the randomness of the system was increased.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of a temperature on the sorption efficiency b the thermodynamic parameters of Se(IV) ([Se(IV)] = 100 mg L−1, Dose = 0.10 g, pH = 3.0, t = 10.0 min, V = 5 ml, T = 25 ºC) from aqueous solutions

Table 5 Parameters of thermodynamics for the sorption of selenium ions

Desorption and reusability studies

Selenium desorption from loaded Amberlite IRA-400 resin was also performed with several desorbing agents of different concentrations. The desorbing agents used included sodium acetate, nitric acid, and hydrochloric acid. According to Table 6 data and findings, 1.0 mol L−1 of nitric acid was used to produce a maximum Se(IV) desorbing of 96.40%. However, there is a slight difference in the results of using HCl and HNO3 as desorbing agents for the desorption of Se-ions from the resin. 0.5 mol L−1 HCl was used in the recycling process because the resin is present in the chloride form.

Table 6 Desorption of Se(IV) from loaded Amberlite IRA-400 resin using several desorbing agents of different concentration ranges*

Furthermore, the recycling process has numerous benefits for our environment. Recycling the materials we use decreases environmental pollution, helps preserve our health and the environment around us, and reduces the amount of waste that is buried in landfills.

In this study, five recycling processes were implemented for Se ions from the resin under the optimum conditions used in this study for adsorption–desorption on the resin as indicated in Fig. 9. From this figure, the loaded resin was nearly completely desorbed by 0.5 mol L−1 HCl after two cycles for each sorption stage. Where the first sorption reached 80.5% with two stages of desorption attained 99.9%. Then the second, third, fourth, and fifth sorption were 74.23, 72.88, 72.23, and 70.88% with their 2 cycles of desorption of 98.78, 98.90, 98.23, and 97.02%, respectively. These results also indicated the stability of the Amberlite IRA-400 resin after being used several times in the recycling process of Se(IV), where there is about a 10% difference between the first and fifth sorption processes.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Reusability and stability of the resin for sorption of Se(IV) utilizing 0.5 mol L−1 HCl ([Se(IV)] = 100 mg L−1, Dose = 0.10 g, pH = 3.0, desorbing time = 30.0 min, T = 25 ºC)

Effect of competing ions

To determine the selectivity of Se(IV) from other competing ions using the amberlite IRA-400 resin, the sorption efficiency and the separation factor were studied and the results are tabulated in Table 7. From Table 7, it illustrated that the sorption % of Se(IV) is higher than of other competing ions and the best separator factor was between selenium and cobalt ions. This may be due to, (a) the ionic radius of Se4+ (0.5 A°) < Co2+ (0.745 A°) and (b) the electronegativity of Se4+ (2.55) > Co2+ (1.88) and for other competing ions as Se4+ (2.55) > Mo6+ (2.16) > V5+ (1.63) > Eu3+ (1.2) > Sr2+ (0.95) > Cs+ (0.79) as indicated in Table 7.

Table 7 Effect of interfering ions on Kd and separation factor (SF) by Amberlite IRA-400 resin at pH = 3.0 and V/m = 0.005 L/g

Comparison with other adsorbents

In the comparison of Amberlite IRA-400 with other materials reported in Table 8, this adsorbent shows potential effectiveness for the removal of Se(IV) ions from aqueous solutions [20, 22, 23, 38,39,40,41,42].

Table 8 Comparison of Se(IV) adsorption by Amberlite IRA-400 with other materials

Conclusions

In this research, the sorption of Se(IV) was performed using (Amberlite IRA-400) resin as an adsorbent under various batch adsorption experiments. To identify the Amberlite IRA-400 resin, several characterization techniques were employed, including FTIR, SEM, and EDX. The Langmuir isotherm and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model match the experimental results remarkably well. It was shown that Se(IV) has an experimental sorption capacity of 18.52 mg/g at pH 3.0. Moreover, the adsorption process was an exothermic, spontaneous reaction based on the thermodynamic properties (negativity of both ΔG° and ΔH°). In conclusion, the Amberlite IRA-400 resin exhibits great potential for selenium adsorption from aqueous solutions.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Hamed MM, et al. Removal of selenium and iodine radionuclides from waste solutions using synthetic inorganic ion exchanger. J Mol Liq. 2017;242:722–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Galambos M, et al. Utilization of Slovak bentonites in deposition of high-level radioactive waste and spent nuclear fuel. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2011;288(3):765–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elbshary RE, et al. Recovery of W(VI) from Wolframite Ore using new synthetic Schiff base derivative. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:7423.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed AH, et al. Uptake of uranium(VI) upon a novel developed nanocomposite of bimetallic Mg/Mn bentonite lupine peels. J Water Proc Eng. 2024;66: 106009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Elbarbary AM, et al. Radiation fabrication of hybrid activated carbon and functionalized terpolymer hydrogel for sorption of Eu(III) and Sm(III) ions. Radiochim Acta. 2023;111(6):439–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tian Q, et al. Mechanism analysis of selenium (VI) immobilization using alkaline-earth metal oxides and ferrous salt. Chemosphere. 2020;248: 126123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo B, et al. Selenite and selenate uptaken in ettringite: immobilization mechanisms, coordination chemistry, and insights from structure. Cem Concr Res. 2017;100:166–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bleiman N, et al. Selenium removal from drinking water by adsorption to chitosan–clay composites and oxides: batch and columns tests. J Hazard Mater. 2010;183:590–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fındık S, et al. Adsorption of selenite ions onto poly (1, 8-diaminonaphthalene) synthesized by using ammonium persulfate. Sep Sci Technol. 2014;49(18):2890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawamoto D, et al. A new and practical Se (IV) removal method using Fe3+ type cation exchange resin. J hazard Mater. 2019;378: 120593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sattari A, et al. Solvent extraction of selenium in hydrochloric acid media by using triisobutyl phosphate and triisobutyl phosphate/dodecanol mixture. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2017;70:1103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Okonji SO, et al. Removal and recovery of selenium species from wastewater: adsorption kinetics and co-precipitation mechanisms. J Water Process Eng. 2020;38: 101666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richards LA, et al. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: salt and inorganic contaminant removal by nanofiltration/reverse osmosis. J Membr Sci. 2011;369:188–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Toyos L, et al. Sorption of Selenium (IV) and Selenium (VI) onto iron oxide/hydroxide-based carbon materials: activated carbon and carbon foam. Water. 2023;15(19):3499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharaf El-Deen SEA, et al. Preparation of titanate nanoflower for sorption of 75Se(IV) radioisotope from aqueous solution: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Radiochim Acta. 2015;103(12):843–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zha G, et al. Purification of crude selenium by vacuum distillation and analysis. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(3):2926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma Z, et al. Efficient adsorption of Selenium (IV) from water by hematite modified magnetic nanoparticles. Chemosphere. 2018;193:134–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Puhakka E, et al. Sorption of selenium species onto phlogopite and calcite surfaces: DFT studies. J Contam Hydrol. 2019;227: 103553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thakkar M, et al. Bimetallic oxide nanohybrid synthesized from diatom frustules for the removal of selenium from water. J Nanomater. 2017;2017(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuan W-H, et al. Removal of Se (IV) and Se (VI) from water by aluminum-oxide-coated sand. Water Res. 1998;32(3):915–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bleiman N, et al. Selenium removal from drinking water by adsorption to chitosan–clay composites and oxides: batch and columns tests. J Hazard Mater. 2010;183(1–3):590–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.07.065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang N, et al. Adsorptive selenite removal from water using iron-coated GAC adsorbents. Water Res. 2008;42(14):3809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kongsri S, et al. Nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite from fish scale waste: preparation, characterization and application for selenium adsorption in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J. 2013;215:522–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bakather OY, et al. Enhanced adsorption of selenium ions from aqueous solution using iron oxide impregnated carbon nanotubes. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2017;2017:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen M-L, et al. Selenium adsorption and speciation with Mg–FeCO3 layered double hydroxides loaded cellulose fiber. Talanta. 2012;95:31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan YT, et al. Molecular structures of Al/Si and Fe/Si coprecipitates and the implication for selenite removal. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):24716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fındık S, et al. Adsorption of selenite ions onto poly (1, 8-diaminonaphthalene) synthesized by using ammonium persulfate. Sep Purif Technol. 2014;49(18):2890.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zelmanov G, et al. Selenium removal from water and its recovery using iron (Fe3+) oxide/hydroxide-based nanoparticles sol (NanoFe) as an adsorbent. Sep Purif Technol. 2013;103:167–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abd-Elhamid AI, et al. Synthesis of Prussian blue-embedded magnetic micro hydrogel for scavenging of cesium from aqueous solutions; batch and dynamic investigations. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;254: 126864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abd-Elhamid AI, et al. Sugarcane bagasse decorated by metal (Fe3+/Cu2+) ferrocyanide for effective removal of cesium from aqueous solutions. J Water Process Eng. 2024;57: 104641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Abd-Elhamid AI, et al. Adsorption of palladium from chloride aqueous solution using silica alginate nanomaterial. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253: 126754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Traboulsi A, et al. Investigation of gamma radiation effect on the anion exchange resin Amberlite IRA-400 in hydroxide form by Fourier transformed infrared and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopies. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;717:110–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Joshi S, et al. Interaction of aqueous phase fluoride and Amberlite IR400 Cl resin: evaluation of batch process. Chem Data Coll. 2021;32: 100643.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Polowczyk I, et al. Amberlite IRA-400 and IRA-743 chelating resins for the sorption and recovery of molybdenum(VI) and vanadium(V): equilibrium and kinetic studies. Hydrometallurgy. 2017;169:496–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2017.02.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Leonard J, et al. Efficient removal of hexavalent chromium ions from simulated wastewater by functionalized anion exchange resin: process optimization, isotherm and kinetic studies. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol. 2023;5:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2023.03.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Khalil M, et al. Removal of Ce(IV) and Nd(III) from acidic solution using polyacrylonitrile-encapsulated lithium titanium vanadate as an efficient adsorbent. J Inorg Organomet Polym. 2022;32:1370–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-021-02200-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Abu Elgoud EM, et al. Modification of graphene oxide with imidazolium-based ionic liquid for significant sorption of La (III) and Pr (III) from aqueous solutions. Appl Water Sci. 2023;13(7):152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gonzalez CM, et al. A study of the removal of selenite and selenate from aqueous solutions using a magnetic iron manganese oxide nanomaterial and ICP-MS. Microchem J. 2010;96(2):324–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu Y, et al. Water-dispersible magnetic nanoparticle-graphene oxide composites for selenium removal. Carbon. 2014;77:710–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gonzalez CM, et al. Sorption kinetic study of selenite and selenate onto a high and low pressure aged iron oxide nanomaterial. J Hazard Mater. 2012;211–212:138–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rovira M, et al. Sorption of selenium(IV) and selenium(VI) onto natural iron oxides: goethite and hematite. J Hazard Mater. 2008;150:279–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. El-Shafey E. Sorption of Cd(II) and Se(IV) from aqueous solution using modified rice husk. J Hazard Mater. 2007;147(1–2):546–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.E.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing—original draft, writing—review, and editing. E.M.A.E.: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review, and editing. S.E.A.S: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Writing—review, and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. El-Tantawy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Tantawy, A., Abu Elgoud, E.M. & Sharaf El-Deen, S.E.A. Evaluation of anion exchange resin for sorption of selenium (IV) from aqueous solutions. BMC Chemistry 19, 10 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-024-01356-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-024-01356-3

Keywords