Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

In silico engineering of graphitic carbon nitride nanostructures through germanium mono-doping and codoping with transition metals (Ni, Pd, Pt) as sensors for diazinon organophosphorus pesticide pollutants

Abstract

The extensive use of pesticides has raised concerns about environmental contamination, which poses potential health risks to humans and aquatic life. Hence, the need for a healthy and friendly ecosystem initiated this study, which was modeled through profound density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2svp level of theory to gain insights into the electronic characteristics of germanium-doped graphitic carbon nitride (Ge@C3N4) engineered with nickel group transition metals (Ni, Pt, and Pd) as sensors for diazinon (DZN), an organophosphorus pesticide pollutant. To effectively sense diazinon, this research employed a variety of methodologies, beginning with the analysis of electronic properties, intermolecular investigations, adsorption studies, and sensor mechanisms. These detailed assessments revealed insightful results, as clearly indicated by their narrow energy gap and other electronic properties. Noncovalent interactions characterized by van der Waals forces were revealed predominantly by quantum atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and noncovalent interaction (NCI) analyses. Furthermore, the results of the adsorption studies, which measured the strength of the interaction between the pesticide molecules and the nanostructures, revealed favorable results characterized by negative adsorption energies of − 1.613, − 1.613, and − 1.599 eV for DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, respectively. The simulated mechanism through which diazinon is sensed revealed favorable results, as observed by the negative Fermi energy and fraction of electron transfer (∆N), as well as a high dipole moment. This study also revealed that the codoping influenced the behavior of the systems, revealing that DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 was the best sensing system because of its strongest adsorption (− 1.613 eV), highest dipole moment (8.348 D), most negative Fermi energy (− 1.300 eV), lowest work function (1.300 eV), and good ∆N (− 1.558) values. This study, therefore, proposes these nanostructures for further in vitro studies seeking to sense diazinon and other pesticides to maintain healthy ecosystems.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

With the IUPAC name O,O-diethyl O-[4-methyl-6-(propan-2-yl)pyrimidin-2-yl] phosphorothioate and a molecular formula of C12H21N2O3PS, diazinon (DZN) is an insecticide known as an organophosphate [1]. Its widespread application in agriculture is aimed at controlling insect infestations in various crops, including fruits, vegetables, nuts, and field crops. Organophosphorus pesticides (such as malathion, parathion, fenthion, dichlorvos, chlorpyrifos, and ethion) are esters originating from phosphoric acid and are commonly employed to manage insects and mites on vegetables [2, 3]. These pesticides, specifically organophosphorus pesticides, are recognized for their capacity to improve both the quality and quantity of crop yields in agriculture. As an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, similar to other organophosphates, diazinon interferes with the breakdown of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine [4, 5]. This disruption leads to the accumulation of acetylcholine in nerve cell synapses, resulting in overstimulation of the nervous system in insects [6]. Additionally, it has been applied in nonagricultural settings, such as residential areas, for pest control in and around buildings [7]. However, the extensive use of pesticides raises concerns about environmental contamination, which poses potential health risks to humans and aquatic life because of their environmentally persistent properties [8,9,10]. In response to these concerns, several countries, including the United States, have implemented regulatory actions, restricting or outright banning the use of diazinon. In the U.S., for example, residential use was phased out in 2004, and diazinon was no longer registered for use on most crops [11, 12].

To maintain healthy ecosystems, several techniques and methods have been employed by several researchers to remediate pesticides, including diazinon. Some of these methods include biological and chemical methods such as bioremediation, phytoremediation, activated carbon, liquid chromatography, and mass spectrometry, as revealed by the review carried out by Lykogianni et al. [13]. All these methods have several shortcomings, with a high dependence on uncontrollable factors. As such, recent advances have ushered in the application of nanotechnology for the monitoring and control of toxic substances, including pesticides. In terms of investigating novel sensing adsorbents, density functional theory is a widely used modeling method for exploring the behavior of nanomaterials. Hence, researchers have adopted this computational tool to explore the behavior of nanomaterials for the sensing of toxic compounds such as drugs and pesticides. On the basis of pesticide sensing and adsorption, scholars have used different nanomaterials, such as nanoparticles [14,15,16,17,18], nanotubes [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], nanowires [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35], quantum dots [36,37,38,39], 2D materials [40,41,42], nanosheets [43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51], nanocages [52,53,54,55,56], nanostructures [42,43,44,45,46], nanocomposites [57,58,59,60], nanoclusters [61,62,63,64], metal‒organic frameworks [51, 65, 66], and nanodots [67], and many studies have reported that introducing materials improves the behavior of nanomaterials [56, 68, 69]. For example, Luo et al. [70] reported a significant decrease in the energy gap of their systems after doping atoms on g-C3N4 for the sensing of hydrogen gas. Owing to these insightful results, studies in which various dopants are added to enhance the behavior of their investigated nanomaterials are common. Most of these nanomaterials are built on different materials, including graphene and graphene-based materials [16, 71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79]. These studies reported insightful results ranging from their good electronic properties to their adsorption behavior. However, there is still much to explore due to the dynamic nature of nanomaterials.

This finding simply suggests more advances and calls for more applications in various nano research explorations, including pesticide sensing. Although graphitic carbon nitride has been widely explored [59, 79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86] and some have specifically focused on diazinon [60, 82, 87,88,89,90], studies in which germanium is used to engineer graphene carbon nitrides are rare even when Laumier et al. [19], and several scholars have previously reported the insightful behavior of Ge and other elements. Some studies have investigated other nanomaterials, such as carbon nitride and boron nitride, for use in pesticide sensing [91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102]. Hence, the present study investigated a more insightful dimension by probing the electronic behavior of Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4) for diazinon sensing, with a critical interest in the influence of the functionalization of Ni, Pd, and Pt on the system.

We utilized advanced theoretical calculations employing density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2svp level of theory to gain insights into the electronic characteristics of Ge@C3N4 and doped transition metals such as Ni, Pt, and Pd. The objective of this study was to investigate the promising sensing capabilities of Ge@C3N4-based diazinon sensors. Analyzing the electronic properties of sensor materials is crucial for understanding their sensor behavior. Consequently, we conducted a detailed assessment of the electronic properties, including the analysis of frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO energies). This provided comprehensive information on the sensitivity and conductivity of the studied material. Natural bond orbital analysis was employed to examine both intermolecular and intramolecular charge transfer between the investigated nanomaterials and diazinon. After optimizing the geometric structure, we thoroughly evaluated the changes in the electronic properties, specifically bond lengths, before and after the adsorption of the diazinon pesticide. This discussion covers the adsorption capacity and sensor mechanism of the Ge@C3N4 surface and its doped elements.

Methods

In this investigation, we employed density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2svp level of theory to assess the efficiency of electronically optimized nanocomposites in detecting diazinon pesticide. The optimization procedure for DZN_Ge@C3N4, which incorporated Pt, Pd, and Ni dopants, was systematically carried out via Gaussian 16 [103] and GaussView 6.0.16 [104]. The selection of this computational approach is crucial because it facilitates a comprehensive exploration of molecular properties and interactions, offering valuable insights into electronic structures, reactivity, and bonding mechanisms. To effectively sense diazinon, a variety of methodologies, beginning with the analysis of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) and natural bond orbital (NBO) methods, coupled with evaluations of density of states (DOS) plotted via OriginPro 2018, were used [105]. These procedures provided in-depth insights into the electronic characteristics governing the behavior of the nanocomposites under investigation. The visualization of isosurfaces for the highest molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO–LUMO) was facilitated via Chemcraft software version 1.644, accessible at http://www.chemcraftprog.com. To bolster scientific validity, this study utilized the Multiwfn package 3.7 [106] to explore the quantum theory of atoms-in-molecules (QTAIM), which offers valuable insights into intermolecular interactions. A thorough investigation of noncovalent interactions (NCIs) was carried out, elucidating the nonbonding forces influencing molecular assemblies via the visual molecular dynamics (VMD) software package version 1.9.4 [107]. Additionally, the research has extended its scope to encompass studies on adsorption energy and a comprehensive exploration of sensor mechanisms. This holistic analytical framework collectively advances our understanding of the potential of Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4) for sensing, positioning this study at the forefront of scientific inquiry.

Results and discussion

Geometry optimization

Geometry optimization is a structural analysis generally used to ascertain stable geometric structures for calculating bond lengths within systems [107,108,109]. Optimization before and after interaction ensures the conformation of the complexes under investigation. The geometries of the investigated systems are shown in Fig. 1, while their bond length results, as discussed herein, are presented in the supporting information (see Table S1). This analysis shows the bond lengths of diazinon (DZN) before and after interaction with Ge@C3N4 doped with metals (Ni, Pd, Pt). For the Ge54–C14 bond, DZN_Ge@C3N4 exhibited a bond length of 2.162 Å before interaction and 2.241 Å after interaction; DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 exhibited a bond length of 2.023 Å before interaction and 1.612 Å after interaction; DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 exhibited a bond length of 2.018 Å before interaction and 2.022 Å after interaction; and DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 exhibited a bond length of 2.017 Å before interaction and 2.022 Å after interaction. The DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 complex demonstrated the shortest bond length, suggesting that it had the lowest tendency to undergo structural rearrangement. Additionally, for the Ge54–C15 bond, DZN_Ge@C3N4 has a bond length of 2.044 Å before interaction and 2.037 Å after interaction, whereas DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 has a bond length of 2.005 Å before interaction and 1.632 Å after interaction; moreover, the DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 system has a bond length of 2.005 before interaction and 2.008 Å after interaction, and finally, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 has a bond length of 1.998 before interaction and 2.001 Å after interaction. Additionally, for the Ge54–C16 bond, DZN_Ge@C3N4 had a bond length of 2.044 Å before the interaction and 2.079 Å after the interaction, DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 had a bond length of 2.005 Å before the interaction and 2.004 Å after the interaction, and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 had a bond length of 2.017 Å before the interaction and 2.021 Å after the interaction. Finally, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 exhibited a bond length of 1.998 Å before interaction; upon interaction, the bond length was 2.002 Å. Hence, DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 is theoretically explained to have the most stable configuration owing to the shortest bond lengths observed within the system.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Geometry of the investigated systems presented using Chemcraft

Electronic properties

HOMO–LUMO analysis

The analysis of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is a molecular assessment used to qualitatively determine the molecular excitation capacities and electron transport characteristics of the examined molecules [110]. The HOMO indicates the electron-donating ability, whereas the LUMO designates the electron-attracting capacity, also known as the electrophilic capacity, of the synthesized compounds [56, 62]. As presented in Table 1, the highest HOMO energy among the doped surfaces was observed for Ge@C3N4 at − 5.388 eV, whereas the other surfaces presented values of − 5.034 eV, − 5.089 eV, and − 4.299 eV for Ni_Ge@C3N4, Pt_Ge@C3N4, and Pd_Ge@C3N4, respectively. Conversely, the highest LUMO peak was observed for Ge@C3N4 at − 3.129 eV, with other surfaces displaying values of − 2.748 eV, − 2.667 eV, and − 2.640 eV for Ni_Ge@C3N4, Pt_Ge@C3N4, and Pd_Ge@C3N4, respectively.

Table 1 HOMO‒LUMO and energy gap analysis of the studied systems

When these surfaces interact with the pollutant DZN, both the HOMO and LUMO exhibit distinct energy levels. Discrepancies in these energy levels are evidenced by the presence of an energy gap, a crucial parameter that provides valuable insights into the stability and reactivity of the investigated nanostructures. Considering the energy gap and the justification for this observation, it is imperative to highlight that, according to the literature, a high energy gap implies low chemical reactivity, whereas a low energy gap signifies high reactivity [51]. The results revealed that the pollutant diazinon (DZN) possesses a high energy gap of 7.504 eV, whereas the doped surfaces exhibit energy gaps ranging from 1.551 eV to 2.422 eV. The introduction of diazinon onto different doped surfaces led to a reduction in the energy gap for all systems with codopants. Specifically, the energies of the DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 systems decrease to 0.735 eV, 2.367 eV, and 2.340 eV, respectively. Interestingly, DZN_Ge_@C3N4 (without codopant) was observed with an increased energy gap (2.449 eV). The decrease in the energy gap of the codoped systems emphasized the importance of transition metals in influencing the sensing behavior of engineered graphitic carbon nitride. The flow of electrons from the HOMO to the LUMO, which is revealed by the isorsurfaces, is clearly visualized and presented in Fig. 2. Figure 2 shows that the major transfer of electrons is influenced mostly by the transition metal functional groups, as observed by the density of the isorsurfaces. This justifies the importance of adding functionals to nanostructures.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Isorfaces showing the HOMO–LUMO contributions of the investigated surfaces and their interactions

Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis

NBOs are localized few-centered orbitals that usually describe the Lewis-like bonding structural pattern of electron pairs (or individual electrons in the open shell) in a desireably close form. NBO (natural bond orbital) analysis has proven to be a valuable tool in the interpretation of computational solutions derived from Schrödinger's wave equation, specifically in the realm of chemical bonding. Furthermore, it offers an alternative method for characterizing noncovalent interactions by delineating the functional groups involved in a molecular aggregate [93, 108]. NBO analysis is a comprehensive method for interpreting the numerical content of quatum chemistry in conventional language. By effectively investigating both intra- and intermolecular bonding and interactions, charge transfer and conjugative interactions within molecular systems can be explored [90]. The following section presents various NBOs from diverse systems employed in this research, accompanied by their corresponding transitions, perturbation energies, and diagonal elements. The NBO parameters obtained as discussed herein are presented in Table S2. Notably, transitions for the DZN_Ge@C3N4 system involve \({\uppi }^{*}\to {\uppi }^{*}\), \({\uppi }^{*}\to {LP}^{*}\). \({\uppi }^{*}\to {\uppi }^{*}\), as shown by the E(2) value of 254.96 kcal, contributes significantly to the system stability, and the other adsorbed bate‒adsorbent interactions result in a lower E(2) value (178.42 kcal). For DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, the bond transitions observed for the adsorbate-adsorbent were both \({\uppi }^{*}\to {\uppi }^{*}\) bonds, with the highest energy observed at 120.87 kcal and the other at 199.68 kcal. For the interaction DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, the bond transitions observed in this system are \({\uppi }^{*}\to {\uppi }^{*}\) and \({\uppi }^{*}\to {LP}^{*}\). The \({\uppi }^{*}\to {\uppi }^{*}\) transition contributes significantly to the stability of the system, as indicated by E(2), which is 163.95 kcal, whereas the other transition has an E(2) of 134.97 kcal. Finally, the \({\uppi }^{*}\to {LP}^{*}\) values of the DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 system exhibit bond transitions of 226.76 kcal/mol and 327.15 kcal/mol, respectively. DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4, with an E(2) of 327.15 kcal/mol for \({\uppi }^{*}\to {LP}^{*}\), is more chemically stable than other adsorbate‒adsorbent interactions, as the E(2) value surpasses that of other interactions. According to a literature review, the complex with the least energy stabilization energy (E(2)) is said to be more reactive [111].

Topology analysis

QTAIM

The quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analysis, which originated from Bader’s theory [112], is utilized to gather information about bond types and spatial interactions between adsorbate-adsorbent surfaces. According to QTAIM theory, a bond path connects the nuclei of interacting atoms at topological points known as bond critical points (BCPs). The BCP is a spatial point where the Laplacian electron density equals zero, 2ρ(r) = 0. Several topological parameters are studied at BCPs, including the electron density ρ(r), Laplacian electron density 2ρ(r), Lagrangian kinetic energy G(r), potential electron energy density V(r), total electron energy density H(r), eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3) of the Hessian matrix, and bond ellipticity ɛ [26]. These parameters are tabulated in Table 2. With the electron density values ρ(r), one can predict the strength of the studied interactions, where higher ρ(r) values (ρ > 0.1 a.u.) indicate stronger covalent interactions, and lower ρ(r) values (ρ < 0.1 a.u.) suggest weak noncovalent interactions. The analysis results show p(r) values ranging from 0.100 to 0.905 a.u., indicating strong covalent interactions for all the systems. DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 exhibited the most covalent interactions, with a p(r) of 0.905 a.u.

Table 2 Parameters of quantum atoms in molecules investigating the intermolecular behavior of the adsorbed systems

The Laplacian electron density 2ρ(r), derived as the sum of Hessian eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, λ3), provides insights into the electron density distribution. 2ρ (r) reveals strong shared-shell interatomic interactions with a local concentration of electron density distribution at the critical point when 2ρ(r) < 0. Conversely, weak closed-shell (CS) interactions are characterized by local depletion when 2ρ(r) > 0. Greater electron density at bond critical points (BCPs) signifies greater structural stability, highlighting the importance of understanding the stability and reactivity of sensor materials for the sensor community [113]. In the obtained H(r) calculation results, negative values were observed for Ge54–N75, H92–C14, and N76–O80, suggesting covalent interactions at these points. In contrast, other forms of bond formation presented positive values, indicating robust electrostatic bonding. The results for λ1, λ2, and λ3 from the QTAIM studies were subsequently analyzed via noncovalent interaction (NCI) analysis, revealing a strong correlation between these two studies.

NCI analysis

Noncovalent interaction (NCI) analysis was conducted to clarify and quantitatively assess both inter- and intramolecular interactions involving DZN_Ge@C3N4 and doped metal atoms (lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), and platinum (Pt)). NCI, which is distinct from covalent bonding interactions, does not necessitate the exchange of electrons; instead, it rationalizes more distributed variations in electromagnetic interactions between molecules or within a molecule. Various dimensions or categories of noncovalent contacts are generally recognized, including electrostatic interactions, π effects, van der Waals forces, and hydrophobic effects. The formation of NCIs is undoubtedly studied in terms of the release of chemical energy, which typically ranges from 1 to 5 kcal/mol (1000–5000 cal per 6.02 × 1023 molecules).

The visualization of both intramolecular and intermolecular interactions within and between complex molecules revealed numerous noteworthy zones, as permitted by the created isosurfaces. These zones encompass van der Waals contacts, steric repulsion, and strong attractive attractions. The NCI method, utilized to analyze weak noncovalent interactions, involves plotting the reduced density gradient (RDG) and the product of the second eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix (λ2) with the electron density ρ (sign (λ2) ρ). These weak interactions were visually represented via NCI 3D iso-surface plots and 2D-reduced density gradient (RDG) scatter plots (Fig. 3). On the 2D-RDG scatter plots, interactions manifest as spikes. Specifically, attractive hydrogen bonding interactions are indicated by the sign (λ2) ρ < 0, strongly repulsive/steric forces are represented by the sign (λ2) ρ > 0, and relatively weak van der Waals (vdW) interactions are denoted by the sign (λ2) ρ ≈ 0 [114]. On the 3D iso-surface plots, the color range from a blue‒green‒red scale provides informative insights into interaction types, with blue representing hydrogen bonding, green indicating weak van der Waals (vdW) interactions, and red indicating repulsive forces.

Fig. 3
figure 3

RDG plots showing the prevalence of noncovalent interactions characterized by van der Waals interactions

Sensor mechanism

The mechanism of detection and possibly control of the environment exposed to Diazinon, which is an organophosphorus pesticide employing metal (Ni, Pd, Pt)-encapsulated Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4), encompasses the reactivity, adsorption potentials, etc., utilizing different parameters such as the Fermi energy level, charge transfer, work function, electron transfer, dipole moment, electrical conductivity, etc. The detection of the pesticide is solely dependent on the interaction between the studied metal-doped nanocomposites and the diazinon pesticide, which influences or does not influence the general structure and configuration of the studied material. The mechanism of the sensor activity of the systems was calculated via density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2svp level of theory, as presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Results of the calculated sensor mechanism parameters (dipole moment, adsorption energy, Fermi energy, work function, charge transfer, and fraction of electron transfer)

Adsorption studies

Adsorption energy is a crucial parameter in designing sensor materials and is calculated by taking the difference between the energy of the adsorbing interaction and the energy of the diazinon surface. This energy is significant enough to explain the mechanism of adsorption and factors that may contribute to the energy values in the detection of the DZN pesticide [110]. It also measures the strength of the interaction between the pesticide molecules and the surface of the sensor material, contributing to the sensitivity, reproducibility, and selectivity of the sensor. The adsorption energy for this study was calculated via Eq. (1) and is presented in Table 3.

$$Eads = E_{complex} {-} \, (E_{surf} + \, E_{adsorb} )$$
(1)

where Ecomplex is the energy of the adsorbent (metal (Ni, Pd, Pt)-encapsulated Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4)) and DZN, Eadsorb is the energy of the adsorbate DZN, and Esurf is the energy of the noninteracting surfaces. The negative adsorption energy exhibited by three negative adsorption energies (DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4), which is synonymous with chemisorption, suggested greater adsorption stability than that of DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4, with a high positive value explaining physisorption. The literature has reported that a higher negative adsorption energy signifies a more favorable system for the adsorption of the pesticide diazinon [115]. Notably, the systems performed well in terms of adsorption energy, with values of − 1.613 eV, − 1.613 eV, and − 1.599 eV for DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, respectively. However, DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 was observed to have a positive adsorption energy (7.999 eV), suggesting weak adsorption. The positive adsorption observed for DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 suggests further exploration.

Fermi energy

The Fermi energy is the peak energy level at zero temperature occupied by electrons and is significant in defining the electronic structure of the interface between the nanomaterial and the pesticide in the process of charge transfer [74, 116]. A higher Fermi energy indicates that electrons may move to a higher energy state and higher thermal conductivity, contributing to the electronic structure of the studied nanocomposite after the adsorption of the diazinon pesticide [117]. After the adsorption of the diazinon pesticide on the studied metal-doped surfaces DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4, the Fermi energy level was calculated and is presented in Table 3 via Eq. 2.

$${\text{E}}_{FL} ={E}_{HOMO+}\left(\frac{{\text{E}}_{\text{LUMO}}- {\text{E}}_{\text{HOMO}} }{2}\right)$$
(2)

The results revealed that DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 presented Fermi energies of − 1.519 eV, − 1.300 eV, − 1.331 eV, and − 1.345, respectively. A Fermi energy < 0 indicates that the material falls below the conduction band and lacks electrons, leading to the transfer of electrons between the nanomaterial and the sensing pesticide. Additionally, the negative energy level potentially enhances the adsorption of pollutants by metal (Ni, Pd, Pt)-encapsulated Ge-doped graphitic carbon nanomaterials.

Dipole moment

The dipole moment is referred to as a measure of electrical charge separation and is significant in sensor materials because it can influence behavior, electrostatic interactions, the electronic structure, and the distribution of charges. This can also influence the performance and reactivity of the sensor material. The higher values derived from the dipole moment suggest a greater binding strength of the material to the diazinon pesticide, which may enhance the sensitivity [117,118,119]. The results in Table 3 show that the DZN_Ge@C3N4 system had the lowest dipole moment of 1.3189, whereas the DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 system had the highest dipole moment of 8.3479, and the dipole moments of DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 and DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 were 7.0217 and 5.9176 D, respectively. The higher dipole moments in DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 suggest a high separation tendency of the electrical charge between the complexes and the pesticide diazinon.

Charge transfer (Qt)

In the development of sensors for the detection of pollutants, the mechanism of pesticide sensing involves noticeable interactions between metal-doped surfaces and the DZN pesticide. There is always acceptance or donation of electrons when a nanocomposite adsorbs a pesticide, which subsequently results in the transfer of charges between the molecules. The transfer of charges between molecules greatly influences the conductivity of electrons in the system as a result of an alteration of their structural properties [71, 74, 116]. The charge can be obtained by determining the difference between the charge on the metal (Ni, Pd, Pt)-encapsulated Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4) and that of the diazinon pesticide molecule. The results calculated through Eq. 3 and presented in Table 3 show that the charge transfer for DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 was the highest (1.5887 e), whereas DZN_Ge@C3N4 presented the lowest charge transfer values (−0.1495 e). However, the other systems, DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 and DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4, had comparable values of 1.1906 and 1.2865 e, respectively. The charge transfer values are possibly influenced by the doped metals, leading to a change in the electronic properties of the bare surface.

$${\text{Qt}} = {\text{Qadsorption }}{-}{\text{Qisolated}}$$
(3)

where Qadsorption is the charge of the individual meta-doped surfaces and where Qisolated is the charge after interaction with the DZN pesticide.

Work function (ɸ)

The minimum energy required for electrons to escape from the conduction band to the free energy state of a material is referred to as the work function and can be generated as in Eq. (4). This function is important for characterizing the surface energy and electronic structure of the sensor of a material by measuring the adsorption properties and determining how electrons move within the system. A higher work function can explain the applicability of the material as an insulator or semiconductor, whereas a lower value indicates electron emission in the system resulting from possible thermal excitation upon adsorption of the pesticide [116, 120]. The work functions calculated for this study are presented in Table 3, and from the results, the work functions decreased in the order DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 < DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 < DZN_Pt_Ge@C3N4 < DZN_Ge@C3N4, with values of 1.300 eV, 1.331 eV, 1.345 eV, and 1.519 eV, respectively. This result explains why metal-doped systems have greater potential for transferring electrons between interacting molecules owing to their smaller work function; however, the bare nanocomposite is likely to perform better as a semiconductor than the other systems.

$$\phi = - {\text{Ef}}$$
(4)

Fraction of electron transfer (∆N)

Electron transfer refers to the relocation of electrons from a molecule or atom to another chemical species. The fraction of electron transfer as a pesticide detection mechanism is important for predicting the sensitivity and response of a sensor to a pesticide [107,108,109]. In this study, this parameter was calculated for the interaction of codoped transition metals (Ni, Pd, Pt) and Ge-doped graphitic carbon (Ge@C3N4) with the diazinon pesticide via Eq. (5). The literature suggests that an FET value < 0 indicates the electron acceptance potential of the sensor, whereas FET values > 0 indicate electron donation. The results of this analysis presented in Table 3 show that the fraction of electron transfer falls between 0.036 and 4.074. The positive values suggest that the sensor selectivity toward the diazinon pesticide results from the higher electron donation potential of the sensor material. Furthermore, this leads to the distribution of charges in the system and subsequently affects the electronic structure of the system (increasing the reactivity of the sensor toward the pesticide).

(5)

Conclusions

The extensive use of pesticides has raised concerns about environmental contamination, which poses potential health risks to humans and aquatic life. In response to these concerns, several countries, including the United States, have implemented regulatory actions, restricting or outright banning the use of diazinon. Hence, the motivation for this study stems from the quest to maintain healthy ecosystems. This study utilized advanced theoretical calculations employing density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP-D3(BJ)/def2svp level of theory to gain insights into the electronic characteristics of Ge@C3N4 and doped transition metals such as Ni, Pt, and Pd, as well as their sensing behavior. This allows us to comprehensively explore the molecular properties and interactions of the investigated systems, offering valuable insights into their electronic structures, reactivities, and bonding mechanisms. To effectively sense diazinon, this research employed a varied range of methodologies beginning with the analysis of electronic properties (such as FMO, NBO, and DOS), intermolecular investigations (QTAIM and NCI), adsorption studies, and sensor mechanisms. These detailed assessments revealed insightful results, as clearly indicated by their narrow energy gap and other electronic properties. Noncovalent interactions characterized by van der Waals forces were revealed predominantly by QTAIM and NCI analysis.

Furthermore, the adsorption studies, which measured the strength of the interaction between the pesticide molecules and the surface of the sensor material, contributing to the sensitivity, reproducibility, and selectivity of the sensor, revealed favorable results characterized by negative adsorption energies of − 1.613 eV, − 1.613 eV, and − 1.599 eV for DZN_Ge@C3N4, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4, and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4, respectively. Although some results are not quite consistent across the various analyses, DZN_Ni_Ge@C3N4 and DZN_Pd_Ge@C3N4 are more consistent across all the parameters and are therefore associated with more insightful results. For example, both are observed to exhibit strong adsorption mechanisms and high separation tendencies, explained by the consistency in their adsorption energy and polarity values (dipole moment). This study, therefore, proposes these nanostructures for further in vitro studies aimed at sensing diazinon and other pesticides to maintain healthy ecosystems.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Boyda J, Hawkey AB, Holloway ZR, Trevisan R, Di Giulio RT, Levin ED. The organophosphate insecticide diazinon and aging: neurobehavioral and mitochondrial effects in zebrafish exposed as embryos or during aging. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2021;87:107011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2021.107011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dar MA, Kaushik G, Villareal Chiu JF. Pollution status and biodegradation of organophosphate pesticides in the environment. In: Singh P, Kumar A, Borthakur A, editors. Abatement of environmental pollutants. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 25–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818095-2.00002-3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Hassaan MA, El Nemr A. Pesticides pollution: classifications, human health impact, extraction and treatment techniques. Egypt J Aquat Res. 2020;46(3):207–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2020.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Karimani A, Ramezani N, Afkhami Goli A, Nazem Shirazi MH, Nourani H, Jafari AM. Subchronic neurotoxicity of diazinon in albino mice: impact of oxidative stress, AChE activity, and gene expression disturbances in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus on mood, spatial learning, and memory function. Toxicol Rep. 2021;8:1280–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.06.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Slotkin TA, Seidler FJ. Comparative developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphates in vivo: transcriptional responses of pathways for brain cell development, cell signaling, cytotoxicity and neurotransmitter systems. Brain Res Bull. 2007;72(4):232–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Taillebois E, Thany SH. The use of insecticide mixtures containing neonicotinoids as a strategy to limit insect pests: efficiency and mode of action. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2022;184:105126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stehle S, Bline A, Bub S, Petschick LL, Wolfram J, Schulz R. Aquatic pesticide exposure in the U.S. as a result of nonagricultural uses. Environ Int. 2019;133:105234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pereira LC, et al. A perspective on the potential risks of emerging contaminants to human and environmental health. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(18):13800–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4896-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Singha DK, Majee P, Mandal S, Mondal SK, Mahata P. Detection of pesticides in aqueous medium and in fruit extracts using a three-dimensional metal-organic framework: experimental and computational study. Inorg Chem. 2018;57(19):12155–65. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rani L, et al. An extensive review on the consequences of chemical pesticides on human health and environment. J Clean Prod. 2021;283:124657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124657.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Banks KE, Hunter DH, Wachal DJ. Diazinon in surface waters before and after a federally mandated ban. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350(1):86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.01.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson HM, Domagalski JL, Saleh DK. Trends in pesticide concentrations in Streamsof the Western United States, 1993–20051. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2011;47(2):265–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00507.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lykogianni M, Bempelou E, Karamaouna F, Aliferis KA. Do pesticides promote or hinder sustainability in agriculture? The challenge of sustainable use of pesticides in modern agriculture. Sci Total Environ. 2021;795:148625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eyvaraghi AM, et al. Experimental and density functional theory computational studies on highly sensitive ethanol gas sensor based on Au-decorated ZnO nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films. 2022;741:139014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2021.139014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbasi A, Jahanbin Sardroodi J. An innovative gas sensor system designed from a sensitive nanostructured ZnO for the selective detection of SOx molecules: a density functional theory study. New J Chem. 2017;41(21):12569–80. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NJ02140B.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mo Y, et al. Acetone adsorption to (BeO)12, (MgO)12 and (ZnO)12 nanoparticles and their graphene composites: a density functional theory (DFT) study. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;469:962–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pan Q, Li T, Zhang D. Ammonia gas sensing properties and density functional theory investigation of coral-like Au-SnSe2 Schottky junction. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2021;332:129440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ambrusi RE, et al. Density functional theory model for carbon dot surfaces and their interaction with silver nanoparticles. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2019;114:113640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2019.113640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aasi A, Aghaei SM, Panchapakesan B. A density functional theory study on the interaction of toluene with transition metal decorated carbon nanotubes: a promising platform for early detection of lung cancer from human breath. Nanotechnology. 2020;31(41):415707. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab9da9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Demir S, Fellah MF. Carbon nanotubes doped with Ni, Pd and Pt: a density functional theory study of adsorption and sensing NO. Surf Sci. 2020;701:121689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2020.121689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuksel N, Kose A, Fellah MF. A density functional theory study for adsorption and sensing of 5-Fluorouracil on Ni-doped boron nitride nanotube. Mater Sci Semicond Process. 2022;137:106183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Menazea AA, Awwad NS, Ibrahium HA, Delerkheiroehin P, Ali HE. Ru-decorated gallium nitride nanotubes as chemical sensor for detection of purinethol drug: a density functional theory study. Phys Scr. 2021;96(12):125870. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac3f68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoosefian M, Etminan N. Density functional theory (DFT) study of a new novel bionanosensor hybrid; tryptophan/Pd doped single walled carbon nanotube. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2016;81:116–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.03.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tong X, Shen W, Chen X. Enhanced H2S sensing performance of cobalt doped free-standing TiO2 nanotube array film and theoretical simulation based on density functional theory. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;469:414–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.032.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spencer MJS. Gas sensing applications of 1D-nanostructured zinc oxide: insights from density functional theory calculations. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57(3):437–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.06.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Elesawy BH, El Askary A, Awwad NS, Ibrahium HA, Nezhad PD, Shkir M. A density functional theory study of Au-decorated gallium nitride nanotubes as chemical sensors for the recognition of sulfonamide. J Sulfur Chem. 2022;43(5):482–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2022.2074794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maarouf M, Al-Sunaidi A. Investigating the chemisorption of CO and CO2 on Al- and Cu-doped ZnO nanowires by density-functional calculations. Comput Theor Chem. 2020;1175:112728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2020.112728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chakraborty D, Kumar V, Kamil SM, Johari P. Using density functional theory to correlate charge transport properties with gas sensing by organic nanowires. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2021;4(6):5972–80. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c00846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan MAH, Thomson B, Motayed A, Li Q, Rao MV. Functionalization of GaN nanowire sensors with metal oxides: an experimental and DFT investigation. IEEE Sens J. 2020;20(13):7138–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2020.2978221.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Korir KK, Catellani A, Cicero G. Ethanol gas sensing mechanism in ZnO nanowires: an ab initio study. J Phys Chem C. 2014;118(42):24533–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507478s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miranda A, de Santiago F, Pérez LA, Cruz-Irisson M. Silicon nanowires as potential gas sensors: a density functional study. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;242:1246–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.09.085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Laumier S, Farrow T, van Zalinge H, Seravalli L, Bosi M, Sandall I. Selection and functionalization of germanium nanowires for bio-sensing. ACS Omega. 2022;7(39):35288–96. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Santana JE, et al. Selective sensing of DNA/RNA nucleobases by metal-functionalized silicon nanowires: a DFT approach. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2023;36:102529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Qin Y, Liu M, Ye Z. A DFT study on WO3 nanowires with different orientations for NO2 sensing application. J Mol Struct. 2014;1076:546–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.08.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Duan Y-N, Zhang J-M, Fan X-X, Xu K-W. Structural and electronic properties of the adsorbed and defected Cu nanowires: a density-functional theory study. Phys B Condens Matter. 2014;454:110–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2014.07.064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kanagasubbulakshmi S, Kathiresan R, Kadirvelu K. Structure and physiochemical properties based interaction patterns of organophosphorous pesticides with quantum dots: experimental and theoretical studies. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2018;549:155–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.04.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh S, et al. Bioengineered sensing of Atrazine by green CdS quantum dots: evidence from electrochemical studies and DFT simulations. Chemosphere. 2023;345:140465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.140465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vajubhai GN, Chetti P, Kailasa SK. Perovskite quantum dots for fluorescence turn-off detection of the clodinafop pesticide in food samples via liquid-liquid microextraction. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2022;5(12):18220–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c04089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Li H, Sun C, Vijayaraghavan R, Zhou F, Zhang X, MacFarlane DR. Long lifetime photoluminescence in N, S codoped carbon quantum dots from an ionic liquid and their applications in ultrasensitive detection of pesticides. Carbon N Y. 2016;104:33–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.03.040.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vaidyanathan A, Mathew M, Radhakrishnan S, Rout CS, Chakraborty B. Theoretical insight on the biosensing applications of 2D materials. J Phys Chem B. 2020;124(49):11098–122. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c08539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vaidyanathan A, Lakshmy S, Sanyal G, Joseph S, Kalarikkal N, Chakraborty B. Nitrobenzene sensing in pristine and metal doped 2D dichalcogenide MoS2: insights from density functional theory investigations. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;550:149395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149395.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Joseph KS, Dabhi S, Chakraborty B. Importance of 2D materials for electrochemical sensors: theoretical perspectives. In: Rout CS, editor. 2D materials-based electrochemical sensors. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023. p. 133–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15293-1.00010-0.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Dindorkar SS, Patel RV, Yadav A. Unraveling the interaction between boron nitride nanosheets and organic pesticides through density functional theory studies. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;649:129550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Qin G, Kong Y, Gan T, Ni Y. Ultrathin 2D Eu3+@Zn-MOF nanosheets: a functional nanoplatform for highly selective, sensitive, and visualized detection of organochlorine pesticides in a water environment. Inorg Chem. 2022;61(23):8966–75. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao F, et al. Self-reduction bimetallic nanoparticles on ultrathin MXene nanosheets as functional platform for pesticide sensing. J Hazard Mater. 2020;384:121358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dindorkar SS, Patel RV, Yadav A. Quantum chemical study of the defect laden monolayer boron nitride nanosheets for adsorption of pesticides from wastewater. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2022;643:128795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yadav A, Dindorkar SS, Sinha N. Insights on the enhanced nitrogen dioxide sensing using doped boron nitride nanosheets through the quantum chemical studies. Chem Phys. 2022;562:111629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2022.111629.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu L, et al. Cationic covalent organic nanosheets for rapid and effective detection of phenoxy carboxylic acid herbicides residue emitted from water and rice samples. Food Chem. 2022;383:132396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Marzi Khosrowshahi E, et al. Experimental and density functional theoretical modeling of triazole pesticides extraction by Ti2C nanosheets as a sorbent in dispersive solid phase extraction method before HPLC-MS/MS analysis. Microchem J. 2022;178:107331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yu C-X, et al. Luminescent two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets with large π-conjugated system: design, synthesis, and detection of anti-inflammatory drugs and pesticides. Inorg Chem. 2022;61(2):982–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu C-X, et al. Ultrathin two-dimensional metal-organic framework nanosheets decorated with tetra-pyridyl calix[4]arene: design, synthesis and application in pesticide detection. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2020;310:127819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127819.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mahdavian L. A study of B12N12 nanocage as potential sensor for detection and reduction of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin. Russ J Appl Chem. 2016;89(9):1528–35. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427216090226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Palomino-Asencio L, García-Hernández E, Salazar-Villanueva M, Chigo-Anota E. B12N12 nanocages with homonuclear bonds as a promising material in the removal/degradation of the insecticide imidacloprid. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2021;126:114456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2020.114456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Ghafur Rauf H, Majedi S, Abdulkareem Mahmood E, Sofi M. Adsorption behavior of the Al- and Ga-doped B12N12 nanocages on COn (n=1, 2) and HnX (n=2, 3 and X=O, N): a comparative study”. Chem Rev Lett. 2019;2(3):140–50. https://doi.org/10.22034/crl.2020.214660.1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zahedifar M, Seyedi N. Bare 3D-TiO2/magnetic biochar dots (3D-TiO2/BCDs MNPs): highly efficient recyclable photocatalyst for diazinon degradation under sunlight irradiation. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2022;139:115151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2022.115151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ni J, Quintana M, Song S. Adsorption of small gas molecules on transition metal (Fe, Ni and Co, Cu) doped graphene: a systematic DFT study. Phys E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2020;116:113768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2019.113768.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cetinkaya A, et al. Detection of axitinib using multiwalled carbon nanotube-Fe2O3/chitosan nanocomposite-based electrochemical sensor and modeling with density functional theory. ACS Omega. 2022;7(38):34495–505. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou Q, Zhu L, Zheng C, Wang J. Nanoporous functionalized WS2/MWCNTs nanocomposite for trimethylamine detection based on quartz crystal microbalance gas sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(34):41339–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c12213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Xiao F, et al. Graphitic carbon nitride/graphene oxide(g-C3N4/GO) nanocomposites covalently linked with ferrocene containing dendrimer for ultrasensitive detection of pesticide. Anal Chim Acta. 2020;1103:84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.066.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mohammadi A, Mirhosseini H, Hekmatiyan A, Abdolahi L, Mehrabi F, Shahmirzaei M. Efficient degradation of parathion as a pollutant and diazinon as a nerve agent by reaction mechanism with rGO-Co3O4/ZnO nanocomposite photocatalyst. J Environ Chem Eng. 2023;11(5):110912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Aparna A, et al. Ligand-protected nanoclusters and their role in agriculture, sensing and allied applications. Talanta. 2022;239:123134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.123134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Shakerzadeh E, Khodayar E, Noorizadeh S. Theoretical assessment of phosgene adsorption behavior onto pristine, Al- and Ga-doped B12N12 and B16N16 nanoclusters. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;118:155–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.03.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hoseininezhad-Namin MS, Rahimpour E, Aysil Ozkan S, Pargolghasemi P, Jouyban A. Sensing of carbamazepine by AlN and BN nanoclusters in gas and solvent phases: DFT and TD-DFT calculation. J Mol Liq. 2022;353:118750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118750.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hussain S, et al. A theoretical framework of zinc-decorated inorganic Mg12O12 nanoclusters for efficient COCl2 adsorption: a step forward toward the development of COCl2 sensing materials. ACS Omega. 2021;6(30):19435–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c01473.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lu B-B, Xing Z-X, Bao Y-S, Ye F, Fu Y. Selective luminescent sensing of teflubenzuron and oxyfluorfen by a resorcin[4]arene-based metal-organic framework. Chem Eng J. 2023;452:139234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Mahmoudi E, Fakhri H, Hajian A, Afkhami A, Bagheri H. High-performance electrochemical enzyme sensor for organophosphate pesticide detection using modified metal-organic framework sensing platforms. Bioelectrochemistry. 2019;130:107348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhang D, Liu H, Sun B. Peptide nanodots-bridged metal-organic framework (PNMOF): Intelligently design a cascade amplification platform for smartphone-facilitated mobile fluorescence imaging detection of pyrethroids. Chem Eng J. 2023;468:143690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeng Z, et al. Transition metal-doped germanium oxide nanozyme with enhanced enzyme-like activity for rapid detection of pesticide residues in water samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2023;1245:340861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2023.340861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pan Y, et al. Electronic structure and d-band center control engineering over M-doped CoP (M = Ni, Mn, Fe) hollow polyhedron frames for boosting hydrogen production. Nano Energy. 2019;56:411–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Luo S, Zhou Q, Xue W, Liao N. Effect of Pt doping on sensing performance of g-C3N4 for detecting hydrogen gas: a DFT study. Vacuum. 2022;200:111014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ilager D, Shetti NP, Foucaud Y, Badawi M, Aminabhavi TM. Graphene/g-carbon nitride (GO/g-C3N4) nanohybrids as a sensor material for the detection of methyl parathion and carbendazim. Chemosphere. 2022;292:133450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang N, Yang M-Q, Tang Z-R, Xu Y-J. Toward improving the graphene-semiconductor composite photoactivity via the addition of metal ions as generic interfacial mediator. ACS Nano. 2014;8(1):623–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn405242t.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Magesa F, et al. Graphene and graphene like 2D graphitic carbon nitride: electrochemical detection of food colorants and toxic substances in environment. Trends Environ Anal Chem. 2019;23: e00064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2019.e00064.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Shivankar BR, Singh CP, Krishnamurty S. Chemically modified graphene sheets as potential sensors for organophosphate compounds(pesticide): a DFT study. Appl Surf Sci. 2023;619:156745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.156745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Deji R, Verma A, Kaur N, Choudhary BC, Sharma RK. Density functional theory study of carbon monoxide adsorption on transition metal doped armchair graphene nanoribbon. Mater Today Proc. 2022;54:771–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Mandeep, Gulati A, Jogender, Kakkar R. DFT study of carbaryl pesticide adsorption on vacancy and nitrogen-doped graphene decorated with platinum clusters. Struct Chem. 2021;32(4):1541–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-020-01693-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang L, et al. Characterization of Pt- or Pd-doped graphene based on density functional theory for H2 gas sensor. Mater Res Express. 2019;6(9):095603. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab2dc0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Mandeep, Gulati A, Kakkar R. DFT study of adsorption of glyphosate pesticide on Pt-Cu decorated pyridine-like nitrogen-doped graphene. J Nanopart Res. 2020;22(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4730-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Sudhaik A, et al. Peroxymonosulphate-mediated metal-free pesticide photodegradation and bacterial disinfection using well-dispersed graphene oxide supported phosphorus-doped graphitic carbon nitride. Appl Nanosci. 2020;10(11):4115–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-020-01529-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Keerthika Devi R, et al. Tailored architecture of molybdenum carbide/iron oxide micro flowers with graphitic carbon nitride: an electrochemical platform for nanolevel detection of organophosphate pesticide in food samples. Food Chem. 2022;397:133791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Rajaji U, et al. Rational construction of novel strontium hexaferrite decorated graphitic carbon nitrides for highly sensitive detection of neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide in fruits. Electrochim Acta. 2021;371:137756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137756.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Tan J, et al. Enhanced photoelectric conversion efficiency: a novel h-BN based self-powered photoelectrochemical aptasensor for ultrasensitive detection of diazinon. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;142:111546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2019.111546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Tan SC, Lee HK. Graphitic carbon nitride as sorbent for the emulsification-enhanced disposable pipette extraction of eight organochlorine pesticides prior to GC-MS analysis. Microchim Acta. 2020;187(2):129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-019-4107-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Ejeta SY, Imae T. Photodegradation of pollutant pesticide by oxidized graphitic carbon nitride catalysts. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2021;404:112955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112955.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Sudhaik A, et al. Synergistic photocatalytic mitigation of imidacloprid pesticide and antibacterial activity using carbon nanotube decorated phosphorus doped graphitic carbon nitride photocatalyst. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2020;113:142–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2020.08.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Rajaji U, et al. Design and fabrication of yttrium ferrite garnet-embedded graphitic carbon nitride: a sensitive electrocatalyst for smartphone-enabled point-of-care pesticide (mesotrione) analysis in food samples. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(21):24865–76. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Rubi RVC, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of diazinon in g-C3N4/Fe(III)/persulfate system under visible LED light irradiation. Appl Sci Eng Prog. 2021;14(1):100–7. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.asep.2020.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Miroliaei MR, Dadfarma A, Shahabi-Nejad M, Jalali E, Sheibani H. Biochar/g-C3N4 nano heterostructure decorated with pt nanoparticles for diazinon photodegradation and E. coli photodeactivation under visible light. Braz J Chem Eng. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-023-00374-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Azhdeh A, Mashhadizadeh MH, Moazami HR. Developing a photoelectric-field wireless electrochemical system for highly efficient removal of diazinon as an organic model pollutant as a next-generation electrochemical advanced oxidation process. J Appl Electrochem. 2023;53(6):1219–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-022-01839-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Mohamad Idris NH, Cheong KY, Smith SM, Lee HL. C, N-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles immobilized on floating alginate beads for diazinon removal under solar light irradiation. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.3c03622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Khatoon R, et al. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) stabilized silver nanoparticles as colorimetric nanosensor for diazinon detection in water. Appl Nanosci. 2023;13(8):5467–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-023-02903-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Talari FF, Bozorg A, Faridbod F, Vossoughi M. A novel sensitive aptamer-based nanosensor using rGQDs and MWCNTs for rapid detection of diazinon pesticide. J Environ Chem Eng. 2021;9(1):104878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Khaledian S, et al. Rapid detection of diazinon as an organophosphorus poison in real samples using fluorescence carbon dots. Inorg Chem Commun. 2021;130:108676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2021.108676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Zahirifar F, Rahimnejad M, Abdulkareem RA, Najafpour G. Determination of Diazinon in fruit samples using electrochemical sensor based on carbon nanotubes modified carbon paste electrode. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;20:101245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Ghiasi T, Ahmadi S, Ahmadi E, Bavil Olyai MRT, Khodadadi Z. Novel electrochemical sensor based on modified glassy carbon electrode with graphene quantum dots, chitosan and nickel molybdate nanocomposites for diazinon and optimal design by the Taguchi method. Microchem J. 2021;160:105628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Kamyabi MA, Moharramnezhad M. An ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence probe based on ternary nanocomposite and boron nitride quantum dots for detection of diazinon. Microchim Acta. 2021;188(3):93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-021-04732-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kamyabi MA, Moharramnezhad M. A novel cathodic electrochemiluminescent sensor based on CuS/carbon quantum dots/g-C3N4 nanosheets and boron nitride quantum dots for the sensitive detection of organophosphate pesticide. Microchem J. 2022;179:107421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Sohrabi H, et al. Advances in fabrication, physio-chemical properties, and sensing applications of nonmetal boron nitride and boron carbon nitride-based nanomaterials. Surf Interfaces. 2023;41:103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Li H, et al. Rapid detection of organophosphorus in tea using NaY/GdF4:Yb, Er-based fluorescence sensor. Microchem J. 2020;159:105462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2020.105462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Wang G, et al. Multiplex strategy electrochemical platform based on self-assembly dual-site DNA tetrahedral scaffold for one-step detection of diazinon and profenofos. Sci Total Environ. 2023;868:161692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bilal S, Sami AJ, Hayat A, Fayyaz ur Rehman M. Assessment of pesticide induced inhibition of Apis mellifera (honeybee) acetylcholinesterase by means of N-doped carbon dots/BSA nanocomposite modified electrochemical biosensor. Bioelectrochemistry. 2022;144:107999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2021.107999.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Boher S, Ullah R, Tuzen M, Saleh TA. Metal doped nanocomposites for detection of pesticides and phenolic compounds by colorimetry: trends and challenges. OpenNano. 2023;13:100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2023.100168.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Frisch MJ, et al. Gaussain. Wallingford: Gaussian Inc.; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Dennington RD, Keith TA, Millam JM. GaussView 6.0.16. Shawnee Mission: Semichem Inc; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  105. OriginPro 2018 (64-bit) SR1 b9.5.1.195 (Academic). Northampton: OriginLab Corporation.

  106. Lu T, Chen F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem. 2012;33(5):580–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Prandi IG, Ramalho TC, França TCC. Esterase 2 as a fluorescent biosensor for the detection of organophosphorus compounds: docking and electronic insights from molecular dynamics. Mol Simul. 2019;45(17):1432–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2019.1648808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Khavidaki HD, Soleymani M, Shirzadi S. A DFT study on adsorption of diazinon and fenitrothion on nanocages B12N12 and B12P12. Struct Chem. 2023;34(3):1133–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-022-02062-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Badran HM, Eid KhM, Ammar HY. A DFT study on the effect of the external electric field on ammonia interaction with boron nitride nanocage. J Phys Chem Solids. 2020;141:109399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109399.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Farmanzadeh D, Rezainejad H. Adsorption of diazinon and hinosan molecules on the iron-doped boron nitride nanotubes surface in gas phase and aqueous solution: a computational study. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;364:862–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.12.202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Hamid A, Roy RK. Correlation between equilibrium constant and stabilization energy: a combined approach based on chemical thermodynamics, statistical thermodynamics, and density functional reactivity theory. J Phys Chem A. 2020;124(7):1279–88. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Matta CF. On the connections between the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) and density functional theory (DFT): a letter from Richard F. W. Bader to Lou Massa. Struct Chem. 2017;28(5):1591–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-017-0946-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Shaikh N, Som NN, Jha PK, Pamidimukkala P. Chitosan supported silver nanostructures as surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor: spectroscopic and density functional theory insights. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253:127444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Xu X, et al. Self-assembled ultrathin CoO/Bi quantum dots/defective Bi2MoO6 hollow Z-scheme heterojunction for visible light-driven degradation of diazinon in water matrix: Intermediate toxicity and photocatalytic mechanism. Appl Catal B. 2021;293:120231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Shrivas K, et al. Silver nanoparticles for selective detection of phosphorus pesticide containing π-conjugated pyrimidine nitrogen and sulfur moieties through non-covalent interactions. J Mol Liq. 2019;275:297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Asif M, Sajid H, Ayub K, Ans M, Mahmood T. A first principles study on electrochemical sensing of highly toxic pesticides by using porous C4N nanoflake. J Phys Chem Solids. 2022;160:110345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Narayanan N, Mandal A, Kaushik P, Singh S. Fluorescence turn off azastilbene sensor for detection of pesticides in vegetables: an experimental and computational investigation. Microchem J. 2022;175:107205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Chiu W-T, Chuang Y-Y, Chen H-C, Huang H-H, Wang R-C. Significant increase in dipole moments of functional groups using cation bonding for excellent SERS sensing as a universal approach. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2021;340:129960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.129960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Panigrahi P, et al. Identification of selected persistent organic pollutants in agricultural land by carbon nitride (C3N5) based nano sensors. Adv Theory Simul. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202300697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Yuksel N, Kose A, Fellah MF. Pd, Ag and Rh doped (8,0) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs): a DFT study on furan adsorption and detection. Surf Sci. 2022;715:121939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2021.121939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EFO: Writing, results extraction, analysis, visualization and manuscript first draft. MOO and OIM: Conceptualization, design, methodology and supervision. DCA: Writing, editing, revision, and visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel C. Agurokpon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Otoh, E.F., Odey, M.O., Martin, O.I. et al. In silico engineering of graphitic carbon nitride nanostructures through germanium mono-doping and codoping with transition metals (Ni, Pd, Pt) as sensors for diazinon organophosphorus pesticide pollutants. BMC Chemistry 19, 78 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01436-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01436-y

Keywords