Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

DNA barcoding of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and detection of Leishmania and other trypanosomatids in southern Thailand

Abstract

Background

Biting midges of the genus Culicoides play an important role in the transmission of pathogenic arboviruses and parasites. Thailand has documented more than 100 species of Culicoides; however, several cryptic species complexes remain to be clarified. Recent studies in areas with leishmaniasis indicate that several species of Culicoides might be potential vectors of Leishmania in the subgenus Mundinia, but evidence supporting the hypothesis is still lacking. Therefore, the diversity of Culicoides biting midges and their potential role as vectors of leishmaniasis in southern Thailand remains uncertain.

Methods

Female Culicoides biting midges were collected using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ultraviolet (UV) light traps from four locations within leishmaniasis-affected areas in three provinces of southern Thailand, including Nakhon Si Thammarat, Krabi, and Surat Thani. Culicoides species were identified based on the morphology of wing spot patterns and subsequently confirmed by cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) Sanger sequencing. A potential cryptic species was classified using an integrative taxonomic approach associated with DNA barcoding identification by Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) searches. Furthermore, three different methods of species delimitation, namely ASAP [Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning], TCS [Templeton, Crandall, and Sing], and PTP [Poisson Tree Processes], were employed to verify the sequences into the molecular operational taxonomic unit (MOTU). Detection of Leishmania and other trypanosomatid parasites was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on the ITS1 region and small subunit SSU ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene, followed by Sanger sequencing and haplotype diversity analysis. The identification of host blood sources was carried out using host-specific multiplex PCR.

Results

A total of 716 unfed midges and 159 blood-fed specimens were morphologically identified into 25 species belonging to five subgenera (Avaritia, Hoffmania, Meijerehelea, Remmia, and Trithecoides) and four species groups (Clavipalpis, Ornatus, Shermani, and Shortti). Two unidentified specimens were classified into two subgenera (Trithecoides and Avaritia). The DNA barcoding identification exhibited an 82.20% success rate. Species delimitation analyses demonstrated the presence of cryptic species complexes, categorized into six species: Culicoides actoni, C. orientalis, C. huffi, C. palpifer, C. clavipalpis, and C. jacobsoni. Furthermore, 6.42% of the Culicoides biting midges tested positive for Leishmania DNA in three sampling sites in Nakhon Si Thammarat and Surat Thani provinces (with no positive results in Krabi province). Furthermore, the sympatric infection of Leishmania martiniquensis and Leishmania orientalis was identified in several Culicoides species in Ron Phibun and Phunphin districts in Nakhon Si Thammarat and Surat Thani, respectively. In contrast, L. orientalis was detected in Sichon district, Nakhon Si Thammarat province. A genetic diversity analysis revealed high haplotype diversity and relatively low nucleotide diversity in both parasite populations. Additionally, Crithidia sp. and Crithidia brevicula were detected in Culicoides peregrinus and Culicoides subgenus Trithecoides. The analysis of the host blood meal from Ron Phibun also demonstrated that Culicoides had fed on cows, dogs, and chickens, and mixed blood preferences for humans and cows or chickens and cows were detected.

Conclusions

The findings of the present study demonstrate the presence of mixed blood hosts and co-circulation of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis in Culicoides in areas of leishmaniasis, as well as cryptic species of Culicoides biting midges, through an integrative taxonomic approach. These findings support the hypothesis that Culicoides biting midges may serve as potential vectors in southern Thailand, and vector diversity is a contributing factor to the risk of zoonotic transmission.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Biting midges of the genus Culicoides are small, hematophagous insects belonging to the family Ceratopogonidae [1]. These flies are widespread and diverse, with approximately 1450 species recorded to date, of which 96% feed on avians and mammals [2]. It has been demonstrated that several species are associated with the transmission of arboviruses that impact both domestic animals and humans, including bluetongue virus (BTV), African horse sickness (AHSV), and Oropouche virus (OROV) [3, 4]. This insect has been incriminated as a vector of filarial nematodes [1], Trypanosoma [5], haemosporidian parasites [6], and most importantly, Leishmania [7,8,9].

Leishmaniasis is a vector-borne disease caused by obligate intracellular parasites of the genus Leishmania [10]. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 report indicates that 99 countries are endemic for leishmaniasis [11]. Of these, 71 countries have reported cases of both visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), while nine and 19 countries have reported cases of VL and CL, respectively [12, 13]. It is noteworthy that both VL and CL are endemic in Thailand, representing a significant public health challenge [14]. Recent studies and surveillance data indicate that the incidence of leishmaniasis in Thailand is a matter of growing concern due to the ongoing transmission of the disease [14]. To effectively interfere with disease transmission, a comprehensive understanding of the vectors and reservoirs that maintain the transmission cycles of pathogens is critical. In Thailand, the predominant species of Leishmania are Leishmania martiniquensis and L. orientalis, which have been previously reported in endemic areas of the northern and southern regions [15, 16]. Previous studies have reported on the subgenus Mundinia in traditional phlebotomine sand fly vectors of the genera Sergentomyia [17,18,19], Phlebotomus [19], and Grassomyia [20].

Recent studies have reported that biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) have been identified as potential vectors of leishmaniasis in Thailand [21, 22], expanding the known range of vectors for this disease beyond sand flies. This discovery highlights the need for further research to elucidate the role of biting midges in the transmission dynamics of Leishmania parasites. Recent research findings from laboratory-based infection experiments noted that the Leishmania subgenus Mundinia, encompassing L. chancei (formerly referred to as “Leishmania sp. Ghana”), L. martiniquensis, and L. orientalis, possesses the capacity to metamorphose into metacyclic promastigotes within Culicoides sonorensis, and subsequently transmits to mice through the process of biting [9]. These findings suggest that the midges of the genus Culicoides may play a crucial role in the transmission of Mundinia species, in particular L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis. The first evidence of a molecular survey on Leishmania detection in biting midges from Thailand was conducted by Sunantaraporn et al., demonstrating the presence of L. martiniquensis DNA in Culicoides mahasarakhamense from Lamphun province of northern Thailand [21]. In southern Thailand, increasing cases of autochthonous leishmaniasis have been continuously reported [16, 22]. Studies have been conducted on the vectors of leishmaniasis in three locations; Songumpai et al. reported that Culicoides peregrinus, C. oxystoma, C. mahasarakhamense, C. huffi, C. fordae, and C. fulvus tested positive for L. martiniquensis DNA, while L. orientalis DNA has been reported in C. peregrinus and C. oxystoma from Songkhla Province [22]. In addition, Kaewmee et al. reported the detection of L. martiniquensis DNA in C. peregrinus, which was collected from Nakhon Si Thammarat province [23]. Conversely, no evidence of Leishmania was detected in Culicoides biting midges collected from Phatthalung province, as reported by Sunantaraporn et al. [24].

Previous studies in Thailand have focused on identifying Culicoides biting midges based on the morphology of their wing pigmentation patterns [25, 26]. Several studies have proposed the efficacy of DNA barcoding, utilizing the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) of the mitochondrial DNA, as a molecular marker for Culicoides species identification in different countries of Asia, including India [27], Japan [28], China [29], and Thailand [30,31,32]. Furthermore, an integrative taxonomic approach for species delimitation-associated DNA barcodes has been shown to potentially facilitate the identification of cryptic species complexes within the genus Culicoides [33]. Studies on Culicoides DNA barcoding in Thailand have been performed in several areas of animal sheds [30,31,32, 34]. Additionally, most studies on Culicoides composition in leishmaniasis areas were performed based on morphological characteristics [24, 35, 36]. However, only two studies on endemic areas for leishmaniasis have confirmed Culicoides species using COI-based identification in Thailand [21, 22]. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the DNA barcoding of Culicoides biting midges to demonstrate the species diversity or cryptic species complex, as well as the molecular detection of Leishmania parasites and other trypanosomatids in Culicoides biting midges collected from Nakhon Si Thammarat, Surat Thani, and Krabi provinces of southern Thailand. The findings of this study may be useful for monitoring and determining the vectorial capacity as well as the epidemiology of leishmaniasis and Culicoides biting midges in endemic areas in southern Thailand.

Methods

Sampling sites and biting midge collection

Culicoides biting midges were collected from three provinces in southern Thailand, around houses of new symptomatic and asymptomatic leishmaniasis cases. The sampling sites are depicted in Fig. 1, and were located in Ron Phibun district (8°16′10.8″N 99°49′31.5″E) (NST1) and Sichon district (9°0′46″N 99°46′42″E) (NST2) from Nakhon Si Thammarat province; Khlong Thom district (8°2′54″N 99°12′50″E) (KB) from Krabi province; and Phunphin district (9°5′59″N 99°14′42″E) (ST) in Surat Thani province. Midge specimens were captured around the houses of people with a history of leishmaniasis, where domestic animals such as cows, dogs, and chickens were raised in the same neighborhood. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps equipped with a 25 W ultraviolet (UV) light bulb were operated between 6:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. for three consecutive nights between 31 July and 3 August 2024. The positioning of the four traps was at an approximate height of 1.5 m above ground level, with the traps being situated near the cattle shed and chicken coop. Subsequently, insect collection bags were stored at −20 °C for 30 min to anesthetize the insects inside. All female Culicoides biting midges were morphologically sorted from other insects according to their wing spot patterns under a stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Non-engorged and blood-engorged biting midges were placed separately in a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube containing 70% ethanol and kept in an ice box before being sent to the Center of Excellence in Vector Biology and Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University. Non-engorged female (parous and gravid) biting midges were selected for screening of Leishmania parasites and other trypanosomatids, while blood-engorged biting midges were subjected to blood meal identification. All specimens were then taxonomically identified according to Wirth and Hubert (1989) [37] using characters visible on unmounted specimens.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of the southern region of Thailand (A), demonstrating Culicoides species diversity and locations of trapping in four collection sites, including Nakhon Si Thammarat [NST1 (B, C) and NST2 (D, E)], Krabi (KB) (F, G), and Surat Thani (ST) (H, I) provinces. The map was obtained and modified from Google Earth Pro version 7.3.4.8248 (https://www.google.com/earth/about/)

Nondestructive DNA extraction

For non-engorged specimens, genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from the whole body of individual Culicoides biting midges by digestion in 100 µl of cell lysis buffer (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea), treated with 10 µl of proteinase K solution, and incubated at 50 °C for 16 h. The lysate solution was further extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions using the Genti™ 32 automated nucleic acid extraction instrument based on a magnetic bead system (GeneAll, Seoul, Korea). The DNA quality and concentration were measured using the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until the next processing. The remaining insect carcass was kept in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube containing 70% ethanol solution in case retrospective morphological confirmation of identification was required. To detect host DNA in engorged midges, the abdomens of the engorged midges were removed, placed in individual 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes, and crushed using a sterilized plastic pestle. DNA extraction was performed as described above.

Molecular identification of Culicoides species

The COI gene was targeted for species identification of Culicoides biting midges. A 523-base-pair (bp) fragment of the COI gene was amplified using C1-J-1718 and C1-N-2191 primers described previously [38]. If the amplification with the first primer pair failed, the primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 were used [39]. The PCR condition of the two primer sets was carried out as previously described by Mathieu et al. [40] and Harrup et al. [27]. For confirmation of the Culicoides species, the PCR products were purified using the FavorPrep™ GEL/PCR Purification Kit (FAVORGEN, Ping Tung, Taiwan). Bidirectional sequencing was carried out using the corresponding forward and reverse primers for COI amplification by Macrogen Inc., South Korea.

Detection of Leishmania and other trypanosomatid parasites in the Culicoides biting midges

Conventional PCR was employed using the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) [41]. To detect other trypanosomatids, a nested PCR was performed based on the small subunit (SSU) rRNA region [42]. The thermal cycles of the PCR reaction followed the protocol previously described for Leishmania spp. [41] and other trypanosomatid parasites [18]. All detection experiments were carried out with PCR components as described in Additional file 1: Supplementary materials 1. Positive PCR products were inserted into the pGEM®-T Easy Vector System (Promega, WI, USA), and plasmid extraction was performed and sent for sequencing by Macrogen, Inc., in Seoul, South Korea.

Identification of blood meal source by host-specific multiplex PCR

Amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cytb) gene was used to detect the presence of vertebrate host-specific DNA in the engorged midges. Multiplex PCR was performed with primers specific to human, cattle, dog, pig, chicken, and universal primers of mammal (UNREV1025) and chicken (UNFOR1029) [43, 44]. Alternative PCR using UNFOR403 and UNREV1025 primers [43, 44] was performed to detect the presence of mammalian DNA in specimens that did not amplify by multiplex PCR. The PCR conditions for mammal blood screening were identical to the multiplex PCR as described in Additional file 1: Supplementary materials 1. Specimens that did not react in either the multiplex PCR or the mammal blood screening were regarded as negative.

Phylogenetic construction and species delimitation analysis of Culicoides biting midges

The COI nucleotide sequences obtained were subjected to editing and analysis using the BioEdit sequence alignment editor (version 7.2.5) [45]. The consensus nucleotide sequences were then compared with sequences available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) (https://www.boldsystems.org/). The construction of the phylogenetic tree was achieved by employing the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap tests, utilizing Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software, version 11 (MEGA11) [46]. The ML tree was then visualized and edited using FigTree version 1.4.4 (https://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/FigTree/). The intraspecific variations were calculated using the Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model in MEGA11 [46].

For the species delimitation, the COI sequences of Culicoides species were identified at the molecular operational taxonomic unit (MOTU) level generated by the three algorithms: ASAP [Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning) [47], PTP [Poisson Tree Processes] [48], and TCS [Templeton, Crandall, and Sing] haplotype network [49]. The genetic diversity and neutrality test of Leishmania populations and other trypanosomatids were evaluated using DnaSP version 6 [50], and the haplotype network based on the minimum spanning network was then generated using PopART version 1.7 [51].

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics based on the PCR-positive results in Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft Corp., USA). The prevalence rate was calculated by dividing the number of positive specimens by the total number of specimens collected in each sampling site, and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was evaluated. Other parameters were calculated for the Culicoides population from different collection sites, including relative abundance (number of specimens of each species/total number of specimens × 100) and species richness (number of species in the investigated areas).

Results

Species composition of Culicoides biting midges

Overall, 875 female Culicoides biting midges were collected from four different areas in southern Thailand. In total, 716 non-engorged (parous and gravid) female specimens were collected from all sampling sites, whereas 159 blood-fed female midges were collected only in Ron Phibun (NST1). The highest relative abundance of Culicoides species in this study was demonstrated in Ron Phibun (56.34%) from Nakhon Si Thammarat, followed by Khlong Thom (24.80%) from Krabi, Phunphin (11.09%) from Surat Thani, and Sichon (7.77%) from Nakhon Si Thammarat. Additionally, the species richness of all collected Culicoides spp. was 25, belonging to five subgenera (Avaritia, Hoffmania, Meijerehelea, Remmia, and Trithecoides) and four species groups (Clavipalpis, Ornatus, Shermani, and Shortti). The highest species richness was observed in Ron Phibun (16), followed by Sichon (11), Khlong Thom (11), and Phunphin (10). The most abundant species demonstrated in each study site were C. peregrinus (30.03%), C. subgenus Trithecoides (27.94%), C. huffi (72.16%), and C. guttifer (29.49%) in Ron Phibun, Sichon, Phunphin, and Khlong Thom, respectively. For the Trithecoides subgenus, the specimens were not classified to species level. However, this subgenus was identified by its morphological characteristics of a yellow scutum and three spermathecae. The morphological characteristic wing patterns are illustrated in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Photographs of wing patterns of representative 27 Culicoides species collected from this study; the scale bar indicates 100 µm

DNA barcoding and phylogenetic analysis of COI sequences

A total of 118 Culicoides DNA specimens were randomly selected for COI sequencing to represent each morphologically identified species from different sampling sites. Identification of Culicoides species using the BOLD search (https://www.boldsystems.org/) demonstrated a success rate for accurate identification. Of the 118 COI sequences analyzed, 97 (82.20%) sequences were correctly identified at the species level, while 14 sequences were identified with ambiguity, and seven sequences did not match sequences in the BOLD database. Fourteen ambiguous sequences were identified by morphology into three species, including C. jacobsoni (n = 7), C. palpifer (n = 2), and C. subgenus Trithecoides (n = 5). Two ambiguous species (C. jacobsoni and C. palpifer) were identified at the genus level (Culicoides sp.), and five specimens of C. subgenus Trithecoides were found to be closely related to Dasyhelea ludingensis (0.98%) and Forcipomyia sp. (0.63%), with relatively low sequence variation. Seven sequences, one from C. nigripes, two from C. palpifer, and four from C. subgenus Avaritia, did not match the sequences in BOLD (Additional file 3: Table S1).

A comparison of the two identification methods, BLASTn and BOLD, was conducted in order to confirm the identification of the species. All COI sequences were classified to the species level by a BLAST score ranging from 98.25% to 100% similarity, except for C. subgenus Trithecoides and C. subgenus Avaritia. BOLD scores ranged from 96.76% to 100% similarity. Three nominal species demonstrated a low percentage identity in BLASTn analysis, with 97.70%, 94.10%, and 91.85% for C. palpifer, C. nigripes, and C. clavipalpes, respectively. In addition, BOLD results demonstrated a low identity percentage for C. palpifer (97.26%) and C. clavipalpes (95.20%), while C. nigripes did not match within the database. Furthermore, BLASTn results for five C. subgenus Trithecoides specimens showed relatively low percentage identity with Ceratopogonidae species (97.92%), while BOLD results were identical to D. ludingensis and Forcipomyia sp. Culicoides subgenus Avaritia showed a low shared identity with C. fulvus (88.67%) by BLASTn search; notably, there was no matching of these species in the BOLD database (Additional file 3: Table S1).

A total of 190 COI sequences belonging to 118 of the sequences under investigation and 72 reference sequences of conspecific species in the GenBank database were utilized to construct a phylogenetic tree. Based on the T92+G+I model, the phylogenetic tree has classified our Culicoides specimens according to conspecific species with bootstrap tests > 80%. Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis illustrated a distinct separation into two clades of C. palpifer and C. huffi (Fig. 3). For the K2P intraspecific genetic variations result, the highest maximum intraspecific variation exceeding 3% was demonstrated in five Culicoides species, including C. clavipalpis (18.80%), C. huffi (18.37%), C. palpifer (9.64%), C. orientalis (8.14%), and C. actoni (4.77%) (Additional file 4: Table S2). The COI sequences of Culicoides species in this study were deposited in the GenBank database as accession numbers PQ838158–PQ838275.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Maximum likelihood tree based on partial COI sequences with a Kimura 3-parameter with gamma distribution and invariant sites (T92+G+I) model (1000 bootstrap tests) of 25 Culicoides species and their conspecific species and two unidentified Culicoides species. The green, gray, and blue bars demonstrate three species delimitation methods—ASAP, TCS, and PTP, respectively

Species delimitation analysis

Species delimitation was conducted using three methods—ASAP, TCS, and PTP—to demonstrate diversity between species levels by two or more lineages, suggesting a potential cryptic species complex. The results of the three species delimitation methods are shown alongside the ML tree in Fig. 3. The COI sequence dataset was sorted into 38, 43, and 34 MOTUs (species groups) by the ASAP, TCS, and PTP methods, respectively. A congruence of ASAP and TCS methods was observed in three species datasets, including C. actoni (three MOTUs), C. orientalis (two MOTUs), and C. jacobsoni (two MOTUs). Furthermore, the ASAP and PTP methods were split into two and three MOTUs in C. huffi and C. palpifer, whereas the TCS method identified two species, dividing them into four and five MOTUs. The TCS and PTP methods were classified into four MOTUs for C. clavipalpis, and the three species delimitation methods were divided into two MOTUs in C. nigripes. Furthermore, C. arakawae and C. mahasarakhamense exhibited analogous wing morphological patterns. However, the three species delimitation methods (ASAP, TCS, and PTP) were clearly distinguishable between the two species. The TCS network analysis of Culicoides species in this study demonstrated the presence of 65 haplotypes, with an overall high haplotype diversity (Hd) value of 0.976. The statistical analysis using Tajima's D (0.09427) and Fu and Li's D (1.14406) was not significant (P > 0.10). The highest observed haplotype diversity was found in C. huffi, which contained nine distinct haplotypes (H12, H13, H19, H20, H21, H44, H52, H53, and H54). This was followed by C. palpifer, which contained six distinct haplotypes (H45, H46, H47, H51, H60, and H51) (Additional file 2: Figure S1.).

Detection of Leishmania spp. and other trypanosomatids in Culicoides biting midges

A total of 716 non-engorged biting midges were subjected to molecular screening for Leishmania and other trypanosomatid parasites. Overall, 46 (6.42%) of the Culicoides biting midges were found to be positive for Leishmania DNA. The presence of Leishmania DNA was detected at three different sampling sites: Nakhon Si Thammarat (Ron Phibun [NST1] and Sichon [NST2]) and Surat Thani (Phunphin [ST]). Conversely, Culicoides biting midges collected from Krabi (KB) were found to be negative for Leishmania DNA.

The overall prevalence rate in Ron Phibun (NST1) was 9.28%. Leishmania orientalis was detected in C. peregrinus (n = 18), C. oxystoma (n = 1), and C. innoxius (n = 1) with a prevalence rate of 5.98%. Leishmania martiniquensis was also detected in C. peregrinus (n = 9) and C. oxystoma (n = 2), with a prevalence of 3.29%.

In Sichon (NST2), six specimens of C. guttifer (n = 2), C. huffi (n = 2), C. subgenus Avaritia (n = 1), and C. orientalis (n = 1) were found to be positive for L. orientalis, with a prevalence rate of 8.82%.

In Phunphin (ST), six specimens of C. huffi were positive for L. martiniquensis (6.18%), and one specimen each of C. guttifer, C. innoxious, and C. nigripes was found to contain L. orientalis (3.09%), giving an overall prevalence rate of 9.27%.

The BLASTn results of positive specimens for L. martiniquensis ranged from 97% to 100% similarity with L. martiniquensis reported in humans (accession no. KY982640) from Trang and Sergentomyia khawi (accession no. MK603826) from Songkhla provinces of southern Thailand. Conversely, the BLASTn results of positive specimens for L. orientalis demonstrated an identity score ranging from 95% to 100% similarity with L. orientalis (accession no. MH807723 and MH807729) reported in humans from Trang province of southern Thailand.

The present study detected monoxenous trypanosomatids with the primer targeted to the SSU rRNA gene, with an overall prevalence rate of 1.82% (13/716). Eleven C. peregrinus specimens (3.29%) were positively detected in Ron Phibun (Nakhon Si Thammarat). Sequence comparison of the 11 positive specimens with data available in GenBank revealed high sequence similarity (99–100%) with SSU rRNA sequences of Crithidia sp. (accession no. OR077444, OR077445, and OR077454) found in C. peregrinus as previously reported in Thailand. Furthermore, two (0.92%) specimens of C. subgenus Trithecoides collected from Krabi province were positively detected. A comparison of the two obtained SSU rRNA sequences with sequences published in the GenBank database demonstrated that the sequences were 98.92% and 98.93% compatible with Crithidia brevicula (accession no. MT232052). However, co-infection of Leishmania spp. and Crithidia spp. could not be detected (Additional file 5: Table S3).

The obtained sequences were submitted to the GenBank database under accession numbers PQ805171–PQ805187 for L. martiniquensis, PQ805188–PQ805216 for L. orientalis, PQ799320–PQ799330 for Crithidia sp., and OP315268 and OP315269 for .Crithidia brevicula (Table 1).

Table 1 Species composition, number of specimens, relative abundance, and species richness in different locations in southern Thailand

Haplotype network and genetic diversity of Leishmania and Crithidia parasites

The present study investigates the genetic diversity of L. martiniquensis, utilizing a dataset comprising 58 ITS1 sequences derived from Culicoides-positive specimens and those previously reported in southern Thailand from human, sand fly, rat, and biting midge specimens. Twenty-three distinct haplotypes were identified, encompassing 33 polymorphic sites. The classification of our Leishmania sequences revealed their association with eight distinct haplotypes, namely H1, H17, H18, and H19 from Nakhon Si Thammarat (NST1), and H20, H21, H22, and H23 from Surat Thani. H1 was identified as the predominant haplotype, comprising 23 sequences from multiple hosts (Fig. 4). The haplotype diversity (Hd) was relatively high, at 0.831. In contrast, the nucleotide diversity (π) was relatively low at 0.01224. The neutrality test was found to be negatively significant for Tajima's D (−1.89378) and Fu and Li's D (−3.95199) (Table 2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Haplotype diversity network of L. martiniquensis based on ITS1 sequences from our collected Culicoides biting midges and L. martiniquensis sequences from different hosts from southern Thailand. The size of each circle is proportional to the frequency of the respective haplotype. The lines in the branch correspond to the number of mutations

Table 2 Genetic diversity of Leishmania and Crithidia parasites from Culicoides species

A total of 63 L. orientalis ITS1 sequences, including our Culicoides specimens, along with those sequences from humans, sand flies, and biting midges previously reported in southern Thailand, were utilized for genetic and haplotype analysis. Twenty-five distinct haplotypes were identified, encompassing 56 polymorphic sites. Our L. orientalis was identified within 11 haplotypes, consisting of six haplotypes (H16, H17, H18, H19, H20, and H21) from Sichon (NST2), four haplotypes (H22, H23, H24, and H25) from Surat Thani, and two haplotypes (H1 and H16) from Ron Phibun (NST1). The predominant haplotype of L. orientalis was H1, comprising 33 sequences from human (n = 14), Culicoides biting midges from Songkhla (n = 1), and our sequences from Ron Phibun (NST1) (n = 18) (Fig. 5). The genetic diversity of L. orientalis exhibited a high haplotype diversity (Hd = 0.726) and a relatively low nucleotide diversity (π = 0.01951). The neutrality test yielded negative results, with Tajima's D and Fu and Li's D values of −2.15392 and −2.81159, respectively (Table 2).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Haplotype diversity network for L. orientalis ITS1 sequences detected in Culicoides biting midges, compared with L. orientalis as previously reported from southern Thailand. The size of the circles is proportional to the number of specimens. Each line in the branches indicates the number of base mutations

For Crithidia sp., 67 SSU rRNA sequences were used for haplotype and genetic analysis. Of these, 31 classified haplotypes, which were divided into four distinct groups:  Crithidia brevicula group, Crithidia sp. in Glossina sp. group, Crithidia haplogroup A, and Crithidia haplogroup B. Notably, 11 SSU rRNA sequences isolated from this study were classified into two major haplogroups, A and B. For Crithidia haplogroup A, there are 19 haplotypes belonging to Crithidia sequences previously reported in Culicoides biting midges from Songkhla and Nakhon Si Thammarat, and our sequences. The H20 and H29 were identified in our Crithidia species. The Crithidia haplogroup B was classified into five distinct haplotypes, demonstrating one (H4) belonging to Crithidia sp. from Nakhon Si Thammarat and two (H4 and H5) from Phatthalung provinces, while four Crithidia SSU rRNA sequences in this study were classified into four distinct haplotypes, namely H4, H28, H30, and H31. For  Crithidia brevicula, three distinct haplotypes were identified. Crithidia brevicula sequences from Krabi were grouped into H2 by one sequence, sharing with  Crithidia brevicula from Culex torrentium and Chrysops viduatus, while the remaining sequence belonged to H1, which was a unique haplotype (Fig. 6). The genetic diversity of Crithidia was found to be 0.941, suggesting high haplotype diversity. In contrast, the nucleotide diversity was 0.03590, indicating a relatively low level. The neutrality tests were not significant in the populations (Table 2; Additional file 6: Table S4).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The haplotype diversity for Crithidia SSU rRNA sequences detected in Culicoides biting midges of this study and sequences of different insect species is demonstrated in this following analysis. The size of each circle is proportional to the number of specimens. The line in the branches demonstrates the number of base mutations

Host blood meal identification in Culicoides biting midges

A total of 159 blood-fed specimens were collected, representing 11 species (C. actoni, C. fulvus, C. huffi, C. innoxius, C. insignipennis, C. jacobsoni, C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, C. peregrinus, C. shortti, and C. sumatrae) and one subgenus, Trithecoides. These specimens were then tested for the presence of host DNA. Of these, two specimens were found to be negative in both the multiplex PCR and the mammalian blood screening PCR. The multiplex PCR demonstrated an efficacy rate of 98.74% (157/159) in host-specific identification. The most prevalent blood meal pattern identified in this study was cow blood DNA in 149 (94.90%) specimens of 12 Culicoides species. In addition, dog blood DNA was identified in three (1.91%) C. subgenus Trithecoides. Notably, only one specimen (0.64%) of C. huffi was positive for chicken blood DNA. Interestingly, four specimens were found to be mixed with host blood DNA; one specimen of C. innoxius was fed on both cows and chickens. Furthermore, each specimen of C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, and C. sumatrae was found to be feeding on both humans and cows. Conversely, no specimen was found to be positive for pig blood DNA (Additional file 7: Table S5).

Discussion

Morphological identification of Culicoides species has historically relied on keys and taxonomic descriptions. However, this method has several limitations, including the requirement for expertise, intraspecific morphologic variation, and the fact that specimens are often damaged during collection or preservation [37, 52], leading to misidentification. DNA barcoding has been increasingly applied for Culicoides identification, providing high precision in species identification, especially for cryptic species that are morphologically indistinguishable [30, 52]. In Thailand, 103 species of Culicoides biting midges have been recorded [25, 32, 53, 54]. Several investigations have been conducted to identify Culicoides species in different areas of Thailand [21, 22, 30,31,32]. This study investigated the diversity of Culicoides biting midges based on morphological characteristics and DNA barcoding for species delimitation in leishmaniasis areas of southern Thailand. Twenty-five Culicoides species were identified based on morphological traits and confirmed at the species level by COI sequencing. Furthermore, two subgenera were identified at the genus level, Trithecoides and Avaritia. The predominant Culicoides species at the four sampling sites were C. peregrinus, C. subgenus Trithecoides, C. huffi, and C. guttifer. These were found in Ron Phibun, Sichon, Phunphin, and Khlong Thom, respectively. Higher species richness (SR) was found in Ron Phibun (SR = 16), followed by Sichon and Khlong Thom (SR = 11) and Phunphin (SR = 10). Previous studies of Culicoides species composition in leishmaniasis endemic areas of southern Thailand demonstrated that C. peregrinus was the most common species, with 17 species found in Phatthalung province [24], while C. peregrinus and C. oxystoma were the dominant species with seven and six species in the two areas in the Sadao district, and C. fordae was the dominant species with 10 species found in the Ratthaphum district in Songkhla province [22]. A study by Kaewmee et al. demonstrated low species richness (C. peregrinus, C. mahasarakhamense, and C. oxystoma) in Nakhon Si Thammarat [23]. The variations in dominant species and species richness across the designated areas may be attributable to several factors, including seasonality, environmental factors (temperature, rainfall, wind speed, and humidity), host animal availability, and the optimal height and distance of traps with animal baits [55, 56].

The COI sequences of Culicoides species in this study were verified in the BOLD database, indicating an 82.20% (97/118) success rate for correct identification. However, 14 sequences were identified as ambiguous, and seven sequences had no match in the BOLD database. The failure to identify the species may be attributed to misidentification of the specimens in public databases or to sequence variations of the COI gene, which cannot distinguish some conspecific species [30]. Phylogenetic analysis clearly delineates two and three lineages of C. palpifer and C. huffi, respectively. These data are consistent with the results of previous studies on potential cryptic species of C. palpifer and C. huffi collected from the leishmaniasis area in Lamphun, northern Thailand  [21], and the specimens from southern and eastern Thailand [34].

In a recent study, Jomkumsing et al. reported the possible existence of cryptic species for five species: C. arakawae, C. huffi, C. innoxius, C. jacobsoni, and C. actoni. These findings were derived from a combination of phylogenetic neighbor-joining (NJ) tree analysis and ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery) analysis, a method that has proven effective in identifying genetic lineage variations. [30]. This study employed species delimitation methods, including ASAP, TCS, and PTP, to demonstrate the presence of cryptic species of Culicoides biting midges based on single-locus data from COI sequences. Six species, C. actoni, C. orientalis, C. huffi, C. palpifer, C. clavipalpis, and C. jacobsoni, were identified as exhibiting two or more MOTUs. Similarly, intraspecific genetic variation analysis showed high divergence in five species, namely, C. clavipalpis (18.80%), C. huffi (18.37%), C. palpifer (9.64%), C. orientalis (8.14%), and C. actoni (4.77%). This finding suggests the potential existence of a cryptic species complex. Additionally, all species delimitation methods and phylogenetic analysis supported the proposal of a cryptic species complex within C. palpifer and C. huffi, as reported in previous studies [21, 30, 34]. Furthermore, other species, C. actoni, C. clavipalpis, and C. jacobsoni, were consistent with the findings of previous studies by Fujikawa et al. [31]. In the case of C. nigripes, this species demonstrated low percentage identity (94.10%) in the BLASTn result and no match sequence within the BOLD database. In contrast, three species delimitations, ASAP, TCS, and PTP, were separated by two specimens. However, the single sequence of C. nigripes deposited in the GenBank database (MZ189960) was insufficient for comparative analysis, as it was only reported from Kanchanaburi, western Thailand. It is, therefore, imperative to collect additional specimens from different locations for this species in order to facilitate further analysis. Culicoides arakawae and C. mahasarakhamense exhibited similar wing morphological patterns [30, 53], which made it difficult to distinguish between the two species based solely on their external features. However, when employing the three species delimitation methods—ASAP, TCS, and PTP—a clear genetic separation between the two species was observed. This finding underscores the limitations of relying solely on morphological traits for species identification, particularly in cases of cryptic or closely related species.

In the present study, the identification of C. subgenus Trithecoides and C. subgenus Avaritia specimens collected from Sichon, Nakhon Si Thammarat, was conducted based on fundamental morphological characteristics, utilizing BLASTn, BOLD, phylogenetic analysis, and species delimitation. The inability to assign these specimens to the species level led to the hypothesis that they might not possess any sequences from the two subgenera (Trithecoides and Avaritia) available in the database, or they could be a novel species. However, further investigation into the taxonomic identification of these insects, based on whole bodies, may be conducted in the future. In this study, morphological and COI barcoding were conducted, demonstrating that DNA barcoding can effectively confirm species and identify potential cryptic species. It can also be used to confirm species in cases where there is a lack of expertise or when insect specimens are incomplete.

Molecular and morphological methods for identifying Culicoides species involved in leishmaniasis are highly complementary, with each addressing the limitations of the other. Morphological identification using traits such as wing venation, genitalia, and body structure is often used in field settings where only basic tools are available, but it can be difficult to distinguish closely related or cryptic species. Molecular techniques, such as DNA barcoding using the COI gene, provide accurate species identification and can confirm or clarify ambiguous morphological findings, especially when cryptic species are involved [30, 34]. In situations where only morphological methods are feasible, molecular identification can still play a vital role when specimens are returned to the laboratory, ensuring accuracy and revealing species that may have been misidentified in the field. Integrating molecular data with morphological identification not only improves the overall accuracy of species identification but also enhances surveillance efforts, allowing for better tracking of Culicoides populations involved in leishmaniasis transmission and informing more targeted control measures.

In the present study, natural infections by Leishmania parasites were conducted in four sampling sites from three provinces, including Nakhon Si Thammarat, Krabi, and Surat Thani in southern Thailand. All selected provinces have reported several cases of autochthonous leishmaniasis caused by Mundinia species. The molecular evidence of Leishmania infection in potential vectors was performed by ITS1-PCR-based detection. The study revealed the sympatric infections of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis in C. peregrinus and C. oxystoma, with the detection of L. orientalis in a single specimen of C. innoxius from Ron Phibun. Our result was consistent with the previous study by Songumpai et al., which mentioned the co-circulation of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis in C. peregrinus and C. oxystoma from Songkhla in southern Thailand. [22].

In the present study, C. peregrinus was identified as the predominant species and was found to be positive for Leishmania detection in Ron Phibun. A previous study by Kaewmee et al. suggested that C. peregrinus is a potential vector of L. martiniquensis from southern Thailand [23]. Leishmania orientalis was detected in C. guttifer, C. huffi, C. orientalis, and C. subgenus Avaritia in Sichon, while L. martiniquensis was not detected. The high prevalence of Leishmania infection was predominantly observed in C. peregrinus (NST1) and C. huffi (in NST2 and ST). It was hypothesized that the most abundant Culicoides species are potential vectors for increasing disease transmission of pathogens [22, 57]. Previous studies have reported that several Culicoides species were detected for L. martiniquensis DNA, including C. mahasarakhamense, C. peregrinus, C. oxystoma [22, 23], C. huffi, C. fordae, and C. fulvus [22], in southern Thailand. Consistent with the present study, L. martiniquensis was positive in C. peregrinus, C. oxystoma, and C. huffi. While C. peregrinus and C. oxystoma have been documented as positive for L. orientalis [22], our study presents the novel finding of molecular evidence for L. orientalis in C. guttifer, C. huffi, C. orientalis, C. innoxius, and C. nigripes in the southern region of Thailand. However, recent studies by Soe et al. have shown a remarkable inability to detect Leishmania and other trypanosomatid DNA in Culicoides biting midges sampled from mixed livestock farms in Nakhon Si Thammarat [58]. These findings raise questions about the ecological and environmental factors influencing the presence or absence of these pathogens in such vectors and suggest a need for further investigation to understand the dynamics of vector–pathogen interactions in different geographic settings. Previous reports indicated that traditional vectors such as sand flies in northern and southern Thailand were found to be positive for L. orientalis in Sergentomyia iyegari [59], Se. gemmea [19], and Se. khawi [60]. Additionally, L. martiniquensis was reported in Se. khawi [18], Se. gemmea, Se. barraudi [17], Grassomyia indica [20], and Phlebotomus stantoni [19].

The genetic diversity of both L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis populations was found to be characterized by high haplotype diversity and relatively low nucleotide diversity, suggesting that they have recently diverged in the populations [35, 36, 61]. A star-like or complex distribution pattern was demonstrated by the haplotype network of both species, with the origin haplotype and several connecting haplotype lineages with a few base mutations, indicating a recent population expansion from the major haplotype [62]. Furthermore, a significant negative result of the neutrality test suggested possible rapid population growth or selective sweep [36, 61, 63]. Of particular significance is the observation that the genetic divergence of novel haplotypes may be indicative of an evolutionary process by which parasites have successfully adapted to a diverse range of vector species or may be associated with a separate vector. [62, 63].

The detection of blood meal provides information about the host preferences of potential leishmaniasis vectors. In the present study, 159 biting midges from Ron Phibun in Nakhon Si Thammarat were blood-engorged. Our findings revealed that the primary blood source for these biting midges was cows, constituting 94.90% of the samples, followed by dogs (1.91%). This observation indicates a strong mammalophilic blood preference and underscores the potential role of these mammal species as reservoirs for disease transmission. Furthermore, mixed blood-feeding of humans and cows was found in C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, and C. sumatrae, while C. innoxius was found to feed on both cows and chickens. In Thailand, previous reports on blood meal analysis in Culicoides were mainly conducted in different locations [24, 30, 32, 64]. The findings revealed that the host preferences of midges depend primarily on the availability of animals [30, 32]. A few studies in Thailand have identified an anthropophilic blood preference in C. brevitarsis [32], C. oxystoma, and C. imicola [64]. However, in the present study, three species, C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, and C. sumatrae, were shown to feed on human blood. Of particular interest is the positive detection of C. oxystoma for both L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis in the present study, as well as in a previous study conducted in southern Thailand [22]. Consequently, it is hypothesized that C. oxystoma may act as a potential vector for transmission to humans or animals.

The detection of parasite DNA and the identification of human blood in field-caught biting midges supported only two of Killick-Kendrick's criteria [65]. It is impossible to incriminate Culicoides as the principal vector of leishmaniasis in Thailand. The remaining criteria include the isolation and cultivation of these parasites from insect vectors in the field, the experimental infection of parasites for completed development cycles in Thai Culicoides species, and the transmission of parasites to vertebrate hosts by bite. However, the missing evidence data will be provided for completion in future studies to fulfill the criteria.

Furthermore, the utilization of SSU rRNA-PCR for the screening of trypanosomatids in biting midges resulted in the identification of Crithidia sp. in C. peregrinus from Ron Phibun, Nakhon Si Thammarat province, and the detection of Crithidia brevicula in two C. subgenus Trithecoides specimens in Khlong Thom, Krabi province. These parasites are one-host or monoxenous trypanosomatids and are commonly found in the intestinal tract of insects [66]. A previous study by Sunantaraporn et al. reported Crithidia sp. in C. peregrinus from Phatthalung province in southern Thailand [24]. Furthermore, Crithidia sp. was identified in several Culicoides species, including C. peregrinus, C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, C. fordae, and C. elbeli, collected from Songkhla in southern Thailand [22]. A subsequent study by Kaewmee et al. identified two distinct clades (designated as A and B) of Crithidia spp. in C. peregrinus specimens obtained from Nakhon Si Thammarat in southern Thailand [23]. Previous research in eastern Lithuania had identified Crithidia sp. in C. festivipennis, and  Crithidia brevicula had been found in C. festivipennis, C. kibunensis, and C. pictipennis [67]. In the present study, we report Crithidia brevicula in C. subgenus Trithecoides in Thailand for the first time. In contrast, Crithidia brevicula has been observed to infect a broader range of species, including insects from the families Nabidae, Diptera, and Muscidae [68]. The analysis of Crithidia sp. detection was classified into two haplogroups, A and B. Of particular interest was the finding that haplogroup A contained Crithidia sp. from various Culicoides species, including C. peregrinus, C. orientalis, C. oxystoma, C. fordae, and C. elbeli, while haplogroup B contained Crithidia sp. from only one species of C. peregrinus, suggesting that Crithidia haplogroup B may be specific to C. peregrinus. However, the isolation of these trypanosomatids was not performed in this study. Therefore, it is recommended that future research focus on observing live parasites in biting midges to gain a deeper understanding of their biology and interactions.

Conclusions

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of the presence of mixed-blood hosts and the co-circulation of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis within Culicoides populations in leishmaniasis-endemic areas of southern Thailand. Additionally, the study identified cryptic species of Culicoides biting midges, highlighting the complexity of vector species in the region. The results support the hypothesis that Culicoides may act as vectors for Leishmania transmission, thereby contributing to the zoonotic transmission risk in this area. The diversity of Culicoides species further underscores the importance of understanding vector species composition as a key factor influencing disease transmission dynamics. It is recommended that future research focus on investigating the role of Culicoides species as vectors of Leishmania in southern Thailand. Additionally, longitudinal studies should be conducted to assess seasonal variations in vector populations and their implications for disease transmission. Expanding the study to other regions with similar environmental conditions will provide a broader understanding of the geographic spread and risk factors associated with Leishmania transmission in Thailand. Enhanced surveillance and vector control strategies are also recommended to mitigate the risk of leishmaniasis transmission.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of the study must be available within the article and/or its supplementary materials, or deposited in a publicly available database. Please revise the data availability statement accordingly. The sequence data obtained from this study have been deposited in the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). All sequences are available in GenBank under the accession numbers PQ805171–PQ805187 for L. martiniquensis, PQ805188–PQ805216 for L. orientalis, PQ799320–PQ799330 for Crithidia sp., and OP315268 and OP315269 for Crithidia brevicula. PQ838158–PQ838275 for Culicoides species are based on the COI gene.

References

  1. Mullen GR, Murphree CS. Biting midges (Ceratopogonidae). Med Vet Entomol. 2019. p. 213–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/mve.12352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borkent A, Dominiak P. Catalog of the biting midges of the world (Diptera Ceratopogonidae). Zootaxa. 2020;4787:1–377. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4787.1.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sick F, Beer M, Kampen H, Wernike K. Culicoides biting midges-underestimated vectors for arboviruses of public health and veterinary importance. Viruses. 2019;11:376. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11040376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sakkas H, Bozidis P, Franks A, Papadopoulou C. Oropouche fever: a review. Viruses. 2018;10:175. https://doi.org/10.3390/v10040175.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Svobodová M, Dolnik OV, Čepička I, Rádrová J. Biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of avian trypanosomes. Parasit Vect. 2017;10:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2158-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Žiegytė R, Platonova E, Kinderis E, Mukhin A, Palinauskas V, Bernotienė R. Culicoides biting midges involved in transmission of haemoproteids. Parasit Vect. 2021;14:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04516-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Seblova V, Sadlova J, Vojtkova B, Votypka J, Carpenter S, Bates PA, et al. The Biting Midge Culicoides sonorensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) Is Capable of Developing Late Stage Infections of Leishmania enriettii. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004060. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chanmol W, Jariyapan N, Somboon P, Bates MD, Bates PA. Development of Leishmania orientalis in the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) and the biting midge Culicoides soronensis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Acta Trop. 2019;199:105157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Becvar T, Vojtkova B, Siriyasatien P, Votypka J, Modry D, Jahn P, et al. Experimental transmission of Leishmania (Mundinia) parasites by biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). PLoS Pathog. 2021;17:e1009654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Torres-Guerrero E, Quintanilla-Cedillo MR, Ruiz-Esmenjaud J, Arenas R. Leishmaniasis: a review. F1000Res. 2017;6:50. https://doi.org/10.1268/f1000research.11120.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. (2022). Leishmaniasis. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/gho-ntd-leishmaniasis.

  12. World Health Organization. Status of endemicity of visceral leishmaniasis. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/status-of-endemicity-of-visceral-leishmaniasis. Accessed 29 Sep 2023

  13. World Health Organization.. Status of endemicity of cutaneous leishmaniasis. https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/status-of-endemicity-of-cutaneous-leishmaniasis. Accessed 29 Sep 2023

  14. Leelayoova S, Siripattanapipong S, Manomat J, Piyaraj P, Tan-Ariya P, Bualert L, et al. Leishmaniasis in Thailand: a review of causative agents and situations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96:534–42. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0604.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Srivarasat S, Brownell N, Siriyasatien P, Noppakun N, Asawanonda P, Rattanakorn K, et al. Case report: autochthonous disseminated cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and visceral leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania martiniquensis in a patient with HIV/AIDS from Northern Thailand and literature review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;107:1196–202. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.22-0108.PMID:36375453;PMCID:PMC9768252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Anugulruengkitt S, Songtaweesin WN, Thepnarong N, Tangthanapalakul A, Sitthisan M, Chatproedprai S, et al. Case report: simple nodular cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by autochthonous Leishmania (Mundinia) orientalis in an 18-Month-Old Girl: The First Pediatric Case in Thailand and literature review. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;108:44–50. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.22-0385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chusri S, Thammapalo S, Chusri S, Thammapalo S, Silpapojakul K, Siriyasatien P. Animal reservoirs and potential vectors of Leishmania siamensis in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2014;45:13–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Srisuton P, Phumee A, Sunantaraporn S, Boonserm R, Sor-Suwan S, Brownell N, et al. Detection of Leishmania and Trypanosoma DNA in field-caught sand flies from endemic and non-endemic areas of leishmaniasis in Southern Thailand. Insects. 2019;10:238. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects10080238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sriwongpan P, Nedsuwan S, Manomat J, Charoensakulchai S, Lacharojana K, Sankwan J, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Leishmania infection among immunocompetent hosts, a community-based study in Chiang Rai, Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Preativatanyou K, Chinwirunsirisup K, Phumee A, Khositharattanakool P, Sunantaraporn S, Depaquit J, et al. Species diversity of phlebotomine sand flies and sympatric occurrence of Leishmania (Mundinia) martiniquensis, Leishmania (Leishmania) donovani complex, and Trypanosoma spp. in the visceral leishmaniasis focus of southern Thailand. Acta Trop. 2023;244:106949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2023.106949.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sunantaraporn S, Thepparat A, Phumee A, Sor-Suwan S, Boonserm R, Bellis G, et al. Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as potential vectors for Leishmania martiniquensis and Trypanosoma sp. in northern Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0010014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Songumpai N, Promrangsee C, Noopetch P, Siriyasatien P, Preativatanyou K. First evidence of co-circulation of emerging Leishmania martiniquensis, Leishmania orientalis, and Crithidia sp. in Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), the putative vectors for autochthonous transmission in Southern Thailand. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022;7:379. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed7110379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaewmee S, Mano C, Phanitchakun T, Ampol R, Yasanga T, Pattanawong U, et al. Natural infection with Leishmania (Mundinia) martiniquensis supports Culicoides peregrinus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as a potential vector of leishmaniasis and characterization of a Crithidia sp. isolated from the midges. Front Microbiol. 2023;22:1235254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1235254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sunantaraporn S, Hortiwakul T, Kraivichian K, Siriyasatien P, Brownell N. Molecular Identification of host blood meals and detection of blood parasites in Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) collected from Phatthalung province, southern Thailand. Insects. 2022;13:912. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13100912.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Thepparat A, Bellis G, Ketavan C, Ruangsittichai J, Sumruayphol S, Apiwathnasorn C. Ten species of Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) newly recorded from Thailand. Zootaxa. 2015;4033:48–56. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4033.1.2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitaoka S, Takaoka H, Chochoote W. New species and records of Culicoides biting midges attracted to human baits in Inthanon National Park, northern Thailand (Diptera Ceratopogonidae). Med Entomol Zool. 2005;56:283–29. https://doi.org/10.7601/mez.56.283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harrup LE, Laban S, Purse BV, Reddy YK, Reddy YN, Byregowda SM, et al. DNA barcoding and surveillance sampling strategies for Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in southern India. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:461. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1722-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yanase T, Matsumoto Y, Matsumori Y, Aizawa M, Hirata M, Kato T, et al. Molecular identification of field-collected Culicoides larvae in the southern part of Japan. J Med Entomol. 2013;50:1105–10. https://doi.org/10.1603/me11235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu Y, Tao H, Yu Y, Yue L, Xia W, Zheng W, et al. Molecular differentiation and species composition of genus Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in different habitats in southern China. Vet Parasitol. 2018;30:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jomkumsing P, Surapinit A, Saengpara T, Pramual P. Genetic variation, DNA barcoding and blood meal identification of Culicoides Latreille biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Thailand. Acta Trop. 2021;217:105866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105866.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fujisawa Y, Homat T, Thepparat A, Changbunjong T, Sutummaporn K, Kornmatitsuk S, et al. DNA barcode identification and molecular detection of bluetongue virus in Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from western Thailand. Acta Trop. 2021;224:106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gomontean B, Vaisusuk K, Chatan W, Wongpakam K, Sankul P, Lachanthuek L, et al. Diversity, abundance and host blood meal analysis of Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from cattle pens in different land use types from Thailand. Insects. 2023;14:574. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14070574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Gopurenko D, Bellis GA, Yanase T, Wardhana AH, Thepparat A, Wang J, et al. Integrative taxonomy to investigate species boundaries within Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae): a case study using subgenus Avaritia from Australasia and Eastern Asia. Vet Ital. 2015;4:345–78. https://doi.org/10.12834/VetIt.515.2463.2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gopurenko D, Bellis G, Pengsakul T, Siriyasatien P, Thepparat A. DNA Barcoding of Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from Thailand reveals taxonomic inconsistencies and novel diversity among reported sequences. J Med Entomol. 2022;59:1960–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjac142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ampol R, Somwang P, Khositharattanakool P, Promrangsee C, Pataradool T, Tepboonreung P, et al. Nanopore-based surveillance of Leishmania parasites in Culicoides Latrielle (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) caught from the affected community and Tham Phra cave in Chiang Rai Province, the endemic area of leishmaniasis in Northern Thailand. Insects. 2024;15:327. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15050327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Promrangsee C, Sriswasdi S, Sunantaraporn S, Savigamin C, Pataradool T, Sricharoensuk C, et al. Seasonal dynamics, Leishmania diversity, and nanopore-based metabarcoding of blood meal origins in Culicoides spp. in the newly emerging focus of leishmaniasis in Northern Thailand. Parasit Vect. 2024;17:400. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06487-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wirth WW, Hubert AA. The Culicoides of Southeast Asia (Diptera Ceratopogonidae) 44. FL: Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute; 1989.

  38. Dallas JF, Cruickshank RH, Linton YM, Nolan DV, Patakakis M, Braverman Y, et al. Phylogenetic status and matrilineal structure of the biting midge, Culicoides imicola, in Portugal. Rhodes Israel Med Vet Entomol. 2003;17:379–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2003.00454.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1994;3:294–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathieu B, Garros C, Balenghien T, Candolfi E, Delécolle JC, Cêtre-Sossah C. A phylogenetic analysis of the biting midges belonging to Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) subgenus Avaritia using molecular data. Parasit Vect. 2020;13:243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04111-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Manomat J, Leelayoova S, Bualert L, Tan-Ariya P, Siripattanapipong S, Mungthin M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated with Leishmania infection in Trang Province, southern Thailand. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11:e0006095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Noyes HA, Stevens JR, Teixeira M, Phelan J, Holz P. A nested PCR for the ssrRNA gene detects Trypanosoma binneyi in the platypus and Trypanosoma sp. in wombats and kangaroos in Australia. Int J Parasitol. 1999;29:331–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00167-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kent RJ, Norris DE. Identification of mammalian blood meals in mosquitoes by a multiplexed polymerase chain reaction targeting cytochrome B. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005;73:336–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kent RJ, Thuma PE, Mharakurwa S, Norris DE. Seasonality, blood feeding behavior, and transmission of Plasmodium falciparum by Anopheles arabiensis after an extended drought in southern Zambia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;76:267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G. ASAP: assemble species by automatic partitioning. Mol Ecol Resour. 2021;21:609–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, et al. Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1630–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Clement M, Snell Q, Walke P, Posada D, Crandall K. TCS: estimating gene genealogies. Proc 16th Int Parallel Distrib Process Symp. 2002; 2: 184.

  50. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:3299–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Leigh JW, Bryant D. PopART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6:1110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Harrup LE, Bellis GA, Balenghien T, Garros C. Culicoides Latreille (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) taxonomy: current challenges and future directions. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;30:249–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Pramual P, Jomkumsing P, Piraonapicha K, Jumpato W. Integrative taxonomy uncovers a new Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) biting midge species from Thailand. Acta Trop. 2021;220:105941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fujisawa Y, Kornmatitsuk K, Kornmatitsuk S, Kornmatitsuk B. Field evaluation of newly developed 3D-printed ultraviolet and green light-emitting diode traps for the collection of Culicoides species in Thailand. PLoS ONE. 2023;18:e0280673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bartsch S, Bauer B, Wiemann A, Clausen PH, Steuber S. Feeding patterns of biting midges of the Culicoides obsoletus and Culicoides pulicaris groups on selected farms in Brandenburg Germany. Parasitol Res. 2009;105:373–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1408-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Cuéllar AC, Kjær LJ, Kirkeby C, Skovgard H, Nielsen SA, Stockmarr A, et al. Spatial and temporal variation in the abundance of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in nine European countries. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2706-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Collins ÁB, Mee JF, Doherty ML, Barrett DJ, England ME. Culicoides species composition and abundance on Irish cattle farms: implications for arboviral disease transmission. Parasit Vect. 2018;11:472. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3010-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Soe BK, Kaewmee S, Mano C, Pattanawong U, Tipparawong N, Siriyasatien P, et al. Molecular detection of parasites and host preference in wild-caught Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Chiang Mai and Nakhon Si Thammarat Provinces Thailand. Parasite. 2025;32:2. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2024082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Siripattanapipong S, Leelayoova S, Ninsaeng U, Mungthin M. Detection of DNA of Leishmania siamensis in Sergentomyia (Neophlebotomus) iyengari (Diptera: Psychodidae) and Molecular Identification of Blood Meals of Sand Flies in an Affected Area Southern Thailand. J Med Entomol. 2018;55:1277–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/jme/tjy069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Phumee A, Sutthanont N, Chitcharoen S, Sawaswong V, Boonserm R, Ayuyoe P, et al. Sergentomyia khawi: a potential vector for Leishmania and Trypanosoma parasites affecting humans and animals and insecticide resistance status in endemic areas of Songkhla, southern Thailand. Parasit Vect. 2024;17:351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06440-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ruang-Areerate T, Ruang-Areerate P, Manomat J, Naaglor T, Piyaraj P, Mungthin M, et al. Genetic variation and geographic distribution of Leishmania orientalis and Leishmania martiniquensis among Leishmania/HIV co-infection in Thailand. Sci Rep. 2023;13:23094. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50604-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Charyyeva A, Çetinkaya Ü, Özkan B, Şahin S, Yaprak N, Şahin I, et al. Genetic diversity of Leishmania tropica: Unexpectedly complex distribution pattern. Acta Trop. 2021;218:105888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Al-Jawabreh A, Ereqat S, Al-Jawabreh H, Dumaidi K, Nasereddin A. Genetic diversity and haplotype analysis of Leishmania tropica identified in sand fly vectors of the genera Phlebotomus and Sergentomyia using next-generation sequencing technology. Parasitol Res. 2023;122:1351–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-023-07835-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kamyingkird K, Choocherd S, Chimnoi W, Klinkaew N, Kengradomkij C, Phoosangwalthong P, et al. Molecular identification of Culicoides species and host preference blood meal in the African horse sickness outbreak-affected area in Hua Hin District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Thailand. Insects. 2023;14:369. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14040369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Killick-Kendrick R. The biology and control of phlebotomine sand flies. Clin Dermatol. 1999;17:279–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kaufer A, Ellis J, Stark D, Barratt J. The evolution of trypanosomatid taxonomy. Parasit Vect. 2017;10:287. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2204-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Kazak M, Bernotienė R, Treinys R, Bukauskaitė D. Trypanosomatids in Bloodsucking Diptera Insects (Ceratopogonidae and Simuliidae) wild-caught at raptor bird nests in temperate forests. Diversity. 2023;15:692. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15050692.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Frolov AO, Kostygov AY, Yurchenko V. Development of Monoxenous Trypanosomatids and Phytomonads in Insects. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37:538–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2021.02.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Center of Excellence in Vector Biology and Vector-Borne Diseases, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University for providing laboratory facilities and technical assistance.

Funding

This research project was supported by the Second Century Fund (C2F), Chulalongkorn University; the Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University (Grant number GA68/041); and Genomics Thailand, The Health Systems Research Institute (HSRI) in Thailand (Grant no. 67-118).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization and design of the study: P.S.; Fieldwork investigation and Culicoides collection: P.T., T.P., R.B., S.S., and P.S.; Morphological identification of Culicoides biting midges: P.T., S.S., and P.S.; Molecular detection of pathogens, molecular identification in Culicoides biting midges: P.T.; Data analysis and visualization: P.T., S.S., T.P., K.P., and P.S.; Funding acquisition: P.S.; Writing original manuscript: P.T. and S.S.; Writing and editing the manuscript: T.P., S.S., L.W.R., and P.S. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Padet Siriyasatien.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study experiment was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Protocol (CU-ACUP), Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand (COA no. 2491010). The investigation was reviewed and approved by the Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Institutional Biosafety Committee (MDCU-IBC) under the level of risk in pathogens and animal toxins list (Approval no. MDCU-IBC014/2024).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary materials 1.

Additional file 2: Figure S1. The TCS haplotype network of COI sequences of Culicoides biting midges from this study.

13071_2025_6812_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Additional file 3: Table S1. Morphological identification and nucleotide search identified results in the BOLD and BLAST databases of Culicoides species collected from this study.

Additional file 4: Table S2. K2P intraspecific genetic divergences of Culicoides species were collected in this study.

13071_2025_6812_MOESM5_ESM.pdf

Additional file 5: Table S3. Culicoides species identification, number of positive specimens for Leishmania, and other trypanosomatids collected from four different areas in southern Thailand.

13071_2025_6812_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx

Additional file 6: Table S4. The haplotype distribution data of ITS1 sequences of L. martiniquensis and L. orientalis and SSU rRNA sequences of Crithidia spp.

13071_2025_6812_MOESM7_ESM.pdf

Additional file 7: Table S5. Host blood meal identification of Culicoides biting midges collected from Ron Phibun district in Nakhon Si Thammarat, southern Thailand.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tepboonrueng, P., Pataradool, T., Boonserm, R. et al. DNA barcoding of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) and detection of Leishmania and other trypanosomatids in southern Thailand. Parasites Vectors 18, 194 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06812-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-06812-0

Keywords