Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis in Spain: results from the ARTESER registry

Abstract

Objectives

To compare mortality rates between GCA patients and the general population in Spain, and to identify associated factors influencing mortality.

Methods

ARTESER, a multicenter registry by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology, includes GCA patients from June 2013 to March 2019. Demographic, clinical, imaging, histological and mortality data were collected retrospectively. Only patients with at least one year of follow-up were included for analysis. The mortality rates were expressed as the number of deaths per 1000 person-years, with 95% confidence interval (CI) by sex and age group. Kaplan-Meier method was performed for survival analysis. The factors influencing mortality were analyzed using Cox regression model.

Results

A total of 1200 patients with GCA were analyzed, with a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.18 (1.53) years. The overall five-year cumulative mortality rate (95%CI) was 37.86 (31.75-43.96) per 1000 patients/year. The cumulative mortality rate was significantly higher in males than females (59.04vs29.06; p<0.001). The age- and sex-adjusted cumulative mortality rate was similar to the Spanish general population (19.75vs20.72;p=0.559). In the multivariate analysis, older age (HR 1.11, 95%CI 1.073-1.142) and male sex (HR 1.775, 95%CI 1.214-2.594) were associated with increased mortality. Headache (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.362-0.843) and high hemoglobin levels (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.744-0.970) were protective factors against death.

Conclusions

The overall five-year age- and sex-adjusted cumulative mortality rate in GCA is similar compared to the general population. Older age and male sex appear to be associated with an increased risk of mortality, whereas headache and high hemoglobin levels might serve as protective factors against death.

Introduction

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common form of vasculitis in the elderly [1]. If not promptly and properly treated, it can lead to ischemic complications such as blindness [2, 3] and stroke [4, 5], resulting in increased morbidity and potentially mortality. The issue of survival in epidemiologic studies on GCA displays notable heterogeneity regarding the mortality rate and distinct patterns of cause-specific death [6]. Several epidemiological studies have observed that the survival of patients with GCA is similar to that of the general population [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Some of them have even shown lower mortality rates [22, 23], attributed to closer monitoring and better management of comorbidities in these patients. On the other hand, other studies have demonstrated higher mortality in patients or in certain subgroups of patients with GCA [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. The methodology used in the different studies varies widely, both in terms of the chosen case study and in the selection of controls from the general population. Some of these studies rely on death certificates that include a diagnosis of GCA [19, 20], although the diagnostic criteria used cannot be determined, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the studies. Another concern affecting some studies arises when biopsy-proven GCA is used as an inclusion criterion [10, 15, 16, 18, 28], which may limit the generalizability of the results. Thus, there is a knowledge gap regarding the issue of mortality in patients with GCA, which must be addressed in order to properly implement measures aimed at improving outcomes.

Our primary objective was to compare mortality rates between GCA patients and the general population in Spain. Secondary objectives included identifying associated factors that might influence mortality and determining specific causes of death.

Patients and methods

Study design

ARTESER (Registro Nacional de Arteritis de Células Gigantes [Spanish Giant Cell Arteritis Registry]), a large Spanish multicenter observational longitudinal study spanning the entire country, is based on a review of the electronic health records of all patients diagnosed with GCA between June 1st, 2013 and March 29th, 2019. The ARTESER registry was conducted in 26 hospitals of the Spanish National Health System with the support of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines of Cantabria, Santander, Spain, and the study was conducted following the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study population

Patients were included consecutively. The study population comprised patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria; namely, a confirmed diagnosis of GCA, age ≥ 50 years, and at least one of the following: (a) positive results in an objective diagnostic test such as a temporal artery biopsy and/or imaging technique, including 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), vascular ultrasound or computed tomography angiography/magnetic resonance imaging angiography; (b) meeting 3 of the 5 criteria of the 1990 ACR classification criteria [39]; or c) the clinical opinion of the investigator (expert criteria).

During the recruitment period, each hospital obtained a list from their databases of patients diagnosed with GCA, including those from the rheumatology, internal medicine, ophthalmology, and neurology departments. Each patient’s electronic health record was obtained to enable collection of the data needed to meet the study objectives. Data were collected from each included patient at baseline (at diagnosis), at 3 months, and annually up to a total of 5 years. For the purpose of our study, only patients with at least one year of follow-up were selected, excluding those lost during follow-up. All data from the ARTESER registry were gathered over a 17-month period. Mortality rates in the general population, as well as by age and sex groups, were obtained through public access to data from the National Statistics Institute (NSI).

Variables

For the purposes of this study, the variables recorded from the ARTESER registry were as follows: [1] social and demographic characteristics (age at diagnosis of GCA, sex); [2] clinical characteristics at diagnosis; i.e., clinical manifestations (headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, limb claudication, fever); [3] comorbidities at diagnosis (smoking, previous cardiovascular disease, previous antiplatelet therapy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia); [4] laboratory test results prior to the start of corticosteroids; namely, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein, hemoglobin, platelet count; [5] results from the temporal artery biopsy and/or imaging techniques (ultrasound, FDG-PET/CT, MRI angiography, CT angiography); [6] mortality data, date of death and cause of death; and [7] use and dosage of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Large vessel (LV)-GCA was defined as evidence of extracranial involvement, based on in imaging analysis, with or without cranial symptoms. Supplementary Material 1 includes the definitions of the clinical variables and diagnostic tests used in the study protocol.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality among GCA patients in relation to subjects from the general population (NSI). Matched comparisons were conducted overall, and were also stratified for sex and age. As a secondary outcome, cause of death frequencies in GCA, based on the underlying cause of death registered in ARTESER, were described, divided into seven categories. Finally, potential clinical, imaging or treatment variables were investigated as predictive factors for death.

Statistical analysis

Continuous numerical variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Differences between dead and living patients were assessed in a bivariate analysis. The mortality rates were expressed as the number of deaths per 1000 person-years with a 95% confidence interval (CI) by sex and age group. The age- and sex-standardized mortality rate (SMR) was calculated using indirect standardization relative to age- and sex-specific rates from the Spanish population. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a log-rank test. The factors associated with mortality were analyzed using a Cox regression model. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

The study population consisted of 1200 patients with GCA from the ARTESER registry (Table 1). At diagnosis (baseline), patients had a mean (SD) age of 76.58 (8.01) years, 365 (30.42%) were male, and the mean duration of symptoms until diagnosis was 3 (5.86) months. The mean follow-up time in the registry was 2.18 (1.53) years. A total of 945 (78.75%) patients had cranial GCA, while 255 (21.25%) had LV-GCA, according to the clinical criteria. From a total of 895 temporal artery biopsies performed, 567 (63.35%) yielded positive results. 84.3% of the patients met the 1990 ACR criteria, while 99.8% met the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria. Only 37 patients (3.1%) were diagnosed solely based on clinical criteria (they did not meet the 1990 ACR criteria nor had positive imaging or temporal artery biopsy results).

Table 1 Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients with GCA based on mortality during follow-up

Mortality rates

A total of 142 deaths were recorded during the follow-up assessments of GCA patients. The overall five-year cumulative mortality rate (95% CI) was 37.86 (31.75–43.96) per 1000 patients/year (Table 2). By sex, the SMRs were 1.11 (111% (85.72–141.65)) and 0.85 (85.1% (67.1–106.44)) for male and female, respectively. The age- and sex-standardized rates were 25.97 (19.66–32.29) for male and 15.70 (12.19–19.20) for female patients, similar to the Spanish population (23.38 vs. 25.97, p = 0.424 in males; 18.44 vs. 15.70, p = 0.130 in females). After age- and sex-standardization, SMR was 0.95 (95.3% (80.29–112.38)) and age- and sex- adjusted mortality rate was 19.75 (16.50–23.00), similar to the general population (19.75 vs. 20.72; p = 0.559). The five-year cumulative mortality rate in GCA patients and in the general population in Spain (NSI) across different year ranges is shown in Figures 1 and 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival during follow-up in all patients with GCA and distributed by sex and age groups. The survival rate was significantly lower in men than in women (Log-rank p-value < 0.001).

Table 2 Five-year mortality rates (95% CI) in GCA patients and the general population in Spain (National Statistics Institute), stratified by age and sex. * Population at 5 years (2013–2019) **Comparison of the five-year cumulative mortality rate in ARTESER and the five-year cumulative mortality rate of the general population (National Statistics Institute); GCA: giant cell arteritis; NSI: National Statistics Institute
Fig. 1
figure 1

The five-year cumulative mortality rate in GCA patients and in the general population in Spain (NSI) across different year ranges

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival rates in (A) all patients with GCA, (B) distributed by sex and (C) distributed by age, included in the ARTESER registry. The differences in the Kaplan-Meier curves were statistically significant (Log-rank p-value < 0.001)

Causes of death

Table 3 shows the causes of death in the total number of patients during the follow-up period, as well as distributed by sex. The most common causes of death were infections (31%), malignancies (16%) and cardiovascular diseases (11.3%). The majority of deaths secondary to infections occurred during the first two years of follow-up. The causes of death were similar between men and women. Supplementary Material 2 shows the causes of death in each of the age groups studied.

Table 3 Causes of death during follow-up in the total CGA population and by sex

Predictors of mortality

Univariate analysis of demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment data in patients with GCA based on mortality during follow-up are shown in Table 1. In the multivariate analysis (Table 4), older age (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.073–1.142) and male sex (HR 1.78 95% CI 1.214–2.594) were the only clinical variables associated with increased mortality. The presence of headache (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.362–0.843) and high hemoglobin levels (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.744–0.970) were protective factors against death (Table 4).

Table 4 Multivariable analysis of factors associated with mortality in patients with GCA. HR: Hazard ratio, * p < 0.05

Use of imaging in relation to mortality

In Supplementary Material 3, cumulative mortality rates at 1 year and 5 years can be observed for the total number of patients included in ARTESER, based on the use of imaging (ultrasound, PET/CT, CT, or MRI) for the diagnosis of GCA. The cumulative mortality rate in the first year was lower in patients who underwent imaging due to a diagnosis of GCA compared to those who did not (27.3 vs. 44.34; p = 0.025). The cumulative mortality rate at five years was similar in both groups (34.2 vs. 43.3; p = 0.101).

Discussion

We have studied the mortality of patients with GCA in relation to that of the general population in Spain, matched by both age and sex. In accordance with our results, we did not detect an excess mortality in patients with GCA.

The issue of mortality in patients with GCA has not been clearly answered to date, and there is disagreement among published studies [6]. Much of the contradictory results stem from the diverse inclusion criteria in these studies [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38], making data standardization challenging. In an attempt to address this heterogeneity, ARTESER not only includes patients with positive temporal artery biopsy or data derived from death records, but also a specific nationwide registry that includes GCA ultimately diagnosed at the clinician’s discretion. This better reflects the current concept of GCA, which is increasingly considered a spectrum of disease with various clinical phenotypes and different risks of complications [40]. The 5-year cumulative mortality rate recorded in ARTESER is consistent with previous publications, although it varies widely among published studies (typically between 10 and 40%) [6]. A comparison of data obtained from the NSI of Spain shows that age- and sex-adjusted mortality in GCA is similar compared to the general population, and that the differences observed in crude mortality data are likely due to age rather than to disease-specific factors.

Regarding factors that may influence mortality, we have found that age and male sex appear to be predictors of mortality in GCA. However, the presence of headache and higher hemoglobin values may be protective factors against mortality. This is important for evaluating treatment strategies and risk stratification in different patient subgroups. Similar to our results, Barra et al. identified higher mortality in men than in women [36] and in another study by Machionni et al. higher hemoglobin levels were associated with lower mortality [41]. However, previous contradictory data have been published in the literature on this matter. Mohammad et al. [28] found higher mortality rates in women and in patients under 70 years old as well as Ben-Shabat et al., who also identified higher mortality in individuals under 70 years of age [37]. An excess mortality in women was also found, along with elevated ESR, in the study by Uddhammar et al. [32]. Another study [10] also found a trend towards lower survival in women. Finally, the LV-GCA phenotype has also been associated with higher mortality [42]. However, the majority of these studies only included patients who had a positive temporal artery biopsy, which considerably limits the generalization of results. The variability of results in the literature highlights the need for more studies with homogeneous inclusion criteria to identify predictors of mortality in GCA.

Causes of death in GCA can be secondary to factors inherent to the disease, such as ischemic complications and associated comorbidities, or to factors related to the treatment received. In this regard, the main cause of death in GCA in our cohort is infections, most likely related to the use of glucocorticoids, especially during the first 2–3 years of treatment, with subsequent gradual reduction. The increase in infections, especially in the first year of the disease, has been found across several studies, yielding similar results [15, 26, 33]. However, many authors have reported that the main cause of death in GCA is cardiovascular events [19, 20, 43,44,45,46,47]. In contrast, malignancy was the second leading cause of death in our cohort, followed by cardiovascular disease in third place, with similar outcomes in both men and women.

Another interesting aspect is the use of imaging in relation to mortality. Although the use of imaging progressively increased during the patient inclusion period in ARTESER [48], secondary analysis indicates that early mortality (within one year of follow-up) may be lower in those patients in whom imaging was used in diagnosis compared to those who did not undergo imaging. Although there may be other confounding factors, these data support previous observations in which the use of fast-track clinics (for example, those using ultrasound) is associated with a lower frequency of ischemic complications due to early diagnosis [49]. Furthermore, EULAR recommends imaging as the first test to be performed in patients suspected of having GCA [50], and according to our data, the use of imaging could also have an effect on mortality.

We need to acknowledge some limitations of our study. On one hand, there are limitations inherent to its retrospective design, with the possibility that deaths may not have been correctly recorded in the medical records. On the other hand, comparisons with data obtained from the NSI on the general population does not exclude patients included in the ARTESER registry, although the probability of error is very low, as data from the entire national territory are recorded therein. Specific causes of death in the NSI cannot be evaluated, and patients from ARTESER may also have died from complications not related to GCA. Additionally, the sample size and age threshold below 70 years old were substantially smaller in ARTESER, thus potentially limiting comparisons. Among the strengths of the study, we have included a homogeneous cohort of patients with GCA representative of the entire national territory in the largest cohort published to date derived from a clinical registry.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the mortality of patients with GCA is similar compared to that of the general population in Spain. Infections remain the leading cause of mortality, especially during the early years of treatment. Age and male sex appear to be factors associated with higher mortality, while headache and elevated hemoglobin levels may serve as protective factors in our cohort. Specific studies in subgroups of patients at a higher risk of mortality are necessary to implement treatment strategies accordingly.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

GCA:

Giant cell arteritis

ARTESER:

Registro Nacional de Arteritis de Células Gigantes (Spanish Giant Cell Arteritis Registry)

FDG-PET/CT:

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography

ACR:

American College for Rheumatology

NSI:

National Statistics Institute

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence interval

SMR:

Standardized mortality rate

References

  1. Ponte C, Grayson PC, Robson JC, Suppiah R, Gribbons KB, Judge A, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(12):1647–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Molina-Collada J, Domínguez-Álvaro M, Melero-González RB, Fernández-Fernández E, Silva-Díaz M, Valero JA et al. Visual manifestations in giant cell arteritis: identification of risk factors from the ARTESER Registry. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024;keae042.

  3. Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman B. Ocular manifestations of giant cell arteritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(4):509–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nesher G, Berkun Y, Mates M, Baras M, Nesher R, Rubinow A, et al. Risk factors for cranial ischemic complications in giant cell arteritis. Med (Baltim). 2004;83(2):114–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. González-Gay MA, Blanco R, Rodríguez-Valverde V, Martínez-Taboada VM, Delgado-Rodriguez M, Figueroa M, et al. Permanent visual loss and cerebrovascular accidents in giant cell arteritis: predictors and response to treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41(8):1497–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Breuer GS, Poltorak V, Nesher G. Survival of patients with giant cell arteritis: a controversial issue. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38(Suppl 124):210–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huston KA, Hunder GG, Lie JT, Kennedy RH, Elveback LR. Temporal arteritis: a 25-year epidemiologic, clinical, and pathologic study. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88(2):162–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gouet D, Marechaud R, Alcalay M, Becq-Giraudon B, Bontoux D, Lefevre JP, et al. Survival in giant cell arteritis: a 14-year survey of 87 patients. J Rheumatol. 1985;12(6):1209–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouet D, Maréchaud R, Le Berre D, Alcalay M, Becq-Giraudon B, Boissonnot L, et al. [Prognosis of treated temporal arteritis. Retrospective study of 87 cases]. Presse Med. 1986;15(13):603–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajala SA, Ahvenainen JE, Mattila KJ, Saarni MI. Incidence and survival rate in cases of biopsy-proven temporal arteritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1993;22(6):289–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matteson EL, Gold KN, Bloch DA, Hunder GG. Long-term survival of patients with giant cell arteritis in the American College of Rheumatology giant cell arteritis classification criteria cohort. Am J Med. 1996;100(2):193–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. González-Gay MA, Blanco R, Abr(7–10)aira V, García-Porrúa C, Ibáñez D, García-Pais MJ, et al. Giant cell arteritis in Lugo Spain is associated with low longterm mortality. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(11):2171–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gran JT, Myklebust G, Wilsgaard T, Jacobsen BK. Survival in polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis: a study of 398 cases and matched population controls. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001;40(11):1238–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salvarani C, Crowson CS, O’Fallon WM, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE. Reappraisal of the epidemiology of giant cell arteritis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, over a fifty-year period. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(2):264–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ninan J, Nguyen AM, Cole A, Rischmueller M, Dodd T, Roberts-Thomson P, et al. Mortality in patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a south Australian population-based study. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(10):2215–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Catanoso M, Boiardi L, Muratore F, Restuccia G, Cavazza A. Incidence, prevalence, and survival of biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in Northern Italy during a 26-year period. Ar1., Ponte C, Grayson PC, Robson JC, Suppiah R, Gribbons KB, Judge A et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for giant cell arteritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(12):1647–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jonasson F, Cullen JF, Elton RA. Temporal arteritis. A 14-year epidemiological, clinical and prognostic study. Scott Med J. 1979;24(2):111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nordborg E, Bengtsson BA. Death rates and causes of death in 284 consecutive patients with giant cell arteritis confirmed by biopsy. BMJ. 1989;299(6698):549–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Aouba A, Gonzalez Chiappe S, Eb M, Delmas C, de Boysson H, Bienvenu B, et al. Mortality causes and trends associated with giant cell arteritis: analysis of the French national death certificate database (1980–2011). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(6):1047–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chazal T, Lhote R, Rey G, Haroche J, Eb M, Amoura Z, et al. Giant-cell arteritis-related mortality in France: a multiple-cause-of-death analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018;17(12):1219–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Andersen JB, Myklebust G, Haugeberg G, Pripp AH, Diamantopoulos AP. Incidence trends and Mortality of Giant Cell Arteritis in Southern Norway. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(3):409–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson R, Malmvall BE, Bengtsson BA. Long-term survival in giant cell arteritis including temporal arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica. A follow-up study of 90 patients treated with corticosteroids. Acta Med Scand. 1986;220(4):361–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garen T, Lerang K, Hoffmann-Vold AM, Andersson H, Midtvedt Ø, Brunborg C, et al. Mortality and causes of death across the systemic connective tissue diseases and the primary systemic vasculitides. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(2):313–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bisgård C, Sloth H, Keiding N, Juel K. Excess mortality in giant cell arteritis. J Intern Med. 1991;230(2):119–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Crow RW, Katz BJ, Warner JEA, Alder SC, Zhang K, Schulman S, et al. Giant cell arteritis and mortality. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(3):365–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nesher G, Sonnenblick M, Friedlander Y. Analysis of steroid related complications and mortality in temporal arteritis: a 15-year survey of 43 patients. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(7):1283–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nesher G, Poltorak V, Hindi I, Nesher R, Dror Y, Orbach H, et al. Survival of patient with giant cell arteritis: impact of vision loss and treatment with aspirin. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18(8):831–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammad AJ, Nilsson JÅ, Jacobsson LTH, Merkel PA, Turesson C. Incidence and mortality rates of biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis in southern Sweden. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):993–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baslund B, Helleberg M, Faurschou M, Obel N. Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015;54(1):139–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li L, Neogi T, Jick S. Mortality in patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: a Cohort Study in UK Primary Care. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70(8):1251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Graham E, Holland A, Avery A, Russell RW. Prognosis in giant-cell arteritis. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981;282(6260):269–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Uddhammar A, Eriksson AL, Nyström L, Stenling R, Rantapää-Dahlqvist S. Increased mortality due to cardiovascular disease in patients with giant cell arteritis in northern Sweden. J Rheumatol. 2002;29(4):737–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt J, Smail A, Roche B, Gay P, Salle V, Pellet H, et al. Incidence of severe infections and infection-related mortality during the Course of Giant Cell Arteritis: a Multicenter, prospective, Double-Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(6):1477–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kermani TA, Warrington KJ, Crowson CS, Ytterberg SR, Hunder GG, Gabriel SE, et al. Large-vessel involvement in giant cell arteritis: a population-based cohort study of the incidence-trends and prognosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(12):1989–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hachulla E, Boivin V, Pasturel-Michon U, Fauchais AL, Bouroz-Joly J, Perez-Cousin M, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term evolution in a cohort of 133 patients with giant cell arteritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19(2):171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Barra L, Pope JE, Pequeno P, Gatley JM, Widdifield J. Increased mortality for individuals with Giant Cell Arteritis: a Population-based study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022;74(8):1294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ben-Shabat N, Tiosano S, Shovman O, Comaneshter D, Shoenfeld Y, Cohen AD, Amital H. Mortality among patients with giant cell arteritis: a large-scale Population-based Cohort Study. J Rheumatol. 2020;47(9):1385–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Therkildsen P, Nielsen BD, de Thurah A, Hansen IT, Nørgaard M, Hauge EM. All-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(3):1195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, Stevens MB, Arend WP, Calabrese LH, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990;33(8):1122–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tomelleri A, van der Geest KSM, Khurshid MA, Sebastian A, Coath F, Robbins D, et al. Disease stratification in GCA and PMR: state of the art and future perspectives. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023;19(7):446–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Macchioni P, Boiardi L, Muratore F, Restuccia G, Cavazza A, Pipitone N, Catanoso M, Mancuso P, Luberto F, Giorgi Rossi P, Salvarani C. Survival predictors in biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis: a northern Italian population-based study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(4):609–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Elfishawi MM, Kaymakci MS, Achenbach J, Crowson SS, Kermani C, Weyand TAM, Koster CJ, Warrington M. Reappraisal of large artery involvement in giant cell arteritis: a population-based cohort over 70 years. RMD Open. 2024;10(1):e003775.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Antonini L, Dumont A, Lavergne A, Castan P, Barakat C, Gallou S, Sultan A, Deshayes S, Aouba A, de Boysson H. Real-life analysis of the causes of death in patients consecutively followed for giant cell arteritis in a French centre of expertise. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(11):5080–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hill CL, Black RJ, Nossent JC, Ruediger C, Nguyen L, Ninan JV, Lester S. Risk of mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017;46(4):513–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee YH, Song GG. Overall and cause-specific mortality in giant cell arteritis: a meta-analysis. Z Rheumatol. 2018;77(10):946–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brekke LK, Fevang BS, Diamantopoulos AP, Assmus J, Esperø E, Gjesdal CG. Survival and death causes of patients with giant cell arteritis in Western Norway 1972–2012: a retrospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Talarico R, Figus M, d’Ascanio A, Stagnaro C, Ferrari C, Elefante E, Tani C, Baldini C, Mosca M, Bombardieri S. Mortality in giant cell arteritis: analysis of a monocentric cohort of biopsy-proven patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(1 Suppl 75):S90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. De Miguel E, Sanchez-Costa JT, Estrada P, Muñoz A, Valero Martínez C, Moya Alvarado P, et al. Influence of the EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis: results of the ARTESER register. RMD Open. 2022;8(2):e002507.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Diamantopoulos AP, Haugeberg G, Lindland A, Myklebust G. The fast-track ultrasound clinic for early diagnosis of giant cell arteritis significantly reduces permanent visual impairment: towards a more effective strategy to improve clinical outcome in giant cell arteritis? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016;55(1):66–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Bond M, Bosch P, Ponte C, Mackie SL et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;ard-2023-224543.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Spanish Foundation of Rheumatology for providing medical writing/editorial assistance during the preparation of the manuscript (FERBT2024).

Patient and Public Involvement

Patients or the public WERE NOT involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of our research.

Funding

ROCHE FARMA S.A. provided financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

Contributors All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of this study. The study was designed by JM-C and RB with the support of the Research Unit of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology. Collection of the epidemiological and clinical data was performed by the investigators of each participating center in ARTESER. MD-A performed the statistical analysis. JM-C and RB drafted the manuscript. All coauthors (JM-C, MD-A, RB M-G, EM, MS-D, JAVJ, IG, JSM, JN, JC, IC-S, JAI, SLA, MVR, CLI, MSBR, CCF, MAV, AJM and RB) revised the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Molina-Collada.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research with Medicines of Cantabria, Santander, Spain (No. 05/2019).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Competing interests

Juan Molina-Collada has received consultancy/speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, and BMS. None of these fees were related to the present manuscript. Ricardo Blanco received grants/research support from AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, and had consultation fees/participation in a company-sponsored speaker’s bureau from AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, UCB, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD. Eugenio de Miguel received research funding/consulting and conferences fees from: Abbvie, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, BMS, UC Pharma, Grünenthal and Sanofi. Carlota L Iñiguez received support and speaker's fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Fresenius - Kiabi, Novartis, GSK, Sanofi y Janssen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

13075_2024_3468_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1: Supplementary Material 1. Definitions of clinical variables and diagnostic tests included in the ARTESER study protocol. Supplementary Material 2. Causes of death of GCA patients during follow-up by age. Supplementary Material 3. Cumulative mortality rates at one year and five years can be observed for the total number of GCA patients included in ARTESER, based on the use of imaging (ultrasound, PET/CT, CT, or MRI) for the diagnosis of GCA

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Molina-Collada, J., Domínguez-Álvaro, M., Melero-González, R.B. et al. Mortality in patients with giant cell arteritis in Spain: results from the ARTESER registry. Arthritis Res Ther 27, 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03468-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-024-03468-6

Keywords