Processing math: 6%
Home What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
Article Open Access

What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?

  • Elemér Elad Rosinger EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2017

Abstract

It is shown by using a rather elementary argument in Mathematical Logic that if indeed, quantum theory does violate the famous Bell Inequalities, then quantum theory must inevitably also violate all valid mathematical statements, and in particular, such basic algebraic relations like 0 = 0, 1 = 1, 2 = 2, 3 = 3, … and so on …

An interest in that result is due to the following three alternatives which it imposes upon both Physics and Mathematics:

  1. Quantum Theory is inconsistent.

  2. Quantum Theory together with Mathematics are inconsistent.

  3. Mathematics is inconsistent.

In this regard one should recall that, up until now, it is not known whether Mathematics is indeed consistent.

PACS: 02; 03; 03.65

1 Bell Inequalities Conundrum

1.1 The Bell Inequalities belong to Pure Mathematics, and NOT at all to Physics …

Recently it was shown, [13], that the Bell Inequalities, [4], are not violated by the quantum theory, contrary to the long ongoing customary and rather unanimous claim by many quantum physicists, a claim which simply turns out to be but the consequence of an elementary error in connecting mathematical abstractions with statistical data. Consequently, the irrelevance of the Bell Inequalities in Physics, in the sense that neither classical, nor quantum systems violate the Bell Inequalities.

Given the above, obviously a number of misconceptions still keep persisting today regarding both the Bell Inequalities as such, and their relation to Quantum Physics. Also, it is hardly at all known, let alone understood, among many physicists that the Bell Inequalities are purely mathematical statements, that is, they follow logically from elementary algebraic properties of the real numbers in ℝ, and thus do not need any sort of physical arguments in order to prove them, [1, 5]. In fact, the Bell Inequalities are mathematical consequences of inequalities proved in the Appendix of George Boole’s 1854 classic book “The Laws of Thought”, [5], thus long before the emergence of Quantum Theory.

Amusingly however, the triplet of seemingly independent recent papers [68], claims to have - at long last - completed the proof of the more than half a century old allegation that quantum physics violates the Bell Inequalities, and the many co-authors of these papers argue that they have closed all the loopholes in the previously presented various proofs, see also [9]. They use a variation of Bell’s inequality that is called the Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality, which is precisely the inequality discussed by Leggett, [10], and of which the Bell Inequality is a special case, namely, when D = A, in Leggett’s notation.

Following soon after the mentioned triplet of papers, rather surprising statements regarding the above conundrum appeared in [11, 12].

The novelty in these two papers is that the mentioned conundrum is shown to reach to such deep levels that, in fact, it can be seen as a “clash between whole mathematical theories”, which in this case are, on one hand, various possible mathematical theories of quantum theory, and on the other hand, theories of pure mathematics. Namely:

  1. As already pointed out in [13, 5], the Bell Inequalities do belong to Mathematics, and not to Physics, hence here in this paper they are once again treated accordingly, thus a considerable amount of misunderstandings in widely used Physics literature, discourse and thinking gets simply set aside.

  2. Consequently, the Bell Inequalities cannot be violated by quantum theory, but only and only by one or another mathematical theory of quanta, and specifically, by some mathematical statement which happens to belong to one or another mathematical theory of quanta. After all, and all too obviously, quanta as such do not belong to Mathematics, while clearly, only the modern theories of quanta do so.

  3. In view of (A) and (B) above, it is shown - as a rather simple and elementary consequence in Mathematical Logic - that in case “quantum theory” would indeed violate the Bell Inequalities, then “quantum theory” would in fact violate the whole of Mathematics as well, thus in particular for instance, “quantum theory” would have to violate relations like 0 = 0, 1 = 1, 2 = 2, 3 = 3, … and so on …

1.2 Global Inconsistency ?

This paper attempts to makes more explicit the possibility shown in [11, 12] of the truly deeper implications which would inevitably result in case, when indeed, quantum theory would violate the Bell Inequalities.

Namely, as a rather trivial logical consequence of such a violation, the following three inevitable alternatives would sum up the situation in Physics and Mathematics:

  1. Quantum Theory is inconsistent.

  2. Quantum Theory together with Mathematics are inconsistent.

  3. Mathematics is inconsistent.

In this regard one should recall that, up until now, it is not known whether Mathematics is consistent.

It follows that, perhaps, we should rather hope that, indeed, the Bell Inequalities are irrelevant, that is, quantum theory does not violate them, just as classical systems do not, since otherwise the … Hell … of the above three inevitable alternatives 1), 2) and 3) would break loose upon us …

This is indeed the stark reality we may face, as argued in this paper …

However, amusingly, due to latest developments in Mathematics and Mathematical Logic such a stark reality may as well be dealt with, as mentioned briefly in the following.

2 Modern Interaction between Physics and Mathematics

The presently predominant way of interaction between theories of Physics, and on the other hand, the various disciplines of Mathematics - interaction on the level of aiming at a more precise formulation of the former - can be traced back to Newton’s master piece “Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica”, published on 5 July, 1687, and in which the fundamentals of Classical Mechanics are presented in an axiomatic manner. In Mathematics itself, the axiomatic method goes back to Euclid’s presentation of Geometry, in the 4th century BC. In Physics, however, the mentioned approach of Newton, coming about two millennia later, is considered to be the origin of axiomatization.

For convenience, a brief presentation of the essential aspects of the general mathematical axiomatic method can be found in the Appendix 1 of [11], and the notations there will be used also in the following.

And now, to the origin of the Bell inequalities.

As seemingly hardly known among physicists, the Bell Inequalities are in fact purely mathematical properties, that is, their formulation and proof does not need any other considerations, except for mathematical ones, [13, 5]. Furthermore, the Mathematics used in both stating and proving them is but a rather simple elementary Algebra of the real numbers in ℝ.

It was George Boole in his 1854 classic “The Laws of Thought” where, in the Appendix, he introduced and dealt with a class of inequalities which, when later extended mathematically, ended up by containing the Bell inequalities as well, and the respective extensions happened before and/or independently of the discovery of quanta. In this way, it is due to the typical limited familiarity with Mathematics on the part of many physicists which, in a way, resulted in John Bell’s unintended and unconscious plagiarizing, when claiming originality with his inequalities.

And now to some brief and relevant considerations related to the axiomatic method.

Much of the theory of quanta - when formulated mathematically - is limited to the Mathematics determined by the axioms of the Zermelo - Fraenkel Set Theory, [13]. The meaning of that is in brief as follows.

Let us denote the set of all the Zermelo - Fraenkel axioms by 𝓐set, [11, 13]. Then as also follows from [11], we have 𝓐set ⫋ 𝓕set, where 𝓕set is the set of all so called well-formed formulas - or briefly wff-s - in the alphabet Aset of Set Theory. Further, we have a set ρset of logical deduction rules, [11], which operate as follows

FsetPρsetQFset(1)

thus, to each subset P of wff-s-called premises - the logical deduction rules ρset associate a subset Q of wff-s - called deductions - and do so by a process which uses exclusively the classical binary valued Logic of Aristotle - Chrysippus.

The axiomatic method in the above particular case of the Zermelo - Fraenkel Set Theory, means that one starts with the specific axioms in the set 𝓐set, and applies to them the logical deduction rules ρset, obtaining thus a certain set of deductions. Then iteratively, one keeps applying the logical deduction rules ρset to the latest set of deductions obtained which now are considered as premises, and does so - in principle - unlimitedly many times.

The result of that axiomatic method is a corresponding set 𝓣set of theorems which constitute all Mathematics expressible by Set Theory. Clearly, we have, [11]

Aset(2)

So much for Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, and let us now turn to Physics.

Let us denote by 𝓣q the set of theorems of a large enough part of a given theory of quanta, when they are formulated in mathematical terms. Here “large enough” means that it contains the mathematical formulation of the quantum arguments regarding the alleged violation of the Bell Inequalities by quantum theory. Then obviously, it is assumed - even if only rather tacitly on the part of physicists - that

TqTset(3)

or in other words, no theorem T ∈ 𝓣q, that is, no theorem T of the mentioned part of the theory of quanta - when considered in its mathematical formulation - is supposed to be mathematically incorrect.

On the other hand, in view of the previous remarks regarding the Bell Inequalities, we have as well

TBellTset(4)

where TBell denotes the pure mathematical theorem stating the Bell Inequalities.

3 Does Quantum Theory Violate the Bell Inequalities ?

Now, the mentioned widely accepted claim, supported by books of famous physicists, [10], that “the quanta violate the Bell Inequalities”- a claim to which recently the further claim was added in [68] that the last loopholes in its experimental verification were at long last closed - amounts in the above formulation to the existence of a mathematical theorem, let us denote it by S, such that

STq(5)

In other words, there exists a theorem S among the set 𝓣q of theorems of the above mentioned relevant part of the theory of quanta, such that

S(nonTBell)(6)

Remark 3.1

Regarding the statement S in (5) let us note the following. In this case, the statement S is in fact the theoretical expression of the results of certain suitable quantum experiments, thus typically those results are expressed in numbers which describe the outcome of the experiments. For instance, according to the Copenhagen Interpretation, those numbers are computable from eigenvalues of Hermitian operators defining the observables which participated in the experiments.

Consequently, the expression of the particular claim that “quantum theory violates the Bell Inequalities" can only take the pure mathematical form in (6). And such an expression is possible, at least in principle, if experimental facts leading to the mentioned numbers get formulated as a mathematical statement S.

Indeed, in present day Physics, there is simply no other way to, so to say, “violate” Bell-type Inequalities, except to express the relevant experimental facts mathematically, see [10], including those which are claimed in [68] to have no longer loopholes …

In other words, the claimed “violation” can only happen in the realms of Pure Mathematics, since the Bell Inequalities do belong to those realms. □

Let us now recall that it is a typical and general feature of all sets of theorems 𝓣 in every axiomatic mathematical theory to have the following implication hold

(ST,SF,SS)ST(7)

where, with the above notation, 𝓕 is the set of all wff-s of the respective axiomatic theory, [11]. Similarly, we have as a typical and general feature of all sets of wff-s 𝓕 in every axiomatic mathematical theory the implication

SFnonSF(8)

And then (5) - (7) give

nonTBellTqTset(9)

which together with (3), (8) implies

TBell,nonTBellTset(10)

that is, 𝓣set, and thus Set Theory, is contradictory, since it contains both the theorem TBelland its negation nonTBell.

However, the set 𝓣set of all mathematical theorems of Set Theory is considered to be contradiction free, although so far that property - or for that matter, the negation of that property - has not yet been proved.

Lastly, let us show that given any S in (5), then we have the following logical consequence, and at the same time, also a much stronger version of (6), namely

[S(nonTBell)][TTset:(S(nonT)](11)

or in other words, the relation 6 holds not only in the particular case of the Bell inequalities given by the theorem TBell, but also for all valid mathematical statements in Set Theory, that is, for all theorems T ∈ 𝓣set.

In particular, as mentioned in [11, 12], it is true that:

If a valid quantum statement - be it of theoretical or experimental nature, yet expressed mathematically by S ∈ 𝓣q - violates the Bell Inequalities, then that statement S must also violate all other valid mathematical statements T ∈ 𝓣set, and thus in particular, relations such as 0 = 0, 1 = 1, 2 = 2, 3 = 3, ….

Indeed, the proof of (11) is as follows. Let us assume that (11) does not hold, and let us reformulate it conveniently in a logically equivalent form. For that purpose, we recall that, according to basic and elementary rules of the binary valued Logic of Aristotel - Chrysippus, we have the following logical equivalences, denoted by ≡, for arbitrary wff-s Q, Q′, Q″ ∈ 𝓕

non(nonQ)Q(QQ)(nonQ)Qnon(QQ)Q(nonQ)

hence regarding (11), we have

(S(nonTBell))(nonS)(nonTBell)(non(S(nonTBell)))(STBell)

thus the expression in (11) is logically equivalent with

(STBell)(TTset:(S(nonT))

And then assuming that (11) does not hold, we obtain

((nonS)(nonTBell))(T0Tset:ST0)(12)

In this way, both statements ((non S) ∨ (non TBell)) and (∃T0 ∈ 𝓣set : ST0) must be valid. And since in view of (5), S was supposed to be valid, it follows that non TBell must also be valid. And then, we are again back to the contradiction in (10).

Thus (11) does indeed hold.

Remark 3.2

  1. Both (10) and (11) require - as we have seen above - the basic assumption that the set 𝓣set of all mathematical theorems of Set Theory is contradiction free. Yet, so far, that remains an unproven assumption, just as is the case with its negation.

  2. In case it may turn out, however, that nevertheless, the above basic assumption is not correct, and Set Theory is in fact contradictory, then one may turn to [1419] and the references cited there, where relevant and major latest extensions of Mathematical Logic and Mathematics are pointed out in the literature.

  1. Dedication: Dedicated to Marie-Louise Nykamp

Acknowledgement

The author - with special appreciation and joy - acknowledges the vital contribution to this paper of Karl Hess who, as a co-author of [1], has been, and still is at the very center of what turned out to be more than a half century long ongoing “Bell inequalities Conundrum”. As can bee seen easily, much of what may be the action in this paper happens in such rather rarefied fields of Pure Mathematics, as Mathematical Logic, although there, it is on a very simple and basic level. And then, clearly, this paper can have relevance in Physics, only and only with the vital help of an appropriate physicist, and in this case, one with an understanding of truly basic issues which may come from a long academic record and essential involvement in clarifying that conundrum, as is the case with Karl Hess.

References

[1] De Raedt H., Hess K., Michielsen K., Extended Boole-Bell Inequalities Applicable to Quantum Theory, J. Comp. Theor. Nanosci., 2011, 8, 1011-1039.10.1166/jctn.2011.1781Search in Google Scholar

[2] Rosinger E.E., The irrelevance of Bell inequalities in Physics : Comments on the DRHM paper, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00824124, http://viXra.org/abs/1305.0129, posted in May 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rosinger E.E., The Irrelevance of Bell Inequalities in Physics: Comments on the DRHM Paper. Quantum Matter, 2014 December, 3, 6, 499-504.10.1166/qm.2014.1153Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bell J., On the Einstein-Podolski-Rosen paradox, Physics, 1964, 1, 195.10.1103/PhysicsPhysiqueFizika.1.195Search in Google Scholar

[5] Pitowsky I., From George Boole to John Bell - the origins of Bell’s inequalities. In Kafatos M (Ed.) Bell’s Theorem, Quantum Theory and Conceptions of the Universe. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1989, 37-49.10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4_6Search in Google Scholar

[6] Giustina M., et. al., A signicant -loophole-free test of Bells theorem with entangled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 115, arXiv:1511.03190.10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Hensen B., et. al., Experimental loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality using entangled electron spins separated by 1.3 km, Nature., 2015, 526, 682, arXiv:1508.05949.10.1038/nature15759Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Shalm L.K., et. al., A strong loophole-free test of local realism, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2015, 115, arXiv:1511.03189.10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2016.FW4C.1Search in Google Scholar

[9] The 17th Växjö conference on Quantum Foundations, Quantum and Beyond, 2016, June 13-16, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden, file:/C:/Users/user/Desktop/qb-poster-160613.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Leggett A.J., The Problems of Physics. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, New York, 1987, 165.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Rosinger E.E., Bell Inequalities ? http://vixra.org/abs/1604.0157.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Rosinger E.E., Do Quanta Violate the Equation 0 = 0 ? http://viXra.org/abs/1604.0211.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Wikipedia : Zermelo - Fraenkel set theory.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rosinger E.E., A Few Remarks on Microscopes and Telescopes for Theoretical Physics : How Rich Locally and Large Globally is the Geometric Straight Line ?, Foundations of Probability and Physics - 6, Växjö, Sweden, June 2011, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012, 1424, 317-323.10.1063/1.3688983Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rosinger E.E., Five Departures in Logic, Mathematics, and thus - either we like it, or not - in Physics as well …, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal00802273, http://viXra.org/abs/1303.0136, posted in March 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Rosinger E.E., Five Departures in Logic, Mathematics, and thus - Whether We Like It, or Not - in Physics as Well …, Found Phys, 2015, 45:799-805, 10.1007/s10701-015-9891-8.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rosinger E.E., Van Zyl A., Self-Referential Definition of Orthogonality, arXiv:0904.0082.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Rosinger E.E., A Disconnect : Limitations of the Axiomatic Method in Physics, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00678113, http://vixra.org/abs/1203.0087, posted in March 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Rosinger E.E., Physical Intuition : What Is Wrong with It ? http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00688722, http://vixra.org/abs/1203.0089, posted in March 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-7-25
Accepted: 2017-8-16
Published Online: 2017-9-26

© 2017 E. E. Rosinger

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Analysis of a New Fractional Model for Damped Bergers’ Equation
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Optimal homotopy perturbation method for nonlinear differential equations governing MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow with heat transfer problem
  5. Regular Articles
  6. Semi- analytic numerical method for solution of time-space fractional heat and wave type equations with variable coefficients
  7. Regular Articles
  8. Investigation of a curve using Frenet frame in the lightlike cone
  9. Regular Articles
  10. Construction of complex networks from time series based on the cross correlation interval
  11. Regular Articles
  12. Nonlinear Schrödinger approach to European option pricing
  13. Regular Articles
  14. A modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method for three-dimensional non-linear diffusion equations
  15. Regular Articles
  16. A new miniaturized negative-index meta-atom for tri-band applications
  17. Regular Articles
  18. Seismic stability of the survey areas of potential sites for the deep geological repository of the spent nuclear fuel
  19. Regular Articles
  20. Distributed containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems with communication delays
  21. Regular Articles
  22. Sensitivity analysis and economic optimization studies of inverted five-spot gas cycling in gas condensate reservoir
  23. Regular Articles
  24. Quantum mechanics with geometric constraints of Friedmann type
  25. Regular Articles
  26. Modeling and Simulation for an 8 kW Three-Phase Grid-Connected Photo-Voltaic Power System
  27. Regular Articles
  28. Application of the optimal homotopy asymptotic method to nonlinear Bingham fluid dampers
  29. Regular Articles
  30. Analysis of Drude model using fractional derivatives without singular kernels
  31. Regular Articles
  32. An unsteady MHD Maxwell nanofluid flow with convective boundary conditions using spectral local linearization method
  33. Regular Articles
  34. New analytical solutions for conformable fractional PDEs arising in mathematical physics by exp-function method
  35. Regular Articles
  36. Quantum mechanical calculation of electron spin
  37. Regular Articles
  38. CO2 capture by polymeric membranes composed of hyper-branched polymers with dense poly(oxyethylene) comb and poly(amidoamine)
  39. Regular Articles
  40. Chain on a cone
  41. Regular Articles
  42. Multi-task feature learning by using trace norm regularization
  43. Regular Articles
  44. Superluminal tunneling of a relativistic half-integer spin particle through a potential barrier
  45. Regular Articles
  46. Neutrosophic triplet normed space
  47. Regular Articles
  48. Lie algebraic discussion for affinity based information diffusion in social networks
  49. Regular Articles
  50. Radiation dose and cancer risk estimates in helical CT for pulmonary tuberculosis infections
  51. Regular Articles
  52. A comparison study of steady-state vibrations with single fractional-order and distributed-order derivatives
  53. Regular Articles
  54. Some new remarks on MHD Jeffery-Hamel fluid flow problem
  55. Regular Articles
  56. Numerical investigation of magnetohydrodynamic slip flow of power-law nanofluid with temperature dependent viscosity and thermal conductivity over a permeable surface
  57. Regular Articles
  58. Charge conservation in a gravitational field in the scalar ether theory
  59. Regular Articles
  60. Measurement problem and local hidden variables with entangled photons
  61. Regular Articles
  62. Compression of hyper-spectral images using an accelerated nonnegative tensor decomposition
  63. Regular Articles
  64. Fabrication and application of coaxial polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan nanofiber membranes
  65. Regular Articles
  66. Calculating degree-based topological indices of dominating David derived networks
  67. Regular Articles
  68. The structure and conductivity of polyelectrolyte based on MEH-PPV and potassium iodide (KI) for dye-sensitized solar cells
  69. Regular Articles
  70. Chiral symmetry restoration and the critical end point in QCD
  71. Regular Articles
  72. Numerical solution for fractional Bratu’s initial value problem
  73. Regular Articles
  74. Structure and optical properties of TiO2 thin films deposited by ALD method
  75. Regular Articles
  76. Quadruple multi-wavelength conversion for access network scalability based on cross-phase modulation in an SOA-MZI
  77. Regular Articles
  78. Application of ANNs approach for wave-like and heat-like equations
  79. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  80. Study on node importance evaluation of the high-speed passenger traffic complex network based on the Structural Hole Theory
  81. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  82. A mathematical/physics model to measure the role of information and communication technology in some economies: the Chinese case
  83. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  84. Numerical modeling of the thermoelectric cooler with a complementary equation for heat circulation in air gaps
  85. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  86. On the libration collinear points in the restricted three – body problem
  87. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  88. Research on Critical Nodes Algorithm in Social Complex Networks
  89. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  90. A simulation based research on chance constrained programming in robust facility location problem
  91. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  92. A mathematical/physics carbon emission reduction strategy for building supply chain network based on carbon tax policy
  93. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  94. Mathematical analysis of the impact mechanism of information platform on agro-product supply chain and agro-product competitiveness
  95. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  96. A real negative selection algorithm with evolutionary preference for anomaly detection
  97. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  98. A privacy-preserving parallel and homomorphic encryption scheme
  99. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  100. Random walk-based similarity measure method for patterns in complex object
  101. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  102. A Mathematical Study of Accessibility and Cohesion Degree in a High-Speed Rail Station Connected to an Urban Bus Transport Network
  103. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  104. Design and Simulation of the Integrated Navigation System based on Extended Kalman Filter
  105. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  106. Oil exploration oriented multi-sensor image fusion algorithm
  107. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  108. Analysis of Product Distribution Strategy in Digital Publishing Industry Based on Game-Theory
  109. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  110. Expanded Study on the accumulation effect of tourism under the constraint of structure
  111. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  112. Unstructured P2P Network Load Balance Strategy Based on Multilevel Partitioning of Hypergraph
  113. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  114. Research on the method of information system risk state estimation based on clustering particle filter
  115. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  116. Demand forecasting and information platform in tourism
  117. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  118. Physical-chemical properties studying of molecular structures via topological index calculating
  119. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  120. Local kernel nonparametric discriminant analysis for adaptive extraction of complex structures
  121. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  122. City traffic flow breakdown prediction based on fuzzy rough set
  123. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  124. Conservation laws for a strongly damped wave equation
  125. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  126. Blending type approximation by Stancu-Kantorovich operators based on Pólya-Eggenberger distribution
  127. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  128. Computing the Ediz eccentric connectivity index of discrete dynamic structures
  129. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  130. A discrete epidemic model for bovine Babesiosis disease and tick populations
  131. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  132. Study on maintaining formations during satellite formation flying based on SDRE and LQR
  133. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  134. Relationship between solitary pulmonary nodule lung cancer and CT image features based on gradual clustering
  135. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  136. A novel fast target tracking method for UAV aerial image
  137. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  138. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of interuniversity collaborative learning based on network
  139. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  140. Conservation laws, classical symmetries and exact solutions of the generalized KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equation
  141. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  142. After notes on self-similarity exponent for fractal structures
  143. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  144. Excitation probability and effective temperature in the stationary regime of conductivity for Coulomb Glasses
  145. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  146. Comparisons of feature extraction algorithm based on unmanned aerial vehicle image
  147. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  148. Research on identification method of heavy vehicle rollover based on hidden Markov model
  149. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  150. Classifying BCI signals from novice users with extreme learning machine
  151. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  152. Topics on data transmission problem in software definition network
  153. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  154. Statistical inferences with jointly type-II censored samples from two Pareto distributions
  155. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  156. Estimation for coefficient of variation of an extension of the exponential distribution under type-II censoring scheme
  157. Special issue on Nonlinear Dynamics in General and Dynamical Systems in particular
  158. Analysis on trust influencing factors and trust model from multiple perspectives of online Auction
  159. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  160. Coupling of two-phase flow in fractured-vuggy reservoir with filling medium
  161. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  162. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs
  163. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  164. Flow Characteristic and Heat Transfer for Non-Newtonian Nanofluid in Rectangular Microchannels with Teardrop Dimples/Protrusions
  165. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  166. The size prediction of potential inclusions embedded in the sub-surface of fused silica by damage morphology
  167. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  168. Research on carbonate reservoir interwell connectivity based on a modified diffusivity filter model
  169. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  170. The method of the spatial locating of macroscopic throats based-on the inversion of dynamic interwell connectivity
  171. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  172. Unsteady mixed convection flow through a permeable stretching flat surface with partial slip effects through MHD nanofluid using spectral relaxation method
  173. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  174. A volumetric ablation model of EPDM considering complex physicochemical process in porous structure of char layer
  175. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  176. Numerical simulation on ferrofluid flow in fractured porous media based on discrete-fracture model
  177. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  178. Macroscopic lattice Boltzmann model for heat and moisture transfer process with phase transformation in unsaturated porous media during freezing process
  179. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  180. Modelling of intermittent microwave convective drying: parameter sensitivity
  181. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  182. Simulating gas-water relative permeabilities for nanoscale porous media with interfacial effects
  183. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  184. Simulation of counter-current imbibition in water-wet fractured reservoirs based on discrete-fracture model
  185. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  186. Investigation effect of wettability and heterogeneity in water flooding and on microscopic residual oil distribution in tight sandstone cores with NMR technique
  187. Special Issue on Advances on Modelling of Flowing and Transport in Porous Media
  188. Analytical modeling of coupled flow and geomechanics for vertical fractured well in tight gas reservoirs
  189. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  190. Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  191. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  192. The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  193. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  194. Erratum to: The ultimate loophole in Bell’s theorem: The inequality is identically satisfied by data sets composed of ±1′s assuming merely that they exist
  195. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  196. Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
  197. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  198. What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
  199. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  200. Relativity, anomalies and objectivity loophole in recent tests of local realism
  201. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  202. The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
  203. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  204. Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
  205. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  206. Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
  207. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  208. Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
  209. Special Issue on Ever-New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
  210. Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
  211. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  212. Three-dimensional computer models of electrospinning systems
  213. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  214. Electric field computation and measurements in the electroporation of inhomogeneous samples
  215. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  216. Modelling of magnetostriction of transformer magnetic core for vibration analysis
  217. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  218. Comparison of the fractional power motor with cores made of various magnetic materials
  219. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  220. Dynamics of the line-start reluctance motor with rotor made of SMC material
  221. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  222. Inhomogeneous dielectrics: conformal mapping and finite-element models
  223. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  224. Topology optimization of induction heating model using sequential linear programming based on move limit with adaptive relaxation
  225. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  226. Detection of inter-turn short-circuit at start-up of induction machine based on torque analysis
  227. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  228. Current superimposition variable flux reluctance motor with 8 salient poles
  229. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  230. Modelling axial vibration in windings of power transformers
  231. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  232. Field analysis & eddy current losses calculation in five-phase tubular actuator
  233. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  234. Hybrid excited claw pole generator with skewed and non-skewed permanent magnets
  235. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  236. Electromagnetic phenomena analysis in brushless DC motor with speed control using PWM method
  237. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  238. Field-circuit analysis and measurements of a single-phase self-excited induction generator
  239. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  240. A comparative analysis between classical and modified approach of description of the electrical machine windings by means of T0 method
  241. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  242. Field-based optimal-design of an electric motor: a new sensitivity formulation
  243. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  244. Application of the parametric proper generalized decomposition to the frequency-dependent calculation of the impedance of an AC line with rectangular conductors
  245. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  246. Virtual reality as a new trend in mechanical and electrical engineering education
  247. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  248. Holonomicity analysis of electromechanical systems
  249. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  250. An accurate reactive power control study in virtual flux droop control
  251. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  252. Localized probability of improvement for kriging based multi-objective optimization
  253. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  254. Research of influence of open-winding faults on properties of brushless permanent magnets motor
  255. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  256. Optimal design of the rotor geometry of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor using the bat algorithm
  257. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  258. Model of depositing layer on cylindrical surface produced by induction-assisted laser cladding process
  259. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  260. Detection of inter-turn faults in transformer winding using the capacitor discharge method
  261. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  262. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal design of IPM machines for electric vehicle
  263. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  264. Lamination effects on a 3D model of the magnetic core of power transformers
  265. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  266. Detection of vertical disparity in three-dimensional visualizations
  267. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  268. Calculations of magnetic field in dynamo sheets taking into account their texture
  269. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  270. 3-dimensional computer model of electrospinning multicapillary unit used for electrostatic field analysis
  271. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  272. Optimization of wearable microwave antenna with simplified electromagnetic model of the human body
  273. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  274. Induction heating process of ferromagnetic filled carbon nanotubes based on 3-D model
  275. Special Issue: The 18th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Fields in Mechatronics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering ISEF 2017
  276. Speed control of an induction motor by 6-switched 3-level inverter
Downloaded on 3.7.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/phys-2017-0069/html
Scroll to top button