Next Article in Journal
Oral Administration of Berberine Hydrochloride Based on Chitosan/Carboxymethyl-β-Cyclodextrin Hydrogel
Next Article in Special Issue
Kinetics of Polyampholyte Dimerization: Influence of Charge Sequences
Previous Article in Journal
Biocompatibility and Antibacterial Activity of Eugenol and Copaiba Essential Oil-Based Emulsions Loaded on Cotton Textile Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Electrochemical Performance of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles Entrenched in Miscible Poly(methyl methacrylate)-Poly(lactic acid) Blends as Freestanding Electrodes for Supercapacitors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of a Microfluidic-Based Device Coated with Polyelectrolyte-Capped Titanium Dioxide to Couple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Mercury Speciation

by
Ji-Hao Chen
1,†,
Yu-Ting Luo
2,†,
Yi-An Su
2,
Yan-Ren Ke
1,
Ming-Jay Deng
3,
Wei-Yu Chen
4,
Cheng-Yu Wang
1,
Jia-Lin Tsai
1,
Cheng-Hsing Lin
2 and
Tsung-Ting Shih
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City 242062, Taiwan
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
3
Department of Applied Chemistry, Providence University, Taichung City 433303, Taiwan
4
Department of Materials Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung County 912301, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2024, 16(16), 2366; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162366
Submission received: 15 July 2024 / Revised: 15 August 2024 / Accepted: 18 August 2024 / Published: 21 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer Electrolyte: Recent Progress and Applications)

Abstract

:
Mercury (Hg) is a toxic element which impacts on biological systems and ecosystems. Because the toxicity of Hg species is highly dependent on their concentration levels and chemical forms, the sensitive identification of the chemical forms of Hg—i.e., Hg speciation—is of major significance in providing meaningful information about the sources of Hg exposure. In this study, a microfluidic-based device made of high-clarity poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) was fabricated. Then, titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2s) were attached to the treated channel’s interior with the aid of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC). After coupling the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based photocatalyst-assisted reduction device (the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD) with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), a selective and sensitive, hyphenated system for Hg speciation was established. Validation procedures demonstrated that the method could be satisfactorily applied to the determination of mercury ions (Hg2+) and methylmercury ions (CH3Hg+) in both human urine and water samples. Remarkably, the zeta potential measured clearly indicated that the PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2s with a predominance of positive charges indeed provided a steady force for firm attachment to the negatively charged device channel. The cause of the durability of the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD was clarified thus.

1. Introduction

Mercury (Hg) is an element naturally found in the earth’s crust and is highly toxic to living organisms and the environment [1]. Due to the enormous environmental and biological impacts caused by Hg exposure, monitoring of Hg levels in both biological systems or ecosystems has long been recognized as a critical issue all over the world. Over the past few decades, competent authorities in several countries have developed a comprehensive body of legislation governing the maximum permissible levels of Hg [2,3,4]. However, Hg can be found in many forms, including elemental mercury (Hg0), the mercury ion (Hg2+), the methylmercury ion (CH3Hg+), and so on, both in the environment and in living organisms. The toxicity of Hg species is highly dependent on their concentration levels and chemical forms [5,6]. For example, Hg in its inorganic form binding with a methyl group is known to be a developmental neurotoxin, i.e., CH3Hg+, with efficient absorption by the gastrointestinal tract and easy transport across cellular membranes due to its intensive lipophilicity [7]. In addition, the determination of Hg species is typically challenging due to the low levels of each species in most instances [8]. Therefore, the sensitive identification of the chemical forms for Hg, i.e., Hg speciation, is of major significance in providing meaningful information about the sources of Hg exposure.
Nowadays, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with superior analytical features (e.g., low detection limits, wide linear dynamic range, ultrahigh sensitivity, and so on) is widely recognized as one of the most powerful methods for element determination [9,10]. Even so, the same elements in different chemical forms cannot be simultaneously identified by ICP-MS instrumentation due to the completed dissociation of sample analytes achieving during ICP atomization. Although combinations of separation techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ICP-MS detection are frequently utilized for Hg speciation [11,12,13,14], there is a growing awareness of the impropriety of the direct introduction of salt- or organic matter-rich effluent from HPLC into ICP-MS instrumentation [15,16,17].
Up to the present, several vapor generation (VG) techniques have been proposed to interface with HPLC and ICP-MS for efficient sample introduction. The volatile products of the target analytes obtained by VG techniques are separated from liquid sample matrices for subsequent measurement, leading to the advantages of the alleviation of matrix effects and enhancement of analyte transportation [18,19]. Among the VG techniques available, photoinduced VG techniques have emerged as alternatives to those using chemical reducing agents (e.g., sodium tetrahydroborate (NaBH4) or tin chloride (SnCl2)) [20]. In 2003, Sturgeon’s group initiated related research into the development of photoinduced VG for elemental analysis [21]. Target analytes can be transformed into gaseous species with the aid of free radicals generated by the dissociation of low molecular weight (Mw) organic acids (e.g., formic acid (HCOOH), acetic acid (CH3COOH), and so on) under “pure” ultraviolet (UV) irradiation. The determination of Hg based on such an analytical strategy was then successfully achieved by Hou’s group [22,23,24,25]. In 2004, Wang et al. further proposed a new methodology combining the photocatalysts titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2s) with “pure” photoinduced VG, i.e., the nano-TiO2-enhanced photoinduced VG technique, for analytical sensitivity improvement [26]. Afterward, different photocatalysts such as bare/silver-modified nano-TiO2s and zirconium dioxide nanoparticles were applied in similar studies for the same purpose [27,28]. Furthermore, due to illumination being the key to the initiation of photocatalytic reactions, quartz with excellent optical properties is often used in the fabrication of photoreactors. In other words, the expensive nature of quartz reactors continues to limit the widespread use of the two photoinduced VG techniques.
In the following years, Sun’s group made a lot of effort to explore the possibilities of using various materials (e.g., poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) [29,30,31,32] and Pyrex glass [33]) in reactor fabrication for the development of the nano-TiO2-enhanced photoinduced VG technique. However, because the wavelength of the optimum transmittance of reactors did not match that of the photocatalytic activation reaction, the analytical sensitivity was thus limited. Such compromised results were unsatisfactory, even if the fabrication cost of the photoreactors was dramatically reduced. Additionally, both tangle-prone reactors and fragile tubes are troublesome issues during operation procedures.
The deadlock regarding the photoinduced VG technique has subsequently been broken by the emergence of suitable microfluidic system designs. In 2013, Shih et al. first developed a poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) reactor, i.e., a microfluidic-based, photocatalyst-assisted reduction device (microfluidic-based PCARD) with outstanding clarity [34]. Meanwhile, additional accessories were eliminated because operational functionalities like mixing tees were integrated into a microfluidic system. After coupling HPLC separation with ICP-MS detection, a selective and sensitive speciation technique for the two inorganic selenium (Se) species was constructed. In view of the overconsumption of photocatalysts resulting from consecutive loading during analytical procedures, a microfluidic-based PCARD coated with nano-TiO2 catalysts was developed thus [35]. To simplify the coating procedure and improve the stability of the coating materials, a charge-rich polyelectrolyte, namely poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC), was employed to cap nano-TiO2 catalysts for firm attachment to the treated channel interior. In other words, a PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalyst can be tightly embedded on the selected substrate via strong electrostatic attraction for the development of efficient VG. Although the applicability of the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD has been demonstrated [35], the working theory of the coating method has not yet been clarified. Therefore, this work aimed to verify the properties of the PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalyst and further apply the established system to Hg speciation with human urine and environmental water samples.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Materials

All chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and used as received without further treatment unless otherwise stated. High-purity water was obtained by using a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Hydrochloric acid (HCl; 36.5–38.0%), methanol (CH3OH, ≥99.9%), nitric acid (HNO3, 69.0–70.0%), sodium dodecyl sulfate, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were obtained from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Acetic acid (≥99.7%), ammonium acetate (≥97%), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 30–33%), L-cysteine (≥98.5%), formic acid (HCOOH, ≥98%), 2-mercaptoethanol (≥99.0%), methylmercury(II) chloride (PESTANAL™, analytical standard, ≥98.0%), poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC, MWav: 100,000–200,000, 20 wt% in H2O, d = 1.040), and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 95.0–97.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (nano-TiO2s, Aeroxide® TiO2 P25, average primary particle size: ~21 nm, specific surface area: 50 ± 15 m2 g−1) were purchased from Evonik Industries AG (Essen, Germany). Stock Hg solution (1000 ± 6 μg mL−1, Hg metal in 2% HNO3) was purchased from High-Purity Standards (North Charleston, SC, USA). A certified reference material (CRM, Seronorm™ Trace Elements Urine L-2, freeze-dried human urine) was obtained from SERO (Billingstad, Norway).

2.2. Construction of the HPLC/Nano-TiO2-Coated Microfluidic-Based PCARD/ICP-MS System

A diagram of the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD/ICP-MS system is provided in Figure 1. The system can be divided into three main parts: the separation unit, the detection unit, and the VG unit interfaced with the two units described above.
The chromatographic separation unit consisted of an HPLC pump (S 1125-G, Sykam GmbH, Eresing, Germany), a six-port electric actuator valve (C22Z-3186E, VICI Valco Instruments Co. Inc., Houston, TX, USA) equipped with a 50-μL poly(aryletherketone) (PEEK) sample loop, and a guard column (XBridge® BEH C18, 3.5 µm, 5 × 2.1 mm, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) attached to an analytical column (XBridge® C18, 3.5 µm, 150 × 3.0 mm i.d., Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). The detection was achieved by ICP-MS instrumentation (iCAP RQ, Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Bremen, Germany).
The VG unit consisted of an in-house-fabricated nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD, an ultraviolet (UV) irradiation source (UV-A lamp, 40 W, maximum emission at 365 nm, Great Lighting Corp., New Taipei City, Taiwan) mounted in an opaque box, a mixing tee (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA, USA), and a gas–liquid separator (GLS) (B0507959, PerkinElmer Inc., Hopkinton, MA, USA). Briefly, the network of the microfluidic-based PCARD was designed using geometric modeling software (AutoCAD 2019, Autodesk Inc., Sausalito, CA, USA), then patterned on PMMA substrates (Kun Quan Engineering Plastics Co. Ltd., Hsinchu City, Taiwan) using a laser micromachining system (EBF-090060-60R, Laser Life Co. Ltd., Hsinchu City, Taiwan). Then, the channel interior of the developed device was modified with TiO2 photocatalysts via two-step dynamic coating procedures (using saturated NaOH for 12 h and a reagent containing 500 mg L−1 nano-TiO2 and 0.5% (w/v) PDADMAC for 8 h); Ultimately, the channel was flushed with high-purity water and dried under a gentle stream of air. Throughout the coating procedures, the operation flow rate was 0.1 mL min−1. Detailed descriptions of the fabrication procedures of the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD are provided elsewhere [35].
All components of the units were connected by PEEK tubes (Upchurch Scientific Inc., Oak Harbor, WA, USA). Peristaltic pumps (Minipuls 3, Gilson Inc., Middleton, WI, USA) with peristaltic tubing (Gilson Inc., Middleton, WI, USA) were employed to deliver sample solutions and reagents. The outlet of the peristaltic tubing was modified for attachment to PEEK tubes via a conical adapter (Upchurch Scientific Inc., Oak Harbor, WA, USA).

2.3. Analytical Protocol

First, the sample was delivered into the chromatographic system for species separation. Afterward, the Hg species in the effluent were loaded into the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD, followed by vaporization in the presence of HCOOH under UV irradiation (shown below) [23,36].
TiO2 + hν → TiO2 (holes (h+) + electrons (e))
H2O ↔ H+ + OH
OH + h+ → OH
HCOOH + h+ → CO2 + H2O + mineral acids
CH3Hg+(aqueous) + OH‧ → Hg2+(aqueous) + products
Hg2+(aqueous) + 2e → Hg0(gas)
Then the volatile Hg products were separated from the sample matrix via the GLS and carried into the ICP-MS system by a stream of Ar for subsequent measurement. (Caution! An exhaust system is recommended because of the generation of ozone and volatile Hg products during UV irradiation.) Adjustment of the sampling position and ion lenses for the optimal signal for Hg at m/z 202 was performed using an Hg standard solution. Detailed operational conditions for achieving optimal sensitivity and low background noise are provided in Table 1.

2.4. Characterization of the PDADMAC-Capped Nano-TiO2 Catalyst

The PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalyst was investigated using a particle analyzer (NanoBrook 90Plus PALS, Brookhaven Instrument Co., Holtsville, NY, USA) based on phase analysis light scattering (PALS). Test samples containing aliquots of nano-TiO2 and PDADMAC were dissolved in high-purity water and then adjusted to the desired pH using HNO3 and NaOH solutions. Data obtained during measurement were processed using built-in software (BIC Particle Solutions v. 3.6.0.7079 version 7.12.).

2.5. Sample Preparation

The urine samples were collected from volunteers in our research group. The water samples were collected from the water dispenser at the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences, National Tsing Hua University (Hsinchu City, Taiwan) and effluents near industrial outfalls (New Taipei City, Taiwan). All samples were stored in glass bottles/vials (Yeong-Shin Co. Ltd., Hsinchu City, Taiwan) along with an aliquot of concentrated HCl, followed by wrapping with aluminum foil and storing at 4 °C in the dark [31]. The collected samples were filtered through a PTFE membrane (Acrodisc, 0.45 μm, 25 mm O.D., Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY, USA) before use. (Note: The bottles/vials were immersed in 40% HNO3 and then flushed with high-purity water. The bottles/vials were rinsed thoroughly with the designated samples prior to sample collection.)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Verification of the PDADMAC-Capped Nano-TiO2 Catalyst

Previously, numerous clusters of PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalysts forming a continuous bed in a channel interior have been validated by scanning electron microscope (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX), and a laser ablation (LA) system coupled with ICP-MS measurements [35]. Even so, the working theory of such a method was still not clearly elucidated. Thus, the causes of the unique characteristics of the PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalyst should be identified. Figure 2 presents the variations in the zeta potentials of the samples with respect to the pH of the solution. As indicated in Figure 2, no significant changes in the potentials of the samples were observed in the region ranging from 3.0 to 10.0, revealing that the strong cationic polyelectrolyte PDADMAC stabilized the nano-TiO2 catalyst against surrounding pH changes via cluster formation. As for the fluctuations in the zeta potentials in the investigated pH region, it might be attributed to variations in the ionic strengths of the tested solutions when the solutions were susceptible to significant dilution and pH adjustment [37,38]. Anyway, the PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2s with a predominance of positive charges indeed provided a steady force for firm attachment to the negatively charged device channel treated, leading to high tolerance of flushing with strongly acidic and/or basic reagents.
In comparison with the TiO2 coating methods for PMMA substrates reported in the literature [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50], both the preparation steps and additional equipment were dramatically simplified. Table 2 provides a comparison of the TiO2 coating methods for PMMA substrates proposed in this study with those reported in other studies. Furthermore, the amounts of chemicals used during the preparation procedures employed in this study were also much lower than those reported in other studies, which could be considered to fulfill the goals of green nanotechnology. According to our calculations, the consumption of the nano-TiO2 catalyst was approximately 24 mg. Remarkably, because the preparation conditions for the TiO2 coating were quite gentle, i.e., all processes are carried out in the aqueous phase and at room temperature, the morphology of the PMMA substrates was preserved. In other words, the methods employed in this study indeed provided a promising strategy for the development of nano-TiO2-enhanced, photoinduced VG in microfluidic devices due to the elimination of channel deformation.

3.2. Optimization of Operating Conditions for Chromatographic Separation

3.2.1. Influence of L-Cysteine and 2-Mercaptoethanol Concentration on the Separation Efficiency of Hg Species

Because the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD was used for vaporizing Hg species after the chromatographic separation, the operation conditions for chromatographic separation were an important issue for Hg speciation. Typically, the chromatographic separation of Hg species is achieved by reversed-phase methods and ion-exchange methods. Among the methods mentioned above, reversed-phase chromatography with stable analytical performance is especially popular [51]. In general, thiol-containing compounds (e.g., L-cysteine [52,53], 2-mercaptoethanol [54,55] or both [56]) are added into the mobile phase for complexing with Hg species (shown below).
R-SH + CH3Hg+ → R-S-Hg-CH3
R-SH + Hg2+ → R-S-Hg-S-R
Then, separation of each thiol-complexed Hg species can be achieved according to the mobility difference caused by varying degrees of interactions between thiol-complexed Hg species and the stationary phase.
Considering that the use of a single thiol-containing compound as a complexing reagent is often associated with a prolonged retention time (tR) [57], two thiol-containing compounds, i.e., L-cysteine and 2-mercaptoethanol, were simultaneously used for the separation of CH3Hg+ and Hg2+. Figure 3a,b displays the variation in tR of the two Hg species as functions of L-cysteine and 2-mercaptoethanol concentration. As shown in Figure 3a,b, the maximum difference in tR between CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ could be observed when 100 µM L-cysteine and 1500 µM 2-mercaptoethanol were applied. Therefore, the abovementioned concentrations of L-cysteine and 2-mercaptoethanol were selected for subsequent experiments.

3.2.2. Influence of CH3OH Concentration on the Separation Efficiency of Hg Species

Apart from the use of complexing reagents, the addition of CH3OH is thought to be another strategy for improving separation efficiency [58]. Figure 4a displays the chromatograms of CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ standards under conditions with the modifier CH3OH and without it. Compared to the chromatographic conditions without the addition of CH3OH, both the baseline stability and the signals profile were dramatically improved when CH3OH was applied. Furthermore, to ensure that the CH3OH added was favorable for both the analytical throughput and the separation efficiency, the influence of the CH3OH concentration on the retention behavior of the two Hg species was investigated. As shown in Figure 4b, a decreasing trend in both the tR of the two Hg species and the difference in the tR between CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ appeared when the CH3OH concentration was increased from 1 to 5%. Because undesired deposition resulting from excess organic modifiers in a sample matrix may cause permanent damage to ICP-MS instrumentation [59], a tradeoff between the analytical throughput and the separation efficiency was adopted by using a CH3OH concentration of 2% for the subsequent experiments.

3.3. Optimization of Operating Conditions for Photocatalyst-Assisted VG

3.3.1. Influence of HCOOH Concentration on the Vaporization Efficiency of Hg Species

Typically, photocatalytic reactions are triggered by electrons and holes when photocatalysts are treated with UV irradiation. The holes are generally considered to initiate oxidation reactions, whereas the electrons are responsible for photoreduction pathways. Because the photogenerated electrons and the holes may rapidly recombine, leading to inferior photocatalytic efficiency, additives that can retard the recombination of electrons and holes are usually used. In fact, low molecular weight organic substances such as HCOOH have been demonstrated to be useful for the improvement of the photocatalytic reduction efficiency of analytes due to their relatively high hole-scavenging efficiency [60]. To determine the optimal concentration of HCOOH for the reduction of Hg species, the influence of HCOOH concentration on the signal intensity of the analytes was evaluated. As shown in Figure 5a, significant enhancements in the signals of the two Hg species were obtained when HCOOH was added, reaching a plateau at the HCOOH concentration of 400 mM. Therefore, an optimal HCOOH concentration of 400 mM, which provided maximum signals for CH3Hg+ and Hg2+, was selected for subsequent experiments.

3.3.2. Influence of the pH on the Vaporization Efficiency of Hg Species

It has been recognized that adsorption among analytes of interest, hole scavengers (i.e., HCOOH), and nano-TiO2 catalysts via electrostatic interactions is the key to success in the photocatalyst-assisted reduction reaction. Adsorption among target analytes, hole scavengers, and nano-TiO2 catalysts via electrostatic interactions is considered critical to the efficiency of the photocatalyst-assisted reduction reaction. Because the charge statuses of all species were strongly determined by the acidity of the reaction environment, the pH of the mixture resulting from the column effluent and the hole scavenger was investigated. As indicated in Figure 5b, an increasing trend in the intensity of the two Hg species appeared when the pH was increased from 2.0 to 4.0. In contrast, a deterioration in the signal intensity for both Hg species was observed as the pH exceeded 5.0. This phenomenon could be explained in terms of the degree of deprotonation of HCOOH, leading to competitive adsorption between the analyte species and HCOOH on nano-TiO2 photocatalysts. The phenomenon might also be attributed to competitive adsorption between the analyte species and HCOOH on nano-TiO2 photocatalysts caused by varying degrees of deprotonation of HCOOH. Therefore, the optimal value of pH 4.0, which provided the highest intensity signals for CH3Hg+ and Hg2+, was selected for subsequent experiments.

3.4. Analytical Performance

Table 3 presents the analytical features of merit of the established system operated under optimum conditions. Satisfactory linearities in the region from 0.01 to 1.0 μg L−1 for the two Hg species were observed, with correlation coefficients higher than 0.9998 (see Figure 6a). Figure 6b displays the corresponding chromatograms under the optimized conditions. The method detection limits (MDLs) for CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ were 2.95 and 1.39 ng L−1, respectively. (Note: The MDLs were determined based on the 3σ criterion, where the standard deviation was obtained from the results of seven repeated measurements of a mixture of column effluent.) Moreover, 15 replicate injections of 0.2 μg L−1 samples of each species were conducted to estimate both the stability of the system during the analytical procedures and the drift of the Hg response caused by the memory effect. The obtained repeatability was less than 3% of the coefficient of variation (CV), demonstrating the precision of this method for durable analyses. Then, the accuracy of the proposed method was validated by analysis with the CRM Seronorm™ Trace Elements Urine L-2. Because detailed concentration information regarding Hg species in the CRM was absent, comparison between the certified value of Hg concentration and the summation of the measured values of individual species was adopted. Based on the analytical results, the summation of each measured value was in reasonably good agreement with the certified Hg concentration (see Table 3). Moreover, the CRM with intentional 1000-fold dilution was employed to verify the detection capability of the established system for quantitatively determining ultratrace levels of Hg species.
To further demonstrate the utility of the proposed system, urine samples obtained from three healthy volunteers and water samples collected from the water dispenser and effluents near industrial outfalls were analyzed under the optimized operation conditions. As indicated in Table 4, the concentrations of Hg2+ ranged from 0.036 to 0.112 μg L−1 in the collected samples, and the CH3Hg+ content was much lower than the Hg2+ content in either urine samples or water samples. It is hypothesized that such diverse distributions of CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ are closely related to the unique metabolic mechanisms of the two species [1,7]. Even so, the concentration information for the two Hg species, i.e., CH3Hg+ and Hg2+, could be simultaneously obtained by the proposed method. The acceptable spike recovery of Hg species also revealed that the method employed in this study would be feasible for Hg speciation.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a selective and sensitive hyphenated system including the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD, HPLC and ICP-MS for Hg speciation was established. To fabricate the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD, an alternative involving a charge-rich polyelectrolyte PDADMAC was employed to stabilize the nano-TiO2 catalyst via cluster formation and provide a steady force for firm attachment to the channel interior via electrostatic interactions. The MDLs for CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ achieved by the established system were 2.95 and 1.39 ng L−1, respectively, demonstrating the capability of such a system for quantitatively determining ultratrace levels of Hg species. A series of validation experiments in terms of precision, accuracy, and so on, indicated that the method could also be satisfactorily applied to the determination of the two Hg species in both human urine and water samples. Remarkably, the durability of the nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD created by the unique properties of the PDADMAC-capped nano-TiO2 catalyst was also verified.

Author Contributions

Investigation, methodology, project administration, and writing—original draft preparation, J.-H.C.; investigation, visualization, and writing—original draft preparation, Y.-T.L.; methodology and writing—original draft preparation, Y.-A.S.; investigation and visualization, Y.-R.K.; resources and writing—review and editing, M.-J.D.; resources, validation, and writing—review and editing, W.-Y.C.; investigation and visualization, C.-Y.W.; investigation and visualization, J.-L.T.; methodology, validation and writing—original draft preparation, C.-H.L.; conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, and writing—review and editing, T.-T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council of the Republic of China (Taiwan) (NSTC 108-2113-M-030-010-MY2) and the APC was funded by Office of Research and Development of Fu Jen Catholic University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to convey their immense gratitude to the late Yuh-Chang Sun for his expert advice. The authors are also grateful for the technical support for instrumentation maintenance provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific (Taiwan).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Beckers, F.; Rinklebe, J. Cycling of mercury in the environment: Sources, fate, and human health implications: A review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 47, 693–794. [Google Scholar]
  2. Regulation (EU) 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 on Mercury, and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1102/2008 (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32017R0852 (accessed on 16 October 2023).
  3. The Regulations and Laws of Mercury Management in Taiwan. Available online: https://topic.moenv.gov.tw/hg/lp-93-3.html (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  4. The Regulations and Laws that Apply to Mercury in United States. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/mercury/environmental-laws-apply-mercury (accessed on 18 June 2024).
  5. Hassett-Sipple, B.; Swartout, J.; Schoeny, R. Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume V: Health Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds; United States Environmental Protection Agency: New York, NY, USA, 1997.
  6. Risher, J.F. Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zafar, A.; Javed, S.; Akram, N.; Naqvi, S.A.R. Health Risks of Mercury. In Mercury Toxicity Mitigation: Sustainable Nexus Approach; Kumar, N., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 67–92. [Google Scholar]
  8. Saleh, T.A.; Fadillah, G.; Ciptawati, E.; Khaled, M. Analytical methods for mercury speciation detection, and measurement in water, oil, and gas. Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 132, 116016. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nelms, S.M. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry Handbook; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Thomas, R. Overview of the ICP-MS Application Landscape. In Practical Guide to ICP-MS and Other Atomic Spectroscopy Techniques, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zou, H.; Zhou, C.; Yang, X.; Wen, J.; Li, C.; Song, S.; Sun, C. Speciation analysis of mercury in wild edible mushrooms by high-performance liquid chromatography hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 2829–2840. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Narukawa, T.; Iwai, T.; Chiba, K. Simultaneous speciation analysis of inorganic arsenic and methylmercury in edible oil by high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 2020, 210, 120646. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, D.; Yang, S.; Ma, Q.; Sun, J.; Cheng, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J. Simultaneous multi-elemental speciation of As, Hg and Pb by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry interfaced with high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2020, 313, 126119. [Google Scholar]
  14. Favilli, L.; Giacomino, A.; Malandrino, M.; Inaudi, P.; Diana, A. Strategies for mercury speciation with single and multi-element approaches by HPLC-ICP-MS. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1082956. [Google Scholar]
  15. Caruso, J.A.; Montes-Bayon, M. Elemental speciation studies-new directions for trace metal analysis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2003, 56, 148–163. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, T. Liquid Chromatography-Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LC-ICP-MS). J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2007, 30, 807–831. [Google Scholar]
  17. Thomas, R. Practical Guide to ICP-MS a Tutorial for Beginners, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, Y.; Liu, R.; Yang, L. Application of chemical vapor generation in ICP-MS: A review. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 1980–1991. [Google Scholar]
  19. Brindle, I.D. Vapor generation. In Sample Introduction Systems in ICPMS and ICPOES; Beauchemin, D., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 381–409. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yin, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, G. Photo-induced chemical-vapor generation for sample introduction in atomic spectrometry. Trends Anal. Chem. 2011, 30, 1672–1684. [Google Scholar]
  21. Guo, X.; Sturgeon, R.E.; Mester, Z.; Gardner, G.J. UV Vapor Generation for Determination of Selenium by Heated Quartz Tube Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 2092–2099. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zheng, C.; Li, Y.; He, Y.; Ma, Q.; Hou, X. Photo-induced chemical vapor generation with formic acid for ultrasensitive atomic fluorescence spectrometric determination of mercury: Potential application to mercury speciation in water. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2005, 20, 746–750. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, C.; Zheng, C.; Wang, J.; Cheng, G.; Lv, Y.; Hou, X. Photo-induced cold vapor generation with low molecular weight alcohol, aldehyde, or carboxylic acid for atomic fluorescence spectrometric determination of mercury. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 388, 825–830. [Google Scholar]
  24. Su, Y.; Xu, K.; Gao, Y.; Hou, X. Determination of trace mercury in geological samples by direct slurry sampling cold vapor generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchim. Acta 2008, 160, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  25. He, C.; Cheng, G.; Zheng, C.; Wu, L.; Lee, Y.I.; Hou, X. Photochemical vapor generation and in situ preconcentration for determination of mercury by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 3015–3021. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Q.; Liang, J.; Qiu, J.; Huang, B. Online pre-reduction of selenium(VI) with a newly designed UV/TiO2 photocatalysis reduction device. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 715–716. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yin, Y.; Liang, J.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q. Vapour generation at a UV/TiO2 photocatalysis reaction device for determination and speciation of mercury by AFS and HPLC-AFS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2007, 22, 330–334. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, H.; Luo, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, L.; Wang, Q. Nanosemiconductor-Based Photocatalytic Vapor Generation Systems for Subsequent Selenium Determination and Speciation with Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 2974–2981. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun, Y.C.; Chang, Y.C.; Su, C.K. On-Line HPLC-UV/Nano-TiO2-ICPMS System for the Determination of Inorganic Selenium Species. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 2640–2645. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sun, Y.C.; Chen, Y.J.; Tsai, Y.N. Determination of urinary arsenic species using an on-line nano-TiO2 photooxidation device coupled with microbore LC and hydride generation-ICP-MS system. Microchem. J. 2007, 86, 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen, K.J.; Hsu, I.H.; Sun, Y.C. Determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury by coupling short-column ion chromatographic separation, on-line photocatalyst-assisted vapor generation, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 8933–8938. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Tsai, T.N.; Lin, C.H.; Hsu, I.H.; Sun, Y.C. Sequential photocatalyst-assisted digestion and vapor generation device coupled with anion exchange chromatography and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for speciation analysis of selenium species in biological samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2014, 806, 165–171. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tsai, M.W.; Sun, Y.C. On-line coupling of an ultraviolet titanium dioxide film reactor with a liquid chromatography/hydride generation/inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry system for continuous determination of dynamic variation of hydride- and nonhydride-forming arsenic species in very small microdialysate samples. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 211–216. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shih, T.T.; Hsu, I.H.; Wu, J.F.; Lin, C.H.; Sun, Y.C. Development of chip-based photocatalyst-assisted reduction device to couple high performance liquid chromatography and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for determination of inorganic selenium species. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1304, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Shih, T.T.; Lin, C.H.; Hsu, I.H.; Chen, J.Y.; Sun, Y.C. Development of a Titanium Dioxide-Coated Microfluidic-Based Photocatalyst-Assisted Reduction Device to Couple HighPerformance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry for Determination of Inorganic Selenium Species. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10091–10098. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Gårdfeldt, K.; Sommar, J.; Strömberg, D.; Feng, X. Oxidation of atomic mercury by hydroxyl radicals and photoinduced decomposition of methylmercury in the aqueous phase. At. Environ. 2001, 35, 3039–3047. [Google Scholar]
  37. Biery, A.R.; Knauss, D.M. Recent advances in the synthesis of diallylammonium polymers. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 26, 101251. [Google Scholar]
  38. Akyol, E.; Kirboga, S.; Öner, M. Polyelectrolytes: Science and Application. In Polyelectrolytes; Visakh, P.M., Bayraktar, O., Picó, G.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 87–112. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vasudev, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Yang, J.; Ramadurai, D.; Stroscio, M.A.; Globus, T.; Khromova, T.; Dutta, M. Optoelectronic Signatures of Biomolecules Including Hybrid Nanostructure-DNA Ensembles. IEEE Sens. J. 2008, 8, 743–749. [Google Scholar]
  40. Morselli, D.; Bondioli, F.; Fiorini, M.; Messori, M. Poly(methyl methacrylate)–TiO2 nanocomposites obtained by non-hydrolytic sol–gel synthesis: The innovative tert-butyl alcohol route. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 7003–7012. [Google Scholar]
  41. El-Bashir, S.M.; Al-Harbi, F.F.; Elburaih, H.; Al-Faifi, F.; Yahia, I.S. Red photoluminescent PMMA nanohybrid films for modifying the spectral distribution of solar radiation inside greenhouses. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 928–938. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Y.; Zhao, H.; Yang, M. TiO2 nanoparticles supported on PMMA nanofibers for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 508, 500–507. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Totu, E.E.; Cristache, C.M.; Voicila, E.; Oprea, O.; Agir, I.; Tavukcuoglu, O.; Didilescu, A.C. On Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Poly(methylmethacrylate) Nanocomposites for Dental Applications. I. Mater. Plast. 2017, 54, 666–672. [Google Scholar]
  44. Totu, E.E.; Cristache, C.M.; Isildak, S.; Tavukcuoglu, O.; Pantazi, A.; Enachescu, M.; Buga, R.; Burlibasa, M.; Totu, T. Structural Investigations on Poly(methyl methacrylate) Various Composites Used for Stereolithographyc Complete Dentures. Mater. Plast. 2018, 55, 616–619. [Google Scholar]
  45. Song, J.H.; Yim, S.J.; Lim, S.J.; Yu, J.W. Polymer Masking Method for a High Speed Roll-to-Roll Process. Macromol. Res. 2018, 26, 838–843. [Google Scholar]
  46. Errahmani, K.B.; Benhabiles, O.; Bellebia, S.; Bengharez, Z.; Goosen, M.; Mahmoudi, H. Photocatalytic Nanocomposite Polymer-TiO2 Membranes for Pollutant Removal from Wastewater. Catalysts 2021, 11, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yen, L.T.; Weng, C.H.; Tzeng, J.H.; Chen, Y.C.; Jacobson, A.R.; Lin, Y.T. Substantial improvement in photocatalysis performance of N-TiO2 immobilized on PMMA: Exemplified by inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 345, 127298. [Google Scholar]
  48. Vodišek, N.; Šuligoj, A.; Korte, D.; Štangar, U.L. Transparent Photocatalytic Thin Films on Flexible Polymer Substrates. Materials 2018, 11, 1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Becerril-Estrada, V.; Robles, I.; Martínez-Sanchez, C.; Godínez, L.A. Study of TiO2/Ti4O7 photo-anodes inserted in an activated carbon packed bed cathode: Towards the development of 3D-type photo electro-Fenton reactors for water treatment. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 340, 135972. [Google Scholar]
  50. Xu, J.; Nagasawa, H.; Kanezashi, M.; Tsuru, T. TiO2 Coatings Via Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition for Enhancing the UV-Resistant Properties of Transparent Plastics. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar]
  51. McNeff, C.; Zigan, L.; Johnson, K.; Carr, P.W.; Wang, A.; Weber-Main, A.M. Analytical Advantages of Highly Stable Stationary Phases for Reversed-Phase LC. LC GC N. Am. 2000, 18, 514–529. [Google Scholar]
  52. Jia, X.; Han, Y.; Wei, C.; Duan, T.; Chen, H. Speciation of mercury in liquid cosmetic samples by ionic liquid based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2011, 26, 1380–1386. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, S.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Z. In situ rapid magnetic solid-phase extraction coupled with HPLC-ICP-MS for mercury speciation in environmental water. Microchem. J. 2016, 126, 25–31. [Google Scholar]
  54. Jia, X.; Han, Y.; Liu, X.; Duan, T.; Chen, H. Speciation of mercury in water samples by dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high performance liquid chromatography-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2011, 66, 88–92. [Google Scholar]
  55. Souza, S.S.; Campiglia, A.D.; Barbosa, F., Jr. A simple method for methylmercury, inorganic mercury and ethylmercury determination in plasma samples by high performance liquid chromatography–cold-vapor-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 761, 11–17. [Google Scholar]
  56. Batista, B.L.; Rodrigues, J.L.; Souza, S.S.; Souza, V.C.O.; Barbosa, F., Jr. Mercury speciation in seafood samples by LC–ICP-MS with a rapid ultrasound-assisted extraction procedure: Application to the determination of mercury in Brazilian seafood samples. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 2000–2004. [Google Scholar]
  57. Minnich, M.G.; McLean, J.A.; Montaser, A. Spatial aerosol characteristics of a direct injection high efficiency nebulizer via optical patternation. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2001, 56, 1113–1126. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jia, X.Y.; Gong, D.R.; Han, Y.; Wei, C.; Duan, T.C.; Chen, H.T. Fast speciation of mercury in seawater by short-column high-performance liquid chromatography hyphenated to inductively coupled plasma spectrometry after on-line cation exchange column preconcentration. Talanta 2012, 88, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Chen, J.; Chen, H.; Jin, X.; Chen, H. Determination of ultra-trace amount methyl-, phenyl- and inorganic mercury in environmental and biological samples by liquid chromatography with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after cloud point extraction preconcentration. Talanta 2009, 77, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Tan, T.; Beydoun, D.; Amal, R. Effects of organic hole scavengers on the photocatalytic reduction of selenium anions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2003, 159, 273–280. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD/ICP-MS system.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD/ICP-MS system.
Polymers 16 02366 g001
Figure 2. Variations in the zeta potentials of samples with respect to the pH of the solution. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Figure 2. Variations in the zeta potentials of samples with respect to the pH of the solution. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Polymers 16 02366 g002
Figure 3. Variation in the retention time (tR) of the two Hg species with respect to the concentrations of (a) L-cysteine and (b) 2-mercaptoethanol. The uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Figure 3. Variation in the retention time (tR) of the two Hg species with respect to the concentrations of (a) L-cysteine and (b) 2-mercaptoethanol. The uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Polymers 16 02366 g003
Figure 4. (a) Chromatograms of CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ under the conditions with/without CH3OH. (b) Variation in the retention time (tR) of the two Hg species with respect to the concentration of methanol. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Figure 4. (a) Chromatograms of CH3Hg+ and Hg2+ under the conditions with/without CH3OH. (b) Variation in the retention time (tR) of the two Hg species with respect to the concentration of methanol. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3.
Polymers 16 02366 g004
Figure 5. Variation in the signal intensity of the two Hg species with respect to (a) the concentration of HCOOH and (b) the pH. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3. All the data were normalized to the maximal value.
Figure 5. Variation in the signal intensity of the two Hg species with respect to (a) the concentration of HCOOH and (b) the pH. Uncertainty for each point shown by the error bar is expressed as standard deviation when n = 3. All the data were normalized to the maximal value.
Polymers 16 02366 g005
Figure 6. (a) Calibration curves and (b) chromatograms of the two Hg species obtained using the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD/ICP-MS system.
Figure 6. (a) Calibration curves and (b) chromatograms of the two Hg species obtained using the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD/ICP-MS system.
Polymers 16 02366 g006
Table 1. Operational conditions for the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD /ICP-MS system.
Table 1. Operational conditions for the HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD /ICP-MS system.
Chromatographic Separation
chromatographic columnXBridge® C18, 3.5 µm, 150 × 3.0 mm i.d.
mobile phase solution2% CH3OH, 100 μM L-cysteine, 1500 μM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM CH3COONH4, pH 4
separation flow rate0.3 mL min−1
sample volume50 μL
Nano-TiO2-Coated Microfluidic-Based PCARD
dimension of reaction channel544 mm (W) × 907 mm (D) × 26mm (L)
hole-scavenger reagent resulting mixture for photoreduction400 mM HCOOH, pH 4, 1 mL min−1
reaction time15 s
illumination density10 mW cm−2
iCAP RQ ICP-MS Detection
plasma power1550 W
cool flow14 L min−1 Ar
auxiliary flow0.8 L min−1 Ar
nebulizer gas1.065 L min−1 Ar
sampling conenickel
skimmer conenickel
Table 2. Comparison of the TiO2 coating method for PMMA substrates proposed in this study with those previously reported in the literature.
Table 2. Comparison of the TiO2 coating method for PMMA substrates proposed in this study with those previously reported in the literature.
Coating MechanismChemicalsSubstrate FormIncubation TemperatureStepAdditional EquipmentCitation
electrostatic attractionNaOH, TiO2 a, PDADMAC, high-purity waterchannelR.T. b2peristatic pumpthis study
covalent bondinghexamethylene diamine, borate buffer, glutaraldehyde, phosphate buffer, dopamine hydrochloride, dimethyl formamide, TSU c, DIPA d, TiO2 a, glycidyl isopropyl ether, NaCl, tris-EDTA buffer, DNAsheetR.T.–94 °C9 [39]
sol-gel entrapmentTiCl4 a, tert-butanolpowderR.T.–75 °C4rotary evaporator, oven[40]
sol-gel entrapmentAIBN e, TiO2 amonomer40–50 °C3oven, centrifuge[41]
sol-gel entrapmentethanol, CH2Cl2, Ti(C4H9)4 a, glacial acetic acidpowderR.T.–135 °C6Teflon-lined stainless-steel, oven, electrospinning system[42]
sol-gel entrapmentTiO2 a, methacrylic acid, isopropanolpowder80–85 °C5stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer[43,44]
sol-gel entrapmentTiO2 a, acetone, ethyl lactate, ethanol, diazonaphtoquinonepowder80 °C2spin coater/screen-printer, oven[45]
sol-gel entrapmentTiO2 a, triethyl phosphatepowderR.T.3manual casting knife[46]
sol-gel entrapmentN-TiO2 f, iso-butanolsheet80 °C3dip coater, ultrasonicator[47]
adhesiveTi[OCH(CH3)2]4 a, colloidal SiO2, HClO4, absolute ethanol, tetraethyl orthosilicate, HCl, isopropanol, propanol, 2-propoxyethanolsheetR.T.4Heat gun, dip coater[48]
adhesiveTiO2 a, Ti4O7 a, acetone, silicon-based commercial gluesheet30 °C3oven [49]
depositionTi[OCH(CH3)2]4 asheet25–50 °C1atmospheric pressure plasma jet generator[50]
a Commercially available products. b Room temperature. c O-(N-Succinimidyl)-N,N,N,N-tetramethylammonium tetrafluoroborate. d N,N-diisopropyl amine. e Azobisisobutyronitrile. f In-lab-prepared products.
Table 3. Analytical characteristics of the proposed HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD /ICP-MS system.
Table 3. Analytical characteristics of the proposed HPLC/nano-TiO2-coated microfluidic-based PCARD /ICP-MS system.
SpeciesLinear EquationR2 aLinear Range, μg L−1MDL b, ng L−1Precision c, %Seronorm Trace Elements Urine L-2
(Freeze-Dried Human Urine)
Certified Value, μg L−1Measured Value d, μg L−1Spike Recovery, %
CH3Hg+y = 1426317x + 24411.00000.01–12.95139.8 ± 8.0N.D. e107 f
Hg2+y = 3304219x − 123840.99980.01–11.39341.4 ± 0.4106 f
a Correlation coefficient. b Method detection limit; sample volume = 50 μL; n = 7. c Relative standard deviation; standard concentration: 0.2 μg L−1 (n = 15). d Mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). e Not detected. f Spiked concentration = 0.1 μg L−1.
Table 4. Analysis of urine and water samples.
Table 4. Analysis of urine and water samples.
SampleCH3Hg+Hg2+
Measured Value a, μg L−1Spike Recovery, %Measured Value, μg L−1Spike Recovery, %
Urine 1N.D. b (N.D.) c99 d0.112 ± 0.004 (1.12 ± 0.04)95 d
Urine 2N.D. (N.D.)108 e0.057 ± 0.002 (0.57 ± 0.02)113 e
Urine 3N.D. (N.D.)94 dN.D. (N.D.)102 d
Drinking waterN.D. (N.D.)92 fN.D. (N.D.)96 f
Effluent water 1N.D. (N.D.)106 fN.D. (N.D.)97 f
Effluent water 2N.D. (N.D.)114 g0.036 ± 0.002 (0.072 ± 0.004)116 g
a Mean ±standard deviation (n = 3). b Not detected. c Values in parentheses are the concentration of species in original samples. d Spiked concentration = 0.1 μg L−1. e Spiked concentration = 0.05 μg L−1. f Spiked concentration = 0.02 μg L−1. g Spiked concentration = 0.04 μg L−1.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, J.-H.; Luo, Y.-T.; Su, Y.-A.; Ke, Y.-R.; Deng, M.-J.; Chen, W.-Y.; Wang, C.-Y.; Tsai, J.-L.; Lin, C.-H.; Shih, T.-T. Fabrication of a Microfluidic-Based Device Coated with Polyelectrolyte-Capped Titanium Dioxide to Couple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Mercury Speciation. Polymers 2024, 16, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162366

AMA Style

Chen J-H, Luo Y-T, Su Y-A, Ke Y-R, Deng M-J, Chen W-Y, Wang C-Y, Tsai J-L, Lin C-H, Shih T-T. Fabrication of a Microfluidic-Based Device Coated with Polyelectrolyte-Capped Titanium Dioxide to Couple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Mercury Speciation. Polymers. 2024; 16(16):2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ji-Hao, Yu-Ting Luo, Yi-An Su, Yan-Ren Ke, Ming-Jay Deng, Wei-Yu Chen, Cheng-Yu Wang, Jia-Lin Tsai, Cheng-Hsing Lin, and Tsung-Ting Shih. 2024. "Fabrication of a Microfluidic-Based Device Coated with Polyelectrolyte-Capped Titanium Dioxide to Couple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Mercury Speciation" Polymers 16, no. 16: 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162366

APA Style

Chen, J.-H., Luo, Y.-T., Su, Y.-A., Ke, Y.-R., Deng, M.-J., Chen, W.-Y., Wang, C.-Y., Tsai, J.-L., Lin, C.-H., & Shih, T.-T. (2024). Fabrication of a Microfluidic-Based Device Coated with Polyelectrolyte-Capped Titanium Dioxide to Couple High-Performance Liquid Chromatography with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for Mercury Speciation. Polymers, 16(16), 2366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16162366

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop