Correction: Behavior Research Methods (2025) 57:142

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02664-9

The original online version of this article was revised: Fig. 3 was mistakenly not updated as requested by the author in the original version of the article. Figure 3 has been updated.

Incorrect Figure 3

Fig. 3
figure 1

Classification of styles in the validation experiment. Note. In each plot, the y-axis depicts the proportion of given responses in trials with different styles of vocalization. The dashed gray horizontal line represents chance-level performance (33% for singing performances and 50% for speech performances). AD adult-directed speech, ID infant-directed speech, lul lullaby, op opera. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01;*** p < 0.001

Correct Figure 3

Fig. 3
figure 2

Classification of styles in the validation experiment. Note. In each plot, the y-axis depicts the proportion of given responses in trials with different styles of vocalization. The dashed gray horizontal line represents chance-level performance (33% for singing performances and 50% for speech performances). AD adult-directed speech, ID infant-directed speech, lul lullaby, op opera. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01;*** p < 0.001