Library and Information Science

Library and Information Science ISSN: 2435-8495
三田図書館・情報学会
〒108‒8345 東京都港区三田2‒15‒45 慶應義塾大学文学部図書館・情報学専攻内
https://mslis.jp/ E-mail:mita-slis@ml.keio.jp
Library and Information Science 44: 27-41 (2000)
doi:10.46895/lis.44.27

原著論文

IFLA/FRBRとISWC,ISTCのwork概念の比較

愛知淑徳大学文学部図書館情報学科 ◇ 〒480-1197 愛知県長久手市片平2丁目9番地

受付日:2002年3月26日
受理日:2002年8月7日
発行日:2002年8月31日
PDF

IFLA/FRBR (Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records) provides a structured framework (conceptual model) for relating the data which are recorded in bibliographic records to identify information resources. IFLA/FRBR has 4 bibliographic entities (work, expression, manifestation, item) in its conceptual model.

ISWC (ISO 15707 Information and documentation—International Standard Musical Work) and ISTC (ISO/CD 21047 Information and Documentation—International Standard Textual Work Code) provide efficient means of identifying musical and textual works to trace usage in any media for the rights societies on an international level.

Both IFLA/FRBR and ISWC, ISTC have the same word “work” to denote their objects of identification. By comparing how the word “work” is used, this paper attempts to clarify the differences of identification criteria on information resources between the bibliographic community and the rights societies. ISWC and ISTC dose not use the word “work” in the same way as IFLA/FRBR does. The scope of “work” in ISWC and ISTC corresponds to both “work” and “expression” levels in the IFLA/FRBR conceptual model. The differences in meanings of the two usages of “work” come from the different positions to information resources.

This page was created on 2021-01-19T13:41:49.299+09:00
This page was last modified on


このサイトは(株)国際文献社によって運用されています。