A plural indefinite quantifier on the Romance-Slavic border [PDF]
, 2021 This study investigates the plural form uni/une deriving from the numeral ‘one’ in the Istriot dialect of Sissano. Sissano is located in the Istrian peninsula, an area characterized by high intensity of linguistic contact.
Giudici, Alberto, Zanini, Chiara
core +1 more source
The historical accentuation of masculine nouns in Čakavian and Štokavian Dalmatian dialects in light of Deanović’s Lingvistički atlas Mediterana [PDF]
, 2014 Mirko Deanović’s Lingvistički atlas Mediterana project led to the publication of a series of articles (1958–1967) devoted to the lexicon of a range of BCS dialects extending along the Dalmatian coast and offshore islands from Čakavian Krk in the north to
Schallert, Joseph
core +1 more source
THE DIALECT FROM BUZET AND THE KAJKAVIAN DIALECT [PDF]
, 2021 Buzetski je dijalekt jedan je od šest čakavskih dijalekata, kako uzimamo od Brozovićeve klasifikacije čakavskoga narječja 1970. Danas se upotrebljavaju i nazivi gornjomiranski (Pliško) te buzetsko-gornjomiranski dijalekt.
Lončarić, Mijo
core +2 more sources
O odrazu nenaglašene dužine i kratkog neoakuta u slavenskom, duženju tipa kȍkōt u štokavskom/čakavskom i drugim problemima [PDF]
, 2022 This is the sixth instalment in the discussion between Frederik Kortlandt and the author of this article on several problems of historical Slavic accentology. The paper discusses the reflection of pre- and posttonic length (in accentual paradigm a and c)
Kapović, Mate
core +2 more sources
The accentuation of neuter nouns in Slovene and West Bulgarian [PDF]
, 2010 The Slovene neo-circumflex is our major source of information for the reconstruction of Proto-Slavic long vowels in posttonic syllables (cf. Kortlandt 1976)
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core
On the relative chronology of Slavic accentual developments [PDF]
, 2010 Last year Georg Holzer proposed a relative chronology of accentual developments in Slavic (2005). Here I shall compare his chronology with the one I put forward earlier (1975, 1989a, 2003) and discuss the differences. For the sake of convenience, I first
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core
Rise and development of Slavic accentual paradigms [PDF]
, 2010 It appears that the complexity of Slavic historical accentology is prohibitive for most non-specialists in the field. It may therefore be useful to approach the subject from a number of different angles in order to render it more accessible to a wider ...
Kortlandt, Frederik H. H.
core
Leksičke osobitosti odrješenja grijeha u Klimantovićevu zborniku iz 1512. godine [PDF]
, 2013 This paper presents the lexical and linguistic characteristics of absolution of sins in the Croatian Church Slavonic Klimantović’s Miscellany I, in which the patterns of release and absolution from sin are powerful oral mechanism adjusted to
Lozić Knezović, Katarina
core +2 more sources
Univerbation and prosodic change: On the origin of the Slavic definite adjective accentuation [PDF]
, 2023 This paper argues that the unexpected accentuation of the Slavic definite adjectives inflecting according to accent paradigms b and c can be convincingly explained by considering the relative chronology of the rise of the definite adjective and certain ...
Wandl, Florian
core +1 more source
Tursko podrijetlo čestice de i hrvatsko podrijetlo uzvika deh – Cjeloviti etimološki prilog [PDF]
, 2023 In this article, we deal with the Turkish origin of the particle de, which differs from Skok\u27s etymology, and with the Croatian origin of the interjection deh, which Skok also accepts. More precisely, we will show that de is of Turkish origin, whereas
Velić, Luka
core +1 more source