Results 171 to 180 of about 318,954 (253)
ABSTRACT How should we understand the duration of a pleasant or unpleasant sensation, insofar as its duration modulates how good or bad the experience is overall? Given that we seem able to distinguish between subjective and objective duration and that how well or badly someone's life goes is naturally thought of as something to be assessed from her ...
Andreas L. Mogensen
wiley +1 more source
Impaired belief revision yet intact information seeking in positive schizotypy: A modified task of bias against disconfirmatory evidence. [PDF]
Zhao W, Deng W, Cannon T.
europepmc +1 more source
No Guide to Ground: Right‐Making and Right‐Makers
ABSTRACT It is often taken for granted that right‐makers, that is, the things that make something—say, an action—right, do so by explaining why it is right. This view can be spelled out in terms of metaphysical ground: right‐making just is grounding of rightness facts.
Singa Behrens
wiley +1 more source
Anselm's Temporal‐Ontological Proof
ABSTRACT In his Reply to Gaunilo, Anselm presented two additional arguments for the existence of God beyond those that appear in the Proslogion. In “The Logical Structure of Anselm's Argument,” Robert M. Adams isolates each. One, he develops into a modal ontological argument along the lines of other 20th century ontological arguments (e.g., those of ...
Daniel Rubio
wiley +1 more source
A Short Story Changed How I Care for Persons Living With Dementia. [PDF]
Karlawish J.
europepmc +1 more source
ABSTRACT In several articles, McCall and Lowe have claimed that endurantism and perdurantism are “equivalent.” From this, they conclude that there is no fact of the matter as to whether we live in an endurantist world or in a perdurantist world. In this paper, I use the notion of Morita equivalence to show in which precise sense, McCall and Lowe's ...
Joshua Babic
wiley +1 more source
Multiple authorship of scientific reports-two different evaluations are better than one. [PDF]
Nunes JPL, de Faria Nunes PD.
europepmc +1 more source
In Defense of Comparability: Reply to Carlson and Risberg
ABSTRACT In “The Case for Comparability,” we argue that every comparative expression “F$F$” obeys Comparability: if two things are at least as F$F$ as themselves, then one of them must be at least as F$F$ as the other. One of our arguments appeals to the apparent validity of the Strong Monotonicity schema: x$x$ is F$F$; y$y$ is not F$F$; so, x$x$ is ...
Cian Dorr, Jacob M. Nebel, Jake Zuehl
wiley +1 more source
Dark side of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality: the case of mandatory vaccination. [PDF]
Horák F, Dienstbier J.
europepmc +1 more source

