Results 211 to 220 of about 448,529 (245)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Early judgments of semantic and syntactic acceptability by children
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1972Judgments of the acceptability of correct, word order reversed, and semantically anomalous sentences were elicited from 2- and 3-year-old children in a game played with hand puppets. All of the sentences used were simple imperatives and each child was asked to correct those he called "wrong".
P A, de Villiers, J G, de Villiers
openaire +2 more sources
Judgment Processes for Medication Acceptance
Medical Decision Making, 1994In the present study college students (N = 186) made judgments of the likelihood of accepting a medication for treatment of a hypothetically experienced clinical depression. Three types of information were manipulated: effectiveness of the medication for alleviating the symptoms of depression, potential side effects of the medication, and severity of ...
C E, Wills, C F, Moore
openaire +2 more sources
2013
Abstract This chapter explores four ways in which formal acceptability judgment experiments can contribute to syntactic theory: (i) by exploring the validity and reliability of judgments to better establish the empirical base of the theory, (ii) by exploring differences among acceptability judgment tasks to better optimize syntactic ...
openaire +1 more source
Abstract This chapter explores four ways in which formal acceptability judgment experiments can contribute to syntactic theory: (i) by exploring the validity and reliability of judgments to better establish the empirical base of the theory, (ii) by exploring differences among acceptability judgment tasks to better optimize syntactic ...
openaire +1 more source
Moral Judgment and the Acceptance of Norms
Ethics, 1985In recent years, various ethical theorists have turned to considering the nature of rationality.' How, after all, might we best seek out a promising line of approach to fundamental moral questions? A possible stratagem is to ask first why moral questions matter.
openaire +1 more source
Judgments of the Relative and Absolute Acceptability of Aircraft Noise
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965Subjects selected from airport neighborhoods judged the acceptability of noise produced by actual aircraft flyovers and by recorded flyover signals on both a relative and absolute (category) basis. Judgments were compared with the maximum perceived-noise level occurring during the flyovers.
openaire +2 more sources
Judgments of the acceptability of aircraft noise in the presence of speech
Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1969Abstract Listeners were asked to rate various aircraft flyovers in terms of their acceptability in the home. Ratings were assigned on a scale having four categories: “of no concern”, “acceptable”, “barely acceptable”, and “unacceptable”. Judgments were obtained of noise presented without speech and of noise presented simultaneously with speech.
C.E. Williams, K.N. Stevens, M. Klatt
openaire +1 more source
Perceptual Interpretation of the Social Diad: I. Judgments of Acceptance
The Journal of Social Psychology, 1964(1964). Perceptual Interpretation of the Social Diad: I. Judgments of Acceptance. The Journal of Social Psychology: Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 169-177.
openaire +2 more sources
Magnitude Estimation Scaling Judgments of Speech Intelligibility and Speech Acceptability
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 199920 female students in speech-language pathology provided magnitude estimation scaling responses for the speech intelligibility and acceptability of audio-taped speech samples varying systematically the number of consonant sounds produced correctly. Analysis indicated no significant over-all differences between listeners' judgments of intelligibility ...
openaire +2 more sources
2016
‘z-bad’ is the average z-score for the hypothesized ‘bad’ option. ‘z-good’ is the average z-score for the hypothesized good option. ‘Z.diff’ is the difference between z-good and z-bad and is the effect size. Beta is the estimate from the linear mixed-effects model, which has a standard error ‘SE’ and a t-value ‘t’.
Graff, Peter +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
‘z-bad’ is the average z-score for the hypothesized ‘bad’ option. ‘z-good’ is the average z-score for the hypothesized good option. ‘Z.diff’ is the difference between z-good and z-bad and is the effect size. Beta is the estimate from the linear mixed-effects model, which has a standard error ‘SE’ and a t-value ‘t’.
Graff, Peter +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
Anchoring and Grammar Effects in Judgments of Sentence Acceptability
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1994This study examined the relation between anchoring effects, as demonstrated in 1992 by Nagata, and grammar-based effects in judgments of sentence acceptability. 35 subjects judged the acceptability of target sentences representing six different syntactic types.
openaire +1 more source