Results 1 to 10 of about 956 (135)
On Super Edge-Antimagicness of Subdivided Stars
Enomoto, Llado, Nakamigawa and Ringel (1998) defined the concept of a super (a, 0)-edge-antimagic total labeling and proposed the conjecture that every tree is a super (a, 0)-edge-antimagic total graph.
Raheem A., Javaid M., Baig A.Q.
doaj +3 more sources
Caterpillars Have Antimagic Orientations [PDF]
An antimagic labeling of a directed graph D with m arcs is a bijection from the set of arcs of D to {1, …, m} such that all oriented vertex sums of vertices in D are pairwise distinct, where the oriented vertex sum of a vertex u is the sum of labels of ...
Lozano Antoni
doaj +3 more sources
Regular graphs are antimagic [PDF]
An undirected simple graph G = (V,E) is called antimagic if there exists an injective function f: E → {1,…|E|} such that (formula presented) for any pair of different nodes u, v ∈ V.
Bernáth, Attila +2 more
core +5 more sources
Proof of a local antimagic conjecture [PDF]
An antimagic labelling of a graph $G$ is a bijection $f:E(G)\to\{1,\ldots,E(G)\}$ such that the sums $S_v=\sum_{e\ni v}f(e)$ distinguish all vertices. A well-known conjecture of Hartsfield and Ringel (1994) is that every connected graph other than $K_2 ...
John Haslegrave
doaj +5 more sources
On H-antimagic coverings for m-shadow and closed m-shadow of connected graphs [PDF]
An (a,d)-H-antimagic total labeling of a simple graph G admitting an H-covering is a bijection φ:V(G)∪E(G)→{1,2,…,|V(G)|+|E(G)|} such that for all subgraphs H′ of G isomorphic to H, the set of H′-weights given by wtφ(H′)=∑v∈V(H′)φ(v)+∑e∈E(H′)φ(e) forms ...
Nur Inayah +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
List-antimagic labeling of vertex-weighted graphs [PDF]
A graph $G$ is $k$-$weighted-list-antimagic$ if for any vertex weighting $\omega\colon V(G)\to\mathbb{R}$ and any list assignment $L\colon E(G)\to2^{\mathbb{R}}$ with $|L(e)|\geq |E(G)|+k$ there exists an edge labeling $f$ such that $f(e)\in L(e)$ for ...
Zhanar Berikkyzy +4 more
doaj +5 more sources
Two constructions of -antimagic graphs
Let be a graph. A graph admits an -covering if every edge in belongs to a subgraph of isomorphic to . A graph admitting an -covering is called --antimagic if there is a bijection such that for each subgraph of isomorphic to , the sum of labels of all the
Andrea Semaničová-Feňovčíková +2 more
doaj +2 more sources
Antimagic Labeling of Some Biregular Bipartite Graphs
An antimagic labeling of a graph G = (V, E) is a one-to-one mapping from E to {1, 2, . . ., |E|} such that distinct vertices receive different label sums from the edges incident to them. G is called antimagic if it admits an antimagic labeling.
Deng Kecai, Li Yunfei
doaj +2 more sources
Regular graphs of odd degree are antimagic [PDF]
An antimagic labeling of a graph $G$ with $m$ edges is a bijection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2,\ldots,m\}$ such that for all vertices $u$ and $v$, the sum of labels on edges incident to $u$ differs from that for edges incident to $v$.
Cranston, Daniel W.
core +4 more sources
ON LOCAL ANTIMAGIC CHROMATIC NUMBER OF GRAPHS [PDF]
A {it local antimagic labeling} of a connected graph $G$ with at least three vertices, is a bijection $f:E(G) rightarrow {1,2,ldots , |E(G)|}$ such that for any two adjacent vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$, the condition $omega _{f}(u) neq omega _{f}(v ...
S. Shaebani
doaj +3 more sources

