Results 71 to 80 of about 412,708 (144)
Antimagic Labeling for Unions of Graphs with Many Three-Paths [PDF]
Let $G$ be a graph with $m$ edges and let $f$ be a bijection from $E(G)$ to $\{1,2, \dots, m\}$. For any vertex $v$, denote by $\phi_f(v)$ the sum of $f(e)$ over all edges $e$ incident to $v$.
Chavez, Angel +4 more
core +1 more source
Construction for antimagic generalized web graphs
An antimagic labeling of a graph with q edges is a bijection from the set of edges to the set of integers {1, 2, ..., q} such that all vertex weights are pairwise distinct, where the vertex weight is the sum of labels of all edges incident with the ...
Miller, Mirka +3 more
core
A graph is a set of {\it{vertices}}, and {\it{edges}} which connect vertices. Given any graph $G$ with $m$ edges, we assign integers from $1$ to $m$ to the edges of $G$ and consider vertex sums, the sums of the edge labels incident at each vertex.
LE, PARKER
core
Local inclusive distance antimagic coloring of graphs
For a simple graph G, a bijection f : V(G) → [1,|V (G)|] is called as a local inclusive distance antimagic (LIDA) labeling of G if w(u) ≠ w(v) for every two adjacent vertices u,v ∈ V(G) with w(u) = ∑x∈N [u] f(x).
Fawwaz Fakhrurrozi Hadiputra +4 more
doaj +1 more source
Local edge antimagic coloring for chain of path and cycle
Let G=(V,E) be a simple connected graph with vertex set V and edge set E. A local edge antimagic labeling of G is a bijection f:V (G)→{1, 2, 3, ... , |V(G)|} where the weights of any two adjacent edges of G are distinct.
Yosua Walfried +2 more
doaj +1 more source
The analysis of the implementation of RBL-STEM learning materials in improving student's meta-literacy ability to solve wallpaper decoration problems using local antimagic graph coloring techniques. [PDF]
Dafik +4 more
europepmc +1 more source
COMPLEMENTARY TOTALLY ANTIMAGIC TOTAL GRAPHS
<p>For a graph G, with the vertex set V(G) and the edge set E(G), a total labeling is a bijection f from V (G) U E(G) to the set of integers {1, 2, …, |V (G) |+| E(G) |}.
Mallikarjun Ghaleppa*, Danappa G Akka
core +1 more source
On H-antimagic coverings for m-shadow and closed m-shadow of connected graphs. [PDF]
Inayah N +2 more
europepmc +1 more source
On $H$-antimagicness of Cartesian product of graphs
Summary: A graph \(G=(V(G),E(G))\) admits an \(H\)-covering if every edge in \(E\) belongs to a subgraph of \(G\) isomorphic to \(H\). A graph \(G\) admitting an \(H\)-covering is called \((a,d)\)-\(H\)-antimagic if there is a bijection \(f:V(G)\cup E(G) \to \{1,2,\dots, |V(G)|+|E(G)| \}\) such that, for all subgraphs \(H^\prime\) of \(G\) isomorphic ...
Bača, Martin +3 more
openaire +2 more sources
On regular handicap graphs of order $n \equiv 0$ mod 8
A handicap distance antimagic labeling of a graph G = (V, E) with n vertices is a bijection f̂ : V → {1, 2, …, n} with the property that f̂(xi) = i, the weight w(xi) is the sum of labels of all neighbors of xi, and the sequence of the weights w(x1), w(x2)
Dalibor Froncek, Aaron Shepanik
doaj +1 more source

