Results 11 to 20 of about 957,279 (223)
Justification of Argumentation Schemes
The Australasian Journal of Logic, 2005 Argumentation schemes are forms of argument that capture stereotypical patterns of human reasoning, especially defeasible ones like argument from expert opinion, that have proved troublesome to view deductively or inductively. Much practical work has already been done on argumentation schemes, proving their worth in A1 [19], but more precise ...
Douglas Walton
openalex +3 more sources
Argumentative Scheme for Abduction
Дискурс, 2023 Introduction. The paper scrutinizes abduction through the lens of the argumentation theory. Abduction is treated as an argument with a special argumentative scheme.
A. S. Bobrova
doaj +2 more sources
An Argument and an Outline for a New Employment Scheme
Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2017 Liberalism is celebrating triumphs in these years. As faith in the welfare state and Keynesianism began to crack in the 1970s, capitalist principles were revitalised and the old virtues and dogmas were found and dusted.
Henning Hansen +2 more
doaj +3 more sources
Identifying Argumentation Schemes [PDF]
, 2015 Argumentation is always a defense of a point of view: (a) Mother: “I don’t think five pounds pocket money is at all necessary; your sister always got two pounds a week.” Daughter: “That was years ago, and Betty, Monica, and all my other girlfriends get five or six pounds.” (b) History teacher: “Funny that you don’t want ...
van Eemeren, F.H., Kruiger, T.
openaire +3 more sources
Information and argument patterns in the Introduction sections of sociology research papers
Ibérica, 2022 This study analysed the information-argument structure of the Introduction sections of sociology research papers, to identify differences across three types of sociology research: Investigative research, Development and Evaluation research, and ...
Wei-Ning Cheng +1 more
doaj +1 more source
Argumentation schemes for clinical decision support [PDF]
Argument & Computation, 2021 This paper demonstrates how argumentation schemes can be used in decision support systems that help clinicians in making treatment decisions. The work builds on the use of computational argumentation, a rigorous approach to reasoning with complex data that places strong emphasis on being able to justify and explain the decisions that are recommended ...
Sassoon, I +3 more
openaire +6 more sources
On some Non Asymptotic Bounds for the Euler Scheme [PDF]
, 2010 We obtain non asymptotic bounds for the Monte Carlo algorithm associated to the Euler discretization of some diffusion processes. The key tool is the Gaussian concentration satisfied by the density of the discretization scheme.
Lemaire, Vincent, Menozzi, Stephane
core +3 more sources
Informal Logic, 2008 Used informally, the Reductio ad Absurdum (RAA) consists in reasoning appealing to the logically implied, absurd consequences of a hypothetical proposition, in order to refute it.
Henrike Jansen
doaj +1 more source
Resources for Research on Analogy: A Multi-disciplinary Guide
Informal Logic, 2009 Work on analogy has been done from a number of disciplinary perspectives throughout the history of Western thought. This work is a multidisciplinary guide to theorizing about analogy.
Marcello Guarini +3 more
doaj +1 more source
Conclusions of Practical Argument: A Speech Act Analysis [PDF]
Organon F, 2021 Conclusions of theoretical reasoning are assertions—or at least speech acts belonging to the class of assertives, such as hypotheses, predictions or estimates. What, however, are the conclusions of practical reasoning?
Marcin Lewiński
doaj +1 more source