Results 241 to 250 of about 2,273,730 (292)

Does the brain really know what word is coming next? [PDF]

Elife
Antonello RJ.
europepmc   +1 more source

The sophist in the server : Rhetoric, Reasoning and Scientific Judgment in the Age of LLMs. [PDF]

EMBO Rep
Colangelo MT, Galli C.
europepmc   +1 more source

Investigation of Lexical and Inflectional Verb Production and Comprehension in French-Speaking Teenagers with Developmental Language Disorders (DLDs). [PDF]

Behav Sci (Basel)
Pourquié M, Courteau E, Duquette AS, Royle P.   +3 more
europepmc   +1 more source

hoppet v2 release note. [PDF]

Eur Phys J C Part Fields
Karlberg A, Nason P, Salam G, Zanderighi G, Dreyer F.   +4 more
europepmc   +1 more source

Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

Related searches:

Argumentation framework with weighted argument structure

IEEE 10th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing (ICCI-CC'11), 2011
Theory of argumentation constitutes a general framework for reasoning and has been widely applied in computational intelligence problems such as nonmonotonic reasoning, decision making and logic programming. To capture the internal structure of arguments, each argument is assigned with a weight, which represents the argument's credibility, to construct
Jilong Wang 0001, Guiming Luo, Bingsheng Wang   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Argument Structure and Argument Realization

2022
Versió pre ...
Acedo Matellán, Víctor, Mateu Fontanals, Jaume, Pineda, Anna   +2 more
openaire   +1 more source

Resolutions in Structured Argumentation

2012
Recently resolution of attacks has been studied in the context of abstract argumentation frameworks. In this paper it is claimed that resolutions should be studied under the assumption that they are generated through the acquisition of preference information, and that this implies that the existing study of resolutions has limited applicability.
Modgil, S.J., Prakken, H.
openaire   +2 more sources

Visualizing Argument Structure

2008
Constructing arguments and understanding them is not easy. Visualization of argument structure has been shown to help understanding and improve critical thinking. We describe a visualization tool for understanding arguments. It utilizes a novel hi-tree based representation of the argument's structure and provides focus based interaction techniques for ...
Peter Sbarski, Tim van Gelder, Kim Marriott, Daniel Prager, Andy Bulka   +4 more
openaire   +1 more source