Results 261 to 270 of about 159,385 (285)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
2022
This chapter approaches the problematics, both theoretical and practical, of textual meaning from the perspective of jurisprudential thinkers. It sets out the interconnections between legal interpretation and ‘its literary counterpart’. This essay provides us with an essential map of the ‘meta-textual’ thinking that scaffolds much of the work ...
Tom Hickey, David Kenny
openaire +1 more source
This chapter approaches the problematics, both theoretical and practical, of textual meaning from the perspective of jurisprudential thinkers. It sets out the interconnections between legal interpretation and ‘its literary counterpart’. This essay provides us with an essential map of the ‘meta-textual’ thinking that scaffolds much of the work ...
Tom Hickey, David Kenny
openaire +1 more source
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 2007
We survey the contents of Finocchiaro's papers collected in Arguments about Arguments, pointing out, where appropriate, their expected interest for readers of Philosophy of the Social Sciences. The papers include essays about argument theory and reasoning, the nature of fallacies and fallaciousness, critiques of noteworthy contributions to ...
openaire +1 more source
We survey the contents of Finocchiaro's papers collected in Arguments about Arguments, pointing out, where appropriate, their expected interest for readers of Philosophy of the Social Sciences. The papers include essays about argument theory and reasoning, the nature of fallacies and fallaciousness, critiques of noteworthy contributions to ...
openaire +1 more source
2023
The entry reviews the role of the argument from consequence in legal reasoning.
Canale, Damiano, Tuzet, Giovanni
openaire +2 more sources
The entry reviews the role of the argument from consequence in legal reasoning.
Canale, Damiano, Tuzet, Giovanni
openaire +2 more sources
Fundamenta Informaticae, 1996
Argumentation systems are useful instruments for decision support when the arguments are changed dynamically in dependence of the users and the situation. In argumentation systems different strategies are used when the system prepares the argumentation for a given situation and/or user. These strategies correspond to some many valued logics and some of
openaire +2 more sources
Argumentation systems are useful instruments for decision support when the arguments are changed dynamically in dependence of the users and the situation. In argumentation systems different strategies are used when the system prepares the argumentation for a given situation and/or user. These strategies correspond to some many valued logics and some of
openaire +2 more sources
Linguistics and Philosophy, 2007
We examine an argument for the non-context-freeness of English that has received virtually no discussion in the literature. It is based on adjuncts of the form ‘X or no X’, where X is a nominal. The construction has been held to exemplify unbounded syntactic reduplication.
Geoffrey K. Pullum, Kyle Rawlins
openaire +1 more source
We examine an argument for the non-context-freeness of English that has received virtually no discussion in the literature. It is based on adjuncts of the form ‘X or no X’, where X is a nominal. The construction has been held to exemplify unbounded syntactic reduplication.
Geoffrey K. Pullum, Kyle Rawlins
openaire +1 more source
Cognition, 2005
Three experiments investigated the use of verb argument structure by tracking participants' eye movements across a set of related pictures as they listened to sentences. The assumption was that listeners would naturally look at relevant pictures as they were mentioned or implied.
openaire +2 more sources
Three experiments investigated the use of verb argument structure by tracking participants' eye movements across a set of related pictures as they listened to sentences. The assumption was that listeners would naturally look at relevant pictures as they were mentioned or implied.
openaire +2 more sources
2011
Gliederung 1. Begriffsbestimmungen 2. Geschichte und Bedeutung der Argumentationstheorie 3. Die Funktion von Argumentationen - Die Grundansätze in der Argumentationstheorie 3.1. Rhetorische Argumentationstheorie - Ziel: Persuasion 3.2. Konsensualistische Argumentationstheorien - Ziel: Konsens 3.3.
openaire +1 more source
Gliederung 1. Begriffsbestimmungen 2. Geschichte und Bedeutung der Argumentationstheorie 3. Die Funktion von Argumentationen - Die Grundansätze in der Argumentationstheorie 3.1. Rhetorische Argumentationstheorie - Ziel: Persuasion 3.2. Konsensualistische Argumentationstheorien - Ziel: Konsens 3.3.
openaire +1 more source
Argumentation–Based Negotiation? Negotiation–Based Argumentation!
2012We design a protocol for two autonomous negotiating agents to incorporate Dung-style argumentation into an ongoing bargaining dialogue. Previous approaches considered bargaining and Dung-Style Argumentation as separated components, we show that intertwining these approaches increases the agents scope of action.
Landes J., Buettner R.
openaire +2 more sources