Results 71 to 80 of about 159,385 (285)
Harry Frankfurt characterised bullshit as assertions that are made without a concern for truth. Assertions, however, are not the only type of speech act that can be bullshit.
José Ángel Gascón
doaj
Writing Argumentative Essay: How Far They Can Go?
Writing is very important for everyone to share their ideas, experiences and their thoughts into the written form. This present study tries to figure out and explore the university students in writing argumentative essay.
Bayu Ramadhan
doaj +1 more source
A Depolarizing Leak in Sodium Bicarbonate Cotransporter NBCe1 Causes Brain Edema
ABSTRACT Objectives SLC4A4 encodes electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransporter NBCe1, prominently expressed in kidney and brain. Recessive loss‐of‐function variants in SLC4A4 cause proximal renal tubular acidosis, no brain edema. In the brain, NBCe1 is expressed by astrocytes, where it regulates pH and mediates astrocyte volume changes.
Quinty Bisseling +16 more
wiley +1 more source
Revealing how different spinors can be: the Lounesto spinor classification
This paper aims to give a coordinate based introduction to the so-called Lounesto spinorial classification scheme. We introduce the main ideas and aspects of this spinorial categorization in an argumentative basis, after what we delve into a commented ...
Cavalcanti, R. T., da Silva, J. M. Hoff
core +1 more source
Learning to Teach Writing Across Contexts [PDF]
The purpose of this study is to examine how Jacob (pseudonyms are used), a preservice teacher, understood and implemented writing instruction during an early field experience and then again during his student teaching placement. This study contributes to
Pytash, Kristine
core +1 more source
Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative discourse: justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue discussion into a complex argumentative discussion [PDF]
This paper seeks to extend existing models of argumentation by considering an important dimension of real-life argumentative discourse: how complex argumentative discussions evolve over time. We define a complex argumentative discussion as a multi-issue
Greco, Sara +3 more
core +1 more source
The aim of this paper is to adapt Miranda Fricker’s concept of testimonial injustice to cases of what I call “argumentative injustice”: those cases where an arguer’s social identity brings listeners to place too much or little credibility in an argument.
Patrick Bondy
doaj +1 more source
This paper advances an approach to relevance grounded on patterns of material inference called argumentation schemes, which can account for the reconstruction and the evaluation of relevance relations. In order to account for relevance in different types
Macagno, Fabrizio
core +1 more source
Scientists’ Argumentative Reasoning [PDF]
Reasoning, defined as the production and evaluation of reasons, is a central process in science. The dominant view of reasoning, both in the psychology of reasoning and in the psychology of science, is of a mechanism with an asocial function: bettering the beliefs of the lone reasoner.
Mercier, Hugo, Heintz, C
openaire +4 more sources
Objective We aimed to construct and evaluate the first laboratory‐based frailty index (FI‐Lab) for predicting adverse outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and to compare its predictive ability to that of an existing clinical frailty index (FI).
Grace Burns +2 more
wiley +1 more source

