Results 281 to 290 of about 1,659,451 (344)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Linguistics and Philosophy, 2007
We examine an argument for the non-context-freeness of English that has received virtually no discussion in the literature. It is based on adjuncts of the form ‘X or no X’, where X is a nominal. The construction has been held to exemplify unbounded syntactic reduplication.
Geoffrey K. Pullum, Kyle Rawlins
openaire +1 more source
We examine an argument for the non-context-freeness of English that has received virtually no discussion in the literature. It is based on adjuncts of the form ‘X or no X’, where X is a nominal. The construction has been held to exemplify unbounded syntactic reduplication.
Geoffrey K. Pullum, Kyle Rawlins
openaire +1 more source
Base Argumentation as an Abstraction of Deductive Argumentation
2021Base argumentation is a logic-based instantiation of abstract argumentation. Each base argument is a subset of the given knowledge base. In this paper, we show that base argumentation satisfies some rationality postulates, and that base argumentation is equivalent to deductive argumentation under complete semantics.
Jinsheng Chen +2 more
openaire +2 more sources
Mathematische Nachrichten, 2019
We study scalar advanced and delayed differential equations with piecewise constant generalized arguments, in short DEPCAG of mixed type, that is, the arguments are general step functions.
Kuo-Shou Chiu, Tong-Xing Li
semanticscholar +1 more source
We study scalar advanced and delayed differential equations with piecewise constant generalized arguments, in short DEPCAG of mixed type, that is, the arguments are general step functions.
Kuo-Shou Chiu, Tong-Xing Li
semanticscholar +1 more source
A Corpus of eRulemaking User Comments for Measuring Evaluability of Arguments
International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2018eRulemaking is a means for government agencies to directly reach citizens to solicit their opinions and experiences regarding newly proposed rules. The effort, however, is partly hampered by citizens’ comments that lack reasoning and evidence, which are ...
Joonsuk Park, Claire Cardie
semanticscholar +1 more source
Philosophy Compass, 2019
Correspondence University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. Email: dkorman@ucsb.edu Abstract Debunking arguments—also known as etiological arguments, genealogical arguments, access problems, isolation objections, and reliability challenges—arise in ...
Daniela Korman
semanticscholar +1 more source
Correspondence University of California, Santa Barbara, CA. Email: dkorman@ucsb.edu Abstract Debunking arguments—also known as etiological arguments, genealogical arguments, access problems, isolation objections, and reliability challenges—arise in ...
Daniela Korman
semanticscholar +1 more source
Fundamenta Informaticae, 1996
Argumentation systems are useful instruments for decision support when the arguments are changed dynamically in dependence of the users and the situation. In argumentation systems different strategies are used when the system prepares the argumentation for a given situation and/or user. These strategies correspond to some many valued logics and some of
openaire +2 more sources
Argumentation systems are useful instruments for decision support when the arguments are changed dynamically in dependence of the users and the situation. In argumentation systems different strategies are used when the system prepares the argumentation for a given situation and/or user. These strategies correspond to some many valued logics and some of
openaire +2 more sources
Argumentation framework with weighted argument structure
IEEE 10th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics and Cognitive Computing (ICCI-CC'11), 2011Theory of argumentation constitutes a general framework for reasoning and has been widely applied in computational intelligence problems such as nonmonotonic reasoning, decision making and logic programming. To capture the internal structure of arguments, each argument is assigned with a weight, which represents the argument's credibility, to construct
Jilong Wang 0001 +2 more
openaire +2 more sources