Results 251 to 260 of about 4,352 (292)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

On Bourbaki’s axiomatic system for set theory

Synthese, 2014
zbMATH Open Web Interface contents unavailable due to conflicting licenses.
Maribel Anacona   +2 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Axiomatic Set Theory

1978
At the close of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th, the discovery by Burali-Forti and Russell of the paradoxical nature of the intuitive approach to set theory gave impetus to the axiomatization of the subject. Zermelo’s postulates for set theory were published in 1908.
D. VAN DALEN, H.C. DOETS, H. DE SWART
openaire   +2 more sources

Axiomatic set theory

1998
In this chapter, we present the Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms for set theory, and sketch the justification of them from the Zermelo hierarchy of Chapter 2. The axiom whose status is least clear is the Axiom of Choice. As a result, it has received special attention from mathematicians, and consequences of its truth or falsity have been noted in various parts ...
openaire   +1 more source

Axiomatic Set Theory

1987
A prime reason for the increase in importance of mathematical logic in this century was the discovery of the paradoxes of set theory and the need for a revision of intuitive (and contradictory) set theory. Many different axiomatic theories have been proposed to serve as a foundation for set theory, but, no matter how they may differ at the fringes ...
openaire   +1 more source

An axiomatic approach to fuzzy set theory

Information Sciences, 1990
The authors attempt to formalize axiomatic fuzzy set theory. The motive underlying their approach is the desire to avoid paradoxes. The set of axioms they exhibit is the minimal set that enables a formal definition of fuzzy sets without assuming a universe of discourse, and requires fewer axioms than any other published formal definition of fuzzy sets.
Dan E. Tamir   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Set Theory, Axiomatizations of

1981
Some statements of the language of set theory are accepted as axioms. They are supposed to reflect “true” properties of sets and are derived from mathematical practice. It should be noted that there are different axiomizations of set theory based on different experiences and intuition.
openaire   +1 more source

EXTENSION OF A NEW AXIOMATIC SET THEORY

Russian Academy of Sciences. Izvestiya Mathematics, 1994
Summary: A new extended axiomatic system of set theory is presented that consists of three perfectly natural axioms. All the axioms of the Zermelo-Fraenkel system, the generalized axiom of choice, and the generalized continuum hypothesis are proved as theorems in the new extended axiomatic set theory.
openaire   +1 more source

ON THE NONEMPTINESS OF CLASSES IN AXIOMATIC SET THEORY

Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 1978
Theorems are proved on the consistency with , for , of each of the following three propositions: (1) there exists an L-minimal (in particular, nonconstructive) such that and , but every of class with constructive code is itself constructive; (2) there exist such that their -degrees differ by a formula from , but not by formulas from with constants from
openaire   +2 more sources

The origins of Zermelo's axiomatization of set theory

Journal of Philosophical Logic, 1978
What gave rise to Ernst Zermelo's axiomatization of set theory in 1908? According to the usual interpretation, Zermelo was motivated by the set-theoretic paradoxes. This paper argues that Zermelo was primarily motivated, not by the paradoxes, but by the controversy surrounding his 1904 proof that every set can be well-ordered, and especially by a ...
openaire   +2 more sources

FOUNDATIONS OF A NEW AXIOMATIC SET THEORY

Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 1991
Summary: A new axiomatic set theory, consisting of four axioms, is presented. In this theory one can prove as theorems all of the axioms of Zermelo- Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice (ZFC), except for the axiom of regularity.
openaire   +2 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy