Equivalence of the existence of best proximity points and best proximity pairs for cyclic and noncyclic nonexpansive mappings [PDF]
In this study, at first we prove that the existence of best proximity points for cyclic nonexpansive mappings is equivalent to the existence of best proximity pairs for noncyclic nonexpansive mappings in the setting of ...
Gabeleh Moosa, Künzi Hans-Peter A.
doaj +4 more sources
Corrigendum to the paper “Equivalence of the existence of best proximity points and best proximity pairs for cyclic and noncyclic nonexpansive mappings” [PDF]
The purpose of this short note is to present a correction of the proof of the main result given in the paper “Equivalence of the existence of best proximity points and best proximity pairs for cyclic and noncyclic nonexpansive mappings,” Demonstr.
Gabeleh Moosa
doaj +4 more sources
Convergence and Best Proximity Points for Generalized Contraction Pairs [PDF]
This paper is devoted to studying the existence of best proximity points and convergence for a class of generalized contraction pairs by using the concept of proximally-complete pairs and proximally-complete semi-sharp proximinal pairs.
Slah Sahmim +2 more
doaj +4 more sources
Strong and weak convergence of Ishikawa iterations for best proximity pairs [PDF]
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a normed linear space X. A mapping T : A ∪ B → A ∪ B is said to be a noncyclic relatively nonexpansive mapping if T(A) ⊆ A, T(B) ⊆ B and ∥Tx − Ty∥ ≤ ∥x − y∥ for all (x, y) ∈ A × B.
Gabeleh Moosa +3 more
doaj +4 more sources
Approximate Best Proximity Pairs in Metric Space [PDF]
Let A and B be nonempty subsets of a metric space X and also T:A∪B→A∪B and T(A)⊆B, T(B)⊆A. We are going to consider element x∈A such that d(x,Tx)≤d(A,B)+ϵ for some ϵ>0. We call pair (A,B) an approximate best proximity pair.
S. A. M. Mohsenalhosseini +2 more
doaj +4 more sources
Best Proximity Pairs in Ultrametric Spaces [PDF]
In the present paper, we study the existence of best proximity pairs in ultrametric spaces. We show, under suitable assumptions, that the proximinal pair $(A,B)$ has a best proximity pair. As a consequence we generalize a well known best approximation result and we derive some fixed point theorems.
Samih Lazaiz +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
A characterization of weak proximal normal structure and best proximity pairs [PDF]
The aim of this paper is to address an open problem given in [Kirk, W. A., Shahzad, Naseer, Normal structure and orbital fixed point conditions, J. Math. Anal. Appl. {\bf{vol 463(2)}}, (2018) 461--476]. We give a characterization of weak proximal normal structure using best proximity pair property.
Abhik Digar +2 more
exaly +5 more sources
Best Proximity Pairs Theorems for Continuous Set-Valued Maps [PDF]
A best proximity pair for a set-valued map F:A⊸B with respect to a set-valued map G:A⊸A is defined, and a new existence theorem of best proximity pairs for continuous set-valued maps is proved in nonexpansive retract metric spaces.
R. P. Agarwal +3 more
doaj +4 more sources
BEST PROXIMITY PAIRS AND NASH EQUILIBRIUM PAIRS [PDF]
Main purpose of this paper is to combine the optimal form of Fan's best approximation theorem and Nash's equilibrium existence theorem into a single existence theorem simultaneously. For this, we first prove a general best proximity pair theorem which includes a number of known best proximity theorems.
Won-Kyu Kim, Sang-Ho Kum
exaly +2 more sources
Some results on best proximity pair theorems
Best proximity pair theorems are considered to expound the sufficient conditions that ensure the existence of an element xo ϵ A, such that d(xo; T xo) = d(A;B) where T : A 2B is a multifunction defined on suitable subsets A and B of a normed linear ...
P.S. Srinivasan, P. Veeramani
doaj +4 more sources

