Results 41 to 50 of about 41,479 (193)

O.J. Simpson - århundrets straffesak i USA. Noen refleksjoner fra TV-stolen

Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 1998
The author examines the evidence in the famous O.J. Simpson murder case where Simpson was acquitted. His conclusion is that the prosecution did prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty.
Ståle Eskeland
doaj   +1 more source

Justification, excuse, and proof beyond reasonable doubt

Philosophical Issues, 2021
AbstractThe law requires criminal guilt to be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. There are two different approaches to construing this legal rule. On an epistemic approach, the rule is construed in terms of justified belief or knowledge; on a probabilistic approach, the rule is construed in terms of satisfying a probabilistic threshold.
openaire   +1 more source

REASONABLE DOUBT AND DISAGREEMENT

, 2017
The right to trial by jury and the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt are two of the most fundamental commitments of American criminal law. This article asks how the two are related, that is, whether disagreement among jurors implies anything
Youngjae Lee
core   +1 more source

Economic crime in the courtroom: A case study of defense lawyers’ arguments against prosecution evidence

Journal of Economic Criminology
A defendant in criminal court should only be convicted if guilt is proven by the prosecution beyond any reasonable doubt. That is the burden of proof. Any doubt emerging should benefit the defendant.
Petter Gottschalk
doaj   +1 more source

Established and Emerging Approaches for the Management of Dyslipidaemia

Scientifica, 2012
The key role of dyslipidaemia in determining cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proved beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore several dietary and pharmacological approaches have been developed.
Giuseppe Danilo Norata
doaj   +1 more source

Reasonable Doubt in Islamic Law

, 2015
Doubt pervades most laws, becomes alarming when it arises in criminal law, and seems especially discomfiting in the context of Islamic criminal law. In the high-stakes area of American criminal prosecutions, dubious facts or ambiguous laws can result in ...
Rabb, Intisar A., Rabb, Intisar
core   +1 more source

Predicting financial distress using financial and non-financial variables

Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 2015
This study attempts to clarify whether using a hybrid model based on non-financial variables and financial variables is able to provide a more accurate company financial distress prediction model than using a model based on financial variables only.
Francois Van Der Colff, Frans Vermaak
doaj   +1 more source

Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction. A Behavioural Perspective on a Conflict between American and Continental European Law [PDF]

Most apparent differences between US and continental law lose their relevance once one looks beneath the doctrinal surface and checks how doctrine plays itself out in concrete cases. One of the few exceptions is standards of proof. Not only distinguishes
Christoph Engel
core  

UNELE ASPECTE PRIVITOARE LA RĂSPUNDEREA PENALĂ A JUDECĂTORILOR

Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale, 2020
Într-o societate democratică judecătorul nu poate fi la adăpostul unei imunităţi absolute, se reliefează problema condiţiilor şi modalităţilor de angajare a răspunderii judecătorului.
Igor HŁOPEŢCHI, Adrian TĂBÎRȚĂ
doaj  

Trial by Motive

Bond Law Review, 2017
This article examines the implications of the High Court ruling in The Queen v Baden-Clay(‘Baden-Clay’)1 for future murder accused with strong motives for killing their spouses who deny all knowledge of their deaths.
David Field
doaj   +1 more source