Results 41 to 50 of about 2,537,634 (144)

O.J. Simpson - århundrets straffesak i USA. Noen refleksjoner fra TV-stolen

Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 1998
The author examines the evidence in the famous O.J. Simpson murder case where Simpson was acquitted. His conclusion is that the prosecution did prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson was guilty.
Ståle Eskeland
doaj   +1 more source

“Däbrä Dammo”, Not “Däbrä Damo”

Géolinguistique, 2020
The historical place-name of one of the most famous monasteries of Ethiopia in northern Tǝgray has a split tradition of transcription, since it is widely known under the two non-matching forms of “Däbrä Damo” and “Däbrä Dammo”, only distinguished by the ...
Alessandro Bausi
doaj   +1 more source

Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Shifting Sands of a Bedrock? [PDF]

, 2003
It is a bedrock principle of our criminal jurisprudence, that the state has the burden of proving the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
Minhas, Azhar J.
core   +1 more source

Reasonable Doubt and Relativity [PDF]

, 2020
In theory, the Constitution protects us against criminal conviction unless the state can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In reality, this lofty standard is only as strong as the words used to explain it to the jury.
Cicchini, Michael D.
core   +1 more source

Economic crime in the courtroom: A case study of defense lawyers’ arguments against prosecution evidence

Journal of Economic Criminology
A defendant in criminal court should only be convicted if guilt is proven by the prosecution beyond any reasonable doubt. That is the burden of proof. Any doubt emerging should benefit the defendant.
Petter Gottschalk
doaj   +1 more source

Established and Emerging Approaches for the Management of Dyslipidaemia

Scientifica, 2012
The key role of dyslipidaemia in determining cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been proved beyond reasonable doubt, and therefore several dietary and pharmacological approaches have been developed.
Giuseppe Danilo Norata
doaj   +1 more source

UNELE ASPECTE PRIVITOARE LA RĂSPUNDEREA PENALĂ A JUDECĂTORILOR

Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale, 2020
Într-o societate democratică judecătorul nu poate fi la adăpostul unei imunităţi absolute, se reliefează problema condiţiilor şi modalităţilor de angajare a răspunderii judecătorului.
Igor HŁOPEŢCHI, Adrian TĂBÎRȚĂ
doaj  

Preponderance of the Evidence versus Intime Conviction. A Behavioural Perspective on a Conflict between American and Continental European Law [PDF]

Most apparent differences between US and continental law lose their relevance once one looks beneath the doctrinal surface and checks how doctrine plays itself out in concrete cases. One of the few exceptions is standards of proof. Not only distinguishes
Christoph Engel
core  

Punishment despite Reasonable Doubt – A Public Goods Experiment with Uncertainty over Contributions [PDF]

Under a great variety of legally relevant circumstances, people have to decide whether or not to cooperate, when they face an incentive to defect. The law sometimes provides people with sanctioning mechanisms to enforce pro-social behavior.
Kristoffel Grechenig, Christian Thöni, Andreas Nicklisch   +2 more
core  

Reasonable Doubt and Moral Elements [PDF]

, 2015
The law is axiomatic. In order to convict a person of a crime, every element of the crime with which he is charged must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This Article argues that this fundamental proposition of American criminal law is wrong.
Lee, Youngjae
core   +1 more source