Results 61 to 70 of about 41,479 (193)
Taking the Evolution of the Standards of Proof for a Criminal Conviction Seriously
The article offers a diachronic and comparative analysis of different standards of proof for a criminal conviction. The first part focuses on the attempt of medieval and early modern Roman-canon systems to clarify this type of rule through a network of ...
Jacopo Della Torre
doaj +1 more source
How to Statistically Show the Absence of an Effect
In experimental studies, the lack of statistical significance is often interpreted as the absence of an effect. Unfortunately, such a conclusion is often a serious misinterpretation. Indeed, non-significant results are just as often the consequence of an
Etienne Quertemont
doaj +1 more source
Sentencing outcomes turn on moral and evaluative determinations. For example, a finding of “irreparable corruption” is generally a precondition for juvenile life without parole.
Atiq, Emad
core
Reasoning v. Rhetoric: The Strange Case of “Unconstitutional Beyond a Reasonable Doubt”
An odd formulation has frequented American constitutional discourse for 125 years: a declaration that courts should not overturn a statute on constitutional grounds unless it is “unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt.” This concept has been thought ...
Spitzer, Hugh D.
core
Proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Shifting Sands of a Bedrock?
It is a bedrock principle of our criminal jurisprudence, that the state has the burden of proving the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
Minhas, Azhar J.
core
Explaining Beyond a Reasonable Doubt to the Modern Juror
: The purpose of this paper is to make the beyond a reasonable doubt standard in criminal trials more comprehensible for the modern juror while also increasing the modern juror’s motivation and ability to apply this standard consistent with trial ...
core
A Bayesian analysis concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory ...
Quay MD PhD, Steven Carl +1 more
core +1 more source
El sistema procesal penal chileno introdujo un nuevo estándar de convicción para condenar: más allá de toda duda razonable. Éste surge de la tradición jurídica anglosajona, por lo que resulta poco conocido -y bajo cierta interpretación inaplicable-en el ...
Raúl Carnevali Rodríguez +1 more
doaj
Reasonable Doubt and Moral Elements
The law is axiomatic. In order to convict a person of a crime, every element of the crime with which he is charged must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This Article argues that this fundamental proposition of American criminal law is wrong.
Lee, Youngjae
core
Reasonable Doubt and Moral Elements
The law is axiomatic. In order to convict a person of a crime, every element of the crime with which he is charged must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. This Article argues that this fundamental proposition of American criminal law is wrong.
Lee, Youngjae
core

