Results 1 to 10 of about 94,783 (262)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.

The generalization of the binomial theorem

Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1989
As is well known, the binomial theorem is a classical mathematical relation that can be straightforwardly proved by induction or through a Taylor expansion, albeit it remains valid as long as [A,B]=0. In order to generalize such an important equation to cases where [A,B]≠0, an algebraic approach based on Cauchy’s integral theorem in conjunction with ...
J. Morales, A. Flores‐Riveros
openaire   +2 more sources

The binomial theorem

The Mathematics Teacher, 1960
An example shows how a teacher may enrich the students’ learning of the binomial theorem.
openaire   +2 more sources

A Proof of the Binomial Theorem

The American Mathematical Monthly, 1974
(1974). A Proof of the Binomial Theorem. The American Mathematical Monthly: Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 390-393.
openaire   +2 more sources

The Binomial Theorem

2019
You may have wondered why the numbers \(\left( {\begin{array}{c}n\\ k\end{array}}\right) \) are called binomial coefficients, and not the “choice numbers” or “combination numbers” or something related to subsets. Why “binomial”? We’ll see why in this chapter, which begins a theme for us: encoding combinatorial results algebraically.
openaire   +2 more sources

The Story of the Binomial Theorem

The American Mathematical Monthly, 1949
(1949). The Story of the Binomial Theorem. The American Mathematical Monthly: Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 147-157.
openaire   +2 more sources

A Proof of the Binomial Theorem

The Mathematical Gazette, 1933
In teaching algebra, it is obviously desirable to prove the Binomial Theorem for a real (or at any rate for a rational) index without assuming certain theorems on convergence which are used in Euler’s proof. So far as I know, no one has thought it worth while to devise such a proof.
openaire   +2 more sources

Local Theorems for the Markov Binomial Distribution

Lithuanian Mathematical Journal, 2001
The Markov binomial distribution was considered by many authors [cf. \textit{R. L. Dobrushin}, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 17, 291--330 (1953; Zbl 0052.14301); \textit{J. Gani}, J. Appl. Probab., Spec. Vol. 19A, 321--326 (1982; Zbl 0488.60074); \textit{B. O. Koopman}, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36, 202--207 (1950; Zbl 0037.08502); \textit{R.
M. Mikalauskas, Vydas Čekanavičius
openaire   +3 more sources

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy