Results 191 to 200 of about 210,207 (311)

The Place of Marginalization in Bioethics: Do We Need the Concept?

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Marginalization is a widely studied phenomenon and recognized as a critical topic in relation to health, shaping health inequities, access to resources, health outcomes, and policy decisions. However, despite its normative importance for health and justice, its conceptual role in bioethics remains unclear.
Elisabeth Langmann, Verina Wild
wiley   +1 more source

Design and validation of a bioethical assessment instrument for public health policies involving behavioral change: A mixed-methods study. [PDF]

open access: yesPublic Health Pract (Oxf)
Martínez AC   +7 more
europepmc   +1 more source

The Euthyphro Dilemma, Assisted Dying, and a Virtue Ethics Approach to Autonomy

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The Euthyphro dilemma highlights that accounts of moral value which are dependent on the decisions of agents either result in arbitrary values arising from agent's decisions, or accept external reasons to morally justify the value, making the agent's decisions unnecessary for explaining the resulting value.
Thomas Donaldson
wiley   +1 more source

Expanding the Taxonomy of Ethical Issues in Surgical Innovation

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Surgical innovation poses significant ethical challenges. Previous work has grouped these challenges under four categories: potential harms to patients; compromised informed consent; unfair allocation of healthcare resources; and conflicts of interest. We argue that recent technological developments in surgery warrant the addition of three new
Jane Johnson   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Human embryonic stem cell research: Why the discarded-created-distinction cannot be based on the potentiality argument [PDF]

open access: yes, 2005
Davis D.S.   +7 more
core   +1 more source

Should We Use Citizens' Assemblies to Make Health Policy?

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This article assesses the normative case for using citizens' assemblies—small deliberative forums of randomly selected citizens—in health policymaking. Although they are increasingly popular, their normative justification remains underexplored. We reconstruct three possible rationales: Norman Daniels's ‘Accountability for Reasonableness’ (A4R)
Daniel Hutton Ferris, Johannes Kniess
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy