Results 241 to 250 of about 216,471 (341)

Empowering Patient Autonomy: The Role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Scaffolding Informed Consent in Medical Practice

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT The principle of (respect for) patient autonomy has traditionally emphasized independence in medical decision‐making, reflecting a broader commitment to epistemic individualism. However, recent philosophical work has challenged this view, suggesting that autonomous decisions are inherently dependent on epistemic and social supports.
Jemima W. Allen   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Thoughtful Accompaniment in Life's Final Stages: Philosophical Practice as a Complement to Ethics Consultation

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT This paper argues that philosophical practice can complement existing medical ethics structures by offering a publicly accessible space for discourse and negotiation of basic concepts that are relevant to ethical decision making. The potential of collaboration becomes particularly evident by the example of assisted dying: it raises a wide ...
Patrick Schuchter   +3 more
wiley   +1 more source

When Is It Safe to Introduce an AI System Into Healthcare? A Practical Decision Algorithm for the Ethical Implementation of Black‐Box AI in Medicine

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT There is mounting global interest in the revolutionary potential of AI tools. However, its use in healthcare carries certain risks. Some argue that opaque (‘black box’) AI systems in particular undermine patients' informed consent. While interpretable models offer an alternative, this approach may be impossible with generative AI and large ...
Jemima Winifred Allen   +2 more
wiley   +1 more source

Integrating medical humanities in undergraduate medical education: a curricular model aligned with the InspirE5 framework. [PDF]

open access: yesBMC Med Educ
Coronado-Vázquez V   +5 more
europepmc   +1 more source

I Feel I Need to Think about It: A Defence of Affective Moral Enhancement

open access: yesBioethics, EarlyView.
ABSTRACT Critics of affective moral enhancement generally contend that moral improvement can only be properly achieved through interventions that engage a person's rational faculties. Therefore, they view attempts to achieve moral improvement by targeting emotions as futile at best and detrimental to moral agency at worst.
Pei‐hua Huang
wiley   +1 more source

Home - About - Disclaimer - Privacy