Foundation models and deep learning for cancer drug response prediction: a framework for data, metrics, and validation. [PDF]
Sada Del Real K +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Clinical efficacy of different supplemental doses of vitamins A and D in preventing bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: A network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. [PDF]
Yu Q, Chen X, Chen J, Peng L, Luo K.
europepmc +1 more source
Beyond the viral triad: hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome as a blind spot in Brazil's post-pandemic respiratory diagnostic reasoning. [PDF]
Faico-Filho KS, Bellei N.
europepmc +1 more source
A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with ulcerative colitis. [PDF]
Yang Q, Yan Y.
europepmc +1 more source
Correction to "Warm-Up Program for Adolescent Golfers Reduces Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial". [PDF]
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
Don’t Be Blinded by the Blinding
NEJM Evidence, 2022Don't Be Blinded by the BlindingBlinding of participants and investigators is universally accepted as a critical component of a high-quality randomized clinical trial. In conjunction with random assignment, blinding protects against several potential sources of bias, such as selection of participants, compliance and adherence to the protocol ...
openaire +2 more sources
Change blindness and inattentional blindness
WIREs Cognitive Science, 2011AbstractChange blindness and inattentional blindness are both failures of visual awareness. Change blindness is the failure to notice an obvious change. Inattentional blindness is the failure to notice the existence of an unexpected item. In each case, we fail to notice something that is clearly visible once we know to look for it. Despite similarities,
Melinda S, Jensen +3 more
openaire +2 more sources

