Results 231 to 240 of about 33,690 (269)
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
SURVEYING THE PROPOSED BRUSSELS I BIS REGULATION – SOLID FOUNDATIONS BUT RENOVATION NEEDED
2011exaly +2 more sources
Jurisdiction concerning annex actions in the context of the insolvency and Brussels Ibis regulations
International Insolvency Review, 2020AbstractThe legislation of the European Union has addressed the private international law aspects of civil and commercial matters and those of insolvency cases separately. While the Brussels Ibis Regulation (and its predecessors) focuses on “classic” civil of commercial cases, insolvency proceedings are subject to the (recast) Insolvency Regulation ...
openaire +1 more source
Residual Jurisdiction under the Brussels I bis Regulation
2020The chapter examines the avenues for redress with reference to human rights violations performed by multinational corporations. Specifically, it reviews the practice of EU Member States, discusses the conceptual and normative foundations of domestic residual jurisdiction under Article 6 of the Brussels I bis Regulation, and assesses its potential for ...
openaire +2 more sources
Research Handbook on The Brussels I bis Regulation,
2021par Peter Mankowski (dir.), Edward Elgar, 2020, 378 ...
openaire +1 more source
Collective Redress in the Proposal for a Brussels I bis Regulation: A Coherent Approach?
Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens- und Verbraucherrecht, 2012In rund der Halfte der EU Mitgliedstaaten gibt es bereits Regelungen zur kollektiven Rechtsdurchsetzung. Wenngleich die Herangehensweise an die komplexe Materie des kollektiven Rechtsschutzes national sehr unterschiedlich ist, steht doch ein Element stets im Zentrum des Regelungsbedurfnisses, namlich die Einfuhrung spezieller Verfahrensgarantien fur ...
openaire +1 more source
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014
In European private international law, the ECJ has been particularly thoughtful of promoting legal certainty in its interpretation of the main legal instruments. However, Article 15, d) Rome II and Article 31 (35) Brussels I(bis) both appear to govern provisional measures without any clarification by the ECJ.
openaire +1 more source
In European private international law, the ECJ has been particularly thoughtful of promoting legal certainty in its interpretation of the main legal instruments. However, Article 15, d) Rome II and Article 31 (35) Brussels I(bis) both appear to govern provisional measures without any clarification by the ECJ.
openaire +1 more source
Validity of Jurisdiction Agreements Under Brussel I bis Regulation
2017Brussels I bis Regulation (EU) no 1215/2012, entered into force in January 2015, made significant significant amendments in order to improve the efficacy of jurisdiction agreements on Brussels I Regulation. With this amendments, it is aimed to harmonise with La Haye Convention on Choice of Court Agreement.
openaire +1 more source
Netherlands International Law Review, 2013
The most important political priority of the European Commission in the recast of the Brussels I Regulation has been the abolition of exequatur. The policy to gradually abolish intermediate measures for the enforcement of judgments within the EU flows from the desire to enhance the free movement of judgments and the establishment of a genuine European ...
openaire +2 more sources
The most important political priority of the European Commission in the recast of the Brussels I Regulation has been the abolition of exequatur. The policy to gradually abolish intermediate measures for the enforcement of judgments within the EU flows from the desire to enhance the free movement of judgments and the establishment of a genuine European ...
openaire +2 more sources

