Results 241 to 250 of about 147,890 (292)
Burden of Proof: Use Evidence to Justify Wheelchair Seating Interventions
Boninger, Michael Lee +2 more
core
Some of the next articles are maybe not open access.
Related searches:
Related searches:
Bioethics, 2015
AbstractA common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted.
Julian J Koplin, Michael J Selgelid
exaly +3 more sources
AbstractA common strategy in bioethics is to posit a prima facie case in favour of one policy, and to then claim that the burden of proof (that this policy should be rejected) falls on those with opposing views. If the burden of proof is not met, it is claimed, then the policy in question should be accepted.
Julian J Koplin, Michael J Selgelid
exaly +3 more sources
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof [PDF]
We present a formal, mathematical model of argument structure and evaluation, taking seriously the procedural and dialogical aspects of argumentation.
Thomas F Gordon +2 more
exaly +2 more sources
O presente trabalho tem como objetivo abordar o tema ônus da prova e, em especial, o diálogo entre o Código de Processo Civil e o Código de Direito do Consumidor no tocante ao tema.
Silva, Milena Calori da
openaire +2 more sources
2014
This chapter explains the rules governing the legal and evidential burdens of proof that decide which party has the responsibility of proving a fact in issue to the court. It then discusses the degree of persuasiveness the evidence must attain to satisfy the appropriate standard of proof including the test for a successful submission of no case to ...
Martin Hannibal, Lisa Mountford
openaire +1 more source
This chapter explains the rules governing the legal and evidential burdens of proof that decide which party has the responsibility of proving a fact in issue to the court. It then discusses the degree of persuasiveness the evidence must attain to satisfy the appropriate standard of proof including the test for a successful submission of no case to ...
Martin Hannibal, Lisa Mountford
openaire +1 more source
2016
Pay attention as to who bears the burden of proof. Those who claim that their opponents are inconsistent should prove their claim (it is impossible to prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization).
Joseph Agassi, Abraham Meidan
openaire +1 more source
Pay attention as to who bears the burden of proof. Those who claim that their opponents are inconsistent should prove their claim (it is impossible to prove that one is consistent), and those who claim that a certain generalization is false should point at cases that refute it (there is no way to prove a factual generalization).
Joseph Agassi, Abraham Meidan
openaire +1 more source
The burden of proof is a central feature of all systems of adjudication, yet one that has been subject to little normative analysis. This Article examines how strong evidence should have to be in order to assign liability when the objective is to ...
Kaplow, Louis
openaire +2 more sources
Tato diplomová práce se člení na úvod, 5 kapitol a závěr. Zaměřuje se na různé aspekty důkazního břemena v civilním řízení, včetně jeho definice, rozdělení na subjektivní a objektivní, a souvislosti s procesem dokazování.
Šindelářová, Jana
core +3 more sources

