Comparison of the effectiveness of piezocision-aided canine retraction augmented with micro-osteoperforation: a randomized controlled trial. [PDF]
Husain S, Sundari S.
europepmc +1 more source
Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Repeated Micro-Osteoperforations During Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. [PDF]
Hashem BA +6 more
europepmc +1 more source
Effectiveness of autologous leukocyte-platelet-rich fibrin on the rate of maxillary canine retraction, rotation, pain, and soft tissue healing: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. [PDF]
Satapathy SK +5 more
europepmc +1 more source
Root Resorption and Alveolar Bone Changes in the Maxillary Canine Retraction Using NiTi Closed-Coil Springs Versus Elastomeric Chains: A Split-Mouth Trial. [PDF]
Le LN, Ma HN, Do TT, Le KVP.
europepmc +1 more source
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Associated With the Acceleration of Canine Retraction by Piezosurgery in Comparison With Low-Level Laser Therapy: A Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. [PDF]
Alfailany DT +8 more
europepmc +1 more source
Related searches:
Canine Retraction With J Hook Headgear
American Journal of Orthodontics, 1980Several methods have been described for accomplishing distal movement of canines without losing posterior anchorage. An accepted method in canine retraction is the use of headgear with J hooks. Since it incorporates extraoral anchorage, it is most effective in maximum-anchorage cases.
Angelo A Caputo +2 more
exaly +3 more sources
Biomechanical Modeling of Canine Retraction [PDF]
Objective: To create a comprehensive finite element model capable of analyzing the biomechanics of canine retraction. Methods: A half maxilla virtual model with an extracted first premolar was created from human computed tomography data. Accurate brackets and an 0.018 archwire were placed to model canine retraction under 0.5N and 1.0N of retraction ...
Larson, Matthew Evans
openaire +2 more sources

