Results 191 to 200 of about 180,084 (227)

Changes over time in canine retraction: An implant study

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2009
The objective of this study was to analyze rates of canine movement over the first 2 months of continuous retraction, when rate changes are expected.Ten patients with bone markers placed in the maxilla and the mandible had their canines retracted over a 2-month period. Retraction was accomplished with beta-titanium alloy T-loop springs. Standardized 45
Renato Parsekian, Martins, Peter H, Buschang, Luiz Gonzaga, Gandini, P Emile, Rossouw   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

Canine retraction: A comparison of two preadjusted bracket systems

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1996
Before the 1970s, Begg and Edgewise appliances were the most commonly used appliances in orthodontics. With the introduction of preadjusted appliances, many have made claims of superiority. These claims are often unsubstantiated, as few, if any, have ever been tested in a controlled, prospective in vivo study.
L P, Lotzof, H A, Fine, G J, Cisneros
openaire   +2 more sources

[The ideal forces for canine retraction].

Orthodontike epitheorese : epiotemoniko periodiko tes Orthodontikes Etaireias tes Ellados, 1991
In this study we analyze the factors, which are able to determine the ideal forces for teeth movement and especially canine retraction. These factors are the following: 1. Way of movement. 2. Anatomical situation. 3. Biological situation. 4. Personal factors. 5. Duration of movement. 6. The force control.
K, Markostamos, K, Akli
openaire   +1 more source

A Finite Element Study of Canine Retraction with a Palatal Spring

British Journal of Orthodontics, 1991
The use of a removable appliance to retract a maxillary canine tooth into a first premolar extraction space is one of the most commonly performed orthodontic procedures. However, unwanted movements may occur, including excessive tipping, rotation, and flaring of the tooth.
A N, Wilson, J, Middleton, N, McGuinness, M, Jones   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources

On optimum orthodontic force theory as applied to canine retraction

American Journal of Orthodontics, 1975
The study reported here was undertaken in an attempt to contribute, from a theoretical standpoint, to the knowledge and understanding of optimum force theory, particularly as it may be relevant to canine retraction. The following statements are derived from my analysis of the applicable published literature and the results of the present investigation:
openaire   +2 more sources

Useful Clinical Technique for Upper Canine Retraction and Retention

British Journal of Orthodontics, 1973
Two appliances are described. The first is a lingual arch carrying a Nance bulb and auxiliary springs for retraction of upper canines or premolars. The second is a retention appliance constructed at the chairside from Coe “Dental Guards”.
openaire   +2 more sources

Canine retraction

American Journal of Orthodontics, 1970
openaire   +2 more sources

Effects of Autologous Leukocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) on the Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction and Various Biomarkers in Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF): A Split Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial

International Orthodontics, 2022
Ritu Duggal, Jitendra Sharan, Ashok Kumar Jena   +2 more
exaly  

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Laser-Assisted Flapless Corticotomy in Accelerating Canine Retraction: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022
Mohammad Y. Hajeer
exaly  

Rapid canine retraction by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2018
T P, Chaturvedi, Ajit V, Parihar, Ashish, Agrawal, Sadhana, Swaraj   +3 more
openaire   +2 more sources