Results 61 to 70 of about 5,451,041 (291)
Applying an Ethical Lens to the Treatment of People With Multiple Sclerosis
ABSTRACT The practice of neurology requires an understanding of clinical ethics for decision‐making. In multiple sclerosis (MS) care, there are a wide range of ethical considerations that may arise. These involve shared decision‐making around selection of a disease‐modifying therapy (DMT), risks and benefits of well‐studied medications in comparison to
Methma Udawatta, Farrah J. Mateen
wiley +1 more source
Bayesian modelling of criminal cases as a whole
The Bayesian model is gaining ground in criminal law as a rational method for evaluating evidence. The central question of this article is whether the Bayesian model can provide guidance for the judicial evaluation of evidence.
Anne Ruth Mackor
doaj +1 more source
ABSTRACT Introduction Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a neurodegenerative ‘tauopathy’ with predominating pathology in the basal ganglia and midbrain. Caudal tau spread frequently implicates the cerebellum; however, the pattern of atrophy remains equivocal.
Chloe Spiegel +8 more
wiley +1 more source
Voter model with non-Poissonian interevent intervals
Recent analysis of social communications among humans has revealed that the interval between interactions for a pair of individuals and for an individual often follows a long-tail distribution. We investigate the effect of such a non-Poissonian nature of
A. Barrat +6 more
core +1 more source
Fluid Biomarkers of Disease Burden and Cognitive Dysfunction in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
ABSTRACT Objective Identifying objective biomarkers for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is crucial to improving diagnosis and establishing clinical trial and treatment endpoints. This study evaluated fluid biomarkers in PSP versus controls and their associations with regional 18F‐PI‐2620 tau‐PET, clinical, and cognitive outcomes.
Roxane Dilcher +10 more
wiley +1 more source
Ensuring Uniform Case Law in Slovenia: Jurisprudence Constante, Stare Decisis, and a Third Approach
The judicial doctrine of jurisprudence constante is a civil-law equivalent of the common law doctrine of stare decisis. Both doctrines resulted from the 19th-century legal positivist movement criticizing the liberty of courts when deciding like cases. If
Marko Novak
doaj +1 more source
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a series of policies that mandated switching patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) from an originator biologic to a biosimilar in British Columbia, Canada, on health care resource use and cost.
HaoHung Dang +4 more
wiley +1 more source
The Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks [PDF]
The evolution of the Internet has forever changed the legal landscape. The Internet is the world’s largest marketplace, copy machine, and instrumentality for committing crimes, torts, and infringing intellectual property.
D’Angelo, Diane, Rustad, Michael L.
core +1 more source
Objective This study aimed to determine if program format (in‐person, virtual, or hybrid) results in differences in 3‐month outcomes of pain, function, quality of life, self‐efficacy, and chair stands in a hip/knee osteoarthritis‐management program. Methods A secondary analysis of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) Canada database was
Jill Van Damme +7 more
wiley +1 more source
Cuando se habla de derecho es enorme la cantidad de tiempo que se vierte sin precisar qué es o acerca de qué se discute. «Si yo tengo razón», se oye. «Cómo va a hacer eso el juez», recriminan. «Qué injusticia», espetan. «¿Cómo así?», interrogan. «No es justo», concluyen. Sí, se habla con un sentido de inconformidad y desaliento lógicos ya que ...
openaire +1 more source

