Results 1 to 10 of about 75 (61)

How to Continue a Meaningful Judicial Dialogue About EU Law? From the Conditions in the CILFIT Judgment to the Creation of a New European Legal Culture

Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 2018
The aim of this article is to better understand the conditions outlined in the 'CILFIT' judgment and their role in creating a meaningful dialogue about European Union law. For these purposes two distinct views on the relation between language and meaning
Jacobien van Dorp, Pauline Phoa
exaly   +8 more sources

The CILFIT Criteria Clarified and Extended for National Courts of Last Resort Under Art. 267 TFEU

European Papers, 2022
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2022 7(1), 265-274 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Context: two preliminary references and the need to prove relevance. - III. The Advocate General opinion. - IV.
Imelda Maher
doaj   +3 more sources

Sulla riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT: le Conclusioni dell'A.G. Bobeknel caso Consorzio Italian Management e Catania Multiservizi

European Papers, 2021
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2021 6(2), 955-965 | European Forum Insight of 9 October 2021 | (Table of Contents) I. Premessa. - II. La proposta di riformulazione dei criteri CILFIT. - III.
Francesco Liguori
doaj   +2 more sources

How to Make a Unicorn or ‘There Never was an “Acte Clair” in EU Law’: Some Remarks about Case C-561/19 Consorzio Italian Management

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2021
In its judgment in Consorzio Italian Management, the Court of Justice has gone some way to solving the riddle that since the beginning of European integration has remained one of the most important and widely discussed doctrines of EU law: one that ...
Davor Petrić
doaj   +1 more source

It Takes Two to Tango: An Introduction

European Papers, 2020
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 745-754 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Evolving legal questions surrounding Art. 267 TFEU. - III. Stocktaking: the procedure under pressure? - IV.
Jasper Krommendijk
doaj   +1 more source

Irish Courts and the European Court of Justice: Explaining the Surprising Move from an Island Mentality to Enthusiastic Engagement

European Papers, 2020
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(2), 825-849 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Research design and literature overview. - III. Legal explanations. - III.1.
Jasper Krommendijk
doaj   +1 more source

La cuestión prejudicial europea en evolución: necesaria motivación para omitirla e instrumentos para su efectivo planteamiento

Revista Vasca de Administración Pública, 2023
The relevance of the question referred for a preliminary ruling was interpreted more than forty years ago by the Cilfit judgment and, although the core of such interpretation is maintained, the most recent Consorzio judgment has provided something new in
Edorta Cobreros Mendazona
doaj   +1 more source

Inter-Environnement Expanded: Another Brick Out of the Wall of EU Law Supremacy?

European Papers, 2017
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 321-327 | European Forum Insight of 29 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. The legal and factual background of the case. - III.
Giulia Gentile
doaj   +1 more source

L'obbligo (flessibile) di rinvio pregiudiziale e i possibili fattori di un suo irrigidimento. Riflessioni in margine alla sentenza Association France Nature Environnement

European Papers, 2017
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2017 2(1), 383-391 | European Forum Insight of 29 March 2017 | (Table of Contents) I. La questione al vaglio della Corte di giustizia. - II.
Federico Pani
doaj   +1 more source

Multilingual Law and Judicial Interpretation in the EU

Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 2009
The purpose of this article is to assess how multilingualism affects judicial interpretation of EU law. In the EU, the European Court of Justice is in the position of having the final say on what EU norms mean.
Tamara Ćapeta
doaj   +1 more source