Results 21 to 30 of about 75 (61)

The right to climate protection and the essentially comparable protection of fundamental rights: Applying Solange in European climate change litigation?

Review of European, Comparative &International Environmental Law, Volume 33, Issue 2, Page 265-275, July 2024.
Abstract In an action for annulment against the European Union (EU) Emissions Trading Directive, both the EU General Court and the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) found the claim to be inadmissible because the applicants did not satisfy the infamous Plaumann criteria.
Michael Kalis, Anna‐Lena Priebe
wiley   +1 more source

A Matter of Prescriptive Clarity? Analysing How Swedish Judges' Motives for Action Vary in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure

JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 62, Issue 2, Page 468-486, March 2024.
Abstract This article explores how national judges' reasoning in the preliminary ruling procedure varies depending on the prescriptive clarity of European Union (EU) legal frameworks. Drawing on the logic of appropriateness and the logic of expected consequences, this article formulates hypotheses regarding judges' motivational patterns.
Karin Leijon
wiley   +1 more source

The Unfolding Story of Judicial Dialogue in the EU: The Coercive and Persuasive Motives Behind the Participation of Belgian Highest Courts in the Preliminary Ruling Procedure

German Law Journal
The story of national judges’ participation in the process of dialogue with the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) pursuant to Article 267 TFEU is a well-known one.
Urszula Jaremba, Marleen Kappé
doaj   +1 more source

Între eficienţă și uniformitate: mecanismul trimiterilor preliminare, Doctrina Acte Clair și valorile UE Between Efficiency and Uniformity: The Preliminary Ruling Mechanism, Acte Clair Doctrine, and the Values of the EU

Analele Ştiinţifice ale Universităţii "Al.I. Cuza" din Iaşi. Ştiinţe Juridice
This paper aims to highlight the indispensable role of the preliminary ruling mechanism (Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, hereinafter TFEU) in the process of legislative harmonization within the European Union.
Sabina SAFTA-ROMANO
doaj   +1 more source

The 2024 Reform of the EU Judicial System and the Transformation of the Court of Justice into a Constitutional Court

European Papers
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2025 10(3), 837-862 | Article | (Table of Contents) 1. Introduction. – 2. Approaching constitutionalisation. – 3.
Tanja Hilpold
doaj   +1 more source

De verwijzingsplicht van de hoogste rechters in Nederland en de Cilfit-controverse. Prejudicieel verwijzen of niet? [PDF]

Ars Aequi, 2019
Contains fulltext : 204103.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Krommendijk, J., Langer, J.
openaire   +2 more sources

Are genome-edited micro-organisms covered by Directive 2009/41/EC?-implications of the CJEU's judgment in the case C-528/16 for the contained use of genome-edited micro-organisms. [PDF]

J Law Biosci, 2022
Dederer HG, Hamburger D.
europepmc   +1 more source

CILFIT in Strasbourg

On 19 February 2024, the European Court of Human Rights decided not to answer the Estonian Supreme Court’s request for an advisory opinion on the basis of Protocol 16 (P16). For the first time, it dismissed a request because it did not concern a question of principle concerning the interpretation and application of ECHR rights.
openaire   +2 more sources

Rivedere CILFIT? Riflessioni giuscomparatistiche sulle conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek nella causa Consorzio Italian management

, 2021
In questo saggio si cercherà di contestualizzare e analizzare in maniera critica le conclusioni dell’avvocato generale Bobek al caso Consorzio Italian management, prestando particolare attenzione alle questioni che lo hanno indotto a suggerire alla Corte di giustizia dell’Unione europea un parziale superamento della nota giurisprudenza CILFIT.
Leonardo Pierdominici, Giuseppe Martinico   +1 more
openaire   +1 more source

Cilfit en Schumacker: tijd voor nieuwe prejudiciële vragen aan het Hof van Justitie?

NLFiscaal Wetenschappelijk, 2023
Nationale rechters en het HvJ zijn belast met de handhaving van het EU-recht. Bestaat onduidelijkheid hoe een bepaling van EU-recht moet worden uitgelegd, dan heeft de nationale rechter de mogelijkheid - en soms de verplichting – de vraag voor te leggen aan het HvJ.
openaire   +1 more source